Senate confirms Kavanaugh; Dem opposition barely a speed bump

This is most disappointing.

White House aide [tag]Brett Kavanaugh[/tag] won [tag]Senate[/tag] confirmation as an appeals judge Friday after a wait of nearly three years, yet another victory in President [tag]Bush[/tag]’s drive to place a more conservative stamp on the nation’s [tag]courts[/tag].

Kavanaugh was confirmed on a vote of 57-36, warmly praised by Republicans but widely opposed by Democrats who said he is ill-suited to sit on the U.S. [tag]Court of Appeals[/tag] for the District of Columbia. […]

Ralph Neas, president of the liberal-oriented lobbying group People for the American Way, said that Bush and Senate Republicans “have succeeded today in putting a partisan lapdog into a powerful, lifetime position on the federal bench. Brett [tag]Kavanaugh[/tag] has spent his career as a partisan operative, carrying out the will of the Bush administration and twisting legal arguments to benefit his political ideology.”

This was supposed to be a big fight. Senate Dems were, just a few weeks ago, prepared to filibuster Kavanaugh — and with good reason.

Kavanaugh was a key member of [tag]Ken Starr[/tag]’s impeachment team and helped lead the investigation of [tag]Vince Foster[/tag]’s suicide. Indeed, Kavanaugh personally wrote the portion of the Starr report that outlined Starr’s reasons for Congress to impeach Clinton in 1998. As Roll Call reported way back in April 2004: “From Starr to Monica [tag]Lewinsky[/tag] to Manuel [tag]Miranda[/tag] — the former GOP staffer at the center of the improperly accessed Democratic memos — Kavanaugh has connections directly or indirectly to a host of scandal figures who have irked Democrats in recent years.”

For that matter, Kavanaugh has no judicial experience, received a sub-par rating from the American Bar Association, has a limited legal background outside partisan political work (his trial work is practically non-existent), and is now one of the youngest judges in the history of the [tag]DC Circuit[/tag]. He’s also spent the last few years helping pick Bush’s other far-right judicial nominees.

Apparently, at some point in recent weeks, Dems decided that a fight over Kavanaugh would ultimately fail. Instead of trying, Dems concerns were rolled over like speed bumps.

The final vote was 57 to 36, with four Dems (Byrd, Carper, Landrieu, and Ben Nelson) voting for confirmation and five Dems not voting. It sends a dangerous signal — Dems are hesitant to block efforts from Bush and [tag]Frist[/tag] to stack the courts with ideologues this year.

“For that matter, Kavanaugh has no judicial experience, received a sub-par rating from the American Bar Association, has a limited legal background outside partisan political work (his trial work is practically non-existent), and if confirmed, would be one of the youngest judges in the history of the DC Circuit. He’s also spent the last few years helping pick Bush’s other far-right judicial nominees.”

CB – so what exactly are you looking for in a judge on the DC Circuit?
Just because it’s one of the most important circuits, handles more issues regarding the government, and is a common stepping stone to the Supreme Court? For that, you want someone with experience and who hasn’t spent his career as a political operative for Bush/Cheney, et al.? High standards, sir.

  • This is just completely sickening and disheartening, to the point where it makes me think my little statement “the only ‘good Republicans’ are face down, bleeding out from a large caliber exit wound” may be more of a strategy down the line than one would care to think of. Although I certainly can’t advocate it, one sees more and more how – as the system continues to fail – extra-systemic measures become politically viable in places other than America. And now, one sees that America – which has shown that even this country is susceptible to the same disease that felled Germany 70 years ago – is perhaps not immune to other aspects of this sort of political disorder.

    This is truly lower than I thought we could go.

  • Woo-hoo! Another victory for bi-partisan ship! I’m soooooooooooooooo thrilled to see that the Dems are not making any sort of fuss about this or anything else, as it is very unseemly. You can’t win elections by seeming to be obstructionist, or uncivil! That was proven in the Clinton Era afterall…

    Seriously though… I was thinking that the Dem’s were maybe laying back hoping to fix things after the election, but this sort of thing shows how futile it is to hope for even a pathetic strategy like that. This is an appointment FOR life… Christ! ^%@#$^ Dems!!!!! Traitors at worse, weak at best!
    (With certain exceptions of course!)

  • A pathetic party unable to stand for its (supposed) convictions.

    What exactly are they going to run on in November?

  • And the Senate just overwhelmingly confirmed Hayden. What does this Teflon-coated Administration have to do to get our elected representatives to stand up?

  • Michelle,
    start an unjustified war and illegally spy on Americans, oh and violate every international treaty the US has signed over that last half century

    Oh, shit

  • I just can’t believe this. We’re heading into an election, a war with Iran, economic meltdown and an environmental disaster while the president and his cabinet gleefully declare themselves above the law. I expect the average citizen to be overwhelmed and desensitized, but these senators don’t have the right to just quit their jobs and continue to cash their checks. We have to have some leadership in times like this, or nobody’s gonna bother to vote again. Maybe that’s what they want, but we can’t just let them have what they want anymore.

  • Next up …. John Snow’s replacement.

    from today WaPo:

    Snow asked the White House to announce his resignation in early June and said he plans to stay in the job no later than July 3 while a replacement is sought, the source said. The secretary’s decision was intended to bring finality to a process that has played out awkwardly in public over months as Snow’s job security has been a regular source of Washington speculation.

    Republican insiders said possible candidates to succeed Snow include former commerce secretary Donald L. Evans, a longtime Bush friend; Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez, a former Kellogg Co. chief executive; Ambassador David C. Mulford, a former treasury undersecretary who represents the United States in India; and Stephen Friedman, the president’s former chief economic adviser and a former Goldman Sachs chief executive.

    SNIP

    Snow grew frustrated as news reports in recent weeks suggested that the White House wanted him out, the source close to him said. Rather than be left hanging any longer, he decided to set a firm July 3 departure date even if a replacement is not named. “He just didn’t want it to drag on later than that,” the source said. “He’s anxious to get back to the private sector.”

  • Thanks for ruining my weekend. Im with Lance. How can the Dems run on any kind of “taking a stand” platform, if they refuse to have any guiding principles. This guy should have been loudly opposed to any extent possible. It is pure cronyism, and given Bush’s track record and how sick people are of that, they could have gained a lot of traction by sticking to their guns on this.

    In a way, they deserve to lose in November.

    Come to think of it, in November, our country looks sure to lose either way. Could this be any more hopeless??? Im going to go crawl under a rock now. UGH!

  • Senator Byrd was a lonely hero in 2002, addressing an empty Senate chamber with fiery, muckraking speeches about the dangers of war and power in Bush’s America.

    Where is that Senator Byrd today?

  • A president with approval ratings n the high 20s and low 30s, and the dems just roll over?

    I believe more and more that it will take a great economic catastrophe to change anything in this country. And more and more, I actually believe it could happen.

    The scariest part is, I wonder if we will choose an FDR or a Hitler to lead us out of it?

    I used to be so sure of the answer….

  • Where is that Senator Byrd today?

    Apparently he went back to being to the old pre-2002 Senator Byrd.

  • Here was a candidate where a very legitimate stance could be taken on his incompetence for the job (a Bush administration trademark) and not just a battle of ideology and the Dems act as a doormat? I get the feeling they are letting Bush cause as much damage as he wants now figuring the Dems will regain control in November. Get a spine!

  • I get the feeling they are letting Bush cause as much damage as he wants now figuring the Dems will regain control in November.

    Yeah, well, that might be believable, except these are lifetime appopintments. Sorry to say, there doesn’t appear to be any savvy political strategery happening here. Just plain old political cowardice and corruption.

  • Gee, tell me again why I should send $$ to the DSCC or vote for mary landrieu?

  • Gee, tell me again why I should send $$ to the DSCC or vote for mary landrieu?

    I stopped giving money to the DSCC when they endorsed Bob Casey in the PA primaries. As for Landrieu, I don’t live in LA so I can’t say why anyone would have voted for her in the first place. Has she ever done ANYTHING good? For ANYONE? (Besides Mary Landrieu, of course.)

  • What would it take to make the Senate Democrats actually fucking defend themselves and oppose Bush? On anything?

    Because right now, the only thing I can think of is that the name of every far-right whacko that they help put on the bench should be forcibly tattooed on the ass of every Democrat who votes for these freaks, under giant block letters that read, “Property of George W. Bush”

    The thing is, there’s been so goddamned many, that I don’t know what they’d run out of first, clean flesh or ink.

  • Gee Chris, do ya ever get the feeling maybe our democrat overlords aren’t really on our side at all? Maybe they are, in fact, serving their interests after all, and we’re just silly fools who THINK we have representation in government.

  • I’m just as pissed at Senate Democrats as everyone else is. The next test will be the nomination of Judge Terrence W. Boyle (U.S. District Judge, Eastern District of North Carolina) to the Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit. If the Democrats stop Boyle, they were “keeping their powder dry”; if they roll over and “play dead” again, they are f**king pathetic.

    PS — the embedded link is excellent.

  • Were the Ds to pick this fight right now, they would play right into the RSCC and the RCCC’s hands.

    They’d get more mileage, more fliers, more ads, more publicity, and in the end provide more than enough motivation for what is a very disillusioned Republican base to get off their ass and vote in November.

    It’s called picking and choosing your battle’s wisely, and in addition sowing fertile political ground for knowing when to sit on your hands and when to raise hell, there’s just as much to gain politically over what issue to raise hell about.

    Picking a fight over a single man whom 90% of the voters couldn’t pick out of crowd of 1, much less even give two craps about what he did 10 years ago, on an issue that resonates with a much higher percentage of hard-core Rs than it does with the 10% that determine most every election ain’t the fight to pick.

    It’s a good call….not a sign of cowering.

    Short term pain, long term gain.

  • What happened to “filibuster”? Are they all so fattened on the Senatorial federal tit that they don’t want to even say the word? What’s happened to “opposition”? Damn the Democrats. Damn nearly all of them. Hell, damn them all. Nearly every day of this adminsitration lends further surpport to the Eagles’ lyric “Call someplace paradise, kiss it goodbye.”

  • This was both morally revolting and tactically dumb.

    My understanding is that the Democrats didn’t filibuster this utterly unqualified piece of shit because they didn’t want to trigger the “nuclear option” battle. Of course, if Democrats ever retake a majority in the Senate, they’d want the filibuster gone. And if it isn’t worth a fight to stop a hack like Kavanaugh, who’s intimately involved with the most repugnant political would-be putsch of our times, what *do* you fight over?

    It’s also dumb on a second level. The one thing about partisan operatives is that traditionally, the more deeply one gets involved in what Donald Segretti memorably called “rat-fucking,” the less likely your prospects are for the future. Starr himself might very well be sitting on the Supreme Court today–which was surely his fondest dream–if he hadn’t taken the special prosecutor gig. On our side, the comparatively tame operatives–the Chris Lehanes and John Sassos–saw their careers dwindle after their shenanigans were exposed. That should be a factor in the mind of every operative tempted to stray down the dark path of American politics.

    Instead, we put this slimebag on the second-most powerful court in the country. The message this sends, to be succinct, is that crime pays.

    Just awful. The Democrats have no balls and no brains.

  • Ed, I think that Darren and I (comments #22 and #21) are contending that perhaps the caving on Kavanaugh was a strategic move. Let’s hope that they stand up to the Rethugs soon. Keep your eye on the Boyle nomination.

  • SKNM, if caving on Kavanaugh was a strategic move, I *have* to question the wisdom of that strategy. What’s the strategy, approve every single fucking nominee that Bush sends up, to show that we won’t leave ourselves open to charges of “politicizing” the judiciary? If we can’t oppose guys like *that*, we might as well recall our senators entirely. Besides, wasn’t Kavanaugh one of the guys that the “Gang of Fourteen (Wusses)” admitted might be thwarted?

    And Darren, Democrats need to fight more, not less (this applies to just about every issue, because Bush is wrong about so much, and people are starting to realize not just that he’s wrong, but that so many other people *AGREE* that he’s wrong). Any “strategy” that involves fighting less will *not* impress voters (especially given Democrats’ lack of power, and reputation for political impotence). If Democrats can’t defend their right to not be a rubber stamp on this (and 99% of Bush’s nominees have been confirmed, including some real whackos, so if Bush/Frist want to complain, they should look like real WATBs, if Dems are willing to call them on it), then they don’t *deserve* to win (the likelihood of Republican attacks does *NOT* increase because of anything Dems do, it increases because Dems *EXIST*). What would they do differently, confirm *MORE* of them?

  • I never thought I’d say this, but Grover Norquist was right:

    “Bipartisanship is just another name for date rape”

  • Comments are closed.