Romney, Huckabee fight over who values Bush more

After a series of humiliating incidents, Mike Huckabee has earned his reputation for knowing less about foreign policy than any credible candidate in either party. To help address his obvious deficiency, Huckabee wrote (or, more likely, someone on his staff wrote) a piece for the upcoming issue of Foreign Affairs, in which he criticizes the Bush administration’s handling of Iraq. Specifically, he laments the size of the troop deployment during the initial invasion, and accuses the White House of approaching the war with an “arrogant bunker mentality,” which he described as having “been counterproductive at home and abroad.”

Assuming Huckabee read the piece, he had to realize there’d be at least some pushback. Mitt Romney was the first out of the gate.

Mitt Romney ripped into Iowa frontrunner Mike Huckabee at a town hall in Humboldt, Iowa, [yesterday] morning over an article Huckabee penned in the current issue of the journal Foreign Affairs. In the article, the former Arkansas governor accused the Bush administration of having an “arrogant bunker mentality” on the world stage.

“I said, ‘Did this come from Barack Obama? Or from Hillary Clinton? Did it come from John Edwards?” Romney told the crowd of about 100 people. “No, it was one of our own. It was Governor Huckabee.”

Romney kept this up on “Meet the Press.”

“I’ve been saying for months — and I think all the Republican candidates, in fact, have been saying for months, if not years — that following the collapse of Saddam Hussein, our policy was unprepared, unplanned, understaffed, undermanaged, and that we made a number of errors and much of the difficulty we face today is due to those errors.

But it’s very different to point out the mistakes that were made. The President’s pointed out the mistakes as well. And then to say the Bush administration, our President, is arrogant with a bunker mentality — that’s a completely different statement, for which Mike Huckabee owes the President an apology.”

Oddly enough, Huckabee is already starting to back down.

TP noted that Huckabee, on CNN, characterized himself as the true Bush ally, not Romney.

“I didn’t say the President was arrogant…. I’ve said that the policies have been arrogant…. I’m the one who actually supported the President’s surge. I supported the Bush tax cuts, when Mr. Romney didn’t. I was with President Bush on gun control, when Mitt Romney wasn’t. I was with the President on the President’s pro-life position, when Mitt Romney wasn’t.”

Let’s be perfectly clear here — Huckabee and Romney are fighting over who agrees with Bush the most.

In other words, two credible challengers for the Republican presidential nomination are struggling to align themselves with the least popular president in the modern political era.

As a rule, the GOP presidential field realizes that the president’s name isn’t supposed to be uttered at all. In this week’s Republican candidate, not a single Republican hopeful used the word “Bush” over the course of the 90-minute event.

And now Huckabee and Romney are moving sharply in the other direction. Apparently, they missed the memo.

Perhaps these comments will prove useful for discussing the eventual nominee’s qualifications in the general election 🙂

  • sweet. keep the videotape rolling, folks, because this has the makings of some awesome general election ads. Show the footage of them competing to be Bush’s BFF, then (while flashing photos of Katrina ravaged N.O., war footage, photos of Gonzales testifying before Congress, newspaper headlines about corruption) “Do you wish you could have 4 more years of George W. Bush and his friends and their policies? Neither do we. Vote [insert Dem candidate] for President.”

    (Maybe we could even have the “Neither do we” said in unison by a large and diverse group of Americans.)

  • I heard somebody say:
    Burn, baby burn! GOPer Inferno!
    Burn, baby burn! Burn the RNC down!

    I leave the rest to Former Dan.

    The only way fluffing a presidont with Nixonian ratings makes sense is they’re hoping that if they play nice, BushBrat will hand over the code for the DieVote Republican Victory program.

    Seriously, saying “I like Bush” is the equivalent of saying “I think we need more plutonium in our water.” Not everyone will think this is a bad idea, but that tiny minority won’t get you elected.

  • Ah, the spectacle of watching right-wing Republicans trying to support (“mistakes were made, but…”) Bush’s wars of imperial corporate aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. Kinda makes you proud to be an imperial aggressor in the 21st century, doesn’t it?. And you thought that colonialism had ended in the middle of the 20th century?
    It seems to be running full bore these days, this time rigged for “no-bid” war profiteering.
    Back in World War Ii days, war profiteering used to be considered treasonous, but now, its’s just corporate “business as usual”….

  • Let’s hope they are both very convincing in their Bush-love proclamations. They are both experts at adopting weird belief systems.

    Slate has some excerpts from Hitchens’ new book God is Not Great.
    http://www.slate.com/id/2165033/entry/2165035/

    I was thinking that if one just included Hitchens’ posts on religion and Sullivan’s recent anti-war posts you’d have a fairly good blog.

  • It’s for certain Hukabee didn’t write that piece. It’s over his head on foreign policy issues and it’s obvious that he has to be told these things just to have ab opinion. Day by day it’s becoming more apparent when Hukabee is filled in on the issues…another op-ed pops up or some public release of information hits the press raising the question…”What took you so long to come to that conclusion Huck?”

    Thank God, I don’t have to worry about either one of these jokers ever being president, though Romney will be the nominee as he is the only one that will be able to withstand scrutiny and the GOP doesn’t want to embarrass itself too badly.

  • Mike Huckabee has earned his reputation for knowing less about foreign policy than any credible candidate in either party.

    Does that mean that Rudy Giuliani is no longer a credible candidate? He’s certainly every bit as incoherent on foreign policy as is Huckabee, not to mention quite a bit more dangerous.

  • ***Dale*** Thanks for the link to slate for excerpts to Hitchens new book. The discussion on the history of Mormons and Islam common threads was extremely informative (2 & 3).

    Thanks.

  • I can’t believe what I am reading on this blog.

    SCARY THOUGHT FOR THE DAY #26:
    Huckabee and Guiliani have nothing for the economy compared with Romney’s business and economic acumen. Will you still be complaining about Romney’s faith when they lay you off and foreclose your home? Get real, and don’t get me started about Huckabee as a foreign policy disaster. Huckabee and Ahmadinejad sitting across at a table???? That’s classic, what a nightmare.

    Take all of the t-shirts mocking Bush you see at the mall and insert Huckabee’s face. That’s what college kids may be wearing until 2012. Bush haters are going to LOVE Huckabee, what a goober…there’s a good image for the Republican stigma. Are you kidding me??

    Why don’t we all vote for an inferior candidate merely because he’s not LDS. Evangelicals are going to ruin this nation!!

  • Comments are closed.