Romney’s Top 10 Greatest Campaign Hits

Mitt Romney has many, many faults, but he’s not dumb. And after a successful career in the private sector, he probably learned very well that it’s a mistake to throw good money after bad. So, he’s exiting stage right.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney will suspend his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, GOP sources tell CNN.

Romney had won 270 delegates in through the Super Tuesday contests, compared with front-runner John McCain’s 680…. Although he outspent his rivals, Romney received just 175 delegates on Super Tuesday, compared with at least 504 for McCain and 141 for former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, according to CNN estimates.

Romney had one last shot to make a serious play for the Republican nomination on Super Tuesday, and he came up short. He assured supporters yesterday that he’d stick around and position himself as the more-conservative alternative to John McCain, but with Mike Huckabee lingering, Romney was out of options.

I’ve always felt kind of bad for Romney, in part because my suspicion is he would have been the best president from the Republican field, despite his shameless flip-flopping and lack of core values.

Given that he was a moderate supporter of abortion and gay rights before deciding to run for president, I’d say Romney did pretty well. Indeed, over the last year, every step of the way, Romney has been “the other guy.” When McCain started out as the GOP frontrunner early on, it was Romney who was positioned as his most credible rival. Over the summer, when Giuliani was considered the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, his principal foe was Romney, who was trying to highlight the former mayor’s less-than-conservative record. When Thompson got in the race, his principal foe was Romney, who was trying to hold onto the GOP base. When Huckabee started gaining support in Iowa, his principal foe was Romney, who was trying to characterize the Arkansas governor as unreliable on taxes and immigration. For the last few weeks, as McCain has solidified his role as the frontrunner, he’s been up against Romney.

As I argued recently, for practically an entire year, the various campaigns went up and down, but in every instance, there was Romney, in their face and presenting himself to voters like an ingratiating, toadying Eddie Haskell.

The problem is, no one ever liked Eddie Haskell.

Mark Halperin published an item this morning, listing the 10 things Romney could have done differently. Some of these points are more persuasive than others, but I have a different list: my top 10 favorite Mitt Romney moments from the presidential campaign:

10. Romney took a surprisingly passive attitude towards the terrorist responsible for 9/11. “It’s not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person,” Romney said of Osama bin Laden. He later said the opposite.

9. Romney was asked why none of his five sons had joined the U.S. military. He responded that they’re all serving their country by working for his campaign.

8. Romney bragged that he wanted to “double Guantanamo.”

7. Romney, who consistently pleaded for tolerance of religious diversity when it came to his personal faith, told an audience that he wouldn’t allow Muslims in his cabinet.

6. Romney once argued that Iran, a mid-level country with a weak economy, represents “the greatest threat to the world since the fall of the Soviet Union, and before that, Nazi Germany.”

5. In his big religion speech at the H.W. Bush library, Romney insisted, “Freedom requires religion.” I’m still not sure what this is supposed to mean.

4. At a nationally televised debate, Romney argued, with a straight face, “[If] Saddam Hussein had opened up his country to IAEA inspectors, and they’d come in and they’d found that there were no weapons of mass destruction, had Saddam Hussein, therefore, not violated United Nations resolutions, we wouldn’t be in the conflict we’re in.”

3. Romney tried to pander to a South Carolina audience by proclaiming, “We should withdraw from the United Nations Human Rights Council.” (The United States can’t withdraw from the Human Rights Council — we don’t have a seat on the human rights council. The Bush administration has been boycotting the human rights council for quite a while.)

2. Romney’s story about having seen his father march with Martin Luther King was a convoluted mess.

1. “Who let the dogs out?

Now we just need Hillary to drop out so that we can have a candidate to be proud of. No more Clinton Shame in the Democratic party. Time for Obama Pride!!

  • have i mentioned how insufferable many Obama supporters are?

    in a 50-50 split party, does any rational person really think insufferability is a good strategy?

  • Does anybody really think that sending the Clinton Soap Opera back to the White House is a good thing?

    Obama is Good
    Hillary is Evil

    Obama is one of the most dynamic candidates in our modern history
    Clintons are some of the biggest crooks in our nation’s history

    How can anybody want to vote for Hillary with such a better option available?

  • I suspect Romney decided to fold the show when his kids threatened to appoint a conservator for their inheritence if he didn’t. /snark

  • Does anybody really think that sending the Clinton Soap Opera back to the White House is a good thing?

    Umm, ILDP? It’s a post about Romney. Let’s try to stay a little focused here….

  • So if this was the alternative form of service to America for Tagg and the other Romney boys, can we now look forward to them heading to Iraq?

    Does this mean the dogs of Massachusetts are safer now that Mitt wont be traveling so much?

    And at least he could have made one last push at the cost-per-delegate record!

  • Romney is now blathering on about increasing defense spending. We already spend more on our military than the rest of the world combined and we can’t exert control in two third world countries. How about smarter defense spending?

    I don’t think that anyone here can forget Rumsfeld’s “You go to war with the army you have – not the army you want or wish to have at a later time…” or the context in which he delivered that line. We were also spending more than the rest of the world back then.

    It’s no accident that Republicans never mention Dwight Eisenhower. If the current crop of Republicans had their way we’d mortgage our great-grand children’s entire incomes to may for more war toys.

  • Who the hell knows what Romney would have morphed into if he got the nomination? He’s more like Woody Allen’s “Zelig” who became so chameleon like, he actually changed complexion when hanging out with African Americans. We saw Romney change from a moderate to a right winger, I would have loved to see him then run back to the center all the while denying any right wing nuttiness. Well, we’re just as lucky that he’s out and can slink home slightly lighter in the wallet. But only slightly.

  • It will be interesting to see who McCain picks as VP. McCain is really old for two terms (and even one), so his VP choice (if McCain wins) should be the Presidential front runner if McCain didn’t run twice. If McCain couldn’t fulfill his term, the VP would become president. Will McCain try to win over conservatives with his pick? Will he take Huckabee, who appeared to campaign to split the conservative vote and hand the nomination to McCain? Will he pick his good bud Lieberman? Will he pick the equivalent of Dan Quayle?

  • Dennis_D, my money’s on Huckabee:

    Bibles!
    Bombs!
    Bullets!
    Bullshit!

    They’ll be a shoo-in in the general.

  • ILDP looks like they want people to vote for Hillary. Fortunately, most of us know that voting for someone just because their opponent’s supporters are insufferable isn’t terribly logical.

  • I am betting in a way that the rethugs had the problems that we have here for our democrats. Just think if ours was winner take all Hillary would have wrapped it up Feb 5. So now were stuck in a dilema just when we don’t need it. The question should be for those that don’t support the other whether or not we just sit and wait until 2012. I for one don’t think thats such a bad idea given that neither Obama or Clinton is going to get the troops out of Iraq. Theres not much they can do about the economy. Neither one has even come close to supporting a $300 billion infrastructure program through open bidding process inforcing the Davis/Bacon act to the fullest. Remember they are all politicians and will lie to your face to get your vote. I only wish that John Edeards had stayed in the race through Super Tuesday the results would have been so much different. This nominating process is just as bad or worse than it has always been. The only true way to have a primary is for their be a national primary in June or July with registration closing the end of May, everyone would get matching funds up to $35 million and can raise no more for the primary. From January through have weekly debates for each party and see who comes out on top for each party. Then on the first Tuesday of November we hold the election. Problem solved. Conventions are just a big waste of tax dollars whether it be Fed, State or local taxes.

  • “have i mentioned how insufferable many Obama supporters are? ”

    Not all of us, Zeitgeist; just the ones who have started taking their cues from Ron Paul’s supporters. Obama’s widespread appeal can be perhaps a little too wide at times.

    (Sorry to go off-topic, CB, just wanted to point that out).

  • You know what will be really interesting? Seeing whether MittFlopper resets to a more liberal chamelion or whether he keeps his “conservative” act up.

    Nowhere man. Making all his nowhere plans for nobody.

  • Ya know, Mitt spent a s**t-load of money on his failed campaign bid. If he wants to follow Bush’s post 9-11 advice to spend, spend, spend – he should just stay in and do his bit for the economy. At the rate he was going he could have infused a lot of money into the economy.

    What do Republicans do now? Cry.

    What does Mitt do now? Wait to be asked for the VP nomination in the hopes McCain wins and he will again have is turn at the White House?

  • Romney says he’s dropping out because otherwise the terrorists will come and eat all our babies:

    “If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.”

  • Making the world safe for plutocracy is hard work when you’re up against a millitary hero (forget about the Keating Five business and Military-Industrial Complex) and the religious fruitcakes of the Old Confederacy (have a snake). What’s a multi-millionaire to do?!

  • So if Romney endorses Huckabee and his pledged delegates all follow, that would make the current count McCain 714, Huckabee 467. 247 delegates is not an insurmountable lead, especially with so much of the right hating McCain.

    Oh, and “I love” — you do know that you are personally hurting Obama’s chances with every hyperbolic word you write, right?

  • Steve Benin :” he (Romney) would have been the best president from the Republican field.”

    Forget about ever running for president. They’ll never let you forget it. OK, it is a rather unique field. 🙂

    Now Huckabee can say, “My job is done. Now I can go home and pray to my empty bookshelf.”

  • Obama’s widespread appeal can be perhaps a little too wide at times.

    LOL, well said and I agree.

    We Obama supporters do our candidate no favor when we try to trash Clinton. He is the better candidate in almost every category than her, but there’s no need for us to get nasty about it.

    I urge every Obama supporter to watch the latest Democratic debate, and emulate the classiness BOTH candidates displayed. Remember that we’re all on the same side!

  • Considering what they had to work with I think the Republicans have done a pretty good job of weeding out the worst choices from a field of bad ones. And I think Romney was righly weeded out. The Eddie Haskall comparison is spot on. Giuliani was worse in too many ways to count, but thankfully he’s out. Huck is worse, and he’s almost out. McCain is probably the most electable they’ve got. The wingnuts will grumble and whine and then vote for him anyway if the other choice is Hillary.

    And if McCain could get Fred Thompson as veep (which is what I think Fred was running for all along, his denials notwithstanding), and he gets to run against Hillary, I don’t see how he’s stoppable.

  • Tamalak wrote: “I urge every Obama supporter to watch the latest Democratic debate, and emulate the classiness BOTH candidates displayed. Remember that we’re all on the same side!”

    Oh, that would be so nice.

    There is just something wrong about Ken Doll Romney, and it’s not just saying his kids are ‘serving the country’. Why after Boy George II would we want another MBA President.

    To quote Mike Huckabee, do we want a president who looks like the last boss to lay you off?

    Good bye and good ridence Mitt.

  • I just wanna know: What will it take before the GOP and the Dems splinter into their respective components? And what can we do to speed up the process?

    Two major parties is too few.

  • Tbogg was right — someone’s going to need to put Hugh Hewitt on suicide watch.

    Well … now … come to think of it, maybe they should just keep that post vacant. For the betterment of our nation.

    😉

  • i am disappointed that neither “lifelong hunter/varmints in the backyard” nor the car-top dog made the top 10, though.

  • I guess now we can all look forward to the Romney boys signing up to fight in Iraq and protect the nation from Clinton and Obama. I’m going to really miss ol’ “dog-on-car” Mitt.

  • “In this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.
    So a vote for a Democrat is surrender to terror.
    Yes! The Forever war. The Republicans dream.
    Too bad so many will fall for this.These people make me sick.

  • The wingnuts will grumble and whine and then vote for [McCain] anyway if the other choice is Hillary.

    My brother is a conservative and mostly Republican (he is not the Republican equivalent of a Yellow Dog Dem) who caucused for Romney in Maine. He is no wingnut, but I find his predicament illuminating. When I called him recently to wish him a happy birthday, he volunteered that he would vote for a Democrat before he would vote for McCain. I was shocked. He detests the Clintons, yet he (at least in the heat of Romney’s evident decline), proclaimed he would vote for either Obama or Hillary over McCain. He prefers Obama to Hillary even though his notion of the political devil-incarnate, Ted Kennedy (Chappaquidick), is supporting Obama. He averred that the Clintons were a foul and corrupt political family, yet something in him was prompting him to say he would vote for Hillary over McCain (the opportunist). I have a great deal of respect for my older brother even though we disagree on so many things political. It is a long time between now and November and it will be interesting to see if he hews to his current line of thinking. But, I could have been knocked over with a feather when he expressed his absolute disdain for McCain.

  • Skip Mendler said: “I just wanna know: What will it take before the GOP and the Dems splinter into their respective components? And what can we do to speed up the process?”

    Do you know why this blog has some of the most vicious Obama vs Clinton, Obama Supporter vs Clinton Supporter language?

    Because there is no difference in their positions. We’re not talking policies anymore. There is no components to splinter into.

    Which is why the language is so hateful. There are no greater enemies than those who agree with you on everything but trivia, no enemy worse than the one who was your friend in the last war.

  • Today’s “Republicans” are fools. They don’t even know what they stand for. Small government, low taxes, lots of personal freedom? Not our Republicans! How about big brother, tax cuts for corporations, and spending, yes, lots of spending. That’s what today’s “Republican party” is all about.

    There is one man who hasn’t lost his way. Like the idea of lower taxes? Ron Paul is ready to abolish the IRS, the Federal Reserve, and return our currency to a gold standard. How will our huge government function without our illegally collected income taxes? Simple, it won’t be a huge government – it will be a small, constitutionally limited government. I was a democrat, so I don’t know, am I sounding Republican here?

    America became the most prosperous nation on Earth through low taxes and a limited government. Now, if we leave the current Republicans OR Democrats to continue on this failed course of action it’ll cost 40 bucks to buy a bottle of water.

    Big government doesn’t work – the FDA can’t protect people from harmful food or drugs, Social Security is going to be broke soon, government managed healthcare is a disaster, FEMA – need I go on?

    Ron Paul can save the GOP. Ron Paul will MOP THE FLOOR with either Hillary or Barak. But if he isn’t their choice then, ironically, the GOP will disappear just like the Whigs – the very party their fresh ideas challenged and were successful against.

    If you love America and the Constitution it was founded on, you owe it to your soul to go check out Dr. Paul.

    RON PAUL REVOLUTION! http://www.ronpaul2008.com

  • Oh, you can’t forget Romney’s quote, “our greatest civil liberty is our right to stay alive,” in the Boston Globe shortly before the NH primary — where the license plates famously read, “live free or die”…

  • So if Romney endorses Huckabee and his pledged delegates all follow, that would make the current count McCain 714, Huckabee 467. 247 delegates is not an insurmountable lead, especially with so much of the right hating McCain. — Brooks, @19

    What makes you think Mittens would toss his candidates to Huckles? There’s bad blood there too. Especially since Super Tuesday, where McC and Huck sliced and diced, in backroom deals, for the “godlier” states but also from even before, when Huckles was claiming “my god is better than your god”. And now, with rumours that McCainiac might call on Huckles for a VP? Mittster may be ready to sacrifice himself so that the terrorists don’t come and eat our babies but rewarding Huckles would be turning the other cheek too far.

    He’s gonna toss his delegates to Ron Paul, so that the poor loser has at least a few 🙂

  • Um, no. America was the only modern economy standing after two world wars had flattened Europe. We became prosperous by having the good fortune to be the only ones left standing. The decades of greatest economic growth – 50s and 60s were done w/o little competition and relatively high taxes and a very keynsian approach to macro-economics….

  • libra @ 37: It’s really hard to take your analysis seriously with all of the pejoratives. Heck, I’m not even sure what you said other than that you hate ’em all.

  • Amen to Tamalek

    I hope some of the knuckle dragging ‘democrats’ get their personal epiphany and realize that the enemy is not Obama (if you’re a Hillary supporter) or Hillary (if you’re an Obama supporter)

    Democrats ‘should’ come together and support Hillary and Obama, regardless who will be the eventual nominee.

    the Republican PARTY is the enemy. The ‘republican’ voters, aren’t the enemy; a lot of them have been fed a line of bullshit for so long, that unless, the Democratic candidates start talking sense, they will only know about our candidates what FOX tells them.

    I believe that when republican voters ‘hear’ Obama and Hillary they’ll at least realize they aren’t the devils. Sure the 28% dead enders and the Clinton Derangement Syndrome right wingers will never listen to anything other than their wing nut leaders.

    That leaves probably about 22 percent of ‘republican’ leaning voters, that can be persuaded by reason. Those are the ones that need to see what Obama and Clinton stand for. No…. I’m not saying pandering to them, the 28% don’t deserve an inch of compromise. I’m talking about the reflexive republican voters who don’t really know what the Democratic party stands for. Once they hear what it is all about, they’ll recognize that the Democratic party has more in common with them than the current Repub party.

  • Pingback: 620b96adba22
  • Comments are closed.