Oh Canada

The idea of an American invasion of Canada is not entirely new. The U.S. first gave it a shot in 1775, and tried again during the War of 1812, but the campaigns were never successful. A couple of centuries later, we can all look back at the “incidents” as quaint misadventures.

But as the Washington Post’s Peter Carlson noted today, as recently as the 1930s, the U.S. government had a frequently updated plan for a Canadian invasion. It was a 94-page document called “Joint Army and Navy Basic War Plan — Red,” with the word SECRET stamped on the cover. The plan was to seize Canada by capturing Halifax, then taking control of Canadian power plants near Niagara Falls, and finally launching a three-front invasion through Vermont, North Dakota, and the Midwest. The whole thing sounds more detailed than Bush’s plan to invade Iraq.

It sounds like a joke but it’s not. War Plan Red is real. It was drawn up and approved by the War Department in 1930, then updated in 1934 and 1935. It was declassified in 1974 and the word “SECRET” crossed out with a heavy pencil. Now it sits in a little gray box in the National Archives in College Park, available to anybody, even Canadian spies. They can photocopy it for 15 cents a page.

Apparently, war planners expected a long, drawn-out battle that might ultimately lead to Canada demanding Alaska.

But before anyone condemns 1930s America for its military ambitions, it’s worth noting that Canada had an invasion plan of its own.

In fact, Canadian military strategists developed a plan to invade the United States in 1921 — nine years before their American counterparts created War Plan Red.

The Canadian plan was developed by the country’s director of military operations and intelligence, a World War I hero named James Sutherland “Buster” Brown. Apparently Buster believed that the best defense was a good offense: His “Defence Scheme No. 1” called for Canadian soldiers to invade the United States, charging toward Albany, Minneapolis, Seattle and Great Falls, Mont., at the first signs of a possible U.S. invasion.

Fortunately, we can all get along now. “Canadian Bacon,” “South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut,” and Jonah Goldberg notwithstanding, no one seriously believes there will be a military conflict between the U.S. and Canada. Well, almost no one.

Floyd Rudmin is a Canadian psychology professor and author of “Bordering on Aggression: Evidence of U.S. Military Preparations Against Canada.” Apparently, he’s a little concerned about Fort Drum, the huge Army base in Upstate New York.

Is he worried that the Yanks will invade his country from Fort Drum?

“Not now ,” he said. “Now the U.S. is kind of busy in Iraq. But I wouldn’t put it past them.”

He’s not paranoid, he hastened to add, and he doesn’t think the States will simply invade Canada the way Hitler invaded Russia.

But if some kind of crisis — perhaps something involving the perennially grumpy French Canadians — destabilized Canada, then . . . well, Fort Drum is just across the river.

Jon Stewart recently joked that Canada has nothing to worry about unless the United States runs out of natural resources. He was kidding. I think.

Well, Britain in Roman times thought it was safe after Julius Caesar gave up trying to take it over, but it failed to reckon on the fact that Claudius (the Idiot, or Cl-cl-cl-Claudius) needed a Triumph. And so, for really no other reason than glory, the Roman legions crossed the channel to take over a backwater island. And then cut and run, so to speak, in around 406AD.

Put differently, genuine grievances are never an essential requirement for invasion. Any pretext will do, when the mood strikes.

  • Seriously, what do you think will happen when Quebec finally votes to secede?

    The maritime provinces will have a hard time surviving when they are cut off from the rest of Canada. What would the US do if the people of Halifax and the rest of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick voted to join the US?

    You can also imagine that the conservative provinces of the west like Alberta and British Columbia would be happier as part of the US than part of Canada.

    I realize the Republicans would scream because almost all conservative Canadians would be far more comfortable as moderate to liberal Democrats than as Republicans.

    But seriously, what would the US do if Canada broke apart?

  • ” conservative provinces of the west like Alberta and British Columbia would be happier as part of the US than part of Canada…”

    Well, maybe southern Alberta. British Columbia (a province that has elected several left-wing NDP governments in the past) would likely opt for independence, should Canada break up. However, I don’t see a break up as being likely in the near or distant future.

  • Hmmmm, wonder if Canada has any plans to invade the U.S.? After 5 years of Bush, I think the Northern half of the country might not resist.

  • Frak,
    You hit the nail on the head. When one’s government no longer represents one’s interests, then there is little incentive to resist invasion. After all, the Russians welcomed even the Nazis with flowers and the Iraqis hardly put up a fight for Saddam Hussein. Creating discontent is bad for national security.

  • Quebec will not vote to secede. The demographics have shifted enough so that the last chance the secessionists had was during the last referendum. And they lost.

    The secessionist party in Quebec will still pick up legislative seats. But they will not, democratically, obtain secession.

    There are powerful conservative pockets in Canada which were quite vocal in their support of Bush and his foreign policies. I would like to think that they have lost credibility as Bush has. But on that issue, I don’t know.

  • Canada ain’t gonna break up eh! So …..wake up!
    Canada is independent and proud. They have been lapdogs to the US at varying times however.

  • Leave it to Jon Stewart to hit the nail on the head. Resoucres or lack thereof may well be provide the future motivation. It’s interesting that one of the first things the new US Ambassador’s did when he arrived was to take a trip out west to check on the oil production.
    Mr Chenney has been up a couple of times as well,… to check on the oil. There’s also a lot of interest lately in water divertion projects. These things can come to ahead in nasty way given the right conditions (administrations?) take a look at what’s happening in Ukraine right now http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/12/30/russia.ukraine.gas.ap/index.html
    or here in Canada http://www.cbc.ca/story/business/national/2005/12/29/naturalgas-051229.html
    We pump a lot of natural gas down south (check your gas bills lately.. how’s that working for ya?) . World’s longest undefended border? only time will tell.

    cheers

  • Quebec will not vote to secede. The demographics have shifted enough so that the last chance the secessionists had was during the last referendum. And they lost.

    I believe you are completely wrong.

    If you, and I don’t know you from Adam, were offered two jobs in Canada and one was in Toronto and the other in Montreal; which would you take?

    Both companies only require English on the job. However, your kids in school would be required to go to a French school and you couldn’t avoid a lot of French in your everyday life. Your families poor French speaking skills would often put you in uncomfortable situations.

    I think the honest answer is that most people would take the job in Toronto. Many of the people who would move to Quebec are the type of people who want independence.

    Along the same lines, if you were pro independence, would you seriously consider leaving Quebec for a job in Alberta? If you were a patriotic Canadian would you be far more likely to take the job in Alberta?

  • Comments are closed.