Snow sees Malkin as soldier in ‘media war’

As much as I’d like to believe that the White House staff is in touch with reality, they keep giving me reasons to believe otherwise.

Take Press Secretary Tony Snow, for example. Snow appeared on Hugh Hewitt’s radio talk show yesterday, and insisted that the Bush administration has been fighting a “new media war” for quite some time. As proof, Snow pointed to Michelle Malkin as a soldier for truth in the “media war.”

“What is interesting, Hugh, and you know this as well as anybody else, you’re also starting to see little glimmers of guys like Michael Yon and others who get over there and they basically embed themselves in Iraq, and Michelle Malkin’s over there now.”

As Judd noted, several times during the interview, Snow referenced Malkin’s work on the Jamil Hussein “story.”

Now, Malkin is embedded in Iraq right now, and I certainly wish her a safe journey. But for the White House press secretary to reference Malkin, Jamil Hussein, and truth, at the same time, suggests Snow isn’t quite keeping up on the news as well as he should.

To be sure, Malkin has been obsessing over the Jamil Hussein story recently, but she’s also been entirely wrong.

…Iraq’s Interior Ministry acknowledged Thursday that an Iraqi police officer whose existence had been denied by the Iraqis and the U.S. military — and mocked by conservative bloggers in the U.S. — is in fact an active member of the force, and said he now faces arrest for speaking to the media.

Ministry spokesman Brig. Abdul-Karim Khalaf, who had previously denied there was any such police employee as Capt. Jamil Hussein, said in an interview that Hussein is an officer assigned to the Khadra police station, as had been reported by The Associated Press — and as AP has reiterated over the past month in lengthy statements and in interviews with E&P.

Confronted with the fact that she got the entire story wrong, for weeks, Malkin said, “I’m not apologizing for anything.”

Exactly which part of this does Snow consider a successful part of a “new media war”?

“Now, Malkin is embedded in Iraq right now, and I certainly wish her a safe journey.”

I don’t.

  • “Exactly which part of this does Snow consider a successful part of a “new media war”? ”

    The sucess that propaganda achieves, even when it’s an outright lie.

    Many people won’t hear or believe the truth after a bogus stry is told, so this type of lie achieves “conventional wisdom” status. Sort of like the “Al Gore claimed that he invented the internet” lie.

  • Michelle Malkin: proof that an aging Olongapo boom-boom girl can find a way to pay the rent now that the fleet no longer calls in Subic Bay.

    Now she’s just a righty “boom-boom girl” – but she’s still getting these bozos who can’t get any any other way to pay her to fuck them.

  • Obviously, Snow considers it successful because Malkin successfully derailed a factual story with bullshit. That’s success.

    Truth is whatever they say. They say whatever pushes their agenda. Their agenda is to gain more power.

  • What makes you think Snow needs to keep up on the news? Snow’s job is to disseminate the Bush administration’s version of reality (lies, to put it bluntly). Familiarity with real events only gets in the way –

  • Snow is asserting that Captain Jumil Hussein doesn’t exist:

    TS: Yeah, I am looking forward to meeting Captain Jumil Hussein, but other than that, yes. You’ve seen the latest on that, right?

    HH: No, I haven’t. I haven’t read today. Is he back and not existing again?

    TS: He’s back to non-existence.

    HH: (laughing) But that’s the new media war…

    TS: Yeah.

    http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/Transcript_Page.aspx?ContentGuid=3cebc08f-de3c-4c12-9135-16c922d27712

  • What they can’t figure out is why the lies are no longer working. With every word, the Bush regime looks more dishonest, and less attached to reality. If Malkin is a ‘soldier for truth in the new media war’, that war is going to go about as well as their war in Iraq. Here’s hoping, at any rate.

  • I’m not even sure that a “safe” journey is possible in Iraq, but I’m sure Malkin will report things are going swimmingly.

    I can only hope that she is exposed to the atrocity of this and all war and that she is left with mental images of pain and anguish that she can’t unsee or forgot.

    Maybe then when she regurgitates meaningless talking points and outright lies she will remember what she saw and the guilt will eat away at her a little bit every day.

    Of course, I’m not sure it would. She’s reality impaired.

  • Snow and Malkin are just following Dear Leader’s lead, doing their part to “catapult the propaganda.” (I still can’t believe Bush actually said that.)

  • Malkin will be taking the “scripted” tour that O’Billy and Hannifucky took when they were there. It’s relatively safe. It’s doubtful anyone will approve her truly embedding with American or British soldiers conducting their patrols–she’d have to steal away in the night, something I seriously doubt she’d try after making the dangerous drive from the airport to the Green Zone.

    And I doubt she’ll get to meet Capt. J. Hussein or go anywhere near the neighborhood under his charge.

  • Malkin is supposed to be interviewing Iraqi security forces as well as U.S. troops.

    I hope she goes to Yarmouk police station to interview Hussein’s former coworkers. I bet they have a better attitude towards the AP than they do towards the right wing blogs that sent their colleague on the lam.

  • Is there any way we can get Tom Cleaver’s comments as a headline on the Huffington Post? Our brothers and sisters in truth could use a good laugh.

  • Hussien existance is still questionable…a man with a name not at all similar to Hussein has been identified as the “source”..altho HE DENIES ever reporting anything to the AP.

    The stories attributed to this alleged Jamil – have never been proven to be true.

    Seems like those here who seek truth only see what they want to see while accusing others of the same .

    And the AP has a legal and ethical responsibility to identify a “psuedonym” for any source they quote.

    You’re hatred for the right makes your judgement and ability to discern between truth and lies no better than those on the right who you attack.

    As of today, Jamil Hussein does NOT exist…a man does exist who some claim is an AP source of stories. The man denies that he is…and to date NO OTHER NEWS ORGANIZATION including the NYTIMES has been able to verify his existance and verify the veracity of ANY of the stories alleged to have come from “him”.

  • Comments are closed.