Sharks with frickin’ laser beams attached to their heads? Almost

We all got a good laugh recently when a CBS affiliate in California discovered that the Pentagon considered building a “gay bomb,” which could purportedly turn enemy soldiers gay. (The Defense Department weighed just such a plan in the 1990s, but subsequently rejected it.)

Apparently, however, that’s not the only wacky idea on which Pentagon officials have been willing to spend money.

Creating armor that renders a soldier invisible. Stimulating the brain to suppress sleep for days. Arming sharks with chemical implants and cameras to work as spies.

This year the Pentagon will spend $78 billion — about half of all government research and development dollars — on a variety of projects, according to the American Association for the Advancement for Science (AAAS).

The vast majority – about $68 billion – goes to traditional spending, like weapons development and space systems. But some fringe research mimics the best of science fiction.

Or perhaps the worst. The ABC News report included quite a few gems, including the “gay bomb,” a lengthy study into “psychic teleportation,” and research into brain implants that intended to “steer sharklike dog fish with a phantom odor.”

First, when the Pentagon has enough money to invest in some of these painfully silly ideas, the Pentagon must have too much money.

Second, when Austin Powers jokes start to resemble actual research, it’s not a good sign.

I just want to know if they’ve perfected the “Men in Black” mind eraser yet…

  • I just want to know if they’ve perfected the “Men in Black” mind eraser yet…

    They did. It’s called “The media”. Watch enough of it and you won’t be able to remember recent history, and it will be replaced with Republican “history” like “we found the WMDs”.

  • I just want to know if they’ve perfected the “Men in Black” mind eraser yet…

    ‘Fredo Gonzales.

  • Start checking how many are congressional earmarks before you begin to laugh at the Pentagon. After Randy “Duke” Cunningham, I trust nothing.

    A gay bomb?

  • This really makes these generals look like they’re not serious people.

    about half of all government research and development dollars

    Wowee

  • Why don’t they spend some of that money on developing a strategy course that teaches people not to pursue stupid options?

  • Does anyone remember former Senator Proxmire’s Golden Fleece Awards, an annual prize awarded for these same sort of harebrained projects. The one that I still remember was called Operation Dumbo Drop (not the disney movie by the same name). They were going to develop a drug to be injected into elephants that would cause massive flatulence, then parachute them into enemy compounds. One had to wonder if they knew the location of these encampments why they didn’t just drop a few 500 pounders on them.

  • A friend of mine from highschool has been trying, for 40 yrs, to get funds for the development of an electric candle extinguisher. I wonder if Pentagon would be interested in financing it…

  • Second, when Austin Powers jokes start to resemble actual research, it’s not a good sign…

    Hey!

    When a President doubts the science of global warming. but believes that dinosaurs were on the Ark, suffice it to say: We’re doing the best we can….

  • Laugh all you want, but the idea of invisibility isn’t too far fetched. A japanese researcher has developed a jacket that projects what is behind the wearer onto his front. It isn’t the Predator, but given time an research who knows.

    So at least one of the things they were investing in is plausible, unlike the gay bomb.

  • Jonathan wrote: “Laugh all you want, but the idea of invisibility isn’t too far fetched. ”

    I have a bit of researcher’s “inside knowledge” about the various invisibility schemes, and it should be said that even though it’s doubtful that someone will make a ‘Predator suit’, there is good science behind it and possibly some decent (non-ninja) applications.

    The reality is that the military tends to fund a lot of projects that are long shots, but have good science behind them (gay bombs and shark controls not included). It is sad to say that given the current state of governmental funding, many researchers end up having to get their funds to do pure science through the military.

  • Comments are closed.