So much for the ‘job performance’ excuse

With the news developments in the prosecutor purge scandal coming fairly quickly over the last couple of days, let’s not overlook the fascinating insights from Michael Battle, who just so happened to be the hatchet man who fired the eight U.S. Attorneys, and then resigned when the heat arrived.

There have been a variety of reports that Battle was less than pleased with the DoJ higher-ups when he stepped down a few weeks ago, and now we’re learning why.

The former Justice Department official who carried out the firings of eight U.S. attorneys last year told Congress that all but one of the prosecutors had no performance problems and that a memo on the firings was distributed at a Nov. 27 meeting attended by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, a Democratic senator said yesterday.

The statements to House and Senate investigators by Michael A. Battle, former director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, represent another potential challenge to the credibility of Gonzales, who has said he never saw any documents about the firings and had “lost confidence” in the prosecutors because of performance problems.

Just what Gonzales needed on the eve of his Senate Judiciary Committee testimony — another reason to question his credibility. Battle’s remarks not only suggest Gonzales was lying about his involvement in the process, but also about the rationale for the purge in the first place.

And in case there was any doubt that Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is playing hardball here, note that the WaPo article about Battle’s revelations came — on the record — from Schumer. Behind the scenes, four top Gonzales aides, including Battle, have been subject to interviews with staff members on the House and Senate Judiciary committees. Schumer waited until Gonzales was gearing up with a p.r. offensive, and then let reporters know about Battle’s comments, which of course make Gonzales look even worse.

Bottom line: Gonzales and his deputy, Paul McNulty, initially told Congress that the firings were due to “performance-related” problems. Battle, who actually did the firings, said that in seven of the eight cases, this just wasn’t true. And since it was his job to supervise the department’s 93 U.S. attorneys, Battle was in a position to know.

I can’t wait to hear Gonzales’ explanation.

In other purge scandal news:

* Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.), the Senate Judiciary Committee’s ranking Republican, said Gonzales should consider reinstating the fired U.S. attorneys. That’s not going to happen, of course, but it helps reinforce a narrative that undermines Gonzales’ chances (these prosecutors didn’t deserve to lose their jobs).

* The LA Times reported over the weekend that Karl Rove and other White House employees “were cautioned in employee manuals, memos and briefings to carefully save any e-mails that might discuss official matters even if those messages came from private e-mail accounts.” They didn’t.

* NPR reported that White House Counsel Fred Fielding, when dealing with Congress, said he won’t budge on offering Rove and Miers for private chats with no transcript and no oath. But back at the White House, Fielding is reportedly fighting to negotiate with lawmakers over how the interviews could occur — but Bush refuses to go along with even opening the door to discussions.

* Time magazine reports that a group of influential conservatives and longtime Bush supporters has written a letter to the White House to call for Alberto Gonzales’ resignation. The letter, written on stationery of the American Freedom Agenda, includes signatures from Bruce Fein, a former senior official in the Reagan Justice Department, who has worked frequently with current Administration and the Republican National Committee to promote Bush’s court nominees; David Keene, chairman of the influential American Conservative Union, one of the nation’s oldest and largest grassroots conservative groups, and Richard Viguerie, a well-known GOP direct mail expert and fundraiser.

* And Daniel Metcalfe, a senior attorney at the department who retired in January, told the Legal Times that Gonzales has “shattered” the department’s tradition of independence and politicized its operation more than any other attorney general in more than 30 years. Metcalfe recently resigned in disgust.

Stay tuned.

I think Abu Gonzales will have memory troubles tomorrow.

Lots of “I don’t seem to recall” and “Golly Gee Heck, I just can’t remember”

  • I’m worried about the timing, that this may sink him. It’s huge–but the news orgs might not treat it that way.
    I guess if he resigns before tomorrow, Dems can still get something going on the missing emails.

  • If Fein, Keene, and Viguerie are coming together to oust Gonzales, they are admitting that the public is suffering from “Bush scandal fatigue” (BSF). What does that mean? Prominent conservatives fear that the 2008 election results will look like 2006’s results—except, on steroids!

  • Strange, but at this point the only way for Bush and company to resolve this particular blunder is to fire Gonzales… something I don’t see happening.

  • I’m guessing that before the hearing is over, Gonzales is going to add a new phrase to the history of American politics along the lines of, ‘I’m not a crook’ or ‘the meaning of is’ as he tries to defend the indefensible.

  • It’s good to see Senator Schumer kicking ass and naming names. Let the Republican whinefest continue. “He’s just being partisan“. Whah.

    When you see corruption at this level, and when the Republicans aren’t willing to clean out their own criminals, there really is only one tool to root it out, namely the other party. Partisanship is good sometimes.

    I think Gonezales will resign soon, and then the “liberal” media will try to convince us that it’s all over. Someone (Schumer et al) needs to make sure that his head on a plate doesn’t constitute “finding out what happened”.

    I want Rove on the stand repeating ad nauseum how he can’t recall anything much, and takes the fifth for the stuff he can recall. I want to know what Georgie Porgie did, and when he did it.

    I want my country back.

  • Glad to see Chuck so aggressive on the PR front. The Repubs will have a much harder time advancing their spin if the first words out of the their mouths have to be ” No we didn’t.”

  • Prominent conservatives fear that the 2008 election results will look like 2006’s results—except, on steroids!

    [sknm]

    Yep, on steroids, snorting meth, riding in a tank, clutching an AK-47, wearing a belt of hand-grenades and a brace of those scary hunter knife/brass knuckle things tucked in its god-damned boots. I hope the cons get caught in the damn treads because they had nothing, nothing to say when their fearless leader was fucking up this country nine-ways from yesterday and Goner was taking a constitutional on the Constitution.

    By the power vested in me by…me I hereby declare that the Clue Bus has reached its maxiumum capacity for repentant cons, so enjoy that bed of nails fuckers! Your suffering will end when 2008 comes along and flattens your arses.

  • Racerx (#7),

    I agree. To listen to “I’m Taking My Country Back” — which seems to have disappeared from its old sites — go here and click “listen now”. The song’s at the top of jukebox list. Some of the others listed are worth listening to, too.

  • There are many good things about the new Democratic tactics.

    That Schumer, Reid, Pelosi, et al, are standing tough and returning fire with tremendous effect instead of caving as the White House obviously expects them to do is one thing.

    Secondly, they’re sticking to their strategy in spite of the efforts of the still-potent Republican-owned media machine to minimize, distort and distract attention from the coming trainwreck. They’re armed for bear and they’re coming for the criminals with focus and resolve.

    And that’s what scares the White House and the whole neocon Republican infrastructure right down to the toes of their fluffy little bunny jammies. They thought they ruled the world, and now they’re feeling the weight of the righteous army bearing down on them who will not be stopped.

    Except Bush himself, of course. He still thinks he rules the Imperial City and thus the country by the sheer force of his will and his direct personal line to God. Sure going to be fun when he locks himself in the Oval Office with Cheney, Rice and Karen Hughes, the last of his faithful office wives, for the final struggle before he’s kicked into the ash can of history once and for all..

  • From TPM:

    The Albuquerque Journal reported yesterday that President Bush and Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) had a phone conversation about U.S. Attorney David Iglesias sometime after the election last year, but before he was fired. The White House has yet to directly respond to that. Today we found out why.

    White House spokesperson Dana Perino said today that she hadn’t asked Bush whether there had been such a conversation. “I haven’t asked him,” she said, but continued to say that she didn’t “think” such a conversation had occurred, because she’d never heard anything about it. When pressed again, she said, “I’m not going to rule it out.”

    How much more pathetic can these morons get????

  • At first I thought it was a really bad idea to let so much time slip by before getting ABU on the stand, since he’d just figure out a way to write up a nice, typically semantically slippery story that would exculpate him.

    But now that I think about it, all the people they are interviewing who are trying to save their own arses are likely to really throw a monkey wrench in the Gonzo concoction, which Im sure, after his little op-ed piece, he is thinking is going to go down oh so smoothly, just as ever other thing has that the administration has papered over for the past 6 years. But now I dont believe that at all.

    What I DO, worry about still, is that the time has given too much cover to the others that have placed just as sinister a role; specifically, Bush, Rove and possibly Domenici. It just kills me that they they are going to be spending pretty much all day of every day figuring out the loopholes that they can weave a story from depending upon how much or how little of the emails they have to release. But Im quite sure now that ABU becomes the fall guy soon, just so they can get past this with the least amount of critical damage, at least as far as the preservation of power is concerned, since that is all that matters to the administration.

    Really sickening to watch this unfold.

  • Actually I think the real drama will start when one salient point really starts heating up:

    The U.S. Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, not the Attorney General. So under the law the Attorney General can’t lawfully fire them on his own ticket but only by order of the president or at least with his explicit knowledge and approval, if my understanding of the law is correct.

    So if AG AG fired them without the knowledge or approval of the president, then he broke the law with all the consequences that entails. And if he fired them *with* the president’s knowledge and approval, that takes the proceedings directly into the Oval Office itself.

    If I’m wrong on the legalities I’ll be glad to amend my speculation. But either way they’d better have a mop handy tomorrow, ol’ Alberto is going to be sweating buckets before the day is out one way or the other.

  • Comments are closed.