Putting the Petraeus presidential palaver to rest

Widespread disappointment within the Republican ranks over their field of presidential candidates took a bizarre turn a couple of months ago when several leading conservative voices said the party should give up on the 12 or so politicians who want the nomination — and go after a general who doesn’t.

Everyone from the New York Sun to the Weekly Standard to the National Review all started touting Gen. David Petraeus for the GOP ticket. (There were even some rumors that the general was amenable to the idea.)

So, is there any reason to take any of this seriously? Fortunately, no. From yesterday’s Fox News Sunday:

WALLACE: Some pundits have suggested that perhaps just like General Dwight Eisenhower in the early ’50s, that you might at some point take off your uniform and run for president. Any interest in that, sir?

PETRAEUS: None, Chris, at all. Thank you. I have great respect for those who do choose to serve our country that way. I’ve chosen to serve our country in uniform.
And I think that General Sherman had it right when he gave what is now commonly referred to as a Shermanesque response when asked a similar question.

In case that wasn’t quite clear enough, Wallace pushed a little further: “So are you giving a Shermanesque response — if elected, you will not serve?” Petraeus dashed Republican hopes without hesitation: “I am, Chris. And I don’t think it would ever get to that point anyway.”

Until one of the Republican candidates can crack the 50% favorability plateau, expect there to be ongoing grumbling about a white-knight candidate who can swoop in and save the party from electoral ruin. I’m not quite sure who that might be — Jeb? Cheney? Newt? — but the fact that the talk continues at all helps highlight the ongoing Republican predicament.

Uh-huh.

Until one of the Republican candidates can crack the 50% favorability plateau, expect there to be ongoing grumbling about a white-knight candidate who can swoop in and save the party from electoral ruin. I’m not quite sure who that might be — Jeb? Cheney? Newt? — but the fact that the talk continues at all helps highlight the ongoing Republican predicament.

Until a bunch of the candidates start droping off, there probably won’t be more than 50% support for a Republican candidate for a short time longer.

Which of course, doesn’t really matter to Democrats who have their own set of, to be charitable, issues with their own, to be charitable again, candidates.

  • Amazing that we are just supposed to pretend that Petraeus is some great hero rather than a general who turned rank into political capital and who was barely successful at his job. Where did all the missing weapons go? What happened to don’t bomb the neighborhoods? How’s the sectarian cleansing working out there for ya’ general? Are you going to ask for the guns back from the Sunnis now that violence is down? Get enough fences built to segregate the neighborhoods you didn’t bomb? All just to get Bush to look better. The GOP may love him but I think he should have just done his job without trying to make political statements. Still no political reconciliations in spite of Petraeus’ efforts. The GOP tried to turn him into a president when he is still a general. I just feel sorry for him.

  • You know how when one or two of the guys on the bottom of a human pyramid start getting tired and shifting position, and all of a sudden they all come falling down and you see it was really more a human house of cards than a pyramid??

    That’s today’s Republican Party – doesn’t it just fill your soul with Holiday Cheer to watch them circling the bowl after falling in??

  • Comments are closed.