Romney’s tough love

A few days ago, Mitt Romney unveiled a new TV ad in New Hampshire in which he tried something counter-intuitive: he took his own party to task for abandoning its principles. “If we’re going to change Washington, Republicans have to put our own house in order,” Romney says in the ad, ticking off a list of transgressions. “When Republicans act like Democrats, America loses. It’s time for Republicans to start acting like Republicans. It’s time for a change, and change begins with us.”

It appears to be part of a concerted strategy that positions Romney as the GOP candidate of change. It’s a bit of a challenge — Romney can’t bash the conservative direction of his party, because his bona fides are far from solid. He can’t bash Bush/Cheney, because the die-hard 28 percenters are a key primary constituency. And he can’t run as Bush’s heir apparent, because the vast majority of the nation is desperate for something different.

So, he’s threading the needle — the GOP is great, according to Romney’s new pitch, but it’s gotten off track.

Courting the party faithful Saturday at the Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference, Mitt Romney promised to return a wayward GOP to its core principles while rival John McCain portrayed himself as the most qualified to take charge of the country amid dangerous times.

“Change must begin with us,” Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, told activists as he challenged the party to “put our own house in order.” […]

On Saturday, Romney argued that Republicans share the blame with Democrats for the nation’s woes. He bemoaned excessive spending, insecure borders and ethical lapses. “When Republicans act like Democrats, America loses,” he said.

Even as he sought to distance himself from the president, Romney gave Bush credit for keeping the United States safe and in “restoring personal integrity and dignity to the White House.” But otherwise Romney talked of problems with the government, saying, for example, that the Hurricane Katrina cleanup “didn’t look like Republicans were in charge.”

That’s not necessarily a bad pitch. Romney is basically saying he’ll be a more competent, fiscally responsible version of Bush. But the pitch only works if Republicans recognize the need for change.

Jonathan Martin, reporting from Mackinac Island, suggested the audience wasn’t exactly quick to embrace the tough-love message.

“I think we’d have to admit that the blame doesn’t all belong to the other party,” Romney said of the unanswered challenges of recent years. “We Republicans have to put our own house in order. We can’t be like Democrats — the party of big spenders. We can’t pretend that our border is secure from illegal immigration. We can’t have ethical standards that are the punch line for Jay Leno. When Republicans act like Democrats, America loses.”

Romney was reading from a teleprompter and punctuated his statement with emphasis — clearly indicating that it was meant for applause. But there was none.

An ovation came a moment later when he implored his party to “start acting like Republicans — not earmarking Republicans, not big spending Republicans, not big government Republicans, but like Reagan Republicans and Roosevelt Republicans.”

But when Romney launched into his litany of how the GOP should act going forward by saying, again with enthusiasm in his voice, that “it’s time for change in Washington and change begins with us,” there was an awkward moment when one person began to clap but nobody else in the crowd joined.

Note to the GOP: the first step on the road to recovery is admitting you have a problem.

Mitt: If we’re going to change Washington…

Does Mitt really believe you can still blow that smoke up John Doe’s rear end?

  • What a load of crap. Share the blame for the nations woes with democrats??? Sorry repubs but you get all the blame for this one. Dems have to continually bail you out after you’ve proven your plans fail every single time. Repubs acting like dems……….they took the largest surplus in our nation’s history and turned it into the largest deficit in our nations history. They have ransacked the government without any help from Dems and not Mr. Phoney-Baloney Romney says they have to change and stoop acting like democrats?.

    Sorry Mitt but the facts and history paint a totally different picture. All you are doing is rabble rousing…applause or no applause you’re insulting to the point of ridiculousness, and will attempt anything to manipulate the truth.

  • It goes without saying, but I’ll say it even as bjobotts got the ball rolling: Romney’s examples are all Republicans acting like Republicans. By definition. Since Republicans did the acting, that defines what Republicans act like.

  • Jonathan Martin, reporting from Mackinac Island, suggested the audience wasn’t exactly quick embrace the tough-love message.

    If anything, what Romney said shows the GOP constituents don’t really take the terrorist threat that seriously, because his people don’t feel they have to highlight it. But where he misses with this, is, even though the right-wingers don’t really believe in their hearts that there are swarms of Al Qaeda ready to set off bombs in the “Heartland,” who would do so if not for peace activists being put under surveillance and the security agencies being able to do any other kind of surveillance they want- only retroactive, post-hoc warrants being necessary- is that they still want the pitch, they still want to hear the talk: if the Dems were in charge, for all we know, the terrorists would be emboldened and take over, but with the GOP on watch, real Americans are going to be sure that’s not going to happen.

    Another thing he misses on is Katrina– if the rest of his primary message is running right, why head-fake left, here? The fact is the 28% feel Katrina went just fine, and it was a bunch of minorities getting what they deserved. To them the details of how the preparation and relief were handled don’t amount to material for a smear against the GOP at all, and aren’t really worth talking about.

  • Is Romney aware that the only thing Roosevelt Republicans and Reagan Republicans had in common was aggressive foreign policy? The single biggest of the many Bush disasters is the only common bond. Roosevelt’s attitude toward big business and Reagan’s attitude toward big business were basically polar opposites.

    It’s certainly a better pitch than “fuck it all, let’s go crazy.” But it’s not coherent in any way.

  • Well, something didn’t take, so let’s try again.

    The first thing to come to mind was FDR, but he can’t mean that as it would get him booted from the party. So it must mean Teddy.

    TR the Trust Buster? TR the conservationist? Or does Mitt really think Repubs want to start speaking softly? I guess there is a hyrid of Big Stick Republicans (other than Larry Craig), but do they really want to call themselves that?

    Who, anywhere, calls themselves a Roosevelt Republican?

  • If it was really important to Bush’s constituents that he take care of Katrina survivors and keep New Orleans from being destroyed, he would have been on top of it like syrup on pancakes.

    If something like that was about to devestate Nashville or Indianapolis or someplace, he would of been on TV as the disaster was in progress, not finishing up his luncheon and following engagements for the next couple days.

  • Republicans act like Republicans. I can teach Republicanism 101. You need to be mean spirited, a hypocrite, a liar and a genuine prick. You also need to hate. You need to hate poor people like the ones in New Orleans during Katrina. You need to hate the middle class as well and pander to the really wealthy with all types of tax breaks and legislation. You need to hate blacks because they have nothing to bring to the table. You need to hate Gays because your frickin base tells you to. You need to hate the troops as well. Yes, we know, you say you support the troops. But no body armor, no Humvees with sufficient protection, extended duty tours to 15 months. JUst hate the troops because that is what Republicans really do. If you do all these things you are a card carrying Republican ass hole.

  • Romney gave Bush credit for … “restoring personal integrity and dignity to the White House.”

    When I saw this shit I laughed so hard that a nose missile blurted out hit my screen.

    Can I sue for a new laptop?

  • Hmmm so a president who thinks farting in public is a form of entertainment is now to be commended for restoring dignity to the white house???
    Damn I must have been transported to an alternate universe in my sleep last night

  • Repub’s are especially big spenders when they act like – Repubs.

    Nobody can spend money like a Repub in charge.

    Look at the current Repub clown, $500K per minute in Iraq.

    And he learned it all from Ronnie Raygun – the first of the tight fisted* hog wild spenders.

    Will Romney really be different?

    Wanna buy a freakin’ bridge in Brooklin?

    * American tax dollars are to be spent by the ultra rich, for the ultra rich, to the ultra rich.

  • It doesn’t really matter how much you show your indignation about Mitt Romney’s latest speech. ALL Republican candidates are talking to the rabid base. They don’t care what we – the progressive kind – think about it.

    By the time the primaries are over and the ‘winner’ is anointed they’ll hope that, just like their base, we will have forgotten about all those ridiculous claims. They’ll start swooning the independents because they already know that Das Base will always vote for them, regardless of what they say once they’re the winner.

    It will be up to us to make sure that the independents do NOT forget about everything they have said so far.

  • I just wish people could see that voting in these liars over and over again is not doing any good. The most important thing is integrity. Can we get someone consistent who can put the weight of time behind their rhetoric? Someone who will actually try to do what they say they will do? That hasn’t happened ever since I can remember, and it wont happen with Romney. If Romney wins the primaries, the Dems are going to be playing the flip-flop card this time around, and it will be a circus once again. It’s nothing but a bunch of paid hacks drumming up support for the “guy who has the best chance of winning!” It’s such a joke, and the joke is most definately on us.

    Given the current state of things, I haven’t found anyone who could put forth any type of argument against Ron Paul. “He can’t win” seems to be the best they can come up with! And that technically is not a valid reason not to elect him. People who say that are only admitting their ignorance of what a real political debate is. And that’s probably half the problem right there. People dont have a clue how to even go about picking someone. They need the media to tell them what to think, and the media wont say anything reasonable about Ron Paul. They can talk about libertarians’ lack of success till they’re blue in the teeth but it will not change the fact that the system is broken and there is nothing to lose by voting for Ron Paul.

  • Did he just accuse the top Republican leadership of acting like Democrats ??
    No wonder the applause meter didn’t move.

    I just don’t see how calling the Messiah a Dem is going to bring in votes from his followers. They still believe in the guy and I am pretty sure they don’t want a Morman telling them he has been acting like the enemy.

  • Comments are closed.