Race once again roils the Democratic presidential campaign

This, alas, isn’t the first time. Two months ago, after Hillary Clinton commented on Martin Luther King and Lyndon Johnson, race became an unfortunate feature of the Democratic presidential campaign. It got worse, and more intense, after some campaign surrogates riles the dispute with some additional contentious remarks.

Before long, Barack Obama and Clinton saw the utility in turning the heat down. Obama held a press conference in Nevada at which he said, “I think that (former President) Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have historically and consistently been on the right side of civil rights issues. I think they care about the African American community and they care about all Americans and they want to see equal rights and equal justice in this country…. I may disagree with Senator Clinton and Senator Edwards on how to get there, but we share the same goals…. They are good people. They are patriots.”

Shortly thereafter, Clinton followed suit. “We differ on a lot of things. And it is critical to have the right kind of discussion on where we stand. But when it comes to civil rights and our commitment to diversity, when it comes to our heroes — President John F. Kennedy and Dr. King — Senator Obama and I are on the same side,” she said in a statement.

Following the terribly foolish remarks of Geraldine Ferraro, maybe the candidates can do it again?

Mr. Obama, speaking to reporters on Wednesday, said he did not believe that there was “a directive in the Clinton campaign saying, ‘Let’s heighten the racial elements in the campaign.’ I certainly wouldn’t want to think that.”

He said he was puzzled at how, after more than a year of campaigning, race and sex are at the forefront as never before.

“I don’t want to deny the role of race and gender in our society,” he said. “They’re there, and they’re powerful. But I don’t think it’s productive.”

The NYT added that the Clinton campaign is “concerned about her standing among blacks, once a core constituency for her and her husband.” The anxiety seems understandable; Clinton’s African-American support appears to be slipping quickly, and it’s getting worse as the campaign continues.

With that in mind, it’s interesting that Clinton, in addition to shedding Ferraro, struck some very conciliatory notes yesterday.

The AP reported on Clinton’s appearance before the National Newspaper Publishers Association, a group of more than 200 black community newspapers across the country.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton did something Wednesday night that she almost never does. She apologized. And once she started, she didn’t seem able to stop. […]

Her biggest apology came in response to a question about comments by her husband, Bill Clinton, after the South Carolina primary, which Obama won handily. Bill Clinton said Jesse Jackson also won South Carolina when he ran for president in 1984 and 1988, a comment many viewed as belittling Obama’s success.

”I want to put that in context. You know I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive,” Hillary Clinton said. ”We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama.”

”Anyone who has followed my husband’s public life or my public life know very well where we have stood and what we have stood for and who we have stood with,” she said, acknowledging that whoever wins the nomination will have to heal the wounds of a bruising, historic contest.

”Once one of us has the nomination there will be a great effort to unify the Democratic party and we will do so, because, remember I have a lot of supporters who have voted for me in very large numbers and I would expect them to support Senator Obama if he were the nominee,” she said.

When the discussion turned to Ferraro, Clinton told the audience, ”I certainly do repudiate it and I regret deeply that it was said. Obviously she doesn’t speak for the campaign, she doesn’t speak for any of my positions, and she has resigned from being a member of my very large finance committee.”

Let’s hope this is a sign of things to come, because at this point, the tension is approaching the point of no return.

In the latest sign of a racial rift in the contest, two prominent black pastors warned Wednesday that African American voters could become so discouraged by the campaign that they might stay home in November if Clinton is the nominee.

“This is a virtual race war, politically,” said the Rev. Eugene Rivers of the Azusa Christian Community church in Boston, one of the country’s leading Pentecostal ministers.

“Virtual race war”? Good lord. Note to the campaigns and the DNC: this is a problem in need of immediate attention. Fix it. Now.

RACISM: I do not think HRC would condone playing the race card…Her campaign has in many ways been a pathetic flop. Too few believed in her candidacy. In fact many, like Senators Kerry and Kennedy seemed anxious to defect a/s/a/p. What was left were money grabbers and D-listers. I guess she knows her chances now are close to nil. But since the campaign continues to raise millions, by staying in the race she can pay herself back the $5 million loan, and pay-off any other debts before bowing out in Denver, possibly with a surplus…Besides, by keeping the race going it gives Obama someone to spar with and news reporters issues to work with.

AFRI’TUDE: Yes blacks were brought to this country against their will to work as slaves. But a Civil War was fought to remedy that. And yes MLK was assassinated but so were Kennedy’s. And yes there is exploitation, but today it’s mostly economic, not racial…This country has made tremendous efforts and investments to be inclusive. But so instead of hearing “Thank you” there’s often angry lashing out…Bottomline: Being physically strong, blacks seem to place a higher priority on action over ideas. Which may be a reason for Obama’s universal appeal; Yes he’s strong too, but also adept at handling complexity…Better at ‘thinking on his feet’ than me anyway.

2009: When Democrats take complete control, might this be Barack’s real agenda: Two terms, then book deals and a California estate? The lobbyist will yawn…Wages will rise – Prices will rise more…Islamic expansion continues…Global-warming continues…Bush & Bill will smile and say, “Welcome to the club ‘Bama.”

BUSINESS-AS-USUAL: At campaign rally’s Obama claims he needs voters support so he can take on the lobbyist. But his agenda is nowhere close to revolutionary. Obama is for subsidizing (corporate) health insurance premiums, not single-payer universal coverage. Instead of spending $12 billion a month in Iraq, how about spending $1 billion a month buying-up guns here in America and then register and “well regulate” the remainder? Instead of his throw away proposal to spend $15 billion a year on green energy projects, how about setting a timetable for the phase out of coal? Instead of passing more (ineffective?) campaign finance reform laws, how about publicly financed elections? Along with higher taxes on the rich, what about taxing imports to force some repaitriation of our manufacturing base? How about controlling the borders and enforcing immigration laws? Instead of leaving it to the states, legalize and (federally) tax marijuana?

NARSCISSIM: Obama points out that Exxon made $11 billion. So what? Do we follow Chavez and nationalize Exxon? Or is he telling us that Exxon stock might be a good investment? How can his inexperience plus a default position of pledgeing to work with others in Washington lead to any REAL change? Like Clinton, Gore & Bush, when after a term or two, Obama leaves the White House, won’t he just be looking to also ca$h in? [Yes, I’m jealous] On the plus side Barack seems focused, dedicated and relatively uncorrupted.

V-P: This is just a suggestion, but why not go with Burt Reynolds? Wouldn’t everyone get a kick out of seeing ‘The Bandit’ back in action?

  • Good for Clinton. It took some prodding but she did the right thing. She does have a conscience. It just seems like her advisers are determined to suffocate it.

  • You know I am sorry if anyone was offended…

    No. I’m sorry because this is not an apology. It’s a fucking insult our intelligence. (You know I’m sorry if anyone was offended by my use of the f-word.)

  • Here’s a question for the Clinton supporters who believe that Obama is too young/inexperienced/unqualified to be President, and is where he is because of his race: Would you have said the same thing about John Edwards if he was still in the race at that point? Because that guy was in the Senate for, like, a New York minute, and I don’t remember Clinton ever raising questions about his basic qualifications for the Presidency.

  • …I regret deeply that it was said. Obviously [Ferraro] doesn’t speak for the campaign…

    Obviously, she Ferraro speak for Clinton’s campaign. Hillary can’t have it both ways. This is a pattern in which she (or usually her surrogates) make assinine and insulting racial or sectarian remarks, lets it fester for a while, blames Obama for playing the race card and then “regrets” it if anybody was offended. But of course, she had nothing to do with it.

    It’s no wonder that African-Americans are voting against her 9-to-1. The wonder is that whites aren’t voting against her 9-to-1 too.

  • I suspect Clinton is very very torn. She is a former Top 100 Lawyers honoree – she isn’t the type of give up a fight, and her high-visibility health care effort being a notable exception, she isn’t used to losing them.

    What she has seen of politics, and what every advisor depending on her to win is saying is the odds are best if she goes way negative, if she takes risks, if she carves up the electorate to try and scramble for a 50%+1 solution.

    But she also somewhere intellectually knows even if she does that the odds are beyond trivially small. And her legacy and pride matter, too – after all, having to stand by Bill as he made his apology to the nation hurt her pride enough for one lifetime.

    And so she ends up wavering, back and forth, almost between two personalities: she distances herself from emotions and becomes a political machine, doing the job she is programmed to do, and slashing at Obama ruthlessly, recklessly; then she wears down and her shields slip and she gets teary-eyed and human about what it all means, or she thinks wistfully about the bigger picture and starts apologizing and can’t stop, or she remembers that before all this began she and Obama actually got along in the Senate and she closes a debate with words of high praise that sound mixed with resignation.

    And while we can try to describe it or analyze it, my guess is no one around here has the most remote ability to truly understand or appreciate what it is like. Which is why I am pretty slow to be judgmental about it.

  • “Virtual race war”?

    You haven’t seen anything yet. Bigotry is as alive as ever in this country. It just isn’t normally “done” out in public with recorders going. But it’s as wide and deep as ever, particularly among those over, say, twenty or thirty.

    If you think the internecine Democratic squabbles are serious (and they are) just wait unteil the GOP launches its full scale attack on Obama this summer and fall. “Virtual civil war” might just describe it.

    Losers who believe themselves to be the Chosen, like the Clintons and the Confederacy, always try to destroy the victors on their way down. It’s never pretty.

  • Too little, too late. She knows exactly what she’s been allowing her campaign to do. It’s obvious to all but the likes of Kevin Drum.

    This kind of thing by her is pathetic. The damage has been done here. Everyone in PA and parts of the country yet to vote got the message, loud and clear.

    I won’t be voting for her, should she make it to the general. Even if Obama were stupid enough to take VP.

  • I like Obama’s approach and I hope the rest of us can take his lead and not make a huge deal out of whatever racial comments people make. The only way Ferraro can drag down her target (Obama) is if the Obama people over-react to her comments and generate a backlash. The backlash comes from the people in the middle, who are inclined to agree to some degree with Ferraro’s comments, but who would also lean towards Obama.

    Chill, people. It’s not a race war for christ sake. Calling it one will only hurt your candidate.

  • You’re watching the unraveling of more than 40 years of work aligning the Democratic party’s white, working class voters with its African-American base. In a few weeks, Hillary has managed to hit every single theme that she could conjure to divide these two parts of the party. If she succeeds, I will no longer consider myself a Democratic. I will withdraw my registration in NY state, I will not organize or donate to Democratic causes, and I will only support candidates that I personally approve. No more “I support the Democrat” crap. Why is this the party’s problem? Because of the deafening sound of the Party’s silence. I would urge all black voters to re-consider your political allegiance. Look at your local Democratic Party leaders and ask, “Why are they being silent in the face of this race baiting?” If you decide that they lack the courage or conviction to stand up to these tactics, then vote for another Dem in the primary, or vote for the Republican in the general. Only by weeding out the establishment will we be able to re-claim the Democratic Party as a force for good in this country.

    Hillary lost my vote awhile ago, and now has lost whatever residual respect remained.

  • Hillary, the perpetual victim, has now been victimized by one of her own, Geraldine Ferraro. The timing of the Clinton “slips” are questionable. Crying before a primary. Victims do that a lot. Race becoming an issue before the Pennsylvania primary. Pennsylvania was described as Pittsburgh and Philadelphia with Alabama in between. The appearance of a little racism on Hillary’s part might appeal to the “Alabama in between” rednecks that would be less likely to vote for Obama because he is black. Now, we have Hillary in a flurry of apologies that is another new side of her. She didn’t happen to apologize for her vote for Bush’s War, did she? It definitely looks like some type of multiple personality disorder like Jonah Goldberg said on the Bill Maher show. I think they should start a new category at the Academy Awards. Hillary’s performances would definitely win her an Oscar.

  • I guess for 200 black community newspapers across the nation accepting her apoligies isn’t enough for some Obama supporters.

  • Once one of us has the nomination there will be a great effort to unify the Democratic party…

    Start now. Drop out, because you cannot win. Today is the day to begin the reunification.

    Can anyone seriously dispute the claim now that the longer she stays in the more harm she’ll do? Ferraro is a perfect example of how piss poor Clinton is at managing her staff. It could’ve been nipped in the bud, but she let it fester.

  • Chris is right. It’s become clear that Hillary Clinton has decided to take her lemon that is her loss in South Carolina and make lemonade out of it.

    1. A surrogate insults blacks.
    2. While letting it play out, Clinton blames Obama for playing the race card.
    3. Clinton denies responsibility and expresses “regret” or apologizes “if anybody was offended”.

    What does this accomplish…she get down-trodden white voters to perceive Obama as the “black” candidate with views perceived as radical and comparable to those of Al Sharpton and others.

    She wreaks havok, claims she had nothing to do with it, and then seeks to benefit from the result. If she doesn’t benefit in the short-run, she at least hopes that she’s hurt Obama’s numbers against McCain so she can make the argument to the supers that Obama can’t win.

    I don’t believe that Hillary Clinton is racist. I believe she’s self-centered. Therefore, she’ll whatever it takes to get the nod in Denver later this summer regardless of any potential collateral damage.

  • One more thing…I’m white. But I’m insulted too, and I don’t accept the comments referenced in CBs post that others label an apology. If and when Hillary actually apologizes, then that’s another story. But as far as I’m concerned, this current round of regrets (we’ve been there before) are all part of her cynical game.

  • Senator Clinton’s campaign is on the verge of destroying the Democratic Party.

    I’ve watched this primary process from the beginning, first with joy that we had such great talent running for President on our side. Who, at the start of this process wasn’t proud of the three main candidates we had running?

    Now it is with dismay that I watch as it has devolved into desperate attacks from the Clinton camp as she has lost in all final results only and seems hell bent on taking Obama down with her. It saddens me as someone who truly believes that Bill Clinton was the greatest president during my 47 year lifetime.

  • doubtful

    with over 50,000,000 votes cast in the democratic primaries and Obama has about 1% lead in the popular vote why would Hillary drop out. Would you? Under your assumption I guess because the polls show McCain beating Barack and Hillary in PA they should concede and give the state to McCain.

  • What if women voters get discouraged by the campaign and prominent women warn that women might stay home if Obama gets the nomination…will that matter to the DNC?

  • Chris above had it exactly right, as did posters on yesterday’s Ferraro thread here. This pattern of using surrogates to dog whistle racial issues is no accident, but an on-going, intentional tactic, the Clintons’ very own version of the Republican southern strategy. Ironically, they both created the “black flight” to Obama that they now seek to exploit among low-information voters in PA, NC and IN.

    To Hillary supporters: Isn’t this precisely the kind of crap that Democrats loathe about Bush-Cheney-Rove? Don’t be suckered by it.

    To the media: The story is not simply that Geraldine Ferraro is the aging crazy grandma of the Clinton campaign; rather, the story is that the Clintons authorized and endorsed her use of these fighting words to rile up her base in the coming primary states.

    Finally, to Maggie Williams: How can you tolerate, let alone participate in this stuff?

  • …Obama has about 1% lead in the popular vote why would Hillary drop out. Would you? -Comeback Bill

    Popular vote? I was thinking more about 130+ lead in delegates.

    Yes, I would drop out if my opponent had an insurmountable delegate lead and a prominent employee of mine had just insulted an entire race of people repeatedly.

  • The first President from Illinois arrived with the Civil War. It is my intense hope that the second President from Illinois will mark the end of the argument. I enthusiastically support Obama. However,I am reasonably astounded by the reaction to Ferraro’s remarks: she is absolutely and incontrovertable correct.

    Would Obama have received a contract for his extraordinary first book after beling elected Editor of the Harvard Law Review if he had not been the first black editor of the Review? Would he have been the convention speaker if he had not been a rising black star? Would he have the personality he does today were he not the product of an ineluctable multi-racial multi-cultural life experience? Would his candidacy have the edge that it does were it not for the awareness that against all odds, the nation might, in our lifetimes, elect a unifying black man as its leader?

    To say such things is not to play a ‘race card’ – it is to acknowledge a profound sociological shift.

    For Senator Clinton to repudiate the remarks is yet another act of Clintonian oportunistic dishonesty.

  • If it wasn’t for the media and left wing blogs such as this there wouldn’t even be an issue. Its left wing blogs that are destroying the democratic party not the candidates. My reasoning is all the venom that is spewed. When you read the comments on here and other left wing blogs all you see is hate. As it happens most but not all comes from Baracks supporters and how is that uniting the party if you piss off 50% of the democratic electorate.

  • Sorry Comeback Bill –

    Have you noticed that Ferraro first used this “Obama is an Affirmative Action hire” meme on John Gibson’s radio show Feb. 27th (in time for OH/TX) and since then has been promoting it on Bill O’Rielly and Fox? That Bill Clinton was on O’Rielly talking about this? That Pat Buchanan, Joe Scarborough and Rush Limbaugh all agree with Ferraro’s comments?

    I’ve always believed that you can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep.

  • As long as polling of any kind reports on the white vote and the black vote, race and gender will be an issue. How polling is reported and the reactions from the campaigns sets the tone of the discourse.. Segregating voters into whites and blacks denigrates the value of the individual votes of every participant. Why is one white woman’s vote more or less valuable than one black woman’s vote? A vote is a vote. Unfortunately this will continue, I see no way to change it.

  • #24

    You have a right to read what you want into her statement. However thats not how I read it. She was simply stating facts and thats all they were. Far to many of Baracks supporters are way to sensitive. Most of the ones on here outraged about this are the same ones that thought it was ok for a reporter to say Hillary was pimping out her daughter double standard I think so. Did Barack condemn that statement.

  • Would he have been the convention speaker if he had not been a rising black star?

    This is the silliest thing I’ve ever heard. If a white makes the keynote speech it’s entirely because of his accomplishments. If a black makes a keynote speech, it’s primarily because he’s black.

    In fact, Neal Johnston couldn’t be more wrong. Essentially he is arguing that the first black in any position got there because of his or her race, not in spite of it. Absolutely absurd.

    In fact, this is the perception that the Clinton campaign is promoting…that Obama is less qualified, but is only where he is because of the color of his skin (i.e. “We don’t need an affirmative action program for the White House”).

    This is not only an insult to Obama, but also to the hundreds of thousands who have supported him through donations and/or votes

  • Most of the ones on here outraged about this are the same ones that thought it was ok for a reporter to say Hillary was pimping out her daughter… -Comeback Bill

    That’s complete bullshit. The resounding consensus among regulars here was that the ‘pimping’ comment was over the line and offensive. Show me one singular commenter who is offended by Ferraro’s comments who defended the ‘pimping’ statement?

    You consistently make wild claims like this with absolutely no evidence to back them up.

    And as far as Barack condemning the ‘pimping’ remark, I don’t know one way or another, but since the offending party was not an employee of Obama’s, I hardly see how this is relevant.

    No one is asking for candidates to be responsible for anyone beyond those who work for or actively campaign for them.

  • If she succeeds, I will no longer consider myself a Democratic. I will withdraw my registration in NY state, I will not organize or donate to Democratic causes, and I will only support candidates that I personally approve. No more “I support the Democrat” crap. Why is this the party’s problem?

    Join the club.

    There are many progressives (including me) who refuse to be aligned with the Democratic Party Machine precisely because party insiders like Schumer, Pelosi, Reid, and Hillary Clinton don’t give a goddamn about ideals or what their constituents want. They care about power. Issues of race, gender, class, social justice — hell, the Constitution itself — are secondary or tertiary considerations to this class of Democrat. The way this inter-party racial bullshit is playing out is merely one more manifestation of a rotten, amoral core within the Democratic Party itself.

  • Ferraro did not claim that Obama is where he is only because of the color of his skin, which would be absurd. Skin color does not write beautiful books, or calmly deliberate or resolve serious problems. Rather, Ferroro observed that his color has contributed to where he is — and also to what he is. And this is true beyond question.

    I wonder of S. James would deny feeling some sort of thrill at the idea of America selecting a man catagorized as black to the Presidency?

  • There are no Progressive candidates running for president. That’s reality. Apart from the single issue of the Iraq war, all are centrists.

  • Braden said:

    I would urge all black voters to re-consider your political allegiance.

    I think it is always a good idea for all voters to actually consider their political choices; mindless voting gets us people like Bushie.

    That said, given that there are two viable parties and there is just – how do I put this? – no objective, reasonable, thinking person’s way in hell that the Republican party has ever done jack for black voters or any other voters besides rich, white, straight, smug, corporate, corrupt, violent old men who like to impose their views on everyone else, I think on such re-consideration you’ll find your present anger more than a little misplaced.

  • in re: Neal Johnston (no. 22);

    Even if we accpet, for the sake of argument, that you’re right; Hon. Sen. Obama didn’t receive added attention because of his race, he received is despite the obstacles that it forced him to overcome. So, to the degree that Ms. Ferraro’s (and your own) nonsense is ‘fact,’ it means Sen. Obama has had to be more qualified, not less.

    She has tried to make this point herself, after the fact, but leaves unsaid why she is saying it so circuitously in the first place.

  • If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. -Ferraro

    Ferraro did not claim that Obama is where he is only because of the color of his skin, which would be absurd. -Neal Johnston, and Nell by proxy

    Read her words, and stop being intellectually dishonest.

    She said if he were white he would not be where he is. His “beautiful books, or calmly deliberate or resolve serious problems” have no bearing on his candidacy, per Ferraro.

    She unambiguously asserted he was in this position solely by virtue of his race.

  • You know I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive,”

    This is the standard non-apology apology, used by every guilty party everywhere everytime. I am sure everyone here has heard it directed to them personally, and has used it at least once in their life, so we all “know it when we see it.”

    There is nothing in her “apology” where she takes any responsbility for any of this crap.

    Sorry, Mrs. Clinton, but the Captain of the ship is responsible for the actions of the most junior crewman. A real leader would know that. A yuppie opportunist never will.

  • A question to Doubtful, JHM, S James: do you not share the thrill I feel at the prospect of voting for someone who, aside from clearly being the best candidate, is also black? And, do you deny that this historic thrill has anything to do with his well earned political success?

  • The narrow-mindedness reflected in this discussionl is predictable, but sad. Be grateful that women and African-Americans receive the level of attention they do in all matters political. The original peoples of North America are never considered in these matters. As a College Dean at my University once said of this institution’s “diversity” programs that completely ignores Native America, “Their are more African Americans and they organize.” Yes, there are. Because there was a genocide.

    The race discussion in this country is so exclusive and distorts race in this country. It is not a black and white matter. Obama knows this. He looked me right in the eye when I shouted out to him not to forget Native America at a political rally. Pointing his finger at me, he said, “I won’t. I promise. You have my word on that.” He has met with tribal leaders. This is a frist. And we will see if he keeps his word. I cannot say the same for Hillary Clinton or any other politician running for President.

    So, I encourage you to be grateful for your numbers, for your influence, for your voice (which is heard), for your Democratic Presidential candidates. And get over yourselves.

  • …do you not share the thrill I feel at the prospect of voting for someone who, aside from clearly being the best candidate, is also black? -Neal Johnston

    How do you not understand the difference between being excited about breaking barriers this election with either of two Democratic candidates and asserting that they are only their because of their gender or race respectively?

    Yeah, I think it’s great we’ll most likely have a groundbreaking Presidency, but that doesn’t mean I think Hillary and Barack are where they are only by virtue of their gender or race.

    There is a very clearly a difference.

  • I hate to steal a joke from Jacki’s serious, passionate, and important post, but. . .

    This is a frist.

    God I hope not. Bill the long-distance doctor was more than enough.
    (And I am quite certain he never did much for Native America either.)

  • I posted over at the Olbermann thread that, this morning, when she was questioned about that comment, she said she had nothing to apologize for. Here we have her yesterday with her “apology.” But less than 24 hours later it’s gone.

    I think that says everything that needs be said about her “sincerity” with this so-called “apology.”

    As someone who has spent a very long time pushing “party discipline,” and someone who has put his ass personally on the line for his beliefs about race and gender equality in this country, I am now ready to consider that “discipline” has its limits. I hope I am not going to end up at a point where I have to act on this belief, I hope the Democratic Party gets the message from the roots that this stuff has to stop. But I’m not going to hold my breath waiting.

  • “proud of both Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama”

    WTF????? What???

    Why didn’t she just say that “they are a credit to their race?”

  • It isn’t a “waste of time,” Jacki – I’m on your side. Who I’m after are the folks — and Bill Frist just happens to be an excellent example — who really don’t think of anyone but themselves. The typo- and we all make them; I’m not trying to be pedantic – struck me as funny because he is so much the opposite of Obama. But as heated as things get around here (especially lately) a little levity really isn’t such a bad thing. Even around serious subjects.

    And if it ever becomes a bad thing, I definitely will need to go find a blog that takes itself less seriously.

  • I find this frustrating. No one has suggested that Obama is where he is simply because of race, but no one should deny that race has something to do with where he is.

  • I would love Obama to choose Al Gore as his running mate and announce it now. The Clinton’s would be furious and the charge of inexperience would be negated by adding a former Senator, Vice President, and Nobel Prize winner to the ticket. To announce this before the Pennsylvania primary would be fantastic! I pray that the Obama team will consider this. I hope they do not make the mistake of choosing someone the nation does not know. If they are smart enough to choose Al Gore this will go a long way towards moving the superdelegates to Obama, and will have the extra added benefit of angering the Clinton’s immensely. 🙂 Let’s see them try and attack a ticket that includes Bill Clinton’s former running mate and the person who won the popular vote in 2000.

  • I appreciate those who got it. Levity is a good thing. Being a student of federal Indian Policy and Law has probably made me too serious. I’ve been reading various blogs around the race/gender. I;ve never see a Native post. But I can assure you that Native people are aware of the exclusivity of the so-called race debate. Non-Native people continue to construct their own reality. It’s hard to push back against it. I hope this historic moment does not implode on us. It would be tragic.

  • Apologies? Are you f’n kidding me?

    Sincere apologies don’t start with “I want to put that in context…” Excuses do.

    Then follows with “You know I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive.” The classic passive/aggressive non-apology apology. Break it down:

    “You know…” Puts the responsibility squarely on the recipient. You’re expected to know that the Clintons could NEVER be racist, and if you don’t, that’s not Hillary’s problem, it’s yours.

    “…I am sorry if anyone was offended…” This never apologizes for what was said. It doesn’t acknowledge that it was offensive coming out of Bill Clinton’s mouth, only that it was offensive to some other people’s ears. And that, by the way, is also their problem.

    “…It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive…” This part is true. It was meant to be a dogwhistle and a wink. It was supposed to fly over he heads of anyone who might be offended. But it’s no apology.

    “…We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama.” I’m not sure what this means…I guess she’ll give them stickers when she’s President?

    Regarding Ferraro:

    ”I certainly do repudiate it and I regret deeply that it was said. Obviously she doesn’t speak for the campaign, she doesn’t speak for any of my positions, and she has resigned from being a member of my very large finance committee.”

    I don’t think she regrets that it was said at all. She was happy to have central PA mull that one over for a couple days…She’s sorry the wrong people paid attention she paid a price for it in the media.

    And finishing with “…he has resigned from being a member of my very large finance committee.” is the not-my-fault cherry on top. Another excuse. you can either run a campaign or you can’t Senator. If your committee is too big for you to control, that’s your problem.

  • I FIGURED IT OUT! HILLARY IS GREAT! Look, she knows she’s going to lose the nomination — known it since Super Tuesday — and everything she’s done since then is part of an UNDERCOVER SCENARIO TRAINING — for Obama! See, the DNC hired Hillary to treat Obama as ruthlessly as the Republicans will come the general election. SO she been ingenious: attacks his readiness to answer the phone at 3 a.m. attacks his conversations with Canada (oops, that was HER conversation with Canada) re: NAFTA, and now… she CLEVERLY appeals to the unconscious racists in the elecotrate, Ferraro was the fontman on this mission. Her and subsequent accusations that its Obama who is playing the race card appeal to the “folks” out there who like the Blacks, especially Bill Cosby, but still feel, gosh-darn-it, they just take and take and expect the world to be handed to them on a silver platter and affirmative action don’t ya know, and now this token running for President. I mean, THIS IS WAY TOO EVIL TO BE SINCERE!!!! It’s GENIUS, far more damaging, subtle and clever than the real attacks will be in the Fall, but genius in their underhanded slimey-ocity! And Obama’s still winning! Still toughening up! THE PLAN IS WORKING.
    Seriously, Hillary should head Obama’s CIA or even a new branch modelled on the KGB! This is the only explanation that redeems her. Think about it! Resigned to her loss of the nomination, she’s helping the democrats by toughing up Obama! What self-less, thankless sacrifice — to lose all her public self-respect, seemingly betray decades of civil rights and Democratic legacy, appear utterly consumed by a lust for power — she’s amazing. God bless you, Hillary, you’re true reward will be in Heaven!

  • The continuing comments about Obama’s skin color contributing to his success are deeply troubling. I was excited when the best democratic candidates were not old, white men. I was excited that they are both polished campaigners who are not likely to be tripped up by cheap shot, swiftboat liars. As the campaign has progressed, Obama has distinguished himself with his charisma and ability to deliver speeches that inspire people to have hope and also to vote.

    I absolutely do not believe that being black has contributed to Obama’s success any more that I believe that being a woman has contributed to Clinton’s success. They both have succeeded through hard work and tireless campaigning and have largely overcome the obstacles of not being white men. For either to attack the other on race or gender issues is despicable and not what the democratic party is supposed to represent. Clinton’s use of a surrogate to attack Obama on race was a new low for her campaign but sadly I do not expect her to stop her negative campaign. Fortunately, Obama appears to be a gifted enough politician to overcome the obstacles being thrown at him and survive the democratic primary.

  • The race card? Pffffffffffffffffffffffft!

    “Racial politics” = “horsecrap politics.”

    The media loves it when race is injected into a political contest because it inflames emotions and spices things up.

    But despite the Clinton campaign’s efforts to inject race into the Democratic primary contest by diminishing Obama as just “a black candidate,” it’s not working.

    Obama isn’t a well-qualified black candidate. He’s a well-qualified candidate. Period.

    And Geraldine Ferraro: Your attempt to carry water for Hillary Clinton by trying to diminish Obama as merely “another Jesse Jackson,” (i.e., just another unqualified, token black man) only succeeded in making you (and Hillary) look foolish.

  • Well for goodness sake, is there ANYONE in America (except for the idiot currently in the White House, who doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the ground) who doesn’t recognize that Barack Obama has based his campaign on “the race issue”? What does everyone think the “change” theme is all about?

  • Has everyone in this country gone insane?

    A man of African and America blood is a forerunner in a race for the Presidency of the United State. When he started winning votes– in Iowa… it was a fluke? Oh, yeah, it has to be a fluke because our polarized media and individual racial biases are rooted to a past riddle with social dysfunction. Nowhere in the collective American psyche was there a sliver of hope that we could move past our sad past and reach for a brighter tomorrow. We are stuck on stupid.

    So here we are months out of Iowa and people are still trying to stop Obama. First Bill Clinton took his racial punch in South Carolina and derailed the monolithic African American support train that put him in office and was suppose to follow Hillary without questioning the racism spewing from his mouth. I have African Americans in my family who still support Hillary- simple because she is a woman. Obama does not carry all of the African American votes. So when I hear CNN and the Msnbs projecting Obama will carry So Carolina and Miss. because of the Black vote – but omitting his wins in “white” American territories, I get really pissed. The media provided the cauldron and Hillary, Bill and Maggie Williams oh, yeah and most recently, Geraldine, are simple stiring the soup. The ingredients of biasness and racism are finally bubbling to the top.
    We have not advanced as a country– at all.

  • Reaching the point of no return?

    What is this delusion that some folks STILL CLING TO around here and elsewhere in the blogosphere.

    Camp Clinton has been involved with consistent, persistent Dogwhistle Racial Politics since Billy Shaheen. There is a ClintonAttacksObama Wiki Incidents Page that is up to #45.

    FORTY-FIVE.

    THE most important word uttered by Olbermann last night was PATTERN.

    PATTERN.

    When ‘ isolated incidents’ are NEITHER

    ISOLATED

    nor

    INCIDENTAL

    They form a PATTERN

    Accept what the PATTERN tells you and proceed onward.

    I believe the Black Community has indeed accepted the PATTERN that they see, and proceeded accordingly with a 2 step solution:

    1. vote for Obama
    2. resolve never to vote for Hillary Clinton ever again.

    I come from an immediate family of 12 Democratic voters. Outside of illness, we don’t miss a primary or general election.

    ONLY 2 will vote for Hillary Clinton.

    ONLY 2.

    What makes folks think, that if this is indeed the PATTERN that Black folk see with regards to the CLINTONS,

    that they would ever vote for her again?

    Period.

    What is it about Black folk that you would make such an assumption.

    I have to ask this.

    If this were a group of Jewish voters, and a candidate was perceived as making a pattern of Anti-Semitic statements toward a Jewish candidate…

    Would folks even utter the words expecting the one lobbing the Anti-Semitic remarks, after some half-assed, insincere non-apology…

    to receive votes from said group of Jewish voters?

    Would you EVER propose that?

    Then, why, would you ever think that any self-respecting Black person…

    After perceiving a malicious, deliberate Dogwhistle Racial Campaign being waged against Barack Obama…

    Would ever consider voting for Hillary Clinton ever again?

    Dogwhistle Racial Politics isn’t just a tactic to someone Black….they’ve been taught to notice and understand it because SURVIVAL in America has depended upon it.

    You don’t seem to understand what the Clintons HAVE DONE.

  • Does America realize “Jim Crow” has resurrected? Articles about Obama’s ex-pastor exacerbate issues of race and continues to bring back Jim Crow. As a result of this nonsense, we have supporters of one campaign using the “N” word through their blogs which of course may cause supporters of the other campaign to respond in a defensive manner.

    When supporters began to openly blog comments with the use of the “N” word, others voters remember what occurred during Jim Crow. At that point, we have to look at what people experienced during the Jim Crow Era. When people begin to look back at those experiences we will hear comments about the privileged compared to those who were not privileged.

    All Democratic leaders need to meet together and determine how to stop further division. If this does not happen, each week something new will be presented to voters to cause negative reactions to either Obama or the Clintons. I believe everyone should just acknowledge that due to the negative democratic campaign, Jim Crow returned and racial issues may never leave America. Then the Democratic Party has to determined how to respond to general party members regarding the issue as needed to attempt to bring the party back together.

    The National Media seems to forget that Obama has other supporters besides black people. Therefore, when reporters compare the “white vote” and the “black vote” the situation gets worse. When I read blogs, I see some people saying they are “older (male and female white) Americans OR “white women” who support Obama and feel left out by the media/articles.

    Also, in the blogs, it seems as if many of Hillary’s supporters do not realize that Hillary has a lot of support from Black Congressional Leaders as well as general voters who are black. I say this because I have read blogs where people are stating they are switching from supporting Obama because he has become the candidate for “the black people”.. I have also read blogs where people state they will vote for McCain before voting for Obama. Where are we heading?

    I believe the use of race was part of a strategic plan. However, Bill and Hillary took the game too far! As a result of this plan and/or game, the field is wide open for Republicans to step up and win in November.

    It seems like Bill Clinton’s prophecy (negative comment) about “Obama’s win in SC” was the same as “Jessie Jackson’s win” started the issue of race. Then, the Clintons continued to make comments which included racial overtones. However, supporters of Hillary are writing blogs stating that “those blacks” or Obama started whinning about race. Each time the issue of race died, the Clintons (or someone from their campaign) always found a way to bring it back up.

    The issue exploded after the race in Mississippi (I think because some Americans do not realize that many whites in the deep south would never vote for a black person. In addition, I am 100% sure that many Americans do not realize Jim Crow is still in the hearts of some voters).

    The explosion has caused a backlash. From what I have read on the blogs, many supporters of Clinton will not vote for Obama if he is given the nomination. Hillary has already endorsed McCain and her supporters (from reading blogs) are following her lead.

    It is my assessment that the Clintons are determined to win by any means necessary. To me, it seems like the word “win” means defeating Obama…What I am trying to say is if the Clintons do not make it back to the white house, they are determined to stop Obama from getting into the white house. Either way, she will have “won” since winning means to “beat” Obama. Yes! Winning means helping

    In the end, if Obama gets the nomination, Clinton has won if McCain gets into the white house. The game/strategic plan does not take “division of the party” into consideration.

  • I am a 71 year old white female and I support Barack Obama.
    The nomination for president has nothing to do with race or gender and am
    tired of the news media making it so. They do not give us, the voters, the
    credit for being capable of bypassing that and vote for the person who will do the
    best job. Hillary has done much, recently, to damage the Democratic
    Party. It is obvious she will do anything to win, regardless of the
    circumstances. I have lost the respect I once had for her.
    Barack represents a change we desperately need and a change I support.
    With all others it will be politics as usual.

  • Comments are closed.