Phil Gramm parts company with McCain — or does he?

After former Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas) explained his belief that he lives in a “nation of whiners,” because Americans are unsatisfied with the state of the economy, the McCain campaign scrambled to argue that Gramm’s opinion does not reflect that of the Republican presidential nominee. Soon after, we were told that Gramm would no longer speak on behalf of the campaign.

Bob Novak, however, reported in his latest column that McCain and Gramm have “patched up their relationship,” and that the former senator “will continue as an adviser and surrogate” for the McCain campaign. The Obama campaign used the Novak item to continue to needle McCain.

In response, late yesterday afternoon, aides announced that Gramm had resigned as the co-chairman of McCain’s presidential campaign.

“It is clear to me that Democrats want to attack me rather than debate Senator McCain on important economic issues facing the country,” Mr. Gramm said in a statement issued by the campaign. “That kind of distraction hurts not only Senator McCain’s ability to present concrete programs to deal with the country’s problems, it hurts the country.” […]

Since the start of his campaign, but particularly since the onset of the most recent economic turmoil, Mr. McCain has been struggling to convince voters of his ability to manage the economy, an area he has acknowledged in the past as a weakness. Mr. Gramm, in addition to being a close friend, helped design his economic program and, until last week’s gaffe, was being mentioned as a possible treasury secretary in a McCain administration.

Democrats quickly criticized Mr. Gramm’s blaming them Friday for his resignation. “The question for John McCain isn’t whether Phil Gramm will continue as chairman of his campaign, but whether he will continue to keep the economic plan that Gramm authored and that represents a continuation of the polices that have failed American families for the last eight years,” said Hari Sevugan, a spokesman for the campaign of Senator Barack Obama.

That’s right, but there’s also another question: Gramm may not be a campaign co-chairman anymore, but is he still advising McCain on economic matters?

Gramm’s resignation prompted plenty of headlines, which is presumably what the McCain campaign wanted — people are supposed to know that Gramm said something crazy, and now he’s no longer on the team as a result.

But the co-chairman designation was little more than an honorary title. The real problems were more substantive, most notably the fact that McCain was shaping his economic worldview on Gramm’s guidance, and that the campaign’s economic policies were the result of Gramm’s advice.

Is Gramm gone, or is he only kinda sorta gone?

Yesterday, the McCain campaign disputed part of Novak’s report, saying that Gramm would no longer be a surrogate. But the report also said Gramm would advice McCain on economic matters, and on this, the campaign said nothing.

Gramm’s decision comes after word that, in his weekend column, Robert Novak was to report that the Gramm and McCain had talked subsequent to the ill-time remarks and that he’d stay on as a surrogate and adviser.

But McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said earlier today that Gramm would no longer represent the campaign.

Gramm’s move tonight appears to be a move to clarify his status. But when asked whether this meant he’d no longer advise or represent McCain, Bounds only said that it was Gramm’s decision to step down from his co-chair post.

So, it’s just another round of double-talk from McCain. First the campaign agrees with Gramm, then it doesn’t. Gramm is a surrogate, then he isn’t, then he is, then he isn’t. Gramm is an advisor, then he isn’t, then he might be.

I can understand the campaign’s embarrassment, but this is ridiculous. Gramm not only thinks we’re a “nation of whiners,” he’s also, more importantly, the man whose financial deregulation efforts made the market meltdown possible.

That he’ll still be offering McCain advice on matters of economic policy tells us quite a bit about McCain’s reliability.

the McCain campaign scrambled to argue that Gramm’s opinion does not reflect that of the Republican presidential nominee

Even though his comments to the Washington Times were made because he was there specifically speaking on behalf of the Republican presidential nominee.

This wasn’t some throwaway comment made at a dinner somewhere. Gramm was there to speak on behalf of the McCain campaign, on the record. To argue that his comments shouldn’t be attributed to the McCain campaign is idiotic.

Sadly, the rest of the media is comprised of idiots.

  • Gramm and McCain are a nation of whiners two peas in a pod. Unless you rip the thing open and separate the contents, they’ll continue to be together—no matter what they say to the cameras.

  • McCain does not understand even basic economy so without Gramm he doesn’t know what to say. Of course he will continue to rely on his advice otherwise he would be speechless. Only now he can claim “he doesn’t speak for me” while he speaks for Gramm.

  • I thought that it was jut a matter of redundancy. How many doddering, out-of-touch hypocrites does a campaign need to speak for it in public?

    Gramm is much to modest to take credit fot it now but, his Commodity Futures Modernization Act (Signed into law by Bill Clinton is 2000) not only enabled the Enron mess (Gramm’s wife served on Enron’s Board of Directors) it also paved the way for the sub-prime meltdown.

  • It’s pretty well understood by everybody with half a brain that McCain’s economic policy boils down to “Steal it from the middle class and give it to the ultra-rich”. It doesn’t matter a whole lot if McCain has Gramm there to put lipstick on that pig or not.

    He really had to get Gramm out of sight because it is very easy to link Gramm to the current economic debacle on Wall St and in America. It was dismissed as “personal attacks”, but hey, Gramm (and a whole bunch of Repubs especially Greenspan, Delay, Gingrich and Bush) ARE PERSONALLY responsible for our economic meltdown. One could only wish they had enough balls to be proud of their accomplishments and admit it.

    I’m sure they’ll blame “SOMEONE ELSE”.

  • McCain has flip-flopped on so many things that there is no core of belief in him or his campaign. All their policy positions are just guesses or refried Republican canards.

  • Phil Gramm parts company with McCain — or does he?

    John McCain does not understand VooDoo economics. He’s gotta lean on the loser, Phil Gramm.

    Unless McCain repudiates Gramm and disassociates himself with Gramm and his theories, McCain and Gramm remain one and the same.

  • Obama’s campaign says: “Gramm’s remarks and his policy work are a pretty accurate REFLECTION of McCain’s worldview.”

    If this is true, why can’t it be said that “Reverend Wright’s remarks and work are a pretty accurate REFLECTION of Obama’s worldview??”

    It can be said, but some things seem to be more acceptable than others. Obama would rather lie or flip-flop than admit his faults and sordid past.

    “GOD DAMN AMERICA” VS. “WHINING’?”

    Hear me whine!

    I’m voting for John McCain in November.

  • Comments are closed.