Osama bin Laden breaks silence, issues new video message

Osama bin Laden hasn’t had much to say in a while, but the terrorist has released a new video that, given the content, appears to have been made sometime since May. OBL seems to have quite a bit to say about domestic affairs in the U.S.

He says President Bush’s words echo “neoconservatives like Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Richard Perle.”

Bin Laden also spoke to the ongoing situation in Iraq throughout the tape.

“People of America: the world is following your news in regards to your invasion of Iraq, for people have recently come to know that, after several years of tragedies of this war, the vast majority of you want it stopped. Thus, you elected the Democratic Party for this purpose, but the Democrats haven’t made a move worth mentioning. On the contrary, they continue to agree to the spending of tens of billions to continue the killing and war there.”

According to the transcript obtained by ABC, bin Laden refers to a statement from a U.S. soldier in Iraq, who criticized the Bush administration’s war policy in an interview with a British journalist.

“It would benefit you to listen to the poignant messages of your soldiers in Iraq, who are paying — with their blood, nerves and scattered limbs — the price for these sorts of irresponsible statements,” the transcript says. “Among them is the eloquent message of Joshua which he sent by way of the media, in which he wipes the tears from his eyes and describes American politicians in harsh terms and invites them to join him there for a few days.”

OBL, who was reportedly rambling quite a bit, went on to praise Noam Chomsky, mention global warming and “the Kyoto accord,” and indicate that the war in Iraq will end when al Qaeda defeats the U.S. or the U.S. gives up on our democratic system of government.

I suspect the video will have some political reverberations, and maybe I’ll regret writing this, but I have a radical idea: let’s ignore the bastard.

If activists want to exploit bin Laden’s tedious nonsense, there are plenty of ways to do so. For those of us on the left, one could say, “bin Laden’s criticism of congressional Democrats sounds just like Republicans’! The GOP and OBL are reading from the same talking points!”

For those on the right, one could do the opposite: “bin Laden blasted the neocons, just like liberals do! The left and OBL are reading from the same talking points! And he says the terrorists are monitoring our media! So when Dems criticize Bush, it emboldens the enemy!”

Can we just skip it? Osama bin Laden is a madman. His perspective is one of insanity. The bastard’s analysis of American politics is a) meaningless; and b) meant to sow division. Might we be better off not trying to make use of the rambling tirade of a monster who killed 3,000 Americans?

I’m just putting that out there.

As for the broader news story here, there are a couple of interesting angles to keep in mind. First, al Qaeda apparently has a problem with leaks.

Soon after Washington announced it had the video, all the Islamic militant Web sites that usually carry statements from al-Qaida went down and were inaccessible, in an unprecedented shutdown.

The reason for the shutdown was not immediately known. Evan Kohlmann, an NBC News terrorism expert, said he suspected it was the work of al-Qaida itself, trying to find how the video leaked to U.S. officials.

“For them this is totally disruptive that the U.S. government could have a copy before their targeted audience does,” he said. “They could be concerned and trying to plug the leak quickly.”

And second, there’s something up with bin Laden’s beard.

One difference in bin Laden’s appearance was immediately obvious. The announcement had a still photo from the coming video, showing bin Laden addressing the camera, his beard fully black. In his past videos, bin Laden’s beard was almost entirely gray with dark streaks.

Bin Laden’s beard appears to have been dyed, a popular practice among Arab leaders, said Rita Katz, director of the SITE Institute, a Washington-based group that monitors terror messages.

These guys are vain? About going gray? I had no idea.

To any wingnuts wanting to use this crap against us, I’d just ask, “Why are you letting Osama run U.S. policy?” Because that’s what they’re doing when they bring him up.

  • How much do you want to bet that we don’t get independent analysis/verification of the tape. Don’t we deserve an exhaustive, public, scientific authentication of the tape since it’s going to be hoisted upon us as justification for all things “war on terror”?

    No, we’ll get the old “trust us” –how’s that workin’ for us?

  • CB, Shouldn’t you really use the terminology “Osama bin Laden allegedly breaks silence, allegedly issues new video message”? How can you be so sure? Isn’t it important to be skeptical of uncorroborated information?

  • all the Islamic militant Web sites

    I have never seen an Islamic militant website, or a link to an Islamic militant website. I’ve heard and seen them referenced many times, but I’ve never seen anyone link to what they refer to. Has anyone else?

    “Bastard,” “Madman,” “perspective of insanity”

    Steve- it’s almost like you’re going out of your way to prove you’re not a conspiracy nutjob like me and JKap.

    let’s ignore the bastard.

    That’s clearly good advice as far as Bush is concerned, but the rest of us are supposed to cower on cue- just in time for the Petraeus “Report.”

    Interesting coincidence.

  • I said it before…
    I will say it again:

    Osama is worth more alive to the Repugs than dead.

    This tape is just further proof.

    I’d vote for Barack Obama for this reason only:
    He has promised (in his own read-between-the-lines way) to get this shit-mouthed bastard.

  • I’m with jimBOB on this one, why on earth are we allowing that madman to dictate our foreign policy? I’ve often wondered how Bush can quote him in speeches it’s depraved . The right understands full well why Bin Laden is doing this. It’s the same shite they pull when they accuse us of aiding the nemeies and treason. Our strength has always been that we are free to speak our minds and to disagree. The right and Bin Laden both think of this as an American weakness.

    I’m with ya CB ignore the bastid do what must be done that’s in OUR best interest.

  • “Osama bin Laden breaks silence, issues new video message”

    CB, you left off the rest of the headline: Republicans and conservatives nationwide poop and pee their pants while GOP politicians thrust more fear upon their constituents and demand acts that fall into the trap OBL has set.

    RE the ‘beard,’ it has also been suggested that it is a fake beard, insinuating that he may have shaved it to fit in where he is hiding–a muslim area that does not follow the beard growing requirement.

  • Fuck bin Laden. Every time people see that psycho, they should be filled with rage that George W. Bush has not only failed to catch him but actually made him stronger, letting him get away in December 2001 and immeasurably strengthening his case within the Arab world by invading Iraq.

    It will never be put better than Richard Clarke in “Against All Enemies”: Bush couldn’t have done more to help bin Laden if the latter had been directly telling him what to do.

  • Bin Laden is more use to the Republican party alive rather than dead.

    If the modern GOP had its hands on the tiller during WWII, we would be faced by continued diatribes by Adolph Hitler’s successor, Reinhard Heydrich over a Nazi dominated Europe.

    Fear is a wonderful thing, eh? The next best thing is removing the source of the fear, but the GOP voters are too pissy to actually entertain that possibility.

  • I think you’re right, bin Laden is a whack job and you can find almost anything you want in his words if you twist it around enough. Of course the Republicans will never stop trying to use his words against their true enemies… us.

    The proper response to the Republicans whenever they bring up binLaden would be “You guys talk a good game about ‘accountability’, but Bush has had six freaking years to get bin Laden. He’s been the best recruiter bin Laden ever had. It’s way past time to bench Bush and anyone who thinks he’s been doing a good job.”

  • I don’t get the sense that bin Laden is criticizing Democrats per se. In the full context of his video, it is apparaent that he is attacking democracy. The “Democrats” example demonstrates (in bin Laden’s eyes) the failure of democracy to respond to the will of the people. Other examples he offers for the failure of democracy are the mortgage crisis, high taxes, etc.

    That said, I agree with CB about ignoring him. If there’s anything the left and right should be able to agree on is that (1) we all like the basic tenets of democracy here (even though we disagree about specific policies under that system) and (2) bin Laden is a freakin’ nut.

  • I’d prefer to point out the obvious: that Bush failed to catch him and after saying “dead or alive”, completely giving up six months later.

    And then ignore him.

    Can we do that?

  • Christopher Hitchens is right, religion does poison everything. It also makes “stupid” contagious. ALL religion is stupid. There are no exceptions. Stop believing in unicorns and invisible people in the sky. There is only one life and it is a singular event. If you’re so convinced there is a paradise beyond now, get on an express train and jettison yourself there.

  • Osama bin Laden just dons the fake beard and the outfit when he tapes in front of a green screen at a porn studio in LA. The fake background is added later.

    The rest of the time you can find him tending bar in Santa Monica.

  • When OBL addresses the world it always feels like a James Bond movie to me. Like Dr. No co-opting network television to explain that, unless $400 billion are wired to his Swiss bank account, he’s going to destroy North America. Except, Dr. No never really rambled all that much.

    Or maybe he’s Blofeld, or Ernst Stavro Blofeld, or Octopussy. In Al Qaeda he’s got his own SPECTRE.

    Just sayin’.

  • Let’s see: should we stay in Iraq because Osama wants us out, or should we get out of Iraq because Osama wants us out? Or, to paraphrase Chris Wallace of Fox “News,” are we going to take our “marching orders” from Osama bin Laden at all?

    Osama dropped another video bomb on us just before the 2004 elections, and we all remember how well that turned out. This one seems timed to coincide with the Petraeus White House report on the “progress” in Iraq. My suggestion: do the right thing in Iraq (start getting out) and tell Osama to go Cheney himself. If the Republicans want to wet their pants over Osama, let them.

  • Bin Laden would probably like Republicans to accuse Democrats of being like al Qaeda, and to get the situation in America as tense aa possible.

    It’s really unfair for Republicans to cherry pick the things Bin Laden said and then ask questions on their TV shows suggesting that Bin Laden is like Democrats. First of all, probably all Democrats know someone is a big advocate of fighitng global warming, talks about the Kyoto protocol all the time, and yet who they staunchly disagree with about tons of particulars, think is a total schmuck, and think would be very terrible if he or she ran the world. Same with Republicans- I’m sure a lot of Republicans know a person who talks about Republican issues and advocates for the Republican result, or a result like it, on a lot of them, but who they still think is a total schmuck. Second, how many liberals support everything Noam Chomsky says, or even know who Noam Chomsky is? Probably only 1 in 200 American have read a Stephen King book, and he is probably our most hugely popular author. Yet it’s probably only a fraction of that amoutn who have read a Noam Chomsky book. That’s not a lot of liberals in America, and also, Noam Chomsky is a lot different than a lot of liberals. So you can’t say he’s very influential. Finally, same thing as before- anybody can say they like Noam Chomsky, yet that doesn’t mean that you like that person or everything they say or do just because you like Noam Chomsky too. These are the simple things we have to say every time Republicans drag this stuff out. Republicans are too stupid and would let our country be torn apart by lies rather than keep it intact and strong with everybody working towards shared goals.

  • First of all, probably all Democrats know someone is a big advocate of fighitng global warming, …

    should have been

    First of all, probably all Democrats know someone who is a big advocate of fighting global warming, …

  • Ignore the centerpiece of the ongoing war on terror causing our occupation of Iraq and our plans to permanently remain in the ME? No way. There should be a statue, a monument built of OBL with the caption,…”Look at What I Made the Americans Do To Themselves”
    Without OBL there would be no dictatorship and we would still have our constitution in place. Now “the military just has two faces…republican and democrat”( read that here on comments). So far our entire military operation is based on what OBL says or doesn’t say as interpreted by Bush WH.

    We should just refer to OBL as the “Don of al queda” to give him the perspective he deserves and 9/11 as a tragically botched attempted robbery of all the gold kept there which resulted in thousands of deaths.

    Of this you can be sure, no matter what OBL or Petraeus or anybody else says, Bush will never leave Iraq until he is forced to. He has blown it so badly that he knows his party will lose in the ‘08 elections so he plans to push his war off on the Dems to end and withdraw, and blame them for all the problems resulting in straightening out his mess so that the republicans can take back the WH in 2012. OBL is irrelevant to preventing this goal. Dems claim it’s Bush’s war but refuse to force him to end it or start straightening out “his” mess which will come back to haunt them in 2012. Their weak cowardly behavior now will be remembered then

  • In my earlier post, I was going to say that the rightwing blogosphere loves bin Laden more than the left, because they can “use” him to score political points against Democrats (who are, as you know, the real enemy).

    But then I thought, naaaah. Too hyperbolic.

    But THEN I came across this from rightosphere blog Protein Wisdom. Actual quote:

    “To borrow from Voltaire, if Osama bin Laden didn’t exist, Republicans would have to invent him.

    At the very least, they might want to send him a fruit basket”.

    Indeed.

  • Osama bin Laden is a madman. His perspective is one of insanity. The bastard’s analysis of American politics is a) meaningless; and b) meant to sow division. Might we be better off not trying to make use of the rambling tirade of a monster who killed 3,000 Americans?

    George Walker Bush is a madman. His perspective is one of insanity. The bastard’s analysis of American politics is a) meaningless; and b) meant to sow division. Might we be better off not trying to make use of the rambling tirade of a monster who killed 3,000 Americans?

    Why is it so easy to switch the names?

  • You know the reason (or you should know) for OBL to put out anything is to further divide Americans, so why fall prey?

    We (Americans) have been attacked 27 times since 1979 by Muslims, the majority of those attacks have been carried out by OBL’s “SPECTRE” (chrenson) the rest by Hezbollah.

    If Al’Queada (Sunni) and Hezbolla (Shite), can appreciate the each others actions against us Americans, why can’t we Democrats and Republicans work together agains our common enemy?

  • Another thing: one person’s reading of Chomsky may be wrong, and another’s may be right. At any rate, we can have two different readings of Chomsky (maybe he would agree with neither). Just because I take an idea away from my reading of Chomsly doesn’t make me the same as someone else who takes an idea away from him, any more than a Republican and a Democrat are the same just because we both speak of Lincoln in glowing terms.

    Too, we may both take the exact same idea or premise from Chomsky, and use it in different ways. In that way we would be different even if we read him the exact same way and think he’s right on the same thing.

  • No wonder he’s been kept alive, Bush has no greater strategic ally than OBL.

    Bush attacking Iraq and letting Bin Laden go is the Historical WTF moment of this presidency.

  • Osama family’s website expired on 9-11-01 – the same day of the US terrorist attacks.
    Proof and facts are at http://saudi-binladin-group.com. This can also be proved from various online articles (including Wired Magazine, Bloomberg, etc) , discussion groups and research tools such as dialog.com. This is a little known bit in the media, but is very verifiable and is a fascinating and rarely documented part of the 9/11 story. Although a weird coincendence, it is an interesting part of the 9/11 story and shows such a bizarre syncronicity of events.

  • actually, i thought his new release was highly derivative and repeated ground he’d already been over.
    it didn’t have a very good beat. you can’t really dance to it. i’ll give it about a 35.

  • Osama has never failed in ensuring his tapes get released at the most politically opportune times – not for ‘Al-Qaeda’ – but for the Neo-Cons and the Bush administration.

    On the eve of the Iraq war, during Colin Powell’s infamous presentation to the UN, an audio tape in which bin Laden claimed he was allied with Saddam Hussein surfaced for the Neo-Cons who had consistently been proven wrong in their assertion that there was a connection between Iraq and 9/11.

    Though such transparent and debase propaganda is still more than enough to fool the remnants of the semi-retarded, kool-aid drinking, Neo-Con cheerleaders out there, many Americans with more than three brain cells to rub together are starting to realize that they have been led on one almighty goose chase.

    The Osama tapes are about as genuine as a used car salesman convention, and have been proven fraudulent on countless occasions. They are nothing more than crude propaganda unleashed in a desperate move to put the genie of what really happened on 9/11 back in the bottle.

  • Hmmm. A little something for everyone there. Playing both ends against the middle, you might even say. Psychotics can be very shrewd and manipulative people.

  • The beard isn’t the only thing that’s fake. The Osama is fake as well. Ever wonder why these tapes always appear when it most benefits the Cheney regime? Ever wonder why “Osama” reiterates left-wing talking points, enabling the Bushites to tell anyone who is dumb enough to listen that the Dems are on the same page as “Al Qaeda”? At what point did Osama bin Laden STOP working for the C.I.A.? Answer: When he died in December 2001.

  • Comments are closed.