Restoring my faith in the electorate a little more

In 1992, Colorado voters approved known as the Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR). The measure added provisions to the state constitution that made it difficult to raise taxes under any circumstances and strictly limited state government’s ability to increase spending beyond the rate of inflation. If Colorado ran a surplus, it had to automatically take the form of a refund to state residents.

At the time, Coloradoans thought it sounded great. It was, of course, a disaster.

TABOR has completely warped Colorado politics ever since. One of the original supporters was a little-known state representative from Aurora named Bill Owens. Six years later, Owens was elected to be Colorado’s first Republican governor in 24 years. It wasn’t long before national Republicans began to notice. National Review named him “America’s Best Governor” in 2002 and admiringly listed his government-cutting bona fides. Anti-tax advocates began touting TABOR as a national model and Owens as a potential presidential candidate for 2008.

But while Colorado has been terrific for TABOR, TABOR has been a nightmare for Colorado, and for Colorado Republicans in particular. The state budget was fine as long as the state’s economy was growing, and bills could be pushed into the following year. Once things slowed down, retrenchment became a serious business just as health care and education expenses began to shoot upwards. Thanks to TABOR, the state can’t increase its spending on roads and other expenditures it’s been putting off.

Owens quickly joined Dem lawmakers in asking state voters to undo at least part of what they had done. TABOR had crippled state government and Owens knew it. It was Grover Norquist’s drown-it-in-the-bathtub vision brought to life. (Indeed, Norquist played a key role in shaping the ’92 referendum.)

Politically, it was a long shot asking voters to undo a measure that passed because it was an “anti-tax” initiative. Coloradoans went to the polls yesterday, and lo and behold, did the right thing.

Colorado voters on Tuesday agreed to give up $3.7 billion in tax refunds over the next five years in a historic move to ease the nation’s strictest limit on state spending. Fifty-three percent of voters supported Referendum C….

Referendum C passed the legislature with the bulk of its support from Democrats, led by state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff, D-Denver.

“I think there are two messages,” Romanoff said. “One is that bipartisanship works. People want to see Democrats and Republicans working together. And, two, the economy matters. People want to invest in the economy, health care, roads and bridges. They want to bring good jobs to this state.”

Referendum C suspends a provision of the state constitution’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights to let the state keep an estimated $3.7 billion in revenue that would otherwise be returned to taxpayers over the next five years.

Nonpartisan state budget officials estimated most taxpayers will be giving up an average of $491 over five years. The state will use it for roads, schools, health care and pensions.

Kudos to the 53% of Colorado voters who had the good sense to want to invest in their future. Under the ’92 TABOR, state’s low-income children who lack health insurance skyrocketed; high school graduation rates fell; teacher salaries fell to the lowest rates in the nation; Colorado hemorrhaged tens of thousands of jobs; all-day kindergarten in low-performing schools and pre-school was eliminated, and Medicaid hospital reimbursement, state support to local and regional health agencies, and mental health funding were all cut.

Norquist and his cohorts looked at Colorado as a model for the nation. Yesterday’s vote should set them back a while.

“My confidence in the voting public has been re-established,” said state Sen. Norma Anderson, R-Lakewood, “because they recognize the needs for the services that government provides.”

I love a happy ending.

I’m proud to be one of those 53% who voted for Referendum C.

  • Terrific! I can’t stand the “all-taxes-are-bad”mentality that our politicians have crammed down our throats. Good for Colorado, and I wish them the best with their governemental programs which help people and make the state a better place to live.

    Congratulations!

  • Congrats to those in CO who saw the light. If only the clowns here in LA would. Not that we have TABOR. But we do have way too many Norquist type asshats who think extremely low taxes and no restrictions on business is good for business. LA has one of the lowest tax systems of any state in the country. It was ranked dead last in the recent study of best places for workers and workers rights. It turns a blind eye towards environmental issues. Because of this, one would think business would be knocking down the doors to get in. But they are not. My guess (not really a guess as I believe it is proven fact) is that there is a little bit more weight given to quality standard of living (which only higher but fair tax systems can provide–i.e. investing in itself and its future), effective government, access to resources (primarily a properly educated work force, which again requires funding i.e. tax revenue) by business and those who must work and live where that business is located. But both the politicians’ and electorates’ collective heads are shoved far too up their asses down here to see such things.

  • I also voted for C; and for D as well which allowed the state to borrow money to start much needed infrastructure improvements. D was narrowly defeated and C just barely passed even though it was a bipartisan compromise and was supported by a republican governor. I guess my message is we have a long way to go. C was almost defeated even though it would have defunded higher education, road construction and many social programs. So remember that there are still many people out there who are anti tax no matter what the circumstances.

  • Well, it was a little bit of progress, but one shouldn’t be too happy or give the voters too much credit.
    The terms of the debate were still pathetic. We were forced to listen to Owens bullshitting about how “There is a glitch in TABOR,” though the fact was that TABOR was doing exactly what its authors intended — strangling government. Owens had to be dragged kicking and screaming to support, and if we had had a Democratic governor in office, Owens would have been in the vanguard of the opposition. Bipartisan support was critical to the narrow passage, and it was only achieved by giving the authors of this disaster a pass on the mess they created.
    So, we got a temporary suspension of TABOR, and that is a very good thing, but as a price we had to agree to a debate in which we had to praise both the substance and philosophy of disastrous policy decisions, further embedding the whole anti-representative government, anti-tax, pro-stupidity meme.

  • “My confidence in the voting public has been re-established,” said state Sen. Norma Anderson, R-Lakewood, “because they recognize the needs for the services that government provides.”

    Why is Anderson a Republican? This statement is the boiled down essence of the Democratic party. Or am I missing something?

  • Now let’s have the DNC package this whole thing into a 30 second spot and prepare it to run across the country. If Karl or Grover set foot in your state to raise money or campaign for a Repub then their district gets to see the reality of the Neocon policies. We all know very few will like the results of these policies (because very few will benefit).

    They are down right now and they need to be kicked in the teeth.

  • Grover Norquist is the poster child for people who advocate extreme positions that hurt countless people except themselves. They keep themselves warm and dry with the steady flow of money that few others are priviledged to have access to. “Hello, Mr. Abramoff!” I wonder how strongly they would push their agenda if they themselves had to live with the same consequences as the ‘little people’ do?

  • You don’t want to pay for it (teacher salaries, crime prevention, etc) you don’t get it and frankly and you get worse.

    Nice to see that what looks good on paper and doesn’t end up well in practice some people are smart enought to throw it on the trash heap. Too band the Norquists of the world won’t take note.

  • Ohio voters will vote on a measure similar to TABOR next year. The measure is backed by the nefarious Ken Blackwell, who is currently the frontrunner for the 2006 GOP nomination for governor. Blackwell’s TABOR currently enjoys the support of a majority of Ohio voters. Perhaps a few horror stories from Colorado might change their minds. After all, you get what you pay for.

  • If I’d had no preconceptions about TABOR and Referendums C and D, I have voted against it based on their attack strategy. Every night I had vile messages on my answering machine that resorted to every negative trick in the book. Same with the TV ads — nothing but innuendo, strawmen, and demagoguery. By comparison, the pro-C/D factions did very little phone banking, and their TV ads came across as mature and reasonable.

    I think the electorate is starved for framing that doesn’t treat them as idiots. Dems need to be assertive, but don’t abandon reason in making arguments, and don’t resort to attacks or demagoguery.

  • Comments are closed.