Romney takes aim at McCain’s Kerry flirtation

I’ve been urging the Romney campaign to pick up on this for a while, and I’m delighted they’re taking the hint, first with a fun new video, and now on the campaign stump.

Republican Mitt Romney took aim at John McCain Monday over reports he once considered signing on to John Kerry’s presidential ticket, the latest effort by the Massachusetts Republican to paint his chief rival as an inconsistent and unpredictable conservative.

“I do recall a story that he was thinking about being John Kerry’s running mate — he gave that some thought,” Romney said at an early-morning rally in West Palm Beach. “Had someone asked me that question, there would not have been a nanosecond of thought about it — It would’ve been an immediate laugh. And of course, if someone asked him if he would consider me as a running mate, he would have also laughed immediately.”

“So, we are different,” Romney continued. “I’m conservative.”

To be sure, the sincerity of Romney’s conservatism is certainly open to debate, but on the substantive claim — McCain was open to joining the Democratic ticket in 2004, and running against Bush-Cheney — Romney is quite right. I’ve long wondered why this hasn’t been a bigger campaign issue; it seems like the kind of thing rank-and-file Republicans wouldn’t like at all.

This began in earnest in April, when The Hill caused a stir with a report that John McCain, in 2001, was close to switching parties, and members of his team had actually initiated discussions about the Arizona senator becoming a Dem.

Soon after, MyDD’s Jonathan Singer chatted with John Kerry and learned a similarly fascinating and related tidbit of news.

Singer: There’s a story in The Hill, I think on Tuesday, by Bob Cusack on the front page of the paper talking about how John McCain’s people — John Weaver — had approached Tom Daschle and a New York Congressman, I don’t remember his name, about switching parties. And I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about what your discussions were with him in 2004, how far it went, who approached whom… if there was any “there” there.

Kerry: I don’t know all the details of it. I know that Tom, from a conversation with him, was in conversation with a number of Republicans back then. It doesn’t surprise me completely because his people similarly approached me to engage in a discussion about his potentially being on the ticket as Vice President. So his people were active — let’s put it that way.

Singer: Okay. And just to confirm, you said it, but this is something they approached you rather than…

Kerry: Absolutely correct. John Weaver of his shop… [JK answers phone]

McCain’s willingness to consider joining the Democratic ticket is beyond dispute. In 2004, he acknowledged on national television that he’d consider the offer, should Kerry extend it. Given this, even if someone were to discount Kerry’s version of events, McCain’s own words should give the GOP base pause.

But if Kerry’s take is taken seriously, and Romney clearly hopes it is, McCain may have to respond to the story.

As Singer noted at the time, “For Republicans, I would imagine that reports that he approached the Democrats about leaving the Senate GOP caucus in 2001 represent a borderline unpardonable offense. But it seems that reaching out to the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee to talk about running on that party’s ticket would be tantamount to the highest form of political treason to Republicans.”

It seems like a potential problem for McCain, doesn’t it?

I have no problem with a Republican who seeks to work with member of the opposing party to get things done. McCain, to his credit, has done that on a number of occasions. The concern about McCain stems from what people on both sides of the aisle can recognize as power whoring and playing both sides against each other in order to get the best deal for his political career. Everyone has reason to distrust the man, especially the voters. McCain is loyal to no one but himself.

  • I think it might be easy to make the case that McCain’s “straight-shooting” is more akin to Romney’s shape-shifting than McCain would like to admit – but while McCain is no less an opportunist than Romney is, the difference is that McCain has been able to determine the framing and Romney has not.

    Romney’s problem is that he can point the finger at McCain, but McCain can point right back. Romney needs to play up the age factor – maybe McCain “forgot” or was “confused” and doesn’t remember what he said.

  • I love watching Republicans search for the “true conservative” at every level of elected office. The early Republican presidential debates were childish bickering:

    “I’m more conservative than you are.”
    “Are not!”
    “Am too!”

    And so it goes. They might as well be searching with a lantern for an honest man as for the ever-elusive “true conservative.”

  • McCain will appeqal more to Independent than Romney.
    Democrats hope Romney wins the nomination.

  • Yep, let’s all hope McCain goes down in flames because he might be willing to work across partisan lines, and that makes him a threat in the general election, especially to Hilary.

    Sometimes Democrats can be just as bad as Republicans when it comes to putting party ahead of country.

  • News Blast– Kettle calls Pot Black! (…and Pot subsequently states that Kettle is playing the ‘race card’…)

  • It was McCain’s declining the offer from Kerry in ’04 that led me to realize that he did not have the integrity and honor and call to service he has claimed. I lost respect for McCain that day. He could have saved our nation from so much.

  • “It seems like a potential problem for McCain, doesn’t it?”

    Only for those who are strict partisans and don’t cherish the thought of government working together to accomplish common goals.

    I do find it quite amusing the recent focus of this blog on McCain as of late… Clearly Steve is trying to point out conservative “flaws” of a candidate in the hopes of derailing his recent momentum. Shouldn’t you be praising McCain for some of his left leaning actions in his past?

    The Carpetbagger is Losing. Credibilty. Quickly.

  • JRS Jr.

    Huh?

    The recent focus of this blog, as it has always been, is Republican hypocrisy. The comments on another post today accused the Carpetbagger of actually being a Romney supporter! I guess the shoe happens to fit McCain today.

    Writing about Republican hypocrisy will never leave the Carpetbagger short of material. (Actually, he writes about Democratic hypocrisy too, but it seems there isn’t quite as much to work with.)

    Many Republicans (and I’m surrounded by them) refer to the “Democrat” party as “dumbocrats.” Working with “dumbocrats” is quite out of the question. A Republican candidate running a race in which he promises to reach across the aisle to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi will have a short career in politics, especially since Republicans have already demonized them so thoroughly. Republican candidates always struggle to stay to the right of each other if for no other reason than to keep Rush Limbaugh happy.

    If anyone is losing credibility, it isn’t Steve Benen.

  • Okie.. I just want Steve to come out and admit “I’d rather see the Dems face Romney than McCain since McCain could cause the Dems a problem in the general election.” Then we all can be clear of where his intentions are when he writes about McCain. Because, alas some of McCain’s attributes should be attractive to Mr. Benen and his followers.

  • JRS jr,

    I would rather Romney win the nomination than McCain because if the Democratic party pulls itself apart with internecine struggles, I would rather have Romney, a successful CEO, in office rather than McCain, the warmonger. Call it Plan D.

  • I think part of the VP talk stems from McCain liking to spread the word that everyone wants him to be their running mate to boost his own reputation and ego. He once claimed that George Bush had wanted him to be his running mate in 2000. It didn’t seem convincing for him to say Bush wanted him in 2004 so I bet he pushed the stories that Kerry was considering him.

    Regarding the comment Shouldn’t you be praising McCain for some of his left leaning actions in his past?

    The fact that McCain has strayed from conservative orthodoxy hardly makes him attractive to liberals. His views remain quite conservative from our perspective. I have actually noted on some posts at Liberal Values that he has had some reasonable positions compared to conservatives (such as opposition to torture and agreeing that global warming is a problem). However his foreign policy views are totally unacceptable. He is also quite conservative on both social and economic issues. I would hardly expect to see The Carpetbagger Report become a site which is writing very favorably about McCain.

  • Regardless of who wins, very nearly 50% of the country will have voted again him or her. Maybe a split-party ticket wouldn’t be so bad. In fact, my understanding is the original presidential elections put the winner in the presidential seat and the runner-up in the VP seat.

    I think the majority of the country is not nearly as extreme, to either side, as the people who get elected into office. I think we might all benefit from a candidate in the middle: and, by that, I mean someone who can see both sides of the issues like McCain, not a woman with a moustache.

  • Comments are closed.