Sadr’s Mahdi Army takes control of Amara

Guest Post by Michael J.W. Stickings

As if we needed yet more evidence that Iraq is falling apart — or, rather, that it is descending ever further into chaos with an impotent central government and rampant sectarianism — the city of Amara, located in the southeastern part of the country, fell today to Moqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army. The New York Times reports:

Hundreds of militiamen linked to the Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr battled local police and members of a rival Shiite militia in the southeastern city of Amara today, destroying police stations and seizing control of entire neighborhoods, in apparent retaliation for the arrest of one of their fighters…

The gunmen from Mr. Sadr’s militia, the Mahdi Army, eventually withdrew from their positions and ceded control of the city to an Iraqi Army batallion sent from Basra. The negotiations continued late into the evening.


Yes, the Iraqi Army retook control, but the incident reveals much about the state of Iraq today:

1) “British forces, who occupied the city for two years before turning it over to Iraqi control in August, did not intervene to stop the bloodshed in Amara, apparently wanting to give Iraqi officials time to resolve the dispute on their own. British military officials said that a quick-reaction force was standing by outside Amara in case the Iraqis’ efforts failed.”

2) “The stunning and defiant display of militia strength underscored the weaknesses of the Iraqi security forces and the potency of the Mahdi Army, which has been able to operate virtually unchecked in Iraq. The Mahdi Army is widely accused of propelling the cycle of sectarian violence that threatens to plunge the country into all-out civil war.”

3) “Today’s clashes, which pitted Mr. Sadr’s fighters against members of a rival Shiite faction, the Badr Organization, also showed the deep fissures in the country’s Shiite leadership, and cast doubt on the ability of the ruling Shiite coalition to hold itself together.”

In other words:

Coalition forces are ceding responsibility for security to the Iraqis in anticipation of a likely withdrawal. Perhaps not a complete withdrawal, but certainly a partial one, particularly of British forces. The Iraqis succeeded today, sort of, but questions remain as to whether they will be able to secure the country, insofar as that is even possible, once coalition forces pull back or out.

The Mahdi Army is strong, but there is evident disunity among Shiites. As Kevin Drum puts it: “Sadr may be playing a double game, encouraging attacks privately while denouncing them publicly, but it’s more likely that he’s genuinely lost control of at least parts of his militia. In other words, not only don’t we control Amara, and not only does the central government in Baghdad not control Amara, but apparently even Sadr doesn’t control Amara.”

It may be next to impossible to control these militias, but apparently they can’t even control themselves. Even Sadr seems to be losing control.

And things will only get worse.

For more, see Abu Aardvark, Kiko’s House, and The Moderate Voice.

So I guess that British General wasn’t quoted out of context.

  • 2 billion American dollars per week… and all I got was this lousy President blowing smoke up my ass…..

    In 5 words and 3 exclamation points:

    Go Fuck Yourself Mr. Bush!!!

  • It must be so destructive to our troops morale to have to constantly refight the same battles to retake the same hills, especially when they know it’s all due to the incompetence of their leaders all the way up the chain to the Commander in Chief.

    I second koreyel’s eloquent sentiment.

  • apropos of doubtful’s comment: it’s pretty much the same strategy that worked so well for us in vietnam!

  • It must be so destructive to our troops morale to have to constantly refight the same battles to retake the same hills

    As reported in the Friday LA Times, the districts of Baghdad that were declared “secured” this summer are the places where the worst fighting in the Sunni districts is happening now, and there was no attempt whatsoever to get control of the Shia areas of east Baghdad – so much for keeping the 173 DStryker Brigade overtime, and everything else they did to “control” Baghdad. They don’t even control the roads leading to the Green Zone.

    The war is falling apart, going over a cliff and taking the American military with it, and General Peter Pace says it’s “god’s will” that Rumsfeld be SecDef. I know what the old Romans used to feel like when they watched the vaunted Imperial Legions fall apart in fighting the barbarians. But that’s what you get when your forces are run by “The perfumed princes of Versailles-on-the-Potomac,” as David Hackworth used to call them.

  • But, but, but, Dick Cheney sez things are going “remarkably well” in Iraq. Why this man’s head has not exploded from the cognitive disonance (or why he has not been fried by multiple lightening bolts) is an absolute mystery to me.

    A bit off topic and with apologies if it has already been noted somewhere in the posts or comments today, Pat Tillman’s brother has a blistering post at Truth Dig today (I found it via Crooks and Liars) – sorry if the link does not work; I’m technically challenged, but at least you will have the URL:

    http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/200601019_after_pats_birthday/

    He leaves no doubt about his feelings for the Bush Gang.

  • So much for the “as they stand up, we stand down”…

    OT. The pro-deWine lying adds that we discussed yesterday? The ones that accuse his opponent of not paying taxes? The one’s that the NRCC acknowledged were pure BS but were gonna run them anyway? Well, they’d been yanked — not by the NRCC, but by the TV stationss. 700thousand down the drain… Lovely

    “http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010462.php

  • Libra – I think we’re into the “the anti-American militias will stand up and we will just stand by and watch” phase of the operation. The militias ceded control of Amara because to keep it would turn the conflict into a symmetrical battle when asymmetric warfare is working so well for them. But to do this at will and in broad daylight lets the Iraqi people know who’s in charge, and it ain’t the U.S. troops and not the “coalition of the willing.”

    So Georgie, just who do we have left to kill to win this thing, since that’s what our forces are trained to do over there? If you just hadn’t been such a stupid and stubborn ass, this illegal war still could have been a victory, but staying the curse was just to damn catchy a slogan to not continue to abide Rummy’s incompetence.

    I’m to the point that any outrage, any vituperative and angry lashing out at the Bush administration just seems so redundant. Others have expressed the anger better, more eloquently, more succinctly — like koreyel or Kevin Tillman, that it’s impossible to express the depths of frustration about the idiocy that passes for leadership in this nation.

  • Signs a situation is FUBAR No. 65,058(B)(7)(f)(iv):

    “Policemen tried to protect the stations, but what can they do? They do not have enough weapons and ammunition compared with the militia, which has all kinds of weapons.”

    (Actually I think this goes beyond FUBAR. Is there a term for that? Uber FUBAR?)

    Fortunately, I have an idea that might stop all the fighting: Once a cease-fire has been in place for a week, we hand ShrubCo (including associated thieves contractors) over to the Iraqi people for a rousing game of “Hunt the war criminal.” Points will be awarded for ingenuity, style and (ahem) execution.

  • I got the newest Mo Do up: Obama’s Project Runway. Enjoy it while you can. My “fan” may make sure it’ll be the last one for a while. Unless blogger’s bluffing about censoring my blog.

  • Comments are closed.