Pentagon smacks around Doug Feith, OSP

The Office of Special Plans was one of those unique absurdities that only the Bush gang could come up with. The idea was fairly straightforward: administration officials wanted to start a war with Iraq, but didn’t have damning evidence to justify an invasion. Desperate, Dick Cheney and other top administration officials created the OSP to give the White House the information it was looking for, but couldn’t find, from the CIA.

It was a parallel intelligence operation, dedicated to churning out the “proof” the neocons wanted to see, with a special emphasis on connecting Iraq and al Qaeda. And, according to the Pentagon’s inspector general, it was pulling a massive scam.

Intelligence provided by former undersecretary of defense Douglas J. Feith to buttress the White House case for invading Iraq included “reporting of dubious quality or reliability” that supported the political views of senior administration officials rather than the conclusions of the intelligence community, according to a report by the Pentagon’s inspector general.

Feith’s office “was predisposed to finding a significant relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda,” according to portions of the report, released yesterday by Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.). The inspector general described Feith’s activities as “an alternative intelligence assessment process.”

An unclassified summary of the full document is scheduled for release today in a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which Levin chairs. In that summary, a copy of which was obtained from another source by The Washington Post, the inspector general concluded that Feith’s assessment in 2002 that Iraq and al-Qaeda had a “mature symbiotic relationship” was not fully supported by available intelligence but was nonetheless used by policymakers.

In his defense, Feith told the WaPo yesterday, “This was not ‘alternative intelligence assessment.’ It was from the start a criticism of the consensus of the intelligence community, and in presenting it I was not endorsing its substance.”

That may be the funniest spin I’ve heard in a while. Feith was manipulating intelligence, spreading lies, and making a bogus case for a disastrous war — but he wasn’t “endorsing” the lies, he was just offering them to others.

When Gen. Tommy Franks, who led the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, called Feith “the fu**ing stupidest guy on the face of the earth,” this is probably the kind of thing he was referring to.

The next question is whether Feith and the OSP broke any laws while they were orchestrating their con. The Pentagon’s inspector general believes Feith was lying, but wasn’t a criminal, a characterization Feith is happy to embrace.

Others aren’t so sure. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, issued an angry statement yesterday about the revelations.

“The IG has concluded that this office was engaged in intelligence activities. The Senate Intelligence Committee was never informed of these activities. Whether these actions were authorized or not, it appears that they were not in compliance with the law.

“In the coming days, I will carefully review all aspects of the report and will consult with Vice Chairman Bond to determine whether any additional action by the Senate Intelligence Committee is warranted.”

Of course, even if Feith and the OSP managed to avoid criminal conduct, the disgrace is shameful enough.

“The bottom line is that intelligence relating to the Iraq-al-Qaeda relationship was manipulated by high-ranking officials in the Department of Defense to support the administration’s decision to invade Iraq,” Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said yesterday. “The inspector general’s report is a devastating condemnation of inappropriate activities in the DOD policy office that helped take this nation to war.”

Problem is, if there is no criminal sanction, then these folks walk away, likely highly rewarded by the corporate interests they were truly representing.

  • I guess this is better late than never. But if we had a functoning MSM, more people would have heard of this as it was happening (as reported in the blogs).
    Back then, Sy Hersch had some great reporting (new term at that time: stovepiping), and people like Ray Suarez were sounding the alarms. But like the Peolsi plane lies (my Mom asked me about that last night), the MSM is a mostly Republican’t set of tools.
    Bottom line, 4 years too late, or we could have stayed out of the Iraq mess. No, we had to have Judy Miller selling us a war, not Scott Ritter warning us off.

  • I hope this Likud Party bastard (he’s actually the son of the founder of the ultra-Zionist Likud party) gets thrown in jail where he belongs for the lives he destroyed.

  • So, the government has concluded that pre-war intelligence was manipulated. Too bad Anna Nicole died and Pelosi wants the world largest plane reserved for her private use or this might get 6 straight days attention from the network and cable news.

  • 3,118 American Servicemen Dead
    54,000 Non-Mortal American Casualties
    What? Maybe 100,000 Dead Iraqis? A million Iraqis wounded?

    All based on consciously and purposefully cooked intelligence – that means lies.

    And the Pentagon finds no criminal action? BULLSHIT!

  • This is what happens when politics trumps policy. Bush lies and people die. Mayberry Machiavellis, indeed.

  • Oh well, as long as the perpetrators say there’s been no criminal activity, and as long as they weren’t explicitly “endorsing” a pack of lies, I guess there’s nothing to see here, move along…

    It’s not like they killed anyone or anything, right?

    I love how they can’t quite say anything in plain English:

    …Feith’s assessment in 2002 that Iraq and al-Qaeda had a “mature symbiotic relationship” was not fully supported by available intelligence but was nonetheless used by policymakers.

    At the time of Feith’s reporting, the CIA had concluded only that there was an “evolving” association, “based on sources of varying reliability.”…

    “fully supported”? How about supported at ALL?

    “sources of varying reliability”? I have sources of varying reliability that say that Bush screws a goat every night on the front lawn of the whitehouse.

    …only “some of the information” in those briefings was “supported by available intelligence,”…

    And the rest was supported by…?

    It’s just like when they said that no “stockpiles” of WMDs were found in Iraq.

    LIES. Impeach the bastards.

  • If Feith is so stupid, how did they manage to pull off exactly what they set out to do? Just a thought. Perhaps “stupid” is the wrong term…

  • And WTF is up with the title of that WaPo report? “Official’s Key Report On Iraq Is Faulted”

    Talk about trying to be confusing. Which report? Which Official? Was there only one official involved (Feith)? No. And “faulted”? How about “was a load of crap”. Why put the meaty title as a subtitle?

    Here’s what it should have said:

    Dubious Intelligence Fueled Push for War
    Official’s Key Report On Iraq Is Faulted

    The liberal media at work yet again.

  • The misuse of power by the Bush (and Cheney) administration, if ever fully documented, would demand so much paper pulp that the national forests would have to have be totally “clear-cut” just to produce the paper to print ten copies of such a compendium. It would also take a shuttered Ford Motor assembly plant to be reopened to use the floor space to store nine of the ten copies.

  • “… even if Feith and the OSP managed to avoid criminal conduct, the disgrace is shameful enough.”

    Am I reading that with the appropriate sarcasm? A normal person would indeed be bothered by the shame of such public disgrace, but these guys aren’t normal. Even after indictment, they seem to rise again (Liddy, North) to foist their misguided notions on the country. Not to mention the merely discredited (Kissinger).

    Nice post.

  • I wouldn’t call these guys stupid or evil. They are fanatics driven by an agenda that are not those of the country they serve.

    Shaming them is pointless. It is hard to shame a deluded egomanical sociopath. They don’t care what we little people think one damned bit. Pretty much the only way to stop these people is to get inside their heads and break them mentally (sort like the Manchurian Candidate’s force deck of Queen of Diamonds or a less over the top Hannibal Lecter type character.)

  • Why didn’t Feith, in the Omertà tradition, just say he was a retired importer of olive oil and let it go at that. The Bush Crime Family can’t even do Mafiosi well.

  • It’s not correct that “The Office of Special Plans was one of those unique absurdities that only the Bush gang could come up with.” A similar group was in operation during Bush I (and Reagan?), including folks like, I seem to recall, Richard Perle. They were producing similarly hysterical and wrong assessments of the Soviet Union. Their talking points in recent years about the CIA have been that the CIA was so wrong they couldn’t even see the Soviet Union crumbling – when in fact they had been “wrong cubed”, proclaiming breathlessly at the time that the CIA was wrong because they couldn’t see how vast and dangerous a threat the Soviet Union was.

    This is nothing new among reThugs. There is also nothing new that they keep getting away with it. Maybe not this time. Maybe.

  • Let’s not forget that members of Feith’s cadre have been busted passing secret Iran intel to Israel, and is still pushing for a war with Iran

    A subordinate of Douglas Feith, Larry Franklin, was convicted, and sentenced to 12 years in Federal prison in 2005 for charges in the AIPAC espionage scandal. Larry Franklin was accused, and convicted, of passing classified information to an Israeli diplomat and Steven Rosen, an employee of the Israeli AIPAC lobby. The ongoing FBI counter-espionage probe into improper transmission of classified information to AIPAC from 1999 to shortly before the 2003 Iraq Invasion could involve Feith [65], who refuses to comment on the investigation…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Feith#Subordinate.27s_involvement_in_the_AIPAC_espionage_scandal

  • I know we got Libby, lets hope we can only continue these trials with Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliot Abrams, Dov Zakheim, David Wurmser, Donald Rumsfeld and many others, to expose the real crime of the century. These men intentionally mislead a paranoid White House that Iraq, not al Qaeda, was the main threat to the US. This group pushed our country to war, not to protect the American people from terrorism, but to be an active participant in a dream for a greater Israel. When this war in Iraq is done, over a million Iraqis will have perished, thousands of Americans will be dead with tens of thousands more wounded, lets pray that justice will be served to these traitors.

  • It’s not lying.

    It’s ’serving a higher Truth’.

    The truth-content of an utterance is a function of the extent to which that utterance supports the leading role of the Party as the vanguard of the Revolution.

    The Warsaw Pact is history, the Soviet Union has gone the way of the Hittites, state socialism is going the way of phrenology and Ptolemaic astronomy, but the Bolsheviks have won.

    Somewhere Lenin is laughing his spectral ass off.

  • Shorter Feith: I just made up the lies, I never said I belived in them myself.

    My question to Peter Pace is, now that your own agency is saying the reasons for your being Iraq were complete BS, will you finally start saying we need to get out of Iraq, the mission was a lie from the start?

  • Must read Kaplan:

    “If only Doug Feith had bigger tits”
    – By Marty Kaplan

    “If Doug Feith looked like a Courtney Love’s bad dream of Marilyn Monroe, would the cable “news” networks clear their schedules when evidence of his manipulation of pre-war intelligence hit the wires? If “the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth,” as Gen. Tommy Franks called Feith, were a now-dead Playmate, would Wolf go wall-to-wall with the story of the neocon Fifth Column within the Pentagon?

    What would it take for “Today” to pay as much attention to the silent coup that lied us into Iraq — Wolfowitz in a platinum wig? Perle in a paternity suit? Cheney in methadone rehab a diaper? MSM: RIP.”

  • It is just factually wrong to suggest that nothing illegal occured at the OSP. It is a LIE to suggest that nothing illegal happened at the OSP, and Senator Levin is helping to propagate that lie.

    As has been pointed out, Larry Franklin is doing 12 years in federal Prison for espionage that was perpetrated while he worked at the OSP, and Feith resigned shortly after franklin was formally sentenced.

    This Espionage was of exactly the type that Senator Levin is supposed to be looking for, yet Senator Levin fails to mention this when commenting on the IGs report or in speaking about it to the American people. Perhaps this is becuase Senator Levin recieves more money from AIPAC than just about any other US Senator, and the people that Larry Franklin was giving classifed Intel about Iran to were top ranking AIPAC officials, who themselves will soon go on trial for espionage for recieving this intel and passing it on to Israel.

    Senator levin is happy not to contest the IGs report or counter it by suggesting that Feith et al were caught trying to start a war with Iran based by leaking classifed intel to Isreal after they had likely done the same thing with Iraq. In fact, it was the OSP’s activities during the run up to the war that tipped the FBI and CIA off in the first place and sparked the invetigation.

    Senator Levin should recuse himself and an Independant Investigator with no ties to AIPAC should be brought in who has the authority to oversee both the Pentagon and the Congressional investigation.

    The fact that Senator Levin allows this GLARING ommision to stand in his appraisal of the IGs report already indicates that his relationship with AIPAC has affected his judgement. He is COVERING for feith et al and AIPAC, not investigating them.

    Where the hell is the news media on this? Every fact recounted here has been reported on by WAPO and NYT and myriad other sources, yet not one news organization is making the obvious connections between Levin, Franklin, AIPAC , and the OSP investigation.
    .

  • Comments are closed.