Pelosi throws Jefferson overboard

I think it’s probably fair to say Rep. [tag]William Jefferson[/tag] (D-La.) will not be missed by the Dem caucus.

A Kentucky technology executive pleaded guilty Wednesday to charges of [tag]bribing[/tag] a member of Congress in an investigation that has centered on Representative William J. Jefferson, a Louisiana Democrat.

While court papers have not referred to Representative Jefferson by name, they leave no doubt that the congressman and his family are the focus of the Justice Department’s investigation. Mr. Jefferson’s homes in New Orleans and Washington were searched last year by federal agents.

The Kentucky businessman, Vernon L. Jackson, chairman of iGate Inc., based in Louisville, offered his plea in Federal District Court in Alexandria, Va., admitting guilt to one count of bribing a public official and one count of conspiracy to commit bribery.

Mr. Jackson acknowledged that he had paid $367,500 over four years to a company controlled by the family of a member of Congress described in court papers only as “Representative A, a member of the House of Representatives.” In exchange, the court papers say, the lawmaker helped promote iGate’s technology products to federal agencies, as well as to African governments and companies.

Recently, when a House Republican faces a controversy like this one, the GOP caucus rallies behind him or her, even when it came to some of the more comically corrupt instances, such as Duke Cunningham. Hoping to show the difference between the parties, Minority Leader [tag]Nancy Pelosi[/tag] called for a full [tag]investigation[/tag] into Jefferson.

Q Congresswoman Pelosi, you are standing in front of a sign that says “Honest Leadership, Open Government.” Your party has also take up the mantra of the culture of corruption, pointing the finger at the GOP. And yet yesterday, [a businessman] plead guilty to bribing [Congressman Jefferson] for $400,000. A couple weeks ago, Congressman Mollohan stepped aside from the Ethic Committee while his name is under investigation. Do you think that perhaps you have to change the sign?

Ms. Pelosi. No. The sign is truer than ever. A culture of corruption is a system in this Congress of the United States that the Republicans have instituted. The Washington Post has called it a “criminal enterprise operating out of” the Republican Leader’s office. It is about all the Republican Caucus enabling their Caucus to have a strong link to the lobbying community at the expense of America’s consumers.

In the case of Mr. Jefferson, I think the Ethics Committee should investigate him. It is his private matter, and he should be investigated because of the stories that have been in the press and the guilty plea that you mentioned yesterday. That is his business; that’s not ours.

Q Have you spoken with Congressman Jefferson to ask him whether or not…

Ms. Pelosi. No. When I know there is a criminal investigation going on I don’t speak to the person. I just don’t, [tag]Democrat[/tag] or [tag]Republican[/tag]. But he knows what is going on, and the [tag]Ethics Committee[/tag] should investigate what is going on.

Q When you have a situation when a businessman has pled guilty to giving a bribe to a Member of Congress should not the Member of Congress who received that bribe also immediately fess up, plead guilty, and take his penalty?

Ms. Pelosi. Well if he is guilty he should. There is a due process involved here. My responsibility is not what that person does; my responsibility is upholding an ethical standard here. And the Ethics Committee, just as they should have with all of the Republicans that we have talked about over and over again that they have neglected to investigate, they should investigate the Democrats and they should investigate the Republicans. But the Republicans are all tied together, the names we put forth, under the name of Jack Abramoff. And again, a criminal enterprise operating out of the Leader’s office.

Mr. Jefferson is his own behavior, he is responsible for it. The Ethics Committee should investigate him.

Good for her. There’s no reason for Dems to show any tolerance for Jefferson’s conduct. Does Jefferson deserve the presumption of innocence? Of course; everyone does. But we’re also the party striving to clean up a pretty serious GOP mess. Jefferson should step aside, work on his defense, and not expect anyone on the Hill to return his phone calls until or unless he’s exonerated.

Exactly. This isn’t about being partisans, this is about being lawful and getting rid of the corrupt, regardless of position, connections, or party affiliation.

  • From commenter Paul at Balloon Juice:

    The smart move by the Democrats would be to call a heavily televised public gathering. At said gathering, they would drag out William Jefferson and publicly demand his resignation from a) the Democratic Party and b) the congressional seat he’s in. Conclude with an open statement that the Democratic Party will not tolerate such corruption and that the Republican Party should learn by example. Once you see the popularity polls for the Democratic Party shoot up 5 points watch the GOP sweat.

    I like Paul’s idea. Don’t sweep dirt under the rug, take it out in the front yard and shake it out. Or even beat it with a stick. Let the Repubs try and Febreze-out the stench and see where that gets them.

    The Republican party is steeping in corruption right now, but people still have the old “they’re all dirty” soundtrack running in their minds. If the Dems publicly toss the dirty members of the own party to the curb now, it is not only the right thing to do, it looks good for them in the fall too.

  • She should thow him overboard because he should be thrown which would then illustrate something the GOP congressional members didn’t/won’t.

    Have not lived in NOLA for 14 years but there was always “feelings” about him.

  • New Orleans would be better off without folks like William Jefferson and his family (who constantly seem to be the beneficiaries of miraculous government related generosity). He is truly part of the problem, at both local and national levels.

  • Good for Pelosi. If you’re going to claim to take the high road, you have to take it when the opportunity arises. Do it enough and people might actually believe you.

  • This is hardly throwing him overboard, she should have said that such an obviously corrupt member should not be in the dem caucus and that he should retire imediatley or will face a DCCC backed primary opponent. And she should have done this months ago. Both for the party’s reputation and because it is the ethical thing to do.

  • I’m glad she’s taking this approach, though I think the bar must be set pretty low when we’re hailing the obviously correct political move.

    Also, is this really all that different from how Republicans treated Cunningham? If it is (and I honestly don’t remember), then *that* should be the story.

  • Changing subject slightly…

    Who’s thinking that the Kennedy car accident is going to get a LOT of airplay on Fox et al?

  • When you want to condem a culture of corruption you should do it by example.
    Pelosi has the opportunity to lead.
    She should call for an “ethical audit” of all congressperson- republican AND democrat.
    This is an opporturnity to show what reform looks like.

  • I’m a New Orleans resident, and I met Jefferson about 10 years ago (I used to print political signs for him). There was corruption in the Jefferson clan at the time, and there’s undoubtedly corruption now. When Katrina hit, Jefferson was escorted to his house here in New Orleans by the National Guard when nobody else could get in. He was left alone in his house for over an hour, and he was allowed to gather some of his “personal items”. It’s believed that he was gathering papers that could prove that he was bribed. We Democrats need to make sure our party is cleansed of corruption. We cannot provide shelter for those who are only in politics so that they can bribe, steal, and cheat. Bye-bye Mr. Jefferson — you won’t be missed here.

  • That’s is throwing him overboard? I’m sorry but all she said was he should be investigated (which he should). But why is that big news? If supporting the process of law and criminal inquiries is what constitutes “throwing overboard” these days, then we’ve set the bar far too low.

    What’s the deal with referring to the issue as “[Jefferson’s] private matter” – since when is criminal conduct a private matter? There are better ways to distance yourself from someone’s actions that to call them a “private matter.”

    Just because it looks like some incredible act of leadership and conviction when contrasted against what Republicans would do doesn’t actually make it so in reality. Or is our side making our own realities too these days?

    Frankly, I’m pretty unimpressed with everything she said regarding Jefferson. I’m all for cleaning house, and rooting out anybody that’s tainted in the party, but let’s not pat ourselves on the back about it too much.

  • As waffley as she sounds, Pelosi is right. We’re a nation of laws, and even if there are videotapes of Jefferson accepting bags of money with “BRIBE” written on them, he’s still entitled to due process. He can’t be convicted until he a) is investigated, tried, and found guilty, b) confesses.

    I’m not a great fan of Pelosi, but she’s a major voice in the political dialogue, and as such, has a responsibility to demonstrate measured and reasoned leadership.

    That said, I’m under no such constraints unless I’m called to serve on a jury. Hang that corruption-ridden leach from the nearest yardarm, give me a stick, and lemme at him. Time for a political pinata! In the words of Josh Lyman, “I’m so sick of Congress, I could vomit.”

  • If supporting the process of law and criminal inquiries is what constitutes “throwing overboard” these days, then we’ve set the bar far too low.Perhaps we have. Particularly since there is very little evidence that any Publicans have even cleared this bar…

  • A better headline would be: Unlike Republicans, Pelosi supports congressional oversight of her own party.

    “throwing him overboard” sounds like she’s doing it for political reasons.

  • Like some people, I’m kind of torn about what to do with Rep. Jefferson. I’d like to see him forced out very publicly to demonstrate that Democrats don’t tolerate corruption. But he’s entitled to due process. Apparently, he’s decided, unwisely, to dig in his heels, regardless of the probable outcome (conviction and prison) and regardless of the effect on his party in November. Selfish, or scared?
    You gotta wonder if this wasn’t planned by high-ups at the FBI as a way of blunting the Democrats’ anti-corruption message in the upcoming election. The timing and everything sure seems like a coincidence. Wouldn’t be the first time that sort of thing has happened.
    By insisting on an investigation, I think Pelosi has struck the right note, at least so far.

  • Comments are closed.