It was as predictable as the sunrise. The Democratic National Committee launched a very good ad hitting John McCain — in an entirely fair and accurate way — for his comments about keeping U.S. troops in Iraq for another century. Given that whenever anyone, anywhere, mentions the words “John McCain” and “100 years” in the same sentence Republicans get apoplectic, it stood to reason that the new DNC ad would cause quite a few GOP operatives to really a blow a gasket.
And, right on cue…
The Republican National Committee wants CNN and MSNBC to stop airing the DNC’s new national television advertisement, calling it “false and defamatory” and illegally coordinated.
“This is a complaint about the facts that are being misrepresented in the ad, and this being a deliberate falsehood, that we are saying, stations have an obligation to protect the public from airing a deliberate falsehood,” said Sean Cairncross, an RNC lawyer.
The RNC provided no evidence to support their change that the communication was illegally coordinated, aside for a few newspaper articles pointing out that some Democrats work for both a candidate and the committee, like pollster Cornell Belcher. DNC chairman Howard Dean said this morning that neither campaign saw or heard the ad before the put it out.
The RNC is ginning up the threat of legal action to give weight to their criticism of the ad’s content. Cairncross would not say whether the party will sue CNN or MSNBC, the two cable networks airing the ad, if they refuse to kill it.
On the one hand, it’s just sad to see Republicans whining so vociferously and dishonestly. On the other hand, I couldn’t be more pleased.
First, the ad isn’t “illegal.” If the Republican National Committee had any evidence at all of unlawful coordination between the DNC and the Clinton or Obama campaigns, it would have backed up the bogus charge with some kind of proof. None exists, but the RNC seems to enjoy throwing around baseless charges.
Second, there is no “falsehood” in the ad, deliberate or otherwise. The DNC commercial quotes McCain directly. It relies on his own comments, the context of which does nothing to change the meaning of his remarks. He believes the United States should be prepared to leave troops in Iraq indefinitely, maybe 100 years, maybe more. He said it, he meant it, and Democrats would be insane not to tell voters about it.
The DNC was very careful in exactly how it worded the ad, precisely because it knew the RNC would make a variety of ridiculous demands. So what on earth is the RNC going to sue over? At least for now, there are no laws against running ads that make John McCain look bad.
Third, last week, when the North Carolina Republican Party wanted to run a cheap and scurrilous ad involving Jeremiah Wright, the national networks ran the ad over and over again — for free — because the commercial was ostensibly part of a national controversy. Perhaps, in the interest of balance and evenhandedness, those same networks can air the “100 years” ad over and over again, letting the public know about this controversy?
And fourth, in case you haven’t seen the ad the RNC doesn’t want you to see, here it is again:
(If, by chance, you’re just joining us and don’t know what all the fuss is about regarding McCain and his “100 years” remark, check yesterday’s post.)
The DNC isn’t going to back down on this, and the more the RNC whines incessantly, the more attention the ad should get. Stay tuned.