Oil law compromise breaks down

This week, Amb. Ryan Crocker pointed to progress on Iraqi oil-revenue sharing as a sign of increasing political stability and progress. Alas, this success story has failed, too.

A carefully constructed compromise on a draft law governing Iraq’s rich oil fields, agreed to in February after months of arduous talks among Iraqi political groups, appears to have collapsed. The apparent breakdown comes just as Congress and the White House are struggling to find evidence that there is progress toward reconciliation and a functioning government here.

Senior Iraqi negotiators met in Baghdad on Wednesday in an attempt to salvage the original compromise, two participants said. But the meeting came against the backdrop of a public series of increasingly strident disagreements over the draft law that had broken out in recent days between Hussain al-Shahristani, the Iraqi oil minister, and officials of the provincial government in the Kurdish north, where some of the nation’s largest fields are located.

Of all the benchmarks crafted by the Bush administration and Iraqi officials, this one was the lynchpin of political progress. The president’s “surge” policy was supposed to, at a minimum, lead to progress on an oil-revenue law. Now, progress is going backwards, making the failure of the surge even more obvious.

As Hilzoy explained, this policy area is key to resolving several other political crises: “Once an oil law is in place, contracts will be on firmer ground, Iraq can collect more revenue, and it will be clear how that revenue is to be distributed to the various provinces. Money flowing to the regions, in turn, could help bolster provincial governments, and give people a stake in the continued functioning of the central government. But it takes actual cooperation to produce, enact, and sign off on that sort of legislation, and cooperation has always been in short supply. If, for some unfathomable reason, we needed more evidence that the Iraqi political process is dysfunctional, we just got it.”

Wait, it gets worse.

Josh Marshall went on to highlight the Bush ally that helped disrupt the negotiations.

The story though connects up with another one we told you about just a couple days ago — the decision of the Kurdistan regional government to sign an oil exploration deal with Dallas-based Hunt Oil, run by Mr. Ray L. Hunt.

The Shia and Sunni leaders believe the Kurds are opting for a sort of oil secession that puts them outside the whole concept of a law to share the country’s oil resources. And the Hunt deal is apparently the straw that broke the camel’s back, shall we say.

But remember, Hunt, in addition to being the son of legendary Texas John Birch Society extremist H.L. Hunt, is also a pal of the president’s. Indeed, President Bush has twice appointed Hunt to his Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. So while the president is striving to get the Iraqis to meet these benchmarks one of his own pals — and more importantly, political appointees — is busy helping to tear the whole thing apart.

The mind reels.

Looks like Huckleberry Graham Cracker is once again wrong on his predictions regarding Iraq. C’mon, South Carolinians, can’t you at least send someone to the Senate that does not have his or her head completely stuck up his or someone else’s ass?

  • Good. If there ever was a proposed law that deserved not to see the light of day, that’s it. The effort to simply conquer the country and redistribute the spoils in favour of the conqueror has failed, and now they’re trying to coax the country into handing them over. Even with oil at $80.00 a barrel, that’s a preferable alternative to a red-white-and-blue OPEC.

  • There is no dealing with Republicans. Hasn’t been since 1994. How long is going to take the damned, dumb, doomed Democrats to learn this? Whatever the Founding Father intended, government isn’t a quilting social with cooperative work toward a common goall. Nor is it an old boys club with friendly rivalries. Nor is it an organize crime unit with various capos vying for control. It’s the Guelfs and the Ghibbelines. Nasty stuff. Get used to it soon … please.

  • Apologies to Schoolhouse Rock

    I’m just a bill.
    Yes, I’m only a bill.
    And I’m smelling like a Gasoline Spill.
    Well, it’s a long, long journey
    To the Baghdad city.
    It’s a long, long wait
    While I’m sitting in committee,
    But I know I’ll be a law someday
    At least W hopes and pray that I will,
    But today I am still just a bill.

    Boy: Gee, Bill, you certainly have a lot of gaul and persistence, like Herpes.

    Bill: Well I got this far. When I started, I wasn’t even a bill, I was just an idea, a really sleazy idea. Some folks, cough, ExxonMobile, cough back home decided they wanted a law passed so they could steal someone else’s oil, so they called the prez and he said, “You’re right and as you gave me a lot of donations, there oughta be a law.” Then he sat down and wrote me out, invaded Iraq, who elected a bunch of religious fanatics and W told’em to put me (at gun point.) And I became a bill, and I’ll remain a bill until they decide to make me a law.

    I’m just a bill
    Yes I’m only a bill,
    And I’m as loved as a massive oil spill.
    Well, now I’m stuck in committee
    And I’ll sit here and wait
    While a few key Iraqi folks are bribed and paid
    Whether they should let me be a law.
    How W hopes and pray that they will,
    But today I am still just a bill…

  • ***Congress and the White House are struggling to find evidence that there is progress toward reconciliation and a functioning government here.***

    Gosh. I’m not struggling to find progress. There is no progress toward these things. George the Ripper broke this “humpty dumpty,” and Congress is all atwitter as to how to cook it.

    “Omelet a la Oil” is a failed recipe. Pass the ipecac, please—and teach those cowards on the Hill how to impeach….

  • Only a brief mention in the WaPo article about “international oil companies” developing the oil fields and no mention of more exact outlays of Iraqi oil revenues in the “compromise.” We always hear that 75% of the oil revenues are supposed to go to anational foreign oil companies, but apparently this is not relevant to the MSM (or to the Iraqi government for that matter)?

    Iraq is sitting on top of a black-gold mine and we wonder why there is civil war and why insurgents attack their foreign occupiers. It would seem that the solutions to many of Iraq’s problems are within reach beneath the sand, but because of anational, amoral, imperial corporatists conducting Dick’s Private Empire that the “liberation” of Iraq was never the mission of our invasion, but to hijack that once-sovereign nation state’s natural resources.

  • I agree with Mark — this is one bill that deserves death.

    But isn’t it curious that Ray Hunt, a Bush-buddy, is the one involved in the straw that broke the camel’s back. I’ve been thinking all along that Cheney’s oil friends would be the ones to rake in the profits and hadn’t even imagined that one of Bush’s friends would slip under the fence and effectively screw up the giant oil steal for them.

    Well, it was certainly a political end-run since the Kurds are determined to operate separately anyway, and Hunt apparently got in on the deal to take advantage of their determination.

    There’s nothing like American greed! You’ll even screw your friend in its throes…

  • I’m offering an alternative view of this bill … it is a US crafted bill that reverses 30+ years of policy (Iraq’s nationalized oil fields) and sets the country up to be plundered by multi-nationals. US media are NOT talking about this — they never mention that Bush et al crafted the original bill without input from MPs. I’ve written about this 3-4 times now. See US-Orchestrated Iraqi Oil Bill Stalled

    Ds and Progressives should not be touting this bill, as it is a big business (as usual) bill.

    :-/

  • Kathy,

    That’s an excellent description of what the bill would do. The Iraqis have experience in this kind of government move, though. They have taken their oil away from an oil consortium before. It isn’t likely the Iraqis will want to return to the robber baron era, and if they can stop it from the get-go, it will save a lot of trouble down the line, for Iraq, at least.

  • Kathy: You just have to keep writing about this. NO Iraqi government will survive if they give up their oil rights. It is their national patrimony if there is such a thing. Greed doesn’t regulate itself and the greed of the U.S. oil companies knows no bounds. It is another reason this shaky edifice called Iraq is doomed to fail. And if the Kurds get any more “independent” you can bet Turkey will not sit idly by, nor will Iran or probably Syria as well. All have large Kurdish populations which want their own country. More disaster is in the wings.

  • See also http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2132574.ece

    and http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=5555 . Note that under the terms of the proposed oil law, foreign companies which will exercise control over all but 17 of Iraq’s 80 known oilfields have no obligation to;

    1. invest their earnings in the Iraqi economy,
    2. partner with Iraqi companies,
    3. hire Iraqi workers, or
    4. share new technologies

    Similarly, Production Sharing Agreements (PSA’s), while the preferred model for the oil companies, were rejected by all of Iraq’s neighbours, all of whom maintain nationalized control over their oil. Only 12% of the world’s oil is produced under PSA’s, which is what the oil-baron-backed U.S. Government is trying to coax Iraq into signing. Once they do so, the U.S. will shout aggressively that the law must be upheld, and would have some legal grounds for using the military to protect what would then be an enormous U.S. investment – not to mention a gigantic national security interest.

  • chrenson,

    Is it OK to say I miss Saddam Hussein?

    Respectfully, No.

    IMHO, though, it is OK to say we miss how the Clinton Adminstration dealt with his regime. It wasn’t perfect, but it was waaay better than what we have now.

  • I didn’t know Hunt oil from Adam, but when I’d heard some company got a specific deal with the Kurds, I said to myself.

    Oil company? Texas based. Is there any way they CAN’T be Bush’s buddies?

  • Comments are closed.