Slowly but surely, a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning continues to gather support in the Senate. As of today, the measure is up to 57 co-sponsors.
If passed and ratified, the amendment would, obviously, be the first time in American history that the Constitution’s Bill of Rights has been undermined. It’s not uncommon for a civil libertarian to argue that this is a radically dangerous precedent to set — once write an exception to the First Amendment into constitutional stone, it’ll be easier to do it again and again. So-called conservatives dismiss this as a slippery-slope argument.
Is it? Patrick H. Brady is chairman of the Citizens Flag Alliance, which is a leading activist group supporting the proposed amendment. To hear him tell it, the concerns of civil libertarians about opening the flood gates are well founded.
“[T]his is about rights: the right of the people to protect their flag, the right of the majority to rule, the right of the people to define their Constitution. And beyond the flag, this issue spills over into the right to protect our children from pornography, the right to own property, to pray, to post the Ten Commandments, and to say the Pledge of Allegiance.
“If we can recapture our flag, we will have begun a march to recapture our Constitution.”
In other words, once the First Amendment has been undercut with this flag-burning measure, proponents of this nonsense have a few other items on their wish list that they’re going after.
Something for senators to consider before they vote on this.