Photographers balk at White House’s heavy-handed control

In every president’s White House, there will be reporters who want more access and officials who want less. With Bush, this is a problem that’s become intensified.

It doesn’t come up as often, but photo journalists are struggling with being shutout as well. For example, under eight years of Clinton, the White House distributed 100 handout pics of staged photos of presidential events. After five years of Bush, more than 500 have been distributed.

“They average about two per week,” said Susan Walsh, an AP photojournalist and president of the White House News Photographers Association, after directing that review. “The White House staff photographer’s role is to document the president. They have now crossed the line and become public relations photographers for the administration.”

She added: “I don’t know the rationale behind it, but there are [handout] events that could clearly include press coverage. The problem with the [photo] releases is that they are often of events that could accommodate press coverage and that previous administrations had allowed press to cover.”

It’s just another part of the “bubble.” The Bush gang could allow photo journalists to take pictures of presidential events, but they find it easier to carefully manage which images are shared with the public and which aren’t. In a very real sense, it’s a restriction on the press. As one publisher, who has photographed each president since LBJ, said, “It curtails our access to events we should be covering with an independent eye and it fools the American public into thinking they are news pictures when they are really public relations pictures.”

We’re not talking about letting cameras into the situation room; the policy applies when the event has nothing to do with national security. When Bush visited the Smithsonian recently, photo journalists were not allowed to take pictures and news outlets were told they’d have to accept official White House pictures if they wanted any picture at all. When Bush re-signed the Americans With Disabilities Act, the same thing happened. When Bush hosted recipients of the Kennedy Center Honors last month, it happened again.

Susan Walsh, an AP photojournalist and president of the White House News Photographers Association said, “Would anyone on the word side take a press release and regurgitate it verbatim and publish it in the newspaper as legitimate news,” she asked. “Of course not.”

It’s just another element of public perceptions that the Bush gang feels the need to control. It’s kind of sad, really.

” ‘ Would anyone on the word side take a press release and regurgitate it verbatim and publish it in the newspaper as legitimate news,’ she asked.”

Well, in a word, yes.

  • and the propaganda machine rolls on….I wonder if there is actually a cabinet level official, “secretary of Propaganda” – oh wait, maybe that’s one of Rove’s hats. But seriously, who is really running the propaganda show their? Is it Rove? or? Goebbels would have been proud.

  • Right. This is the sort of thing one does when lacking confidence that one’s agenda will be well received on its own merits. Thus, the need to control every aspect of interaction with the public (even to the point of having a “public” made to order) and give the appearance of a smooth-running operation and “leadership.”

    While all presidents have to stage things, the staging of every aspect of this presidency therefore betrays a position of gross weakness and, if (IF!) the American people/press could reflect on things at all, this would be a sign that they should be highly skeptical of anything the administration does.

  • somewhat tangential, but the manipulation aspects are a tie-in:

    Jonathan Alter has the line of the day in a Newsweek online piece:

    “Bush has politicized 9/11. His political motto has been ‘The only thing we have to use is fear itself.'”

  • Next thing you know, they’ll dress Bush up in a flight suit and have him pretend to fly a jet fighter. Maybe even strut about the deck of an aircraft carrier. Na, that’d be going too far.

  • I assume the staged photos in question include all those pix we’ve seen over the years of Bush speaking with the Presidential seal (or a chandelier, or whatever) perfectly positioned behind him to make it look like he has a halo.

  • A photographer could walk around ShrubCo’s white house blindfolded with a point and shoot and take damning and incriminating photos without even trying. Everything going on in there is wrong.

  • There is a way to put a stop to this foolishness and teach Bush a dear lesson.
    Instead of running the staged photogrpah newspapers and magazines
    could run a large blank square or rectangle and have in boldface type
    PHOTOGRAPH CENSORED BY WHITE HOUSE. NO PUBLIC
    PHOTO OF THIS EVENT AVAILABLE.
    In South Africa during the Apartheid era newspapers ran blank columns
    instead of the news stories that were prohibited by the government.
    Perhaps our captive news media needs to start taking a stand
    and showing that this isn’t the Third Reich and that the American
    people have a right to see what their elected leaders are up to.

  • Comments are closed.