Open-mike night for the president

It doesn’t happen often, but once in a while, the president doesn’t realize he’s in front of a live microphone — and he says a few interesting things.

In September 2000, for example, then-Gov. Bush didn’t know he speaking in front of a live microphone when he told Dick Cheney, “There’s Adam Clymer, major league asshole from the New York Times.” (Cheney’s famous response, “Big time.”)

Several months later, shortly after he was inaugurated, the president met with a group of Roman Catholic bishops in the White House to tout his support for the “the Mexico City” policy, which bans federal aid to family planning groups that offer abortion counseling. (It got its name because Ronald Reagan launched the ban in Mexico City in 1984.) Bush, anxious to show his support for issues of direct concern to the church, didn’t know that a live microphone was piping his remarks directly into the White House press room.

The president had just signed an executive order on the policy, literally just days prior to speaking to the bishops, but he struggled to explain his position. Bush ended up bragging about “the money from Mexico, you know, that thing, the executive order I signed about Mexico City.” The nonsensical comments were a subtle hint, early on his presidency, about Bush’s not-quite-towering intellect.

Yesterday, the open-mike problem happened to Bush again, though the consequences weren’t nearly as entertaining.

Before beginning a question-and-answer session with House Republicans at their retreat in Cambridge, Md., President Bush wanted to ensure that reporters did not get wind of any of the discussion — even if he had his doubts.

“First of all, I expect this conversation we’re about to have to stay in the room,” he told the House Republican Caucus, gathered at a resort on the Eastern Shore. “I know that it’s impossible in Washington.”

Little did the president know that his comments were being broadcast to reporters in a nearby room via a microphone that was inadvertently left open. Before beginning his 100-minute session with lawmakers, Bush had delivered six minutes of remarks before playfully inviting reporters to leave. “I support the free press — let’s just get them out of the room,” Bush joked as reporters were ushered out.

The open mike, which was soon discovered, provided no scoops: Bush defended his warrantless eavesdropping program exactly as he has in numerous public appearances, calling it an essential method of protecting the nation against potential terrorists.

There weren’t any startling revelations, but I think this might be more interesting than it seems.

There’s a classic Saturday Night Live skit from the 1980s featuring Ronald Reagan as a simple, quiet man in public, masking an adept technocrat with a vast policy expertise and an eye for remarkable detail. The “amiable dunce” facade was just an act.

Similarly, political observers sometimes wonder if Bush is sharper and more adroit than he seems in public. The president manages expectations by playing simple, the theory goes, but behind closed doors, a skillful and adept leader emerges.

Incidents like this one suggest this is clearly not the case. Bush has struggled to explain why he has the authority to circumvent the law and conduct domestic warrantless searches, so when reporters were ushered out of the room, only to discover that they could hear Bush give Republican lawmakers his personal take on the controversy, reporters’ hearts probably skipped a beat. Finally, they thought, an unvarnished, no-spin take on what the president says behind closed doors when he thinks he’s just among like-minded friends.

But guess what — that Bush is the same Bush we see all the time. He has his talking points, which he’ll repeat no matter who’s in the audience, and precious little else to say.

The amiable-dunce act, unfortunately, is genuine.

Actually, the amiable part is still an act. But the dunce part, alas, is not. Noone is that good an actor.

  • He’s an uneducated (probably ineducable) dolt who tries to use amiability to achieve the same thing he used to achieve by excessive use of alcohol and drugs: egocentric jollity. Such comedic effort often works when one is relatively powerless, but to see a POTUS using it – relying on underlings and sychophants to provide the laugh track – is really pitiable.

  • This is just another of Rove’s ruses to say, “see, the microphone was open, and what bush said ‘off-the-record’ is exactly the same as what he has said on-the-record” about the NSA domestic spying. I’m not buying it.

    We know these guys are monumentally arrogant, that they are remarkably incompetent at governance, and that they are craven and brazen liars. But, they ARE great at managing a theme in a campaign. Both Cheney and Rove have already said that they will make domestic spying into a f***ing political issue. This ruse is just one more strategem used by the Lying.Fucking.Bastards to “work the refs” and get us to fall for their “we got nothing to hide” nonsense.

    On this one, the mic was left open on purpose, so that BushCo could say, “Oops, aren’t we cute” and get us to swallow their “innocent” bait like the rubes they always take us for. And, of course, this was intentionally directed at the CCCP (Compliant Complicit Corporate Press), which could be counted on to fully report it — which they did, of course, just like the docile lambs that they are.

    I call BULLSHIT, and I’d bet my last dollar on it.

  • This is just another of Rove’s ruses to say, “see, the microphone was open, and what bush said ‘off-the-record’ is exactly the same as what he has said on-the-record” about the NSA domestic spying. I’m not buying it.

    Me neither. The comments seemed too close to his scripted ones, too ready for public consumption.

  • Analytical Liberal…

    You are absolutely right. I came here to make that very statement but you’ve already covered it.

  • I have never found this dunce to be the least bit amiable. Was the mic left open intentionally? I do not know, but I would not put it past them.

  • The key in any case is that this White House thinks even Republican members of Congress are just so many mushrooms to be fed shit.

  • I also agree with Analytical Liberal. He has that game figured out.
    These people are positively evil and are gunning for complete control. In case nobody noticed, we have not had a legal election since 1996. 2000 was stolen, 2004 was rigged with the Diebold machines.
    The enormous amounts of money leaving this country every day is staggering. I don’t see any coming in to replace it, either.I am stunned at the blindness of Americans in the face of so much corruption and financial destruction.
    The corporate press covers crap like an open mike with bushie speaking his garbage. Or someone arrested for murder. No mention of anything that matters. 2267 soldiers have died in Iraq to date, no mention anywhere about that.Our current debt service to China, Taiwan and Japan is up to 7 billion a week now.
    I am thoroughly disgusted with what has happened to America and even more appalled at the mindless crap that passes for news in local newspapers.

  • A. Liberal got it right on the nose. This was intentional, and even if it was not, that doesn’t mean that this is what Bush is really like in private. It is quite possible he gives the same act to his GOP allies- we all know he detests Congress on principle, regardless of which party is in power.

  • I’d say he set up the open mic on purpose to give us this impression.
    .
    He IS a good actor. He never mispronounces nuclear when he’s overseas and he never pronounces it right when he’s in the US.
    .
    Conspiracy Theory, anyone?
    .
    I think his missing time when he was in the service was when he had a bionic implant. He’s smart enough. He’s just no longer human so it’s an easy misunderestimation to make.
    .
    Let’s face it.
    .
    We are no longer just dealing with lying, thieving, murdering Republicans anymore. Now we are also dealing with the lying, thieving, murdering AND torturing CIA.
    .
    “william casey affidavit cocaine trick” on the net.
    .
    And now we have a new war… How convenient. The firemen have all the matches and we’re not allowed to see how all these fires start. “National Security”, it’s called. And Noriega was denied his right to a defense because of “National Security”.
    .
    [Enter Katrina, stage Right.]
    .
    Am I still connected to anyone here? Is my poetry too abstract? It means whatever you understand it to mean, or possibly nothing at all. Don’t worry about it.
    .
    So let me go a step further and say this: What if they aren’t really “cronies”. What if jobs are payoffs to allies in a Confederate re-insurrection? What if they are being loaded into position for the cleanup after the coup (which started at JFK’s assassination if not before).
    .
    What’s the name of this blog again? Hey ho, and up she rises, hey ho, and up she rises… Skull and crossbones and all.
    .
    Well, I guess I can’t lose any more friends than I already have here, so one more thing.
    .
    What do we get for our military expendatures anymore? Need a hint?
    .
    Cost.
    .
    That’s right. We get more cost per dollar than we ever have before. $9 billion ups and walks away here, $200+ billion overcharged there, and a trillion, leaks through the cracks at the Pentagon… That’s the building that had only one reinforced side that took 16 years to buttress. The side that terrorist plane hit. That plane that had a terrorist in it who must have thrown his wallet out the window before the crash because despite the complete incineration of the corpses…
    .
    “the magic [wallet] was still in pristine condition”.
    .
    All of this is so reminiscent of the “magic bullet” in the JFK thing, but here I go repeating myself…
    .
    More Trickle Down, Anyone?
    .
    Hey, Carpetbaggers! Forget everything I said. But do take a look at the 4th paragraph in the US Constitution, Amendment 14 and wonder…
    .
    How did they know?
    .
    And what was Honest Abe talking about in the last paragraph of the gettysburg address.
    .
    Paranoid? Excessively vigilant? Perhaps his mind-set attracted evil and that is why he was assassinated.
    .
    Counter revolutions usually happen in 15 year cycles. This one was 150 years, probably to avoid an equal and opposite reaction?
    .
    But… That was just a theory. The protracted counter-revolution thing has never been tried before–and probably never will again!!
    .
    The reaction might be ten times FASTER.
    .
    Man your light switches.
    .
    On the count of three…
    .
    Hmmm….
    .
    I see some of you are still not convinced. That’s perfectly understandable. And there’s a cure.
    .
    See the Preamble (all) and Art 1, Sec 9 (just two lines will be enough to show you their true intentions and why they hate labor unions) in the CSA Constitution
    .
    Yup. There’s your “state sovereignty”, “God in government” and “socialist [?] unions” revealed in all their glory.
    .
    Still not convinced? Good grief! Okay then, maybe this will do the trick for you.
    .
    Find the wikipedia article on “labor union”. It’s an excerpt from Adam Smith. Was that, a coincidence that they used the word “master” in that context? BTW, the word “combination” means “union” in case you don’t want to read the entire article. Adam Smith’s Conspiracy Theory. The father of modern economics, no less.
    .
    Everybody ready now?
    .
    On the count of three…
    .
    [You’ll know when it’s time… And it is probably getting pretty close.]
    .

  • rainbow sally,

    I think you’re really out in the stratosphere here. The only ‘conspiracy,’ I think, is what common sense and plain observations will direct you to.

    The right wing will break almost every kind of rule– laws, ethical rules of their peraticular professions, you name it, to consolidate their political power in America. And they’ll coax their like-minded friends into doing the same, to help them by doing the same sorts of things.

    The fact that liberals still fail to ‘get’ this is explainable by pretty mundane and readily identifiable phenomena, the same kinds that operate on people all the time. I, for one, find it kind of shocking that liberals news junkies are so smart (meaning really so great at creating a collection of factoids)–
    that they know all the anecdotes about crazy things Rove has done, Norquist has done, all of them have done, the military has done, the Bush administration has done– they’re so smart that they can remember all of those things, but don’t direct their intelligence to a little creative application.

    Meaning, you can look at what you know, and say “Rove has done this, and this, and this…” but you’re not ready to say, “Well, if they’ve done that, then it’s only natural that they must have thought of doing, and could very likely be doing. . .” whatever.It seems like it would be common sense to draw certain conclusions, certain “proabablies” from what we know.

    Liberals don’t like to speculate too much until the story hits, though. Because you don’t have that foresight, that caution, you’re getting blindsided.

    Why? Well, liberal elites have an almost Social Darwinist propensity that to believe that the people on the other side couldn’t be smart enough to be “pulling one over” on liberals. The fact is that people are just not that different in intelligence. Liberals might really have more ultra-smart people, but the difference between most liberals and most conservatives is really not that much. To think that it is, is like the same magnitude of fallacy as being racist. It hurts too much to think that we’re getting hit so bad, and that we’re so buried, when we’re so sure that we’re something special. So liberals have dropped the ball on being aware.

    As well, there’s the big norm out there of not jumping to conclusions– liberals might want to think that they can’t be affected at all by a little psychological trick, like peer pressure– that the media’s persistent + specious norm about “objectivity” isn’t going to effect you and that it isn’t going to make you less likely to see things a certain way. But even if you read blogs all the time, instead of MSM, you’re still immersed in the culture, and you still talk to people who watch MSM all the time, and so who buy into the norm. So you try to to live up to their expectations, and you don’t want to say something until Seymour Hersh or someone else you know is prestigious is saying it first.

    So all that’s going on, I think, is a lot more of the same dirty tricks, but they’re well-covered-up, and not so much in danger of being exposed. They’re not in danger of being exposed because of the same mundane, pedestrian things about human nature (which the Republicans consultants are probably aware of, and point out to them so that the Republicans can take advantage of them) that keep people from noticing that their friends are disloyal, that their co-workers are talking about them or don’t like the outfit they’re wearing that day.

  • RainbowSally:

    I remember hearing on the radio a speech Bush gave to the International Atomic Energy Agency. I thought that for once someone will tell him its NOO-KLEE-AR, not NOO-KYOO-LER and he would pronounce it correctly before the assembled international nuclear scientists and diplomats. He still proclaimed that Saddam Hussein was trying to make nukyaler weapons.

    For a sense of how this seems to the rest of the world, and how isolating it is, read some of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speeches such as “Israel is to blame for publications of cartoons in Denmark”. The man’s constant confirmation of everyone’s worst fears about his country, and his obvious inability to escape his own miasmic worldview has even brought the Chinese and Russians to move against him. Bush has managed to do the same thing to the US, isolating us from even close friends and NATO allies.

    I think that the folksy attitude is genuine, but he still uses it even when it is manifestly inappropriate, when it only confirms every stereotype of America as ignorant, jingoistic, religistic, and dangerous. Its one thing for the president to say at a campaign rally “Heck, I’m no smarter, worldy, educated, or informed than you”, but I personally want a president who is smarter, worldlier, better educated, and well informed than the philosopher and poet Domenique de Villepin or Vladimir Putin who speaks idiomatic German.

    The mystery isn’t Bush. Its the people around him. They are worldly, intellegent, and informed, but still wrong. Cheney is capable of speaking in paragraphs, but is still evil. Rumsfeld was enough of a military genius to topple famously xenophobic and defensible Afganistan on a shoestring, but can’t do anything right in Iraq. Rice and Wolfewitz could eat de Villepin for breakfast, but still blundered us into and then completely mishandled Iraq. Alan Greenspan obviously knows more in his little finger about economics than the rest of us ever will, but still encouraged ruinous Bush tax cuts to stave off a suffocating federal bugetary surplus.

  • Comments are closed.