Ron Paul faces reality, refocuses his efforts

He hasn’t talked about it much publicly, but the truth is, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) realized a while ago that he wouldn’t win a majority of delegates before the Republican National Convention, but thought he might have greater success if there were a brokered convention, at which anything can happen.

In a message to his fans last night, Paul effectively conceded that it’s time to face facts and refocus his efforts. His message explained:

“With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get. But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter.”

That doesn’t sound like a candidate poised to officially withdraw from the presidential race, though it does sound like a candidate who can see the writing on the wall.

And what about a possible third-party campaign? I’ve long thought that Paul is uniquely well-suited for an independent effort — unlike, say, Unity08 or the Reform Party, his message is truly “distinct” compared to the two major parties — but apparently Paul also realizes that there’s no real point in such a campaign.

Mr. Paul clearly stated that he will not run as a third-party candidate. Right now, his priorities are serving the residents in his Texas congressional district and winning re-election: “If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas.”

From what we can make of the letter, Mr. Paul is staying in the race on a peripheral level, just so he can keep participating in policy discussions (and maybe use up all that money he’s amassed?).

“In the presidential race and the congressional race, I need your support, as always,” Mr. Paul wrote. “And I have plans to continue fighting for our ideas in politics and education that I will share with you when I can, for I will need you at my side. In the meantime, onward and upward! The neocons, the warmongers, the socialists, the advocates of inflation will be hearing much from you and me.”

In this sense, Paul is in a similar position to Dennis Kucinich. He’s been running a presidential campaign with no real expectation of success, but with the hope of giving his ideas a national platform. But pushing the Quixotic effort too far imperils his only day job — serving as a member of the House of Representatives — including a primary challenge back home. (Sometimes, voters actually want a representative who cares as much about them as some broader national vision.)

I suspect Paul, if he gave up his House seat and ran as an independent, could make the ballot almost everywhere, and could probably garner up to 4% of the national popular vote. As third-party candidates go, that’s not too bad.

The problem, of course, is the day after, when Paul found himself unemployed. Given his rabid following, he could probably create some kind of advocacy group and make a fair amount of money, but he’d be completely without power, and his influence in Washington (which is already modest) would disappear.

Better to wrap up the presidential campaign quietly, give some attention to the House race, and hope to keep the political career going.

I understand Kucinich is having trouble hanging on to his House seat in the Dem primary next month.

  • I think the Republicans will try to encourage a 3rd party run for Paul. They know it will mostly hurt Democrats. I could see many anti-war Democrats being fooled into voting for Paul if it was a McCain vs. Clinton contest.

  • Perhaps Ron Paul’s supporters will begin to calm down.But I rweally doubt it.this will more than likely serve to reinforce their paranoid world view even more.I’m sure they’ll begin spamming message boards and comments section even more heavily than before and posting videos to Youtube,braying about the media-political conspiracy against their hero.

    I really think Dr.Paul is cynically using the goodwill of some very disturbed people to further his bizarre agenda.He has known from the beginning that his candidacy
    had no chance.His nineteenth century economic platform,his unrealistic diplomatic agenda,and his just plain weird interpretation of the Constitution suggest that he is either unhinged himself,or is a man with an agenda that has nothing to with being President.I can’t speak as to what that agenda may be,but I do know he is using people who have some real problems to further it.

  • […] the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get.

    I had a message, along the same lines — will fight all the way to the convention — from Edwards. About 48hrs before he dropped out of the race. So… Are we to hear of Paul, packing it in, sometime Monday, noon-ish?

    And is it just me, or does anyone else find it funny that a “thread” directly inviting Paulites into the fray (by putting his name in the subject line) is now the least “attended”, where once it would have drawn hordes of Cap-lockers?

  • … does anyone else find it funny that a “thread” directly inviting Paulites into the fray (by putting his name in the subject line) is now the least “attended”, where once it would have drawn hordes of Cap-lockers?

    Eh – the Paul supporters have been a lot quieter on-line for the last few weeks. Since New Hampshire, actually, I’ve noticed a significant drop in the Paul supporters on-line just about everywhere I read on a regular basis (both political and non-political sites).

    Even in the real world I’ve noticed a drop in the signage, stickers and other “Pauliphenalia” around. Prior to Christmas break, any kiosk or bulletin board on campus would be covered with fliers for Paul meetups. Since the first round of primary/caucuses that’s dropped down to almost nothing.

    I think a lot of the Paul supporters really truly believed that NOW was the time for the massive Libertarian Revolution that they’d been waiting for for as long as they’d started believing in libertarianism. And after NH they knew it just wasn’t going to happen now, so the boosterism trickled off as the inevitable became obvious.

  • Even in the real world I’ve noticed a drop in the signage, stickers and other “Pauliphenalia” around. — NonyNony, @5

    So here’s another “funny” (I’m easily amused).

    Our little town isn’t all that political, if one judges by the number of signs preceding any election. That is true especially in my neighbourhood (somewhat “suburban”, if a town of 4.5K can be said to *have* suburbs).

    So, even though our (dual) primaries are coming up on Tuesday, there were no yard signs promoting candidates in my neighbourhood. Except one. For Paul. And a few Paul posters, stuck to the telephone poles here and there. Today, I took a look, and all those posters were gone. And, as I passed the neighbour’s lawn, I did a double-take: his pro-Paul yard sign had been replaced with a pro-McCain one. I guess the guy doesn’t like to support a losing candidate… 🙂

  • Why have the wheels come off the Dr. Ron Paul internet bandwagon?

    Reality.

    Get out of Iraq? Withdraw most of our troops from around the world? Legalize Pot? Wow!, Yeah, I’ll vote for him!

    Oppose a woman’s right to choose? Uh, hey that doesn’t jive with my defintion of less govenment & more liberty. Maybe I’ll reconsider…

    Do away with social net programs for the poor & Social Security? What??

    Take the U.S. back to the Gold Standard? Had lots of racist rants associated with his newsletter? Who is this nut? The more I hear about him, the less I want anything to do with him.

    O.K. this is oversimplified. But once his eclectic bag of policies came to light, the less people wanted to support him (and they just liked the Iraq & pot thing, anyway).

  • Lots of idiots above, Ron is not a racist and his economics makes far more sense than the rest of the idiots in the government put together.

  • Yup,more half-truths and inaccuracies. I am continually amazed at the number of mentally lazy Americans commenting on something they obviously haven’t researched. Where do you come up with this stuff? Try checking out his website and see what he really has to say.

  • No, we’re still here. We’ve resigned ourselves to the dirty business of winning each and every precinct – we’re campaigning under the radar now. Our objective is control of the Republican party since our candidate has been denied a voice within it. We also have lists of people who support small government, low taxes and personal liberty. We vote OUR candidates in and competing candidates OUT. So Republicans, do what you want. We are becoming MORE of you day by day. Either you will return to your stated purpose or we will do it for you.

  • Comments are closed.