Sen. Chris Matthews (I-Pa.)?

I remember a year ago I stumbled upon a website, which is no longer online, called “[tag]Draft[/tag] [tag]Chris Matthews[/tag].” The site had all the appropriate elements — a petition, an explanation of Matthews’ “qualifications,” etc. — and explained why the Philadelphia native should take on Sen. Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania in 2006. It was good for a quick chuckle and easily forgotten.

After all, who would really want the MSNBC blowhard in the world’s most deliberative body? This online petition drive set a goal of 5,000 signatures. As of today, it’s fallen 4,895 short. It’s a helpful hint about public demand for a Matthews campaign.

And yet, the idea seemed to gain considerable attention yesterday. The Huffington Post noted the rumor about Matthews possibly entering the race and Philadelphia Daily News writer Will Bunch explained that it could, at least as a practical matter, happen.

Can Matthews, a Philadelphia native who lives in the D.C. area, enter the race — which is seen as a showdown between sagging GOP incumbent Rick Santorum and anemic Democratic rival Bob Casey Jr. — at this late date? Yes…if he runs as an independent.

While the door is shut on entering the race as a Democrat or Republican — Matthews is a former Democratic aide on Capitol Hill who has leaned rightward, seemingly, as a TV talking head, we’re told that Matthews could have begun circulating petitions to run as an independent on March 9 and has all the way until Aug. 1 to turn them in.

Bunch added that Matthews may believe he has a shot because he can be an Arlen Specter-like candidate — a pro-choice conservative.

I don’t see this happening, in large part because it’s hard to imagine Matthews taking the pay cut. That said, as pundits-turned-politicians go, I can only think of one other possible candidate who’d scare me more.

CB–what the hell are you talking about re “pay cut”?

Don’t you know that government is the way to get rich, *rich*, RICH! Sure legitimate base pay will be less, but between secret lobbyist envelopes, perks, patronage that will have to be repaid, and manipulating stock prices through legislation he’d be set to be a fat cat for life. And the women! (Assuming Tweety likes women; after what he said to DeLay, I’m not so sure).

As for his qualifications, we know he can be bought. What else is there that he needs?

  • When you said “…as pundits-turned-politicians go…”

    for some reason I saw:

    “…as pundits-turd-politicians go…”

    I can’t imagine what would make me think such a thing. other than the fact that Matthews would make about as good a politician as JD Hayworth.

  • I agree with MNProgressive. Matthews and O’Reilly are no crazier than lots of the wingnuts who are already there, and putting them in office would actually reduce their TV face time. Sounds like a win to me.

  • as pundits-turned-politicians go, I can only think of one other possible candidate who’d scare me more.

    I was amused that this linked to the Carpetbagger Report. Draft Steve Benen!

  • Colbert and Stewart

    or Stewart and Colbert ( it doesn’t matter) in 08

    and let them keep their shows.

    Better the politics as an intentional joke, than the unintentional joke it is becoming.

  • Well, he’d be off the television—and he’d probably drag support away from Santorum as well. Sounds like a win-win situation to me.

    Even if the little nitwit did win, he’d get a fist-full of humility from his fellow politicians—the moment he started playing his “I’m-right-you’re-wrong” idiocy. Personally, I’d give him six months from swearing-in to resignation—the little whiner….

  • Comments are closed.