‘Practical ideas’ vs. ‘psychological benefits’

Delivering a speech on energy policy in California this morning, John McCain emphasized the importance of pragmatism.

“Energy efficiency is no longer just a moral luxury or a personal virtue. A smarter use of energy is part of a critical national effort to regain control of our own energy future. And in this effort, practical ideas are worth a lot more than uplifting lectures.”

McCain didn’t mention Barack Obama, but the reference to “uplifting lectures” was probably a shot in the Democrat’s direction. Fine.

McCain also, by the way, spoke about energy policy during a town-hall event in California yesterday, and struck a different note.

Yesterday, McCain admitted that his offshore drilling proposal would probably have mostly “psychological” benefits, NBC/NJ’s Adam Aigner-Treworgy reports. At a town hall in Fresno that primarily focused on energy issues, McCain was asked a question about the price of gas and the viability of various short-term solutions. […]

“In the short term I’d like to give you a little relief for the summer on the gas tax,” McCain began, referring to his controversial proposal to temporarily suspend the federal tax on gasoline. But then he made a surprisingly candid admission: “I don’t see an immediate relief, but I do see that exploitation of existing reserves that may exist — and in view of many experts that do exist off our coasts — is also a way that we need to provide relief. Even though it may take some years, the fact that we are exploiting those reserves would have psychological impact that I think is beneficial.”

Got that? McCain believes we have to focus on “practical ideas,” which in this case aren’t actually practical, and won’t have a pragmatic effect. At the same time, we have to worry less about practicality, and consider what might have a “psychological impact” on the country, whether the policy makes sense or not.

What?

I’m starting to get the sense that McCain didn’t exactly think his energy policy through before he started talking about it. Indeed, this isn’t the first time he’s had back-to-back contradictions on the subject.

Here’s McCain on April 15:

“I propose that the federal government suspend all taxes on gasoline now paid by the American people — from Memorial Day to Labor Day of this year. The effect will be an immediate economic stimulus…. [B]ecause the cost of gas affects the price of food, packaging, and just about everything else, these immediate steps will help to spread relief across the American economy.”

And here’s McCain 48 hours later:

“I think psychologically, a lot of our problems today are psychological — confidence, trust, uncertainty about our economic future, ability to keep our own home. [A gas-tax holiday] might give ’em a little psychological boost. Let’s have some straight talk: it’s not a huge amount of money…. A little psychological boost. That’s what I think [a gas-tax holiday] would help.”

So, a seasonal tax cut that will serve as “an immediate economic stimulus,” and at the same time, the same policy won’t produce any real savings, but it might alleviate “psychological” problems.

The incoherence here is breathtaking. McCain believes drilling is part of a short-term solution. He also believes drilling offers no real short-term solutions. McCain believes a gas-tax holiday will produce big savings for consumers. And no savings for consumers. McCain believes we need pragmatic policies that work. He also believes we need psychic policies that make people happy whether they work or not.

I have no idea what John McCain is talking about. The real question, though, is whether John McCain knows what John McCain is talking about.

Update: Brad Johnson posted some great video from McCain on this.

Don’t let Richard Cohen or David Broder miss the Straight-Talk!

  • “I think psychologically, a lot of our problems today are psychological.”

    Well, that’s tough to disprove.

    This sounds like projection on the candidate’s part.

  • I want to hear more about his $300 million prize for the car battery. Will that be awarded as part of a new competiion show on Bravo?

  • As the great Yogi Berra once said: “I didn’t really say everything I said”

    My apologies to Yogi who had a much firmer grasp of reality than this bozo…

  • Here comes McCain’s straight talk express
    All these issues, ah what a mess!
    C’mon my friends, give me a little slack

    I know I say one thing, and do another
    or do I do another, hell I can’t remember
    But I’ll remind you I was a POW in Vietnam!

    I wrecked a few planes, and Charlie jumbled my brains
    Some even called me the male Hanoi Jane
    but by God I was a POW in Vietnam!

    So if I seem a little bit off,
    don’t worry about it, just give it a scoff
    After all since when does what I say really matter?

    I get a free ride from the press
    Why? I don’t know I must confess
    Pass me that bottle George,
    let’s dispense some stress

  • When McCain has to tell us that he has just given us some straight talk, he is taking the lazy road. It exempts him from providing a persuasive, well reasoned argument to support whatever he says. But if he does that, then he might not contradict himself so much. He’d be much better off if he would just preface his remarks with something like, “hey, you morons, I’d like to shoot some shit with you, just for shits and grins. And if it does not make much sense, my handlers will clarify and straighten up the straight talk. You know. My mind can get kind of tied up, I mean tired, I mean tried. There. Some more straight talk.”

  • I’ve often wondered what it would take turn Benen into a raving lunatic like some of us readers, and I think 4 years of McCain just might do it.

  • The ability to keep your home is a psychological problem. Okay, then, I’m glad that’s cleared up, thanks John.

  • What about the negative environmental impact of drilling for coastal oil? The results of THAT would be more than psychological I am sure.

  • Reba – losing your clean sand, your view, & a lot of your tourist activity due to off-shore drilling is just a psychological problem, just like paying more for food & feeling bad for the people killed, maimed & displaced by the Iraqi occupation.

    Don’t worry, be happy! Take comfort that your betters in this world will become even more rich from your sacrafices!

  • He seems to be having a lot of senior moments these days, I am as old as he is, and I can say without doubt he is too old for the job!! JS

  • About $20 of the price of oil is from speculators bidding up the price (I’m being inexact here). To a liberal and a democrat the solution would be to outlaw exploitive speculation by:
    1 – Requiring the speculators to use their own money and not borrowed money,
    2 – Taxing the profits for speculation in Oil markets at higher than 15% and not allowing loses to be counted as reductions in your income, or
    3 – Not allow any entity that doesn’t have a stake in the processing of Oil to buy the stuff on the commodities market.

    For a conservative and a Republican’t, the ‘solution’ is to change the ‘psychology’ of the market by making the speculators think that Oil will become an unprofitable speculation. Which it would, five years from now.

    McCan’t wants to quell speculation and it’s price bump in Oil and Gasoline without actually stopping speculation ‘scaring’ the speculators rather than punishing them.

    That’s his problem with unfettered markets. Sometimes that make Republican’ts look bad. But Republican’ts can’t deal with them.

  • That’s right grand-pa. Now let’s sit down over here in the shade. Want some ice cream?

    The least embarrassing candidate the GOP had to offer put in front of a huge republican disaster and told to win one for the gipper. At least I’m getting what I expected.

  • The April 15 justification for a gas tax holiday sounds like he is trying to justify vote-pandering with a woozy claim that the tax holiday would boost consumer confidence and promote spending. It ignores the actual economic effects, including the negligible benefit any taxpayer would derive. I don’t think he’s having a senior moment, nor do I think he fails to grasp what his economic advisors are telling him; I think he’s made a political decision to pander on this issue. The response is to keep truth-squadding him.

  • I imagine McCain is privately really peeved that people are questioning his statements, and considers it extremely unfair.

    If I might be allowed to channel him for a moment, I imagine he’s thinking something like, “Reagan got to say whatever he felt like and no one called him on ANYTHING – ketchup is a vegetable, trees are worse polluters than cars, ‘I don’t remember, wink, wink’, ‘the responsibility for the dead marines in Lebanon is mine (but don’t hold me to it)’, welfare queens driving Cadillacs, falsely remembering being in the war, substituting movie scenes for actual events. Whatever nonsense he spouted, it was ‘that’s just Ronnie.’ Then ole George HERBERT Walker Bush gets to crash HIS plane into the ocean, and is given a pass on flip-flopping on economics, and on ‘I was out of the loop’. Sheesh. Then his effing AWOL wouldn’t-recognize-a-real-jet-if-it-fell-on-him son, it was like Reagan cubed with sunshine beaming out of his ass. His guys get to make their own reality, reject inconvenient scientific facts, tell lies about ME, offer completely contradictory justifications for tax reliefs, accuse democrats of their own failings, sign bills while issuing contradictory signing statements, make shit up about WMDs and terrorists, deny presidential briefing notes and millions of e-mails. There were no limits, and nobody cared. Where was I? – oh yeah. You could just say a few meaningless words and everybody would just roll over and play dead. Now some people have the temerity to criticize me as if words are supposed to mean something and as if arguments are supposed to be consistent, coherent, and evidence-based. Just where the hell have these people been for the last 28 years???? Can’t they just hold the eff off for another six months????? And where did I put Vickie Iseman’s phone number anyway?”

  • Is John McCain a flip-flopper on the issue of whether we need practical energy solutions? Or is he a flip-flopper on the issue of whether psychological solutions are what we need. It’s so hard to keep straight.

    Just more “straight talk” from the new champion of non-Euclidian geometry.

  • I’d say that republicans bank on the psychological aspect of things quite a bit, whether its fear or pride in a home ownership bubble or whatever. The problem is that for waaaaaaay too many right wing politicians, that’s as far as any policy proposal is thought through. They seem genuinely surprised when people stop just blindly believing in something and start to actually require evidence.

  • “Energy efficiency is no longer just a moral luxury or *a personal virtue*. — John Sidney McCain

    Taking little potshots at Cheney, are we? Too late; dear Lizzie has already tied McCain’s umbilical cord to Dick (dick?), with yesterday’s “on all important issues…”

  • Comments are closed.