So much for the ID course in Kansas

We learned last week that the chairman of the Religious Studies Department at the University of Kansas was taking a firm stand against intelligent-design creationism — by including it in a course on “religious mythologies.” As Prof. Paul Mirecki explained, “Creationism is mythology. Intelligent design is mythology. It’s not science. They try to make it sound like science. It clearly is not.”

It was a great idea that seemed to be well received by the academic community, students began signing up for the course, and non-creationists everywhere were thrilled. But it was all for naught. The course has been cancelled — because Mirecki got a little careless with his choice of words.

A University of Kansas course devoted to debunking creationism and “intelligent design” has been canceled after the professor caused a furor by sending an e-mail mocking Christian fundamentalists.

Twenty-five students had enrolled in the course, “Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design and Creationism,” which had been scheduled for the spring. Professor Paul Mirecki, chairman of religious studies, canceled the class Wednesday, the university said.

Mirecki recently posted an e-mail on a student organization forum in which he referred to religious conservatives as “fundies” and said a course depicting intelligent design as mythology would be a “nice slap in their big fat face.” He later apologized, and did so again in a statement issued by the university.

Chancellor Robert Hemenway said Mirecki’s comments were “repugnant and vile.”

Let this be a lesson to all of us — if you’re going to teach a course to make religious fundamentalists look ridiculous, don’t put your motivations in print and publish them on the Internet.

That’s really too bad. The class Prof. Mirecki wanted to create sounded exactly like what was needed to put I.D. in perspective. But when I first read his fat faced fundie comments, I was afraid he was having too much fun and getting too smart alecky for his, (or his supporters), own good. It was a good model though.

  • What burro said. Why couldn’t Mirecki keep his mouth shut and pretend the class was a legit academic exploration?

  • Yes, it’s a shame. The one thing that can’t happen is taking a “mightier than thou” approach. It’s one thing to discredit ID, and quite another to appear to have an agenda, or worse yet…gloat.

    This is exactly the type of thing ID-supporter’s will latch onto to help bolster their case of discrimination.

  • College ain’t what it used to be. One thing that always bothered me was that in Islamic countries the college kids who are supposed to be rebellious were rebelling FOR repressive religion and government. Now I guess college students are turning into Young Republican Guards here in the US.

    Simplistically speaking of course.

  • Well, if there is one lesson all of us can learn from the past 20 years of GOP shit, it is to make something sound positive and inclusive, but actually result in the exact opposite of what is being sold publicly.

  • I had commented before that just the fact
    that he chose the word “mythologies” was
    a giveaway to his attitude. Why not just
    honestly include ID and all its variants in
    a legitimate course on comparative
    religion or philosophy of origins? Let it
    speak for itself in the right course, and
    get that monkee off the back of science.

  • A University Chancellor who was unwilling to stand up for the academic freedom of faculty member, that is the real story here. University leaders are the truly the “captains of erudation” that Veblen portraited them as nearly 100 years ago with more in common with CEO’s than with an academics.

    This course would not have been required. No one would have been forced to take it. Arrahhh, this just irks me!

  • hark, I think the Monkees were superior to monkeys. Michale Nesbit really was a musician ahead of his time, even for being part of a corporate created musical group.

    And on Rege’s point, this happens quite often, as you indicate., Just recently the administration at the law school in Oregon has refused to defend one of its professors in a lawsuit stemming from a law review article.

  • Talk about spineless – a poorly worded statement, and the entire class gets canceled? Why not just apologize for the statement and proceed with the course.

    And, this part really only needed a little tweaking: “nice slap in their big fat face.” Let’s see, remove the “big fat,” stick a “metaphorical” towards the beginning, and you are all set! “A nice metaphorical slap in their face.” Perfect!

  • Comments are closed.