‘She angles her belly button toward him’

My friend J emailed me last night to tell me about CNN’s “Larry King Live” and how the show covered the Obama/Clinton event in Unity, N.H. last night. In addition to the usual speculation from the usual suspects, King invited on dueling “specialists” — a psychiatrist and a “body language and deception detection expert.”

I thought J was kidding. She wasn’t.

In the first segment, King talked to CNN’s Candy Crowley about the event in New Hampshire, followed by Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell. They, of course, are fairly predictable guests, and they shared fairly predictable insights.

But why on earth would CNN feature a psychiatrist and a “deception detection expert,” neither of whom know the candidates, and neither of whom were even on hand for the rally?

I was especially amazed to see the “deception detection expert” explain to the nation that the position of Hillary Clinton’s navel carries great political significance: “She angles her belly button toward him. She’s treating him with respect. She has her hands in a fig leaf position, which tends to be a passive position, really turning the power over to Obama. We face our belly buttons and the core of our body to people we like, have affinity toward and people we respect. And she’s doing it.”

For crying out loud — this is CNN?

And then, just to make matters slightly worse, Anderson Cooper invited on another “body language expert” to offer additional “analysis” in the following hour.

I’m at a bit of a loss. CNN wants to report on the event? Great, it was a politically significant rally. CNN wants to offer some behind-the-scenes reporting about what went on when the candidates weren’t on stage? Wonderful, that’s what reporters are supposed to do.

But CNN also wants to let its audience know what Obama and Clinton are thinking by having “experts” scrutinize the direction of their navels.

And American journalism manages to slip just a little further into the abyss.

The truth is, the rally in Unity was an effective event that went off without a hitch, but in terms of actual news value, there wasn’t a whole lot to say. The candidates looked good, gave good speeches, and shook some hands. It was the first joint public appearance, which in and of itself is newsworthy, but not a whole lot actually happened.

So, CNN is left with all of these hours to fill, talking about an event that didn’t actually produce a lot of news. With that in mind, here’s a radical suggestion — instead of “body language and deception detection experts,” the network can cover the event and then report on other news.

I know, I know, I’m a dreamer….

i am really not surprised…its american teevee
just an electronic billboard with pablum

  • CNN isn’t much different anymore from what I see in the checkout line at the supermarket.

  • There may be a bad vid embed above.

    Or maybe it’s the tubes breaking down on my end. So I’ll add that I do think body language expert that Olberman has on his show to analyze Bill OReilly’s body language, from his Hard Copy days, was particularly insightful.

    Plus, I bet it pissed him off big time.

  • Clearly my standards have fallen a long ways via conditioning from the media for the last two decades, but when I saw your headline and then read your story I was just pleasantly relieved that they didn’t bring in a “deception expert” to stir the pot and say the whole event was a fraud (despite the “experts” not actually being there – you know, the Dr. Frist school of analysis).

  • Looking on the bright side, now they’ll be dispatching some deception detection experts to analyze an upcoming McCain speech.

  • CNN has been a source for nothing more than yellow journalism since the late 90’s. Why do we even bother to pretend they’re any better than FOX?

  • To be fair, King’s show is more of an entertainment program. If you’re looking for hard news and objective, unbiased analysis, you’ll find plenty of that on the “Situation Room” with veteran journalist Wolf Blitzer. Seriously. This isn’t sarcasm. Wolf constantly says they’ve got the best “political coverage on television,” so it simply must be true. I’ve also hear that Iraq is getting much better, and that Obama can’t attract white voters..or women…or Hispanics…or independents…

  • It is a program like the above that sometimes gets me thinking CNN wants to become FOXNN, purely for the ratings. -Kevo

  • TCG (3) You do realize, don’t you, that the body expert Olbermann had on to talk about O’Reilly’s Hard Copy blow up was a comedian. Keith may have waited until the end of the interview to explain that, but it actually was a comedian.

    Meanwhile, CNN can now call itself the most trusted name in navel gazing.

  • King puts “psychic” Sylvia Browne on at times so this might be considered a step up.

  • Danp

    About the comedian on Olbermann. Yeah I knew that.

    Having fun at O’Reilly’s expense is always fine by me.

  • Minga. Fair enough. Let CNN do their gimmick and have “experts” play gotcha. Now, lets have them do the same for McAce and Romney and Dobson and Bush. I mean fair is fair.

    My guess is that these “experts”, if honest, would point out how much these criminals are, well, criminal. Their body language would illuminate their deceit. Come on Larry. fair is fair…

  • For crying out loud — this is CNN?

    Yes. SA2SQ.

    I majored in Psych and sometimes it annoys me that the field doesn’t get as much respect as, say, nephrologists.

    Then I read shit like this and understand why people tend to snicker. It’s as bad as Frist’s video diagnosis of Schiavo.

  • Honestly, the only problem here is that CNN pretends to be real news and too many people go along with that. But the whole thing is meant to be entertainment that happens to cover the news; like The Daily Show, but without much intentional comedy. But it’s been the People Magazine of cable news for quite awhile. Same with MSNBC. They learned long ago that there really wasn’t enough news to cover 24-7 and started creating their own material instead. If they happen to cover actual news, it’s a by-product, not the intent. While they’re unlikely to admit it, I’m sure that’s exactly how they think about it. I’m sure it gets them better ratings.

    The only serious cable news network is Fox, because they’re a propaganda network and can invent all the news they want. If they entertain, it’s because they want you to stick around for the lies, not for the ratings. As we’ve seen elsewhere, Republicans really don’t care if their newspapers, books, etc lose money because they’re not in it for the money. The fact that Fox has such high ratings is only important to them because it means they’re lying to more people. So while CNN and MSNBC would stick to hard news if they thought they’d get higher ratings from it (they wouldn’t), Fox will never stop being propaganda.

  • Over seven years ago, there was virtually nothing on TV news except lying Republicans. Bush lied each and every time he talked about Iraq. We had a small army of retired generals who framed the “truth” in a way so that it secured their investments in the war machine. We heard rehearsed lying from the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Ambassadors to the UN, Senators, Congressmen, and sadly, even the news anchors.

    Each day I would point out various body language and phrases that were clues that these people were lying. In rare cases when a “liberal” pundit might question the lies, there would be an explosive cavalcade of “protesting too much”, and accusations of any with questions as being “un-American” and “unpatriotic terrorist lovers”.

    But not once do I ever recall that any “experts” were called in to watch tapes of Bush, Rice, Bolton, Hadley or any of the obvious liars and point out their techniques or signs of deception or discuss the all important navel positioning. Does this mean the media is undergoing much needed introspection and soul searching and has come to the conclusion that it must reform? Uh, no. It means that if Democratic Politicians are speaking to huge audiences, there can never be enough analysis. But if John McCain is speaking to 25 retired multimillionaires, no analysis is necessary. Everyone knows there’s only one Double Speak Express and he can say anything he wants, then contradict it later in the day without question.

  • ‘Nother thing. Unless Hillary is a contortionist, “Angling her belly button towards him” means she was FACING HIM AS HE SPOKE.

    WTF?

    And yes, I tried to work out how it would possible to aim JUST my navel until the S.O. came in and gave me a look.

  • /snerk/

    I think they do navel-aiming in the Kama Sutra? We’re probably lucky that the “body language expert” (I can’t even type that without more snerking) didn’t declare that Hillary’s navel revealed her respect while her the position of her toes revealed her desire to present her bottom like a bonobo in heat.

    Don’t mind me, I haven’t been awake that long.

  • Had one of these graduate students working on Psych. Doctorate to be “body lang. Expert” and found none of it applied to theatre people or professional speakers who learn to manipulate poses and postures and hand & arm movements for effectiveness. Once you are made aware of your arms and hands etc. you become extremely awkward at first and then make conscious efforts to use them.

    Was that an inner or outer navel and does piercing make a difference? How about previous pregnancies? Lack of news I guess. btw…better than McCain isn’t saying much.

  • Thanks Joey #19. I was thinking that this was a scripted event and Obama and Hillary were merely acting their parts (even though they may have been sincere). So they were actors in this case.

    I noticed a line in Senator Dodd’s excellent speech about the FIXA Capitulation, and wondered if it sunk his chances of VP. He said, “And that message comes straight from the mouth of this President. ‘Trust me.’ ” It was aimed at Bush, but it mirrored Obama’s statement that he would be diligent in supervising the law when he was Prez.

  • As for me, I think she was aiming her pudenda at him. Belly-button is just too PC.

    Sorry to take this discussion into the divination mud, but what’s next in politics? Phrenology? Tarot cards? Rune-reading? Palm reading? Seances? Past-life regressions?

  • Yes, and what was Obama aiming at her, and what did that mean? If you’re going to get crude, go all the way.

  • seriously, that sounds like a line lifted from one of Lynne Cheney’s softcore porn writings or something. . .

    “. . . she angled her belly button toward him and seductively slid the strap of her gown from her shoulder, the cool night air caressing her full breasts that she ached for him to touch. . .”

    eeewwww. (but it was a good excuse for a “Carpetbagger Flashback”)

  • I’ll be the only one to say this body language expert thing isn’t as dumb as it seems. Sure, it’s clumsily handled, and I’m looking forward to the Daily Show parody, but at least this is an attempt to dissect the theatrical aspects of politics. These candidates ARE actors during these events. That is how we take part in campaigns. As David Mamet put it, we are the audience and our ticket is our vote.

    The only problem I have with it is that the press is not examining its own role in the melodrama. Elaborate stagings are mentioned in passing when the press is feeling cynical about the whole process, but CNN can’t show their light rigs or makeup personnel. I think stories like this are a way of the press of getting back at the humiliation of following a candidate that they’re put through as “official” candidate correspondents. They want to report somehow on the whole BS show but refuse to indict themselves as little more than stagehands. If they do, there will be another reporter whore who will take their place.

    I think this too is a bit of a growing backlash against Obama. He really needs to kiss the press’s ass more or he’s going to make a tight race of this. The press turning on him is the only way the Republicans can eek their way back into this, basically by giving credence to bogus rumors, outright lies, racism, etc. As voters grow more used to Obama’s speeches (and that’s his great skill as a political actor) the press will have less incentive to kiss up to his campaign. He’s using up his press capital quick.

    One of the best things I’ve seen on TV all year was a pretty excruciating, unfunny Daily Show segment by Rob Riggle (?) in which he proceeds to piss off all the TV talking heads you see on the networks while they’re packed in a tour bus like a bunch of senior citizens visiting the Grand Canyon. You can see the derision on their faces, not for him so much but for the whole ugly sham of an 18-month campaign.

  • FWIW — The vid embeds have a script (Adobe Flash 9) that’s breaking my RSS reader (NetNewsWire – Mac).

  • “She angles her belly button toward him. She’s treating him with respect. She has her hands in a fig leaf position, which tends to be a passive position, really turning the power over to Obama. — “expert”

    I didn’t watch the rally, but I surely hope that Obama didn’t have his hands in a fig leaf position; the Pumas would have a collective fit about the implied misogyny of the gesture. Sigh… I pine for the old days, when navel gazers stuck to contemplating *their own* navels.

    TAIO, @17,

    It’s obvious that you’re an inflexible man, if you think Hillary would have to be a contortionist to be able to aim her navel in any direction she wanted to. My bet is she had been a royal houri a couple of lives back; you watch the well-trained belly dancers and it’s easy to believe they have no joins in their bodies.

  • I come to the conclusion that nothing happened yesterday, and they can’t just shut the network down.

    I do think there’s some truth to body language, but there are some problems with it as presented. For one, they aren’t there, facing the other person. Makes it hard to analyze the “communication”. What’s more, it’s only vaguely interesting in an instance when they’re not stating what is ABSOLUTELY OBVIOUS TO ANYONE. These “expert” commentaries would, however, be a good feature for my proposed CNN show, “So You’ve Been in a Coma for 5 Months and Need to Catch Up”.

    For what it’s worth, my navel is always pointing towards you as I read this site.

  • Libra, for suggesting that HRC was a dancing girl I sentence you to an hour in the naughty Democrats corner.

    For putting the image of a belly dancing Senator in my head: FIVE YEARS.

  • When I saw this last night, I was floored. At first, I thought it was a take-off a la Countdown but nope…serious as a heart attack. It’s amazing the things you find when you’re channel surfing.

    I realize that King is “infotainment” but honestly, when you wrap that infotainment around politics and come up with drivel at this level it really distracts from the importance of politics – and right now, at this point in time, politics is very, very important!

    I immediately thought of what CB wrote a few days about about “strategists ” for that’s exactly what this was…dueling (left/right) ideologies wrapped in psudo science. It disgusted me completely (along with a bit of an ironic sort of chuckle).

    TAiO, I’d pay to have watched you pointing your belly button. Too bad your SO didn’t catch that one on cam. Cudda made some cashola off of it. 😉

    And, CB, would I kid ya? 😀

  • ‘She angles her belly button toward him’, lifts her blouse , rolls her rippled abs toned by months on the campaign trail and then pops a turquoise blue ball of belly button lint out which bounces off of Obama’s chest, shoots into the air and explodes into sparkling blue lights spelling out the word UNITY!

    Barack takes a half step back, appraises his former opponent with new respect and thinks that hmmmm, a vice president with a belly button like that could be very useful. And he might also be wondering if Michelle could do that belly button popping thing too. Has she been holding out on him?

    These gals are just full of wonderful surprises.

  • So global climate experts that have studied climate for 20 years are not credible but self proclaimed body language “experts” are ?

  • It’s simple, and it’s good. People want to see Obama and Clinton together. They want to see them giving unity speeches. They like politics this year, and they are happy with what they are seeing. CNN puts this on because people want to see it — the actual content they deliver matters less — so they bring in experts to provide color commentary for the event. It’s a tough business for the media this year — people want coverage of the campaign — but the networks don’t really have the smarts to cover it well, so they have to cover it any half-assed way they can. But overall, this is a good sign.

  • Has there ever been a time when Olbermann or Stewart had body language/speech experts come on to evaluate the body language/speech experts that appear on other news shows?

    If not, isn’t it time?

    “well, Keith, you can tell by the way she’s tilting her head and putting emphasis on her plosives that what she’s really thinking is “I’m a fraud. I’m a big fat freaking’ fraud. I never even completed by Associates’ Degree for pete’s sake. I can’t believe Fox News is paying me for my worthless opinion. As long as no one ever finds out about my DUI, I might be able to ride this to my ow syndicated show! Screw you, Dr. Phil!”

  • I watched with horror as this alleged “body language expert” tossed out one absurd conclusion after another based on flimsy evidence. She also kept insistiing that “93% of all communication is nonverbal.” As someone who has a Ph.D. in Speech Communication, my suspicion is that the “expert” may not even be aware that this “truism” is likely based on an early 1970s study by Albert Mehribian. Mehrabian had speaker say ONE WORD, like “Oh” or “Terrible” and the subjects were asked to read words in a positive, neutral or negative way. It should be obvious to most people that to extrapolate from this experiment to include that “93% of ALL communication is nonverbal” is just silly.

  • What did it mean when Obama walked over and stuck his finger in Hillary’s bellybutton?

  • Comments are closed.