Reid stays on the offensive

One of the more common arguments in the political discourse is the idea that the Dems are putting up an adequate fight against the GOP agenda, but they’re failing to present an agenda of their own. Dems are against Bush’s proposals, but, the conventional wisdom tells us, they’re not for anything.

I’ve never really bought into the argument, but whether one accepts the premise or not, I think Harry Reid deserves a lot of credit in trying to dispel the notion that Dems lack a positive, forward-thinking policy agenda. In late January, Reid unveiled a list he called “Keeping America’s Promise,” which included 10 legislative measures to serve as the blueprint for the 109th Congress.

Yesterday, Reid stayed on this point, telling reporters (and everyone else): If you’re looking for the party with a vision, look to the Dems.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid yesterday in a speech laying out Democrats’ agenda accused Republican leaders of being so consumed with partisan political “sniping” that they’ve neglected a troubled economy and a weak national defense.

“Democrats are the party of national security,” Mr. Reid said at the National Press Club. “And we have an agenda to defend America from danger.”

Mr. Reid’s speech was intended to outline his party’s priorities now that a truce has been reached in the Senate fight over judicial nominations. It included some of the most pointed political broadsides since last year’s presidential campaign.

“As of this month, more time has passed since 9/11 than the time between Pearl Harbor and the defeat of Japan. During those three years and eight months — 60 years ago — we invaded North Africa and Normandy, we freed people from the Philippines to France, Hitler lay dead and Tojo was in chains,” Mr. Reid said. “But today Osama bin Laden is still on the loose, our homeland is still not secure, and we’re still not energy-independent, and — in many ways — Americans are less safe than we were before 9/11.”

Indeed, Reid, not unlike the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, believes Republicans had an opportunity to govern at the start of the year, but have squandered their time on the nuclear option, the Terri Schiavo, and fiddling with the House ethics process.

“Perhaps the greatest abuse of power is to have the ability to help but choose to do nothing,” he said.

Nice line, senator.

But remember, while Reid took some shots at his rivals, his speech was loaded with policy prescriptions for the future and an emphasis on the fact that Dems “have something better to offer” the country.

“Americans are coming to realize this Republican Congress is out of touch with the real problems of working families and that the agenda the Republicans are advancing is at odds with what people in this country really care about.

“We Democrats have something better to offer. A reform agenda that will cleanse Washington…give power to the people – not special interests…and make sure that everyday Americans and their concerns get back on the Congressional calendar.

“Strengthening our national defense. Rebuilding our economy. Providing families with affordable health care. Making America energy independent. Securing our retirement. That’s our agenda. That’s America’s agenda. But the Republican Congress has put all this and more on hold. I hope that now we can finally turn to the people’s business.”

The whole speech is online. I thought it struck just the right balance between holding the GOP responsible for its failures and explaining how Dems can govern better.

Granted, getting Dems in a position to become a majority party again is a difficult and time-consuming process. Too much of the public has an incorrect perception of the party and Reid, along with other party leaders, need to do more to “build the brand.” Moreover, Reid’s policy goals for the party may be the greatest ideas ever, but if the party can’t articulate and sell the agenda to voters, it doesn’t much matter.

Nevertheless, this is a tremendous start and Reid deserves a lot of credit. In November, we lost what was billed as the most important campaign cycle in recent political history. Seven months later, Reid has helped lay the groundwork for a comeback.

“Strengthening our national defense. Rebuilding our economy. Providing families with affordable health care. Making America energy independent. Securing our retirement. That’s our agenda. That’s America’s agenda.”

ok, it sounds great, but how is that any different from what the repbulicans are trying 2 do? I don’t want to know THAT your going to do all these things, but HOW.

Republicans wanna strengthen national defense by taking our rights away, rebuild or economy by giving cash tothe rich, and provide families with healthcare by forcing them of medicare, and secure retirement by making private accounts.

That sounds like shit to me, and I hope the democrats have something a helluva lot better.

This is what people have been complaining about, not that the democrats want to do all of these things, but that they don’t say HOW. If Reid doesnt come up with AN ACTUALL IDEA, AN ACTUAL PLAN how is anyone supposed to know that it is better than the republicans, other wise, it just sounds like:

“We don’t care what we do, just as long as we’re againts the republicans.”

prove me wrong please, can sombeody tell me WHAT THE DEMS ACTUALLY WANT TO DO!! so that the republicans don’t keep scaring me with their power, and outright stupidity of THEIR programs

  • i have to agree with EGil. That agenda is the same pablum we’ve been served up by both parties for years. It’s meaningless at this point.

  • I thought the conclusion was that even though Republicans had a plan, Privitizing social security, passing the energy bill, etc. People just didn’t like their plans.

  • See Republican’s Contract with America. National Security. Pro-Family. Fiscal Responsibility. Strengthen the Economy. News flash to the Democratic Party, except for the right wing nut jobs that are only concerned about protecting life (beginning at the sub-atomic level) and quashing homosexuality, a plurality of Americans support this agenda. In fact, that agenda won the House away from the Democrats in 1994. We need ideas that will accomplish these goals. Ideas that will show the true differences in how Republicans and Democrats attack America’s problems. If Democrats can’t come up with legitimate policies to accomplish the goals Senator Reid mentioned, moderate Republicans with shrug off the fact that the majority of their party’s elected leaders pander to the far right and will vote for them again in 2006.

  • You have to remember what these Repugs are good at – Stealing Dems ideas. I think Reid is smart not to show his whole hand just yet. Remember the Homeland Security department and how Bush and Co. opposed it before it became popular? Once they took the dems idea and ran, you’d have thought they’d been planning it all along. Right now we are the Opposition party: first we Oppose, then once we have a little more “political capital” we make progress.

  • Democrats can’t catch a break. I remember when the complaint about Democrats is “You have position papers on everything, but I don’t know what makes you tick.” Now Democrats are stressing themes over details and standing in the gap to stop the stampeding herds of Republican excesses, and people want the position papers back.

    The Democratic party is the natural home for the policy wonk and the technocrat, and they will be doing what they do best when it’s time for that. But not yet. Maybe in 2006, maybe in 2008, when voters are comparing specifics. But right now, at least in the estimation of this rank-and-file Democrat, the level of detail being conveyed is just right.

  • Not to flip flop, but I also agree with Scott. Maybe it’s time for some new language. Reframe the debates, but in the Democrats favor. For example:

    Strengthening our national defense = Protecting America First.

    Rebuilding our economy = Prosperity for the Rest of Us.

    Providing families with affordable health care = Keeping Families, not Corporations Healthy

    Making America energy independent = The money we spend on foreign oil shouldn’t come out of the money Americans spend for groceries.

    Securing our retirement = Securing the Future

    In fact, the Democrats could run their whole platform around the idea of Security, casting the Republicans as the party of Fear.

  • Oh those darn Democrats they don’t have any ideas, why Rush and Hannity tell me this everyday. Just because we’re not up on a soapbox beating our chest, doesn’t mean that we aren’t doing the good things.

    Surveying the current political landscape it looks like things were running a lot smoother before this Republican takeover. Somehow maintaining the status quo doesn’t seem like such a bad IDEA, in other words if it ain’t broke don’t fix it, or in the case of runaway Republicans quit breaking it.

  • Reid’s message sounds like the kinds of message to reassure Americans today. Yes, the Republicans have used a similar message in the past, but we deliver on our promises differently. Republicans can say “No Child Left Behind” and they don’t really mean it, do they? They can say they’re protecting Social Security when they’re really trashing it. They can say that they’re the part that will protect national security when in fact their only interest seems to be in protecting Halliburton’s security. So there’s no need for Dems to become suspicious when they hear these ideas coming out of Democrats — Democrats really mean to accomplish these things in ways that Democrats believe in.

  • I think the theme aym used for securing our retirement could be used for overall theme. Securing the Future would work as a great banner. You could even throw in stuff like real education reform and so on.

  • Scott, DISCO. Exactly right, I totally agree. Here are beautifully-articulated, grand, apple-pie American themes. Excellent job Senator Reid! Of course, the policy papers are all extant, we *know* Democrats have spent more time thinking this stuff through than Repugs, and have more experience and a better track record delivering it too.

    What you might be hearing calls for are not for policy papers down in the details, but the next level of high-level information down from grand themes. This is a *natural thing* in the sales and marketing cycle, and it’s a sign of success. When you’ve hooked customers with emotions and sweeping themes, they start asking about how, why, when, how much. The call for detail is an indicator of good work at the grand-theme level. The next step from here is some high-level, well-marketed, succinct, catchily-named initiatives… maybe 4-5 bullet-items, with catchy 4-word labels for each. We can drill down from those into as much detail as anyone wants to go… after 2-3 more levels you’ll be at policy papers if you want to go that far down the rabbit hole.

    Caveat: I’m a former marketing manager, not a policitian. I know how to sell stuff; the Repugs do too (remember: Rove and Company was a direct-marketing business). Reid is doing a beautiful job of this; I’m totally impressed. For the first time since JFK (and a brief bright spot in Clinton), Democrats seem to be learning how to sell. Nice work.

  • Hey guys, Reid and the Dems DID put the policy pronouncements together at the start of this 109th Congress by introducing ten pieces of legislation (I don’t know the numbers, but if I recall they were S. 1 through 10, or S. 11-20), which DID spell out all the things Reid spoke of yesterday at the National Press Club. In fact, had the nuclear option been successful, Reid had promised that, in addition to slow-walking everything to stymie Frist and his gang, but also to to force action on these ten pieces of legislation that are now bottled up in committee.

    Pay attention. Ried has put this out there. Pelosi is doing the same on the House side. Both of these leaders are using Gen. Clark to educate ALL of their caucuses on defense and military matters. Stem cells are coming, and work is moving forward to change the memes on abortion.

    Other changes in language and focus are coming, and even in some policy positions that Dems hold. But the bottom line is to take back the “liberal” and “progressive” labels, as they truly represent what the vast majority of Americans want from their government.

    The Republicans HAVE overreached, and are too focused on the exercise of power to “rule” rather than to “govern.” This has served to start opening the eyes of America, and Reid and Pelosi are positioning Dems as the rock-steady protectors of what Americans value the most. Let’s join the choir, as Reid is the conductor for now, and he has earned some trust to continue on a while longer before we pitch him overboard! [As evidence of Reid’s solid performance so far, how many of you really miss Tom Daschle as Minority Leader? For me, it took more than just a few seconds to even remember his name!]

  • The ten pieces of legislation were introduced, with a press conference, on January 24, 2005. Each were read twice, then referred to Committees — with no further action since, compliments of the Rethug Chairmen.

    These are all summarized on the “Issues” page of the Senate Democrats website at http://democrats.senate.gov/issues.html

    The bills, the main sponsor, and the titles are:

    S.11 “Standing With Our Troops Act of 2005”
    Carl Levin – Finance Committee
    S.12 “Targeting Terrorists More Effectively Act of 2005”
    Joe Biden – Foreign Relations Committee
    S.13 “Fulfilling Our Duties to America’s Veterans Act of 2005”
    Daniel Akaka – Veterans’ Affairs Committee
    S.14 “Fair Wage, Competition, and Investment Act of 2005”
    Debbie Stabenow – Finance Committee
    S.15 “Quality Education for All Act”
    Jeff Bingaman – Finance Committee
    S.16 “Affordable Health Care Act”
    Edward Kennedy – Finance Committee
    S.17 “Voting Opportunity and Technology Enhancement Rights
    Act of 2005”
    Christopher Dodd – Rules and Aministration Committee
    S.18 “Meeting Our Responsibility to Medicare Beneficiaries
    Act of 2005”
    Mark Dayton – Finance Committee
    S.19 “Fiscal Responsibility for a Sound Future Act”
    Kent Conrad – Budget Committee
    S.20 “Prevention First Act”
    Harry Reid – Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Comm.

    In addition to this and the things I identified in my post above, Reid has started a communications/war room, and has used it to great effect in fighting social security destruction, the nuclear option, and many other things. Good things are happening; we need to avoid the internal sniping and bomb-throwing so evident right now with the the Rethugs and their radical wingnut contingent.

  • Comments are closed.