Questionable security practices at Obama event in Dallas

At 10 am Wednesday morning, the doors opened at Reunion Arena in Dallas for a large Barack Obama campaign rally. The security procedures sounded pretty routine — officers scanned attendees at the entrances, checking their belongings before they could enter. But by 11 am, a new order was issued: just let everyone in.

Security details at Barack Obama’s rally Wednesday stopped screening people for weapons at the front gates more than an hour before the Democratic presidential candidate took the stage at Reunion Arena.

The order to put down the metal detectors and stop checking purses and laptop bags came as a surprise to several Dallas police officers who said they believed it was a lapse in security.

Dallas Deputy Police Chief T.W. Lawrence, head of the Police Department’s homeland security and special operations divisions, said the order — apparently made by the U.S. Secret Service — was meant to speed up the long lines outside and fill the arena’s vacant seats before Obama came on.

“Sure,” said Lawrence, when asked if he was concerned by the great number of people who had gotten into the building without being checked. But, he added, the turnout of more than 17,000 people seemed to be a “friendly crowd.”

Now, I try not to be paranoid about these things. For that matter, security procedures for presidential candidates aren’t exactly my area of expertise.

That said, I’m can’t say I’m especially encouraged by a phrase such as “seemed to be a ‘friendly crowd'” — especially given that it meant untold thousands attended that rally without so much as a visual look-down.

I held off on writing about this yesterday, because it just seemed too bizarre. Why would the Secret Service intentionally end screening after just an hour?

Regrettably, follow-up reporting doesn’t help matters much.

The U.S. Secret Service on Friday defended its handling of security during a massive rally in downtown Dallas for Barack Obama, saying there was no “lapse” in its “comprehensive and layered security plan,” which called for some people to be checked for weapons, while others were not. […]

“There were no security lapses at that venue,” said Eric Zahren, a spokesman for the Secret Service in Washington. He added there was “no deviation” from the “comprehensive and layered” security plan, implemented in “very close cooperation with our law enforcement partners.”

Zahren rebutted suggestions by several Dallas police officers at the rally who thought the Secret Service ordered a halt to the time-consuming weapons check because long lines were moving slowly, and many seats remained empty as time neared for Obama to appear.

“It was never a part of the plan at this particular venue to have each and every person in the crowd pass through the Magnetometer,” said Zahren, referring to the device used to detect metal in clothing and bags.

He declined to give the reason for checking people for weapons at the front of the lines and letting those farther back go in without inspection.

I guess what I’m most curious about is whether the Dallas event was somehow unusual, or whether screenings end all the time and this one just drew more attention.

Sheesh, did it have to be Dallas?

  • The media need to climb all over this one—and they need to start by asking Zahren if they use this same “comprehensive and layered” procedure for Bu$h—of if they “deviate from the norm” for him….

  • Guess there is a reason that the criminal cabal and the bush family which represents it sent the sickest little monkey in the bush east-coast elite clan down to texas to be groomed to steal the presidency, isn’t there.

  • Just remember, folks, GREAT CRIMES DEMAND EVEN GREATER CRIMINALITY!

    You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

  • Cost too much for the secret service to be trasping all over the country anyway. He claims to have alot of campaign funds let him pay for his own security and quit the bitching.

  • I’m sure we’ll see some hard-hitting, investigative journalism from the Corporate Military-Industrial Government-Media on this one ASAP.

    Maybe Obama should hire private security and get rid of Lord Bush’s S.S.

    Like I said yesterday, isn’t it normal protocol for a candidate (and Senator) of Obama’s “profile,” to conduct metal-detector screening of the entire crowd?

    And maybe the Obama campaign wants to show some audacity and hold Lord Bush’s S.S. accountable for these improprieties.

    I don’t have much hope for that, but it would be a welcome change from cover-up after cover-up in the Bush Administration.

  • This scares the hell out of me. The responses by the Dallas Police and the Secret Service are nonsensical. Move the lines along? Seemed friendly?

    Imagine if something had happened to Obama yesterday.

    I hope the press stays on top of this and gets our questions answered.

  • That phrase “friendly crowd” seems rather familiar. Weren’t those John Connelly’s last words to JFK?

  • Just a second, i have to adjust my tinfoil hat so that it fits just right for this…ok:

    In the early summer of 2008, presidential candidate Sen B. Obama is riding a tidal wave of popular support after securing the Democratic presidential nomination. Tens of thousands of Americans are filling arenas across the country to hear the nominee speak. Media around the world suggests that America may be undergoing a sea change of sentiment and political activism. At a rally in [choose a city] the crowd is enormous and security checks bottleneck the entrances. A decision is made to begin letting people through the door without searches, because the crowd is friendly and positively excited.

    Midway through the Senator’s speech, a man is seen moving forward in the crowd. Several shots ring out; the Senator slumps on the stage as Secret Service personnel rush to his side. Pandemonium erupts in the arena. Riot police and SWAT teams are called to the scene, but fail to control the crowd.

    Later that day, as unrest spreads like wildfire from city to city, the President issues a statement invoking continuity of government measures…otherwise known as martial law. Elections, scheduled for November, are postponed indefinitely. Initial police statements suggest the attack was the work of a lone gun man: deranged and possibly mentally unstable. Television stations discontinue regular programming and replay the NY Giants’ Super Bowl victory over the NE Patriots. Senator Obama dies in the hospital later that night, despite heroic attempts to save his life. The gun man, does not survive to exit the arena. No investigation is forthcoming.

    Remove tinfoil hat…and now back to your regularly scheduled loop of Swan Lake.

  • Everybody who doesn’t believe the Prateorian Guard isn’t bullshitting this one, stand on your head.

    Thought so.

    I don’t even have to be African American for my Threat Warning System to be shrieking over the thought of the Praetorian Guard letting this happen to the first serious African-American candidate for President, in frakin’ Dallas. I have an old friend who lives there and he says the place isn’t all that different from 1963.

  • This is one of the most disturbing things I’ve read in a long time. I hope Obama’s campaign has its own security detail that can monitor the actions of the Secret Service and not allow Obama to go on an open stafe unless the venue has been properly screened.

  • Allen K. said:

    Sheesh, did it have to be Dallas?

    That was my thought too, but I guess L.A. would be even worse.

    Or Memphis.

  • This pisses me off like crazy. I would like to chalk this up to phenomenal incompetence. However, given the politicization of other branches of the Administration, its not difficult to imagine darker designs. I hope that Obama’s people are on this. It’s unacceptable.

  • It’s amazing to me how outraged folks are.
    I remember a time when nobody was inspected while going through the gate for any event or service. But now it’s ubiquitous and folks expect it. The inconvenience is frustrating… and I for one do not feel safer for it. At ~15 seconds each, 4 people a minute, it would take ~41 cumulative hours for 10,000 people to get through. To spend less time inspecting each would make a mockery of the process.

    When was the last time somebody got a weapon into a public event and hurt somebody?
    However, Obama is such a tempting target for insane racists… I think we should take special care of him.

  • The other day, I was taken aback to read this bit in a FL Sun-Sentinel op-ed column by Cal Thomas (who I had never heard of before):

    ““Now we’re told (by members of the Kennedys, no less) that Sen. Barack Obama is the reincarnation of the hope that was lost when Jack was murdered in 1963 and Bobby was killed in 1968. And we watch another generation of the young become disciples of another young and handsome politician with a pretty wife and cute children. Will history repeat? God forbid…”

    Yikes.

  • If something did happen, the ensuing turmoil would give Bush the perfect excuse for national martial law. Some heads should roll for this. I said at least a year ago Obama should have his own security too. Circumstances conducive to tragedy dont have to be ordered from the oval office. The obvious beneficiaries don’t have to be the instigators.

  • Well, let’s hope this is the last time that happens because if it’s not, some nut(s) just figured out how to get a gun into a campaign event.

  • many african americans now believe obama has a chance at becoming america’s first (half) black president… only to be assassinated thereafter. i don’t subscribe to conspricy theories, but given obama’s threats to take on the plutocracy i confess to similar concerns.

  • Would many of those AfricanAmericans be actually half AfricanAmericans. Who decides?

  • I’m actually kind of curious about the reaction here more than the story itself. My first assumption reading the post was that the Obama people had originated the action themselves. I’ve read several reports about him going out among the unscreened overflow crowds unable to get into one of his events. So on the one hand I was kind of surprised at the uniformly conspiratorial take on this in the discussion thread.

    On the other hand, I wasn’t really surprised at all.

    It’s been a concern all along hasn’t it, or at least since Iowa when Obama actually emerging as the nominee began to seem like a real possibility. None of us had these kinds of anxieties about Kerry, Gore or even Clinton, did we? At least not in any sustained or broadly voiced way. But the reaction here is evidence of a general perception that is very worrisome in itself: that he has all the earmarks of a U.S. Grade-A political assassination target.

    -Charismatic leader at the head of a movement-like popular upsurge on the left. Check.
    -A “left” candidate in danger of upsetting the one foreordained and approved by the Conventional Wisdom Machine and large components of the Establishment (think RFK). Check.
    -Overall mood of crisis, surveillance, secrecy and external threat in the country at large. Check.
    -Ultraparanoiac suspicions fostered by the right that he is actually the front for a Vast Conspiracy of America’s Darkest, Direst Terra-ist Enemies. “Obama/Osama.” “Hussein.” “Madrassa.” Triple check.
    -A black guy. Quadruple check.

    He’s done a bit to blur a lot of these lines–he has the endorsement of a lot of establishment types; he’s said things that cut against “leftist” credentials. But in spite of that the silhouette is almost ludicrously unmistakable. If this was a movie, he’d have Dead Puppy written all over him, to the point where you’d be annoyed at the scriptwriters for being so cliched and obvious. It’s worried me for quite a while, and clearly a lot of others. I was in 2nd grade when JFK was shot and I can remember the moment and a great deal of the aftermath in photographic detail. And I was an adolescent in 1968 and I remember what that was like in sickening detail as well. They say history doesn’t repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes. This is a very sad and ugly poem I’d really really really never hear any version of ever again.

  • Maybe a message is being sent to Obama. ‘If you end up being president, even with a strong congress behind you, we can easily get you. Don’t think we are going to let you start reverseing 28 years of hard work.’

  • The irony of this situation just struck me.

    On Wednesday, perhaps during this security “lapse” (I love the newspeak), if an individual had tried to smuggle a non-approved sign into this Obama rally, say a Ron Paul sign, he or she would have been, invariably, tasered or tackled according to recent police state trends. But you could be damn sure some unapproved, dissident message would have been prohibited from entering that arena.

    Yet, on Wednesday, a weapon could have been carried into that arena by anyone posing as an Obama supporter.

    Let’s consider the security screening at airports, not to mention the level of security at major sporting events. Would this “lapse,” where screening was summarily discontinued for expedience, have occurred at an airport? In the nature of this “lapse,” it is highly unlikely. When was the last time that a gun was smuggled onto an airplane?

    Such are our priorities here in 1984.

  • So that’s why the right has been floating the trial balloon about how Obama would be assassinated. I guess their target audience reaceted well to the idea.

    Not quite as gruesome as letting all those Democratic looking faces drown in New Orleans to turn a Southern State Red, but pretty darn disgusting nonetheless.

  • Let’s not count on anyone else. If you are at an Obama event, you be security. Keep your eyes and ears open. Somebody pulls a gun, don’t wait for the secret service to act. Pile on. We’re the ones we’ve been waiting for. We’ll protect him ourselves. We’ve got your back, O.

  • Here’s another thought.

    What about terrorism? Wouldn’t a huge Obama rally of some 20,000 be a terrorist target? If 15 Saudi Arabians, who were here legally, with boxcutters can hijack four planes and fly them with razor-precision into American landmarks and violate the airspace of the U.S. Military Command Center, then couldn’t they devise a plot to carry a weapon into a target rich environment with no screening, like an Obama rally? And talk about high profile.

    Get your Global War On Terror license plates. We’re winning. But I’m afraid that our Constitutional Republic is circling the drain.

  • I think the real world is imposing itself on the Obama campaign. If you are going to have a large rally, then real security is very hard to do. When it comes down to following the rules or taking the easy path, it looks like the Obama campaign and the associated staffers are taking the low road.

  • Gosh, JKap—wasn’t it just a week or so ago that some guy managed to get through airport security with a firearm, realized his mistake, and when he went back and did the right thing, they arrested him?

    Besides the obvious incompetence here, there’s another issue: the ability to play off “anything that did happen” (had it happened) on Bu$h’s not getting telecom immunity for his pals at Verizon, et al. It would have granted him immeasurable support to call Congress into endless special sessions to approve the bill—as he wants it, and no other, since he “won’t compromise”—and the moment either chamber balks on the issue of adjournment, he can just “adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper” (US Constitution; Article 2, Section 3).

    Now for the jackpot questions:

    1.) Who runs the country, if the Congress is unilaterally adjourned for an extended period of time?

    2.) Can a sitting president’s term expire if there’s no president-elect to take his place—and there’s no Congress to debate the issue?

    3.) Can an “adjourned Congress” petition the Supreme Court for a ruling if they’re not “in session?”

    JKap,s “1984” subtleties don’t seem so far out of reach right now….

  • The SS response makes no sense. Only people at the front of lines are likely to have weapons? A deranged killer wouldn’t just wait until they stopped checking bags and people? What’s the point of using the metal detectors at all then?

  • “Sure,” said Lawrence, when asked if he was concerned by the great number of people who had gotten into the building without being checked. But, he added, the turnout of more than 17,000 people seemed to be a “friendly crowd.”

    I wonder if the same logic will work with the TSA and airports?

  • The Obama security lapse is not a surprising development. Neither is the McCain scandal. Read The Shock Doctrine (Rise of Disaster Capitalism) by Naomi Klein. Then try real hard to act surprised by these developments or, for that matter, to not be perceived as paranoid.

  • Get over it if he wants more security then he can hire his own and do the taxpayers a favor. That goes for all the canidates. Even a better idea quit trying to be a rock star cause your maniacs are with you, have smaller functions thats pretty simple. I wouldn’t waste my time even going to one of his events unless it was at my favorite golf club.

  • On the one hand, I do understand the concern here but once I calmed down after reading the story I had two thoughts:

    1. If the SS really is in Bush’s back pocket, we may as well plan the Day of Mourning now. They wouldn’t even need to stop the searches and hope some sick fuck came along. They could stick the gun under the chair and then blame the local police force for being lax once the assassin somehow escapes in the confusion.

    2. For seven years we’ve had a pResident who’s handlers have made a point of keeping people who disagree with him as far away as possible. You can’t get within a mile of bubble boy unless you’re a sworn member of the BushLeague Balls Sucking crowd. Remember all those stories of people being hassled/arrested for having the wrong bumper stickers, or t-shirts? Doesn’t this send the message that Obama isn’t another Bush?

  • Tom Cleaver, I’d like to extrapolate out what you said. I have been saying the same thing you did above for a bit now. I fear for that man’s life. Let’s go further.

    If there is a revolt (for any reason), that requires people organize (well, for it to be effective). And I wonder how organization might happen if we no longer have land lines, cell phones or internet (vis a vis AT&T, Verizon and the stories from a few weeks back about severing several underseas cables). We already know how the government infiltrates live organizing parties they don’t like (of which I don’t always disagree with. I don’t believe in people organizing to maim, kill, etc. But the point I am making is still valid, no?) so that hampers live organization.

    Tin foil theories about (god forbid) the assassination of someone who rallies the masses (and I am not referring to Bhutto), instillation of martial law, being incommunicado with anyone else to be able to effectively plan and organize an uprising. Out of a novel (or my little warped mind) or brought to you by the neocon goopers?

    /conspiracy theories off

  • ‘Doesn’t this send the message that Obama isn’t another Bush?’

    Anyone who thinks Obama is like Bush should have a brain scan.

  • Someone needs to inject some sanity into this discussion. Enough with the “conspiracy theories.” Debate should probably end now. Whatever happens with it will be fine (if Obama survives or not). Don’t worry. Relax. Buy some shoes made in Indonesia. Pop a xanax.

    Reinforce the limits of acceptable opinion.

    “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum – even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.” -Noam Chomsky

    Don’t let the freedom of the debate bring you down to the level of “conspiracy theorist” or any other of the buffet of pejorative labels used to reinforce acceptable opinion. The presuppositions of the system must never be questioned lest we become non-mainstream.

    And then what are we but “conspiracy theorists”?

    “This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

    Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?

    For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth — to know the worst and to provide for it.” -Patrick Henry

  • While I don’t approve of what happened in Dallas, I can understand the difficulty of moving so many people through airport-style security. I went to an event here in Kansas City last month. Everyone went through a metal detector and had their bags checked. I arrived shortly before the doors opened and it still took 90 minutes before I made it in. Which was only 30 minutes before the event was scheduled to begin. This was in a space that only held 5000 people. I can’t imagine how you could move 20,000 people through that type of security in a timely manner.

  • My guess is that the secret service called off Obama’s metal detector inspections because they like Obama a lot and want to help him out– yeah, right!

    More likely this is some kind of cop racist shit– the Secret Service, or someone commanding them, got pissed off that a bunch of Texans were going to see a bunch of Texas cops searching peope for Obama, a black man who is a senator. So they pulled a ridiculous stunt– believe it, the forces of racism and ignorance in this country are both powerful and ridiculous.

  • Well, I’m not sure what this administration is NOT capable of. Right now, being willing to go the furthest in torturing someone has replaced abortion as the litmus test value. They refused to find the killer of a DA because he was against gun control. Abramoff’s buddy paid a couple of mafia hit men who ended up offing his former business partner whom abramoff replaced. The man who was fanatical about the National Guard records claims the Bush people refused to allow him to get medication that would save his life until he promised not to go forward with the fact they had destroyed records. These people look at the black void on an x-ray where a woman’s brain used to be and ask themselves, “If we accused the husband of murder, how well would it play with the base?” After Vince Foster killed himself after the WSJ manufactured scandals about him, rather than feel remorse, they pushed the idea that he had been murdered by Hillary and had years of investigations to insinuate it. This Sunday, on 60 Minutes, we’ll learn a governor is in jail because Rove framed him for crimes he didn’t commit with the assistance of his polticized attorneys. The President mocks the people he executes, demands that a man gets tortured when he’s shown to be mentally ill because to refrain would suggest you tortured a mentall ill man, they won’t allow anyone at Guantanamo to get acquitted because it would mean they hold innocent people in Guantanamo, they look at Abu Ghraib and think we need extraordinary rendition to former Gulags so our interrogators won’t be so restrained, they’ll hang Hussein on videotape for a slight uptick in the polls and when they found they had tortured an innocent German citizen, they dropped him off, without ID, where they figured he’d have a good chance of getting killed by bandits. They regularly call for the execution of Supreme Court justices, and fantasize about how awesome it would be for people against the war to have their throats on videotape, or the political utility of a terrorist attack.

    That’s the stuff we know. There’s other stuff that simply looks bad. How anyone can think these guys use FISA authority to look for terrorists is beyond me.

    What would the Republican Party NOT do, if they could get away with it? What do they consider beyond the pale?

    If there is anything, I haven’t seen it yet. The only calculation is only if they can get away with it.

    And I know this: this talking point that’s been floated around about Obama getting assassinated has a purpose.

  • MsJanne, @38

    Absolutely right. When martial law went down in Poland (Dec 13, 1981), total communications blackout went with it. The telephones were dead. The computers (not many people had personal ones but many research institutions used them) wouldn’t connect. The only thing you could find on the radio and TV was an announcement that martial law was in place and that you should stay home the first 24 hrs and that, afterwards, curfew would be imposed from 21:00 to 06:00. You didn’t even know who might have been swept in the initial raid, until you met them in an internment camp.

    I wasn’t there then — I came to the States in ’73 — but many of my friends were on the spot (some got swept up, some not). It’s their stories, on top of my own experiences before ’73, that gave me have that “back to USSR” feeling for the past 7 yrs. And that’s why I write to my Senator (Webb; I don’t even bother with Warner) every time he votes wrong on FISA.

    Control of communications is KEY to control of the country. No number of guns you have at home is going to help you, if you can’t communicate with your neighbors.

  • Sweet Jaysus on a Ritz..this sure isnt’ good news. I can not believe they would even make the resulting statement after the story broke in the news.

    If anyone needs protection..its Obama..and anyone with an IQ above a dandelion knows this.

  • Okay, we all see the problem here. But I’m hoping we don’t leave this discussion having only commented in a fashion that at best is fretful or at worst paranoid. Given the seriousness of the issue, doesn’t this call for action?

    Aside from comment 27 where Bedrosian exhorts us to pile on whoever looks suspicious because he has a gun at an event (as I recall, such action saved FDR’s life on a Miami beach), shouldn’t organized effort be taken to have this addressed in another way? Regardless of their inclinations as superdelegates, Democratic US Senators and Representatives should all be concerned about this. To my knowledge, the only two presidential candidates receiving SS protection are Barack and Hillary. If the SS can be irresponsible towards Barack for possibly political reasons, then the same could happen to Hillary. It seems to me that Congressional oversight from all Congressional Democrats is in order. And I believe that Sen. Durbin who requested the protection for Sen. Obama and provided information to the SS to justify should be at the top of everyone’s list for officials to contact. He should be followed by your local Democratic senator(s) and representative(s).

    Don’t moan about this. Do something about it!

  • Thanks Phonatic @ 46! I just wrote to my 3 MsC and 1 DD…

    Dear (Welch, Leahy, Sanders, Durbin),
    Please look into why this (see web link and excerpt below) happened and what can be done to improve the security of presidential candidates at large events. It seems outrageous to me that an unnamed official at the Secret Service would give an order for the Dallas police to stop checking audience members at an Obama speech.-H

    It does feel a hell of a lot better todosomething. We’re the ones we’ve been waiting for.

  • While it’s unfortunate they allowed people in without even a look over, I think (and hope) the main reason was they were understaffed. They (police, S.S.) didn’t anticipate so many people would show up – like a rock concert – and thought it would be similar to Hillary who drew about 600+.

    Any security should now know that there needs to be a lot more staff and crowd control. There will be no excuse next time.

  • This isn’t a one time thing. I happened to go to a rally in Baltimore a week or two ago, and I did not have to go through security because I arrived extremely late. I’m pretty outraged that they’re not being more careful with this. I was hoping it was a one time thing, but now that I hear this, I’m more angry than ever.

  • Would many of those AfricanAmericans be actually half AfricanAmericans. Who decides?

    Anyone who watched the show on the history of prominent African Americans on PBS the other weeks has to wonder about this “half black” business, given the feact that every African-American has European ancestry when their DNA is analyzed.

    The big difference for Obama is that in his case, the inclusion of European ancestry is not the product of a f ew generations of rape.

  • If there IS any attempt against Obama, look to the White House for blame. And they will need martial law, because I guarantee there will be huge numbers of people marching in the streets if such a thing happens. I will be among them.

  • I have been concerned for the personal safety of Senator Obama for some time. The Obama campaign must hire private plain-clothed armed security guards for all his events.

    The private security guards must mingle with the crowds much like air marshals do and it is important that the presence of the Obama marshals be well publicized.

    It must be clearly understood that an attempt at a preemptive coups against the Senator will bring on disastrous results for any perpetrators immediately and a political catastrophe for their sponsors later.

  • I have just finished “The JFK Assassination Chronicles”, hence this lapse of security for Obama makes my blood run cold. You don’t have to wear a tinfoil hat to see that the stakes are high enough here that it may not be “IF” but “WHEN”. His removal would be the end of the Republic for a long time I think. We may trust in God but we need to do a hell of a lot better to protect our own when God fails us.
    DC

  • I went to an Obama rally in San Francisco a couple of months ago – and this exact thing happened. The line of several thousand people was queued up outside over several city blocks. An hour and a half after the event was supposed to have started and most people were still otside, he pulled up in a secure SUV, then got out and stood in the center of these thousands of people crushing to get close to him. Since the lines had fallen apart, they started rushing the doors after he got back in and drove to the entrance, and everyone just filed in. It was kind of exhilarating at the time, but afterward it really disturbed me.

  • Perhaps this is a very silly suggestion but perhaps we should encourage all people who are attending an Obama rally to come equipped with a good stout, (cane), walking stick. With everybody on alert so to speak any person raising a gun to get a shot off could have their initial aim deflected until the people nearby could beat the crap out of the would-be assassin.
    David Chisholm

  • Sweet merciful Jesus.

    I hadn’t realized that the security measures on his campaign were so bad. I went to a rally in Denver, and didn’t have to go through any kind of security. I didn’t think anything of it at the time, because I was so thrilled to be there. Now, I am terrified for Senator Obama. And with good cause, it appears.

    I agree with several of the comments posted here. Those of us who go to his rallies should keep vigilant watch should any would-be assassins be lurking amongst us. Anyone dumb enough to raise a weapon around me wouldn’t get a shot off. (Thank you fifteen years of martial arts “self-defense” training).

    Unfortunately, I also agree that should anything happen to the Senator, our fragile democratic republic is doomed. My husband and I have watched anxiously as the current idiot in charge (I refuse to use that moron’s name) erodes our liberties in the name of security. Congress is about as useless as the Roman Senate in the end days of that republic. I am no conspiracy theorist, however, I am a student of human nature. Those who seek power for power’s sake rarely give it over freely. I have had (for the past few years especially) a certain queasy feeling when I think of the future of my country and I wonder if these despots we’ve so carelessly let take control will really peacefully stand aside when their term is up. Part of me really doubts that we will actually see the end of the current administration… I will keep hope, however, because I have to.

    Anything happens to Senator Obama, however, my hope, and the hopes of millions of others will not last.

  • Comments are closed.