Romney takes aim at McCain’s weakness

For the better part of the year, John McCain’s campaign was in free-fall, so much so that the rest of the Republican field felt entirely comfortable ignoring him altogether. His money was gone, his staff had quit, and his poll numbers had sunk to near second-tier status. There just wasn’t much point in challenging a candidate who was losing.

Now, after months of media hype about an alleged McCain “comeback,” the Arizona senator actually seems to be on the upswing. In Iowa, he’s still just about done — he’ll be lucky to finish fifth — but in New Hampshire, he’s suddenly a strong second, with the gap narrowing all the time.

How legitimate is the McCain threat? It’s serious enough for Mitt Romney to start going after him.

A Mitt Romney campaign event Friday night offered a taste of the coming rumble in New Hampshire with Senator John McCain now emerging as Mr. Romney’s main rival in the state’s upcoming Republican primary.

Mr. Romney challenged Mr. McCain directly for the first time in months in the state, pointing out before an audience of about 100 people here while talking about his belief in tax cuts that Mr. McCain had voted against the Bush tax cuts in 2001.

“President Bush did a pretty courageous thing,” Mr. Romney said. “At a time when our economy needed a boost, needed a stimulus, he said, ‘You know what, we’re going to lower taxes.’ And not everybody agreed with him. One of my friends is Senator McCain. He voted against the Bush tax cuts. I think the Bush tax cuts were a great thing for our country. I support them. I want to make them permanent and I want to add to them.”

He added: “I want to kill the death tax once and for all. We had a chance to do that by the way. Senator McCain also voted against that.”

I’d bet that for most Republicans in the audience, this was the first time they’d heard any of this, because McCain was relegated to an afterthought. But Romney’s probably right — McCain has a tough record to defend to the GOP base — if he’s not too late to stunt McCain’s growth.

I’ve long believed Romney was making a mistake not laying this groundwork sooner. It’s an easy sell:

* McCain joined with Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) to pass sweeping campaign-finance reform that conservatives generally hate.

* He joined with former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) to support a Patients’ Bill of Rights, which conservatives generally hate.

* McCain joined with Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) to support an immigration-reform measure that conservatives generally hate.

* McCain voted against Bush’s tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.

* McCain voted with Dems to keep the estate tax in place.

* He voted against the anti-gay constitutional amendment last year.

* In March 2004, asked on national television whether he would consider joining the Democratic ticket as John Kerry’s running mate, McCain said, “John Kerry is a close friend of mine. We have been friends for years. Obviously I would entertain it.”

* A month later, in April 2004, just as the national Republican campaign was beginning in earnest, McCain said, “I believe my party has gone astray…. I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy.”

It’s exactly why most of the Republican base doesn’t trust McCain right now. If there’s a genuine McCain “comeback” underway, I suspect we’ll hear quite a bit more about this record over the next two weeks.

The Republican candidates have demonstrated every way a politician can implode.

It’s been fun watching.

  • Professional worriers on the Dem side have been biting nails over all the various potential nominees for some time. Those wanting to fret about McCain pointed to his moderate positions in the areas CB outlines above, and noted the continuing infatuation the DC press corps has for him. Assuming all these worries are well-founded, I still think we have little to fear from McCain, if for no other reason than that the same moderation which endears the man to Washington yakkers and moderate voters also dooms him with the GOP base, which will accept nothing less than a genuine authoritarian extremist.

    It’s slowly dawning on the Republicans that they really got nuttin’ this cycle, so they are frantically flipping from one prospect to the next, trying to convince themselves that ONE of these bozos isn’t quite as much of a disaster as he appears. McCain would likely be their best choice, but their judgment is so impaired they can’t see it. So this boomlet too will pass, IMHO.

  • i don’t particularly care for john mccain. but on the two issues that mittens raises, bush’s tax cuts and the “death” tax (sic, really sic) mccain was on the right side.

  • Just how nutso is the Republican field this year? McCain’s looking like the sane one.

    Agreed with jimBOB. The rollercoaster ride of who is the GOP frontrunner shows just how tainted this batch of presidential hopefuls is this year. Every potential part savior has had their rise and fall and now they’re back to recycling the fallen frontrunners. The wide split between New Hampshire and Iowa polls is a sign of the religion split in the GOP. The Fundies are going to vote their theocratic party line and the old line Repubs are going in another direction. Good to see these guys heading to divorce court.

  • I think we need to start calling them on the term “death tax”, and ask for evidence of anyone that is taxed after death. I have started calling it the “Richie Rich tax”, as it is much more descriptive of who is taxed.

  • in light of romney’s staunch support of dubya’s policies i’m surprised his campaign slogan isn’t “four more years”.

  • You see…you list those things that McCain did while NOT running for president, and all of a sudden he doesn’t seem like such a bad guy again. It’s a pity that the demands of running for president have basically required that he repudiate every sensible thing he ever did, all to bring his public persona in line with every other filthy bastard of a Republican candidate out there.

  • There is no death tax.
    People worth less than one million dollars per heir pay nothing.

    Romney opposes a “hoarding tax” and if we called it that, support for it might become widespread.

  • Comments are closed.