Pelosi to Bush: I’m not waiting for the SOTU

House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has taken quite a bit of heat lately, some of it justified, most of it not. But assuming the media can tear itself away from reporting on the future Speaker’s wardrobe, it’s worth noting that Pelosi has the House well prepared to hit the ground running in January (via Kevin Drum).

House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi made clear Tuesday she’s not willing to cede the public spotlight to President Bush in the weeks before his State of the Union speech.

Pelosi plans to start the 110th Congress with a bang on Jan. 4 — when the House holds its ceremonial swearing in and elects her as speaker — by immediately setting off on a sprint of several weeks to enact the Democrats’ ambitious 100-hour agenda.

Lawmakers usually return home between the swearing-in ceremony and the president’s speech, but analysts say the hurried schedule gives Democrats a chance to show instant results. It could also put Bush on the defensive, forcing him to sign or veto a host of popular initiatives.

“Given the well-earned do-nothing reputation of the 109th Congress and its record-setting minimal number of days in session, Pelosi is right to get a quick and sustained start to the 110th Congress,” said Thomas Mann, a congressional scholar at the Brookings Institution. “Forget the vacation time — better to move quickly to set an expectation of more time and serious work in Washington.”

Quite right. Pelosi and House Dems have been chomping at the bit, waiting to do the governing that Republicans have failed to do. They’re not looking to ease their way into the process, slowly unveiling an agenda; they’re looking to take advantage of post-election momentum, roll up their sleeves, and get to work.

Indeed, the key to this strategy is taking the initiative away from the White House. Ordinarily, Congress waits for the State of the Union before legislating. Pelosi is done waiting for Bush.

Pelosi, in a statement, said the rapid start is needed to tackle a lengthy to-do list that includes everything from passing new ethics rules to raising the minimum wage to $7.25 an hour.

“It is imperative that we waste no time in addressing the pressing needs facing our nation,” the San Francisco Democrat said.

Tactically, the move has several advantages: January is usually a slow news month that the president dominates by leaking tidbits from his State of the Union speech and his proposed budget a few days later. Instead of waiting for Bush’s agenda, Democrats could have a half-dozen bills waiting for his signature or veto by the time he makes his primetime speech.

Good. I probably would have preferred if Pelosi hadn’t taken sides in the House Majority Leader’s race, but that let’s not overlook what she’s done since — she wisely broke up the ethics reform package into a series of key votes; she shut down talk of a draft; she’s closed ranks after the leadership challenges; and she’s sent a shot across the president’s bow.

I think reports of Pelosi’s political death have been greatly exaggerated.

Great move by Pelosi….lets get down to business…it will show DEMS are serious about reform and results right off the bat…

dont worry the media will still spin some nonsensical story like..

“Is Pelosi moving too fast ?”
“Are Pelosi and DEMS too ambitious??”
“Is it a political ploy for DEMS to move immediately on contentious issues ?”
“Should Pelosi dye her hair before getting down to business??'”

  • I think this is brilliant. Let’s see if the MSM play it as such. Anybody have any ideas how this will be spun to put Pelosi in a bad light?

  • And let’s not forget the last Congress went and dumped all their homework on Pelosi and Reid too. So that’s all the more reason to get to work.

    Please, demonstrate that Democrats are not afraid of the work of Government. Maybe the voters will then decide to keep them in power for…

    … well, forever.

  • Bush meets Blitzkrieg. Has a nice ring to it, eh?

  • One hundred hours and the meter is running.
    I expect real reform that cuts across party lines.
    The swamp must really get drained of special interest slush or else Pelosi becomes just another swamp creature.

  • The CW will be that Congress is being disrespectful of the President. To create a flurry of activity just to have it vetoed, only to steal news cycles away from the Commander in Chief in a time of war, shows the Democrat party is not serious about governing. Power is all they understand.

    That’s what I expect to hear. Matt Drudge rules my world…….

  • This new year’s eve I’m chugging an extra one down for Pelosi. Here’s to 2007 – Nancy’s year!

    After being portrayed as “Damaged Goods” by CNN and the “Armani grandma” by Newsweek, it can only get better. Bring ’em on!

  • Thanks CB. This is a great move. Congress has been one big talk show for the past 5 years, and more like Jerry Springer than like Oprah. The Republicans wasted time with impeachment and lately with “values” issues that weren’t going anywhere. They play the lame game.

  • Some good reading primers for Hon. Nancy and our new Congress:
    *The Constitution
    *Federalist Papers

    and some civics lessons and promptings from Thom Hartman!

    Go Nancy!

  • And let’s not forget the last Congress went and dumped all their homework on Pelosi and Reid too. So that’s all the more reason to get to work.

    [Lance]

    Yep, they should point that out, a lot. “Well, we can’t take a break; the Republican majority left all of this work that needs to be finished. Anyway, that’s what we’re paid to do.”

    Repeat as necessary to drive home the image of ReThuglican slackers doing nothing on the tax payer’s dime. Perhaps add they’re trying to make sure the President has something positive to report during the SotU.

  • Good for her for ignoring the leftovers that the Republics intentionally left behind just to slow her down. She can, and will, deal with those expeditiously but not before she gets the 100-hour proposals out the door.

    This is getting exciting. 🙂

  • Did anyone expect the Republican Congress to work harder than the Republican President?

    I want Pelosi to add “lazy” to “incompetent” and “dangerous.”

  • Good for Nancy! I also find it very “fitty”, that where 109 is planning to cut the last (lame duck, indeed) session short by a week (dispersing on the 8th), she plans on extending the 110’s first session by a couple of weeks. Nice balance 🙂

  • http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2004240.ece

    I love what Pelosi is doing. But this article gives some insight as to how others are already portraying the Stoyer/Murtha issue as a major blow to Pelosi’s authority (ultimately a BS position especially if the House Dems don’t believe it, which they don’t appear to), and the Harman/Hastings issue.

    Although this is UK, the immediate condescension towards women is apparent (“catfight”). But I do like Pelosi’s comment at the end….a little face-ripping is always a good thing.

  • The American people are and were angry that Congress didn’t accomplish anything so this shows them that Speaker Pelosi and others are going to work for their paychecks..something not done in Congress for a while.

  • Comments are closed.