‘Rumsfeld’s revenge’

The controversies surrounding Blackwater and other private security forces in Iraq are hardly a secret, but how is it that we’ve reached the point in which the State Department’s private army finds itself facing this fiasco? It stems from a decision made nearly four years ago.

When the U.S. military invaded and occupied Iraq in early 2003, there was no question who would be in charge of security for the official civilians pouring in to remake the country. Under an executive order signed by Bush, the Coalition Provisional Authority and its head, L. Paul Bremer, reported directly to then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. But as U.S. troops became preoccupied with a growing insurgency, the Pentagon hired Blackwater to provide protection for Bremer and other civilians.

The next year, as the United States prepared to return sovereignty to the Iraqis and the State Department began planning an embassy in Baghdad, Rumsfeld lost a bid to retain control over the full U.S. effort, including billions of dollars in reconstruction funds. A new executive order, signed in January 2004, gave State authority over all but military operations. Rumsfeld’s revenge, at least in the view of many State officials, was to withdraw all but minimal assistance for diplomatic security.

“It was the view of Donald Rumsfeld and [then-Deputy Defense Secretary] Paul Wolfowitz that this wasn’t their problem,” said a former senior State Department official.

OK, so institutional grudges and inter-departmental backbiting aren’t that unusual, especially with all the hacks Bush has chosen to run the executive branch. But eventually State and Defense came to some kind of working arrangement, right?

Wrong. As the WaPo reported, “Meetings to negotiate an official memorandum of understanding between State and Defense during the spring of 2004 broke up in shouting matches over issues such as their respective levels of patriotism and whether the military would provide mortuary services for slain diplomats.”

As Paul Krugman concluded, “Remember, however, the important point: if you noticed back then that these were crazy, dangerous people, you were shrill.”

…negotiate an official memorandum of understanding between State and Defense during the spring of 2004 broke up in shouting matches over issues such as their respective levels of patriotism

Patriotism is the last refuge of the bigoted…
the spiteful…
the ignorant…

The only knee-jerk emotion that is more harmful than patriotism is fundamentalism.

Put the those to vile qualities together and you’ve got a human that will torture and commit war crimes.

  • “Meetings to negotiate an official memorandum of understanding between State and Defense during the spring of 2004 broke up in shouting matches over issues such as their respective levels of patriotism […]

    Spring of ’04? That would still have been Powell at the State Dept? Too bad… I’d have liked to think of Condi and Rummy going toe-to-toe in a barking match…

  • How many other things died aborning as a result of turf battles between Rumsfeld and the rest of the world? Was he one of those who forced the inexplicably quixotic decision to disband the Iraqi army, police and civil service?

    Once again we see that the only thing worse than having an incompetent, delusional president is having an incompetent delusional president who chooses like-minded subordinates.

  • Once again we see that the only thing worse than having an incompetent, delusional president is having an incompetent delusional president who chooses like-minded subordinates. — Dennis-SGMM, @3

    Cheney’s Bush’s subordinate on paper only…

  • I am a 2 tour Vietnam Veteran who recently retired after 36 years of working in the Defense Industrial Complex on many of the weapons systems being used by our forces as we speak. I believed another Vietnam could be avoided with defined missions and the best armaments in the world.

    It made no difference.

    We have bought into the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). If you would like to read how this happens please see:

    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/03/spyagency200703

    Through a combination of public apathy and threats by the MIC we have let the SYSTEM get too large. It is now a SYSTEMIC problem and the SYSTEM is out of control. Government and industry are merging and that is very dangerous.

    There is no conspiracy. The SYSTEM has gotten so big that those who make it up and run it day to day in industry and government simply are perpetuating their existance.

    The politicians rely on them for details and recommendations because they cannot possibly grasp the nuances of the environment and the BIG SYSTEM.

    So, the system has to go bust and then be re-scaled, fixed and re-designed to run efficiently and prudently, just like any other big machine that runs poorly or becomes obsolete or dangerous.

    This situation will right itself through trauma. I see a government ENRON on the horizon, with an associated house cleaning.

    The next president will come and go along with his appointees and politicos. The event to watch is the collapse of the MIC.

    For more details see:

    http://rosecoveredglasses.blogspot.com/2006/11/odyssey-of-armaments.html

  • Mr Larson, regrettably the MIC will never collapse – the best that can be aimed for, is to keep it trimmed back to manageable proportions, and that’s pretty much a fulltime job.

  • Defined missions…

    Disarm WMDs. – Check (there were none)
    Regime Change – Check
    Install Democracy – Check
    Stabilize Democracy – Ongoing

    Maybe in addition to better weapons and stated missions we need to not add more missions if the first one proves too easy and painless?

    Bush Sr. followed Mr. Larson’s advice pretty carefully and the result could have been worse.
    His son proved that in spades.

  • Comments are closed.