A few weeks ago, word surfaced that Karl Rove was shopping for a book publisher, and was poised to make a cool $3 million. He is, after all, Karl Rove. He’s The Architect. As the greatest political mind of the decade, his book is bound to be awesome.
Or so the theory went. In reality, of course, Rove’s not quite the legend he thinks he is, and interest in his book was tepid, at best. One recent report noted that Rove made the rounds with of publishers with a power lawyer at his side, and quickly found that there would be no bidding war. An executive at one of the houses said, “It’s very, very slow.”
Rove ended up with his deal yesterday, but it’s not exactly a blockbuster.
GOP strategist Karl Rove has agreed to write about his years as an adviser to President Bush in a deal worth over $1.5 million with former colleague Mary Matalin’s conservative imprint at Simon & Schuster, officials said Friday.
Rove, the architect of Bush’s 2000 and 2004 presidential campaigns and one of the most influential political advisers of his time, signed the deal with Threshold Editions, the imprint’s publisher and executive vice president Louise Burke said.
“All of us at Threshold are thrilled to publish the book from the man who had the president’s ear for two terms,” Burke said.
One publisher was particularly uncharitable, saying Rove “doesn’t have the personality” to land a major deal.
That may very well be part of it, but I think there’s a more realistic explanation for Rove’s book deal getting marked down.
There’s no doubt that Rove has been witness to some extraordinary events, but his book is bound to be a dud. I can think of at least four reasons.
First, he’s tragically dishonest, and everyone, everywhere, knows it. In fact, I’m fairly confident I can summarize the book now: “Bush was extraordinary; his critics were awful; and the media was unfair.” There, I just saved book buyers $29.95.
Second, Rove had all kinds of dirt he could dish, but publishers realize that he’s far too loyal a sycophant to ever make his former boss look bad. He’s the original “loyal Bushie”; the idea of him writing a juicy tell-all is absurd. The book is bound to be hagiographic.
Third, Rove’s genius has been wildly exaggerated, and interest in his insights has waned in light of his failures. In 2000, he pulled out all the stops to help Bush win the New Hampshire GOP primary, where McCain won by double digits. On Election Day 2000, it was Rove’s idea to keep his candidate in California in the waning days, instead of campaigning in key battleground states. Bush lost California by a wide margin, and Rove’s strategy practically cost his candidate the election. More recently, Rove’s single recent responsibility was overseeing the Republican Party’s 2006 election strategy — and Dems won back both chambers of Congress in a historic victory. If congressional Republicans stopped taking him seriously as a credible political strategist in 2007, who’s going to take his book seriously in 2009?
And finally, there’s severe Bush fatigue. I suspect the vast majority of the nation, and even a strong number of Republicans, are anxious to see the end of the reign of error known as the Bush presidency. The idea of a fomer White House deputy chief of staff reflecting, in a sycophantic style, on eight years that most of us will prefer to forget, doesn’t exactly scream, “best seller.”
That said, I open the floor to a little game: come up with a name for Karl Rove’s book. The possibilities are almost endless.