Republican ‘re-branding’ poised to launch

A couple of months ago, Rep. Tom Davis, a Virginia Republican and former chairman of the NRCC, told the WaPo, “The House Republican brand is so bad right now that if it were a dog food, they’d take it off the shelf.”

GOP leaders probably didn’t care for the comparison, but they’ve been worried about the Republican “brand” for quite a while. Indeed, way back in October, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) quietly launched a re-branding initiative, working to with corporate advertising and rebranding experts to help Republicans turn things around.

Seven months later, we’re finally going to see what these guys have come up with. Roll Call reported today:

After months working behind the scenes, House Republican leaders this week will finally start rolling out their rebranding effort aimed at rallying the party around a comprehensive policy and message agenda.

Titled “Reasons to Believe,” the plan is meant to provide House Republicans with a sales pitch to voters by focusing on four issue areas: the economy, energy, health care and security.

Leaders will present the package Wednesday at the weekly meeting of the Republican Conference.

According to a memo that will circulate to House Republicans today (and which Boehner’s office seemed willing to leak), the GOP caucus will get a relatively straightforward message: “Washington is broken, the American people want it fixed, and Democrats in Washington have proven unable or unwilling to get the job done. Republicans will. Americans have seen first-hand the change Democrats are making, and it is moving America in the wrong direction. To the American people, we say that Republicans will deliver ‘the change you deserve.'”

The closer one looks at the details, the more one wonders whether those corporate advertising and rebranding experts were overpaid.

Next week, Republicans will premier their energy policy, focused on boosting the supply of domestic production, bringing down gas prices and creating jobs, the memo states.

In following weeks, GOPers will roll out their visions for other issues:

* Health care — “Affordable, high-quality health care for every American by giving families greater choice and control, not through a massive expansion of government health care controlled by bureaucrats.”

* The economy — “A stronger economy by stopping the largest tax increase in American history, cutting wasteful Washington spending, balancing the budget by 2012, passing serious entitlement reform and strengthening our housing sector.”

* Security — “From threats our families face both at home and abroad by securing our borders once and for all, taking on the rising criminal threats in our communities and giving terrorists plotting new attacks no place to hide.”

Now, maybe it’s just me, but this sounds exactly like the Republican agenda we’ve seen for quite a while. The only substantive difference seems to be that the House GOP caucus is now willing to unveil some kind of “universal” healthcare bill, though it will probably look pretty similar to the McCain plan, which means, of course, that it leaves millions of Americans behind and does nothing to even try to control costs. (I am, however, delighted to see House Republicans endorse the notion that “every American” deserves “affordable, high-quality health care.”)

In other words, the re-branded Republican Party will look exactly like the old Republican Party, except now we’ll hear GOP candidates saying “change you deserve” an awful lot.

My sense is that Boehner & Co. are confused about the systemic and institutional problems burdening the party right now. The problem isn’t that the party has great ideas that it’s having trouble selling or a brilliant agenda lying just below the surface; the problem is the GOP’s “ideas” — I use the term loosely — are either unpopular, complete failures, or both.

This isn’t an old car in need of a fresh coat of paint; this is a car that only moves in reverse.

Does this mean we will soon be able to buy Republicans at Big Lots? ;>

  • This will be the most successful marketing campaign since Ford introduced the Edsel.

  • They can talk about “rebranding” all they want – the fact is they know what they have to offer is unpalatable to most Americans. That is why they had to steal 2 elections (2000 & 2008).

    This isn’t about rebranding at all – it’s how to create and “catapult” the propaganda that will enable them to continue to steal elections and still give the corpocracy’s mainstream media the talking points and distractions to compell Americans to accept and “get over” the fraudulent elections.

  • I just hope that to whatever degree the press questions these talking points (which is, of course, all they are), they ask exactly how the Permanent War/Tax Cuts for Billionaires Party plans to balance the budget by 2012. Eliminate the New Deal entitlement programs? Seize the million poorest Americans and sell off their organs on the black market? Bake sale at Jack Welch’s house?

  • I think the Republicans really believe their own talking points, but their belief is actually ideology not reason. They can’t give up their ideology (regardless that it’s a bunch of nonsense), and so they think that if they just say it a little differently that people will believe them too. Unfortunately, their ideology is shared by millions of Americans who respond blindly to phrases like “socialized medicine,” “lower taxes,” and “islamo fascism.” Fortunately, millions of other Americans are rejecting the Republican “religion” and maybe, just maybe, lasting change will come.

  • The problem the Republicans have is that the inept George W Bush drove this country into virtual bankruptcy, and they helped him do it. The only way these people can redeem their honor is to start saying no to George and that will not happen. They have hitched their wagon to a runaway train. Affordable health care? Does anyone believe that will happen with gazillionaire McCain steering the train?

  • Remember how 8 years of complete Republican rule almost destroyed our counrty? Well, the Democratic party hasn’t been able to clean up our mess, and we’ve given them almost 18 months! If Democrats can’t run a government while Republicans are filibustering mothers day, why should you vote for them? Vote Republican or we’ll hold our breath until we pass out. And then we’re telling on you.

  • As the token moderate on this board, I have to say that the Republicans are in deep trouble if they think this is going to fly.

    Health care — “Affordable, high-quality health care for every American by giving families greater choice and control, ……” So far so good. unfortunately, the experience in the US and the rest of the world shows that the best way to achieve this is through some serious government control over health care.

    The economy — “A stronger economy by stopping the largest tax increase in American history, cutting wasteful Washington spending, balancing the budget by 2012, passing serious entitlement reform and strengthening our housing sector.”

    I like the whole idea. I want a stronger economy. I want my taxes cut to $0. I want a balanced budget. I want to cut waste. I want serious reform, I want a strenthened housing sector.

    Unfortunately, getting rid of the inheritance tax and keeping all sorts of dishonest tax cuts passed since 2001 is not the way to get there.

    Security — “From threats our families face both at home and abroad by securing our borders once and for all, taking on the rising criminal threats in our communities and giving terrorists plotting new attacks no place to hide.”

    I like the idea of being secure. Having lost my previous job when my former company hired a legal alien at a lower wage and then firing me, I am not thrilled with the current immigration policy. I want to prevent terrorist attacks too.

    But then I also like things called the rule of law. So, I can’t imagine the Republicans have a clue how to actually achieve real security.

    Then again, since I go to church every Sunday and try to follow the teachings of Jesus, I can’t stand the idea that we should not treat the poor as badly as the Republicans want them treated. They must use a different Bible than I do. I don’t see where it says that a good Christian should kick people when they are down.

  • The problem isn’t their message: it’s their credibility. Voters know that whatever ‘fix’ republicans try to sell is only a ploy to get people to vote for them only to have them further the wealth and power of corporations. They are a party ruled of, for and by greedy, anti-American corporations that only care about themselves. The gop, aligned with corporation, have and are doing everything they can to undermine the constitution and the American people know it. Someone needs to tell them that the jig is up.

  • “We created these problems – so we know how to solve them!”

    There’s nothing to say here.

  • I know that the GOP relies on its base being dumber than a sack of hammers, but even they are getting their fundamentals screwed up.

    The problem isn’t with the BRAND. It’s with the PRODUCT! It’s what they’re selling, not how they’re selling it.

    But because they don’t want to change the product AT ALL, all they can do is try to figure out how to make the public want it.

    Reminds me of that episode of the Simpsons where Homer hires himself out as a product tester for extra money: “Why would anyone take a diet supplement that causes BLINDNESS?” “We’ll let Marketing worry about that!”

  • we’ll hear GOP candidates saying “change you deserve” an awful lot.

    Please, please, please. Picture the ad showing Boehner saying this while his fellow Reps are voting on the Mother’s Day referendum.

  • I’m not a perfect person. I’ve done many things I’m not proud of. But I still don’t think I deserve whatever the Republicans have in store for me.

  • What Tomb said @ # 5 – They can’t give up their beliefs, no matter what reality throws at them.
    Witness the continued talk of “Market Solutions” while the (now unregulated) finance market melts down, gas prices soar (after the “markets” said people want huge gas-guzzling behemoths, That BTW happened to be very profitable for the automakers), and we see the twin middle class killer of outsourcing & hiring cheaper immigrant workers here at home.
    Markets can and do work, and government works, too. Republican’ts can’t understand the 2nd part of that sentance.

    Neil – my condolences on the job situation. You are not the only moderate here, it just may seem so because people comment on things that stir their passion. That tends to get more extreme comments.

  • This is re-branding? Um no. Seems more like meet the new boss, same as old boss. Of course no matter how far they try to re-brand, they will only ever get so far with the same fools running things.

    There is this Einstein quote – though I have seen variations – to the affect “you cannot solve a problem with the same mind that created it” that seems to fit here.

  • Also, Stringer Bell from the first season of the Wire got more knowledge about branding and marketing from that community college class he took, than these guys got from their corporate consultants.

  • As the token moderate on this board — neil wilson
    You’re not a token moderate, you’re a blatant conservative who was very happy to be supporting Mitt Romney until he dropped out, and you’re concern-trolling now.

  • They’re not selling dog food, they’re selling dog shit.

    Some people will be dumb enough to believe them, but I think that even the dumbest folks out there are getting sick of Bush, and he’s their poster boy. Unless they chuck him overboard they’re dead, and if they do they’re dead (because the moronic 25% who still like Bush will leave).

    I think their one shot is to launch another war (with Iran or maybe some other smaller entity like Syria) and the (temporary) patriotic stupor that would create. And with Bush’s credibility in the toilet, even that might not work.

  • “Reasons to Believe”– Tim Hardin, anyone? (cue guitar):
    “…and if I listen long enough to you
    I’ll find a way to believe that it’s all true,
    knowin’ that you lied
    straight-faced, while I cried,
    Still, I try to find a reason to believe.”

    I don’t think the ad team has any old folkies aboard.
    But the words sure fit the tune they want us to sing.

  • They’re going to make people so sick of the word “change”. It’s a brilliant (read: idiotic, yet somewhat frightening) attempt at poisoning Obama’s message…

  • Kind of ironic about the trademark violation of one of big pharma’s advertizing logos. It’s heartening to know the level of brilliance working the GOP’s machinery. Remember GM trying to sell the Nova in Mexico ( ‘no va’ is spanish for ‘no go’ for those unfamialiar with the language)? Or even better: Nike marketing a woman’s running shoe called ‘Incubus’?!

  • Rebranding the Congressional Republican Party Identity is about like trying to stop a Battleship using OARS.

    So this should take a while if they are serious, if not this short term cycle to cycle spin.

    For this cycle in 08, the bigger GOP opportunity for rebranding lies with McCain. Conceivable this guy could try the triangulating approach by casting dangerous liberals on the left against loser congressional republicans on the right to present himself as a middle of the road option.

  • As someone who used to vote Republican pretty consistently, I still agree (on a conceptual level) with a lot of what the GOP says they stand for. Their problem is, they don’t live up to their ideals.

    The thing that turned me off for good is their blatant fiscal irresponsibility. You can’t let a war (or any project, really) run 1000% over-budget (partially due to rampant corruption, partially due to brain-dead planning) while cutting taxes and borrowing the needed funds from other countries. The GOP claims to be the business party (i.e. the party that best represents the interests and ideals of business owners, large and small), but if any business were run the way they run the country, it would have been borded up long ago, and we’d still be selling office furniture to dry and dent the losses.

  • This approach is as bankrupt as everything else the Republicans have offered since, well, in my memory. It’s also hilarious if infuriating: talk about slogan theft! That said, it remains to be seen how the so-called watchdogs of fact and fair play, the MSM, will “report” this. If people like Tim Russert and oh, say, Wolf Blitzer, introduce this claptrap as credible, and conduct self-important interviews with party flacks, viewers who rely on them as credible sources may be taken in. It is up to everyone else, here and at their dinner tables and with friends, to disagree politely but firmly with the frame in general, to reiterate the link between the Iraq War and the very tough economic times we now face. If enough of us lead the way, hotshot pundits will (perhaps?) follow, start doing their jobs and challenge absurd claims. Their ratings may even improve: action (in this case, the action of real reporting) trumps baloney any time.

  • I like the whole idea. I want a stronger economy. I want my taxes cut to $0. I want a balanced budget. I want to cut waste. I want serious reform, I want a strenthened housing sector.

    I just want my g-ddamned pony already.

  • The “New Republican Transparency” theme—designed with those nasty little restroom-stall problems in mind….

  • Neil,

    I want a stronger economy. I want my taxes cut to $0. I want a balanced budget.

    These statements are internally inconsistent. why not just ask for $1MM a year in tax rebates?

  • Can’t polish a turd. They’re better off trying to sell Amway…

  • OK, so somepeople think I am a conservative. Whatever,

    Look, I want lots of things. I would like 72 virgins right now. I would like to be happier. I would like to be healthier. I would like to be richer. I would like to be wiser.

    However, I am stuck with what I got.

    I was really shocked a few years ago when I paid $60,000 in income taxes. I would love to be $60,000 in income taxes again. As my father says, he would love to be rich enough to worry about estate taxes.

    Remember, it isn’t the amount you pay in taxes that counts. It is the amount you keep after taxes that counts.

    If the economy has been good to you then you can pay taxes. If the economy has not been good to you then it is a lot harder to pay taxes.

    I don’t want to get religious on you but Jesus said the poor woman who gave 2 cents gave far more than the rich man who gave $10 million because the poor woman gave up something while the rich man wouldn’t miss the money.

    I don’t care how much money in taxes Stan O’Neil of Merrill Lynch paid on his $162 million in severance. Whatever the amount, he is a rich man and was paid far more than he deserved. After all, he almost crippled the company and thousands of people lost their jobs and their homes because of him.

    Damn. I must be a conservative Republican since I talked about Jesus and Wall Street in the same post.

  • Answer: “the economy, energy, health care”
    Question: “what are three things the republican party sucks at?”

  • Damn. I must be a conservative Republican since I talked about Jesus and Wall Street in the same post. — neil wilson
    Good job completely ignoring the link I included in my post. I looked up your name when you first came here advocating intelligent design. You stop by here every so often, pretending you’re a moderate while a little research shows you’re very much a conservative. You were a strong backer of Romney back in January. And now you’re claiming you’re a moderate — and the
    token moderate on this blog no less! You’re a stupid concern troll, please stop pretending otherwise.

  • Washington is broken, the American people want it fixed,

    And the next republican filibuster will be in 5, 4, 3, …

  • Nautilator:

    When was I EVER a backer or Romney? I might have said that I thought the person who was governor of Mass. was a decent person. He was pro-choice, pro universal health care, and a sucessful businessman.

    I really like Mayor Bloomberg but then, Mike is still a moderate Democrat who became a Republican to get elected.

    I have been a yellow dog Democrat since the 1988 Republican convention when Pat Robertson and Pat Buchannan convinced me that the Republican party is beyond hope.

    But please tell me where someone who is:
    pro-choice,
    pro free-trade,
    favors single payer universal health care,
    against priviizing social security, in favor of significant gas taxes along with significant rebates on payroll and income taxes to offset them,
    in favor of a higher minimum wage,
    against the Iraq war,
    and believes that Jesus meant for us to help those less fortunate
    and voted a straight Democratic ticket for 20 years should be?

    Am I a conservative Republican?

  • pierce at 26 says “…if any business were run the way they run the country, it would have been boarded up long’ ago, and we’d still be selling office furniture to dry and dent the losses.”

    Remember Enron? I’m sure that lots of our current admin were parts of interlocking directorates with that mess. And are we sure that Halliburton is that much different? What happens when its pipeline to gov’t contracts dries up?

    The problem is that the fat cats have gotten just as lazy/stupid as the last time we let them run around unregulated – before the Great Depression. And they’re probably a LOT more corrupt.

    Remember – there are only 2 kinds of Publicans – millionaires and suckers.

  • Hey, Nautilus – I followed the link you provided, and found ‘neil wilson’ commenting on Publican candidates on an American Prospect posting – nothing in his comments necessarily makes him a dreaded conservative – he’s just saying that the ‘conservative’ candidate is not as ‘conservative’ as he pretends to be – not calling for a ‘true conservative’ or anything like that. So you haven’t convinced me that you have a justification for your disrespect of his post here.

  • Steve, you write:

    The closer one looks at the details, the more one wonders whether those corporate advertising and rebranding experts were overpaid.

    Now, let’s be fair to the branding experts.

    A guy, let’s call him John Boner, comes to me carrying a box and says, “I need to rebrand what’s in this box.”

    I open Boner’s box. There is a feces sandwich inside.

    I think: “Looks like sh**t; smells like sh**t; and if I had to guess, probably tastes like sh**t.”

    I tell the guy, “Boner, you got a problem. That’s a pile of sh**t you have in that box.”

    Boner says, “you don’t know the half of it. I know it’s sh**t. You know it’s sh**t. And really, my company’s most loyal customers love the stuff. But I can’t survive by just selling the same old sh**t to the same old people. I need to expand my market share, or we’re going under.”

    “Have you thought about selling something other than sh**t, Boner?” I ask.

    “I don’t really know how to make anything else,” he says. “That’s why I need you to come up with a new way of selling this sh**t. I can pay you whatever you ask.”

    “Poor Boner,” I think. I mean, I don’t want to take advantage of the guy, but he really does seem to be in a tight spot. And I am in business to make money, after all. So, I tell him I’ll see what I can do.

    I get to work. Pretty soon, though, I realize I was right the first time. This is sh**t. Nobody but this guy’s most loyal customers are ever going to buy this stuff.

    So, I slap a new label on it, jazz up the old marketing slogan a little bit, and send him a bill.

    I did my best. It’s not my fault the guy’s product is crap.

  • Neil: I believe you and enjoy reading your posts. Do we all have to be lock-step on every issue? Let’s hope we don’t. The Republicans lost me in ’88 too when, as I thought through my Catholic faith, I decided that God was not necessarily a Republican. It is actually hard for me to see how any practicing Christian could embrace the republic-thug party line.

  • Obama will win if he doesn’t drive away the center.

    The only way McCain can win is if he captures a huge portion of the center.

    Insulting people who don’t completely agree with you is one way to drive people in the center to the other side.

    Just a little food for thought.

  • When we see Bush’s low popularity numbers and the country-headed-in-the-wrong direction numbers, it’s worth remembering (albeit hard to believe) that some of that dissatisfaction comes from those who believe Bush hasn’t gone far enough to the right. The rebrand does that, and with those people, is likely to succeed.

    As for the rest of the country, I think the rebrand’s success comes down to (1) does anyone believe anything the Republican party says anymore, and (2) do the Democrats offer something as clear and concise as the Repubs are offering.

    The Repubs have created so many “common sense” memes that have become an accepted part of conventional thinking, that all a re-brand has to do is tie into those memes, add a new twist, sound serious and demean the Dems. This one does all that. I wouldn’t dismiss it.

  • Well, Ollie Ox, @10…
    Repubs have always depended on Big Pharma, so, perhaps, it’s not surprising that they went in that direction when their depression reached the nadir (though, personally, I don’t think anything with a big W on it is likely to help them much).

    At least, the Dem motto — the New Direction, promptly renamed the Nude Erection by someone here (Dale?) — had a perky undertone to it 🙂

  • Voters’ ears are replete with news reports betraying the media’s desire to attach brand equity to our current slate of three presidential candidates. Well, I have some bad news for you—the current slate of candidates has yet to promulgate any distinctive branding, not in the way say a Jack Kennedy or a Ronald Reagan projects brand equity.

    Brands are iconic; they are far more than ethereal fads or trends. Jack Kennedy was the scion of a family brand, and his surname was rich with iconography. Icons are about rituals, legacies, and a voice that keeps resonating long after they pass. Kennedy is about Hyannis Port, touch football games, hair blowing on a sailboat, PT-109, a rocking chair in the oval office, a handsome face that informs a sense of aesthetics to sensory branding. Though he was a well-known womanizer, even Kennedy’s dalliances were part of the brand fabric. Kennedy’s memorable Cold War “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech is legendary, not just for the fact that his snowclone was a misstatement and actually meant “I am a jelly doughnut.” Kennedy lives on as an icon in our cultural fabric—and he has been dead since 1963.

    Reagan had brand equity through and through. A Hollywood B-movie star, he was a hero in the movies and would become a hero on the world stage. His lifelong nickname, The Gipper, came from his film role as George Gipp in Knute Rockne, All American. When Reagan stood up to the Soviet Union, he certainly won one for the Gipper. Without flinching, the Russians blinked, and the rest is history as the walls came tumbling down in the breakup that followed. The label “Reaganomics” has worked itself into our vernacular and the words “tear down that wall” will live in infamy.
    And like Kennedy, Reagan had an aura of the virile American. He looked good on a horse and comfortable with a gun and, unlike, Kennedy even looked good on the big screen. He resonated a masculine power in his blue jeans and flannel shirt, with the love of his life on his arm. This is the stuff that icons are made of and create brands that are true.

    Today’s slate of candidates has yet to develop a brand conscience in the minds of voters. McCain certainly owns his space representing the heroism of the Vietnam era, albeit he is not a brand. Hillary seems to permeate with a “More of the Same” message when compared with Obama. But neither of them are a brand. If anything, time will tell if there will be a “Brand Clinton.” If there is, it will be in tribute to Bill—Hillary will get the residue of the label. For his part, Obama may be closer to resonating with the voters as “Brand Hope.” His unflinching message of Change is idealistic in a way that is fresh and new. If he stays on target and goes head to head with McCain, the articulation of “Brand Hope” may galvanize the American voters to land him in the White House. But to call any of them a “brand” is mistaking the meaning of the word. They are “candidates”—a mere moment in time on the radar screen of our political arm wrestling. They could become a brand when they accomplish things that resonate for the long term, when long past their tenure their names are used to drive home a point or used as a noun or stand for something that becomes culturally significant.

    If Hillary doesn’t win, her relevance will be diminished; ergo she can’t be a brand. Same for Obama and McCain. They are all just players, like George McGovern, Ross Perot, John Kerry, John Edwards, Rudy Guliani, Joe Biden, Mitt Romney, Chris Dodd and hundreds of others have been. Just because you are in the news, doesn’t make you a brand. When you start changing the news, you are on your way. When you fulfill a promise that changes lives and impacts our culture in a way that resonates in the history books, then you are a brand. Anything less, you are a just a moment in time.

    Leslie Singer
    President & Chief Creative Officer
    G2 Branding and Design

  • It’s sad that today’s politicians can’t become “more than a moment in time”-As Leslie Singer points out in her insight on political branding. Would love to see more of this on the endless coverage on “political news”-Very insightful Ms. Leslie Singer!

  • Comments are closed.