Plenty of prosecutor purge palaver

There have been a variety of interesting updates on the purge scandal over the last half-day, so how about another round-up?

* The document dump that was rumored for late yesterday afternoon has been put off until Monday. That’s for the best — late-Friday is the worst time for such things.

* Also delayed was an expected announcement from the White House counsel’s office on whether the president’s lawyers would allow Karl Rove and other top aides to testify under oath.

“Given the importance of the issues under consideration, and the presidential principles involved, we need more time to resolve them,” Dana Perino, the deputy White House press secretary, said Friday.

* Alberto Gonzales, struggling to keep his job, held a conference call with all of the U.S. Attorneys nationwide yesterday, during which he apologized for the way in which events have unfolded.

Gonzales apologized to the prosecutors not for the firings but for their execution, including for inaccurate public statements about poor job performance, according to people familiar with the afternoon conference call.

“It shouldn’t have happened,” Gonzales said, according to one lawyer familiar with the conversation. The lawyer, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of the matter, said Gonzales acknowledged that he’d seemed too detached during his news conference earlier this week. He told the prosecutors that he “should have known” about the dismissal planning by his former chief of staff.

“I want you to feel like you can be open with me,” Gonzales told the attorneys, and he gave his assurance that their independence was expected and that they wouldn’t be punished.

Unlike those other guys who were fired for not being “loyal Bushies.”

* A fourth Republican lawmaker has called for Gonzales’ ouster: Rep. Paul Gillmor (R-Ohio) said Gonzales “has become a lightning rod and has distracted” from the Justice Department’s mission.

* CBS News reports: Republicans close to the White House tell CBS News chief White House correspondent Jim Axelrod that President Bush is in “his usual posture: pugnacious, that no one is going to tell him who to fire.” But sources also said Gonzales’ firing is just a matter of time. The White House is bracing for a weekend of criticism and more calls for Gonzales to go. One source tells CBS News he’s never seen the administration in such deep denial, and Republicans are growing increasingly restless for the president to take action.

* Remember when we learned earlier this week that Kyle Sampson had resigned as Gonzales’ chief of staff? As it turns out, this wasn’t quite right — NPR discovered that Gonzales “started to set up a new office for Sampson” in the Justice Department, and Sampson only resigned on Tuesday when “the scandal surrounding eight fired U.S. Attorneys continued to grow.” A Justice official told NPR that “there were discussions about whether or not he would be detailed elsewhere as he was transitioning out and ultimately it was decided not to go that direction.” (Yes, the Bush gang can’t even get resignations right.)

* The NYT reported that “some Republicans say the administration will have little choice but to let Mr. Rove talk in some fashion, preferably in private.”

* Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) wrote an op-ed for the LA Times summarizing why this controversy is important.

* And former U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins, who the Justice Department admits was fired to make room for a Karl Rove protege, told Paul Kiel yesterday that he believes the DoJ
fabricated reasons to fire the other purged prosecutors. Cummins, a life-long Republican, said this was a “reluctant conclusion,” but one he was forced to reach and tell others about. “When they made the decision to lie about these seven people to Congress, that’s when the trouble started,” he said.

“the Bush gang can’t even get resignations right”

Does Rummy still have his new, post-Resignation office in the Pentagon, still drawing a post-“Retirement” paycheck on our dime?

  • The US attorneys ought to read Mary Howitt’s 1829 poem, “The Spider and the Fly” before accepting any more calls from Alberto R. Gonzales.

    Said the cunning Spider to the Fly, “Dear friend, what can I do
    To prove that warm affection I’ve always felt for you?
    ….

    Unto an evil counsellor close heart, and ear, and eye,
    And take a lesson from this tale of the Spider and the Fly.

  • “One source tells CBS News he’s never seen the administration in such deep denial, ”

    As opposed to “no one thought the levees would fail”, “heck of a job, Brownie”, there is no civil war, etc. ?????

  • Also delayed was an expected announcement from the White House counsel’s office on

    Whoa.

    Unlike those other guys who were fired for not being “loyal Bushies.”

    Ha!

  • MW: “One source tells CBS News he’s never seen the administration in such deep denial…’

    yeah, we all know the words to that tune by now: ‘no one could’ve expected…’

  • Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) wrote an op-ed for the LA Times summarizing why this controversy is important.

    Good. In the face of the Republican commentator obfuscation on the TV news, that’s the most important work most of you regular people out there can be doing right now. If you’re smart, do it. Take the time to write a letter or call a TV or radio show.

    “When they made the decision to lie about these seven people to Congress, that’s when the trouble started,”

    Sounds like he should read Feinstein’s essay.

  • Given that we’d expect the White House to prefer to dump the documents on Friday afternoon, shouldn’t we be worried that they felt they needed the weekend to properly purge the purge info?

    And who will be the first to write a protest song featuring the surge and the purge? Who can we urge?

  • Might this be the time the Repubs jettison Rove?

    From the NYT article – “I believe that, given the political realities, he (Rove) will probably testify,” said David B. Rivkin, who served in the White House counsel’s office under the first President Bush. “But it has to be done in a way that is very carefully worked out, with appropriate procedures, making sure it is not a fishing expedition.”

    Karl isn’t winning them any elections with his “brilliant” strategies and math. His name comes up prominently in most every disgraceful scandal. His damage control isn’t even inept — it’s non-existent. He barely escaped the perjury charges that sunk Libby. And what other dirty tricks campaign of Karl’s is next to blow up? Rove is just a political liability anymore.

    Might Karl be the sacrificial lamb to call off the dogs? The way Rivkin describes Rove, he’s a goldmine for Dems and a landmine for Repubs. If Rove was out of the way, the nexis of so many scandals would be gone and any emerging scandal could be blamed on that Rove guy that got canned, turning them into yesterday’s news. This would sem to be the Repubs best strategy, but these guys are famous for their hubris and ego …

  • NPR reported that when Kyle Sampson resigned as the AG’s chief of staff on Monday, Gonzales decided to re-assign Sampson to the DOJ Environment Division. By Tuesday, the decision was made to get rid of Sampson altogether.

    Bit of trivia: When things got hot at the Dept. of Interior, Norton’s chief of staff, Sue Ellen Wooldridge, was transferred to the DOJ Environment Division. Wooldridge recently made the news because her boyfriend is should-be-indicted-soon, J. Steven Griles, former DOI deputy secretary.

  • Re Blueskize, @9:

    It’s no wonder we’re having climate problems. If every piece of sh.. this malAdministration has gets dumped into Environment, can you imagine the methane clouds steaming into the ether?

  • You have to wonder about Bud Cummins. The guy is coming on like a hero by defending the seven prosecutors who got fired but Cummins has nothing to say about the DOJ lying about why he got the boot.

    The 2/2/4/05 US Attorneys – Summary Appointments chart that Kyle Sampson sent to Harriet Miers shows Bud Cummins was rated as “an ineffectual manager and prosecutor and someone who chafed against Administrative initiatives” along with Carol Lam and Margaret Chiara. All three have a strike through their names.

    According to Bud Cummins, “They told me directly that my case was completely different from the others, that there were significant performance issues involved in the other decisions, and if I saw, I’d agree that they’d have to go.”

    The USA Appointments chart was released early in the week when AG Gonzales apparently thought the whole thing would blow over.

    Did someone at the DOJ put a line through the names of Cummins, Lam and Chiara on the chart to make it look like these USAs were rated poor;y long before the Cunningham case broke?

  • Unlike those other guys who were fired for not being “loyal Bushies.”

    Not to mention that he isn’t sorry it happened, but that he’s only sorry he got caught.

  • * The NYT reported that “some Republicans say the administration will have little choice but to let Mr. Rove talk in some fashion, preferably in private.”

    Fortunately for us Congress has the power to make him talk under oath, on the record, and publically to the whole nation. Let’s hope they use that power.

  • Comments are closed.