Supporters of the Geneva Conventions need not apply

There are plenty of instances from recent years of [tag]blogger[/tag]s getting [tag]fired[/tag] for writing about their place of employment, but this is an interesting twist on the phenomenon.

[tag]Christine Axsmith[/tag], a software contractor for the [tag]CIA[/tag], considered her blog a success within the select circle of people who could actually access it.

Only people with top-secret security clearances could read her musings, which were posted on Intelink, the intelligence community’s classified intranet. Writing as Covert Communications, CC for short, she opined in her online journal on such national security conundrums as stagflation, the war of ideas in the Middle East and — in her most popular post — bad food in the CIA cafeteria.

But the hundreds of blog readers who responded to her irreverent entries with titles such as “Morale Equals Food” won’t be joining her ever again.

On July 13, after she posted her views on torture and the [tag]Geneva Conventions[/tag], her blog was taken down and her security badge was revoked. On Monday, [tag]Axsmith[/tag] was terminated by her employer, BAE Systems, which was helping the CIA test software.

Axsmith had an internal blog that the public couldn’t even access. These were CIA employees sharing thoughts with other CIA employees, exclusively. Her employers not only knew about the blog, they offered some encouragement, such as giving Axsmith traffic data.

Moreover, her blog posts covered diverse interests. As Axsmith told the WaPo, she’d write about “lunch meat one day, the war on terrorism the next.” All the while, no one at the CIA or BAE Systems cared.

Then she wrote that “[tag]torture[/tag] is wrong.” Things quickly got ugly.

In her job as a contractor at the CIA’s software-development shop, Axsmith said, she conducted “performance and stress testing” on computer programs, and that as a computer engineer she had nothing to do with interrogations. She said she did read some interrogation-related reports while performing her job as a trainer in one counterterrorism office.

Her opinion, Axsmith added, was based on newspaper reports of torture and waterboarding as an interrogation method used to induce prisoners to cooperate.

“I thought it would be okay” to write about the Geneva Conventions, she said, “because it’s the policy.”

In recounting the events of her last day as an Intelink blogger, Axsmith said that she didn’t hold up well when the corporate security officers grilled her, seized her badge and put her in a frigid conference room. “I’m shaking. I’m cold, staring at the wall,” she recalled. “And worse, people are using the room as a shortcut, so I have no dignity in this crisis.”

She said BAE officials told her that the blog implied a specific knowledge of interrogations and that it worried “the seventh floor” at CIA, where the offices of the director and his management team are.

Anyone care to guess if the reaction, including the firing, would have been the same if Axsmith had criticized the Geneva Conventions?

Believe me, this cuts just a little too close for comfort.

  • Talk about thought control! The Bush Crime Family — more than happy to apply electrodes to genitals when that’ll get Rummy’s rock off — retaliates with expulsion when one of its professional employees expresses herself to her co-workers within a security shield.

    I wonder how many experts have been trained, or gained experience, at government (our) expense and then been fired to soothe the egos of their employers.

    Since the GOP is beginning to act like the Roman Catholic Church during its heyday (The Inquisition), shouldn’t they at least provide some outlet for asserting their power while retaining the talent, like periodic sacramental Confession? “Yes, my child, you erred in expressing yourself. Say three Our Fathers and ten Hail Marys. Go, and sin (think) no more.”

  • I’ll be the contrarian here and suggest there’s nothing terribly wrong with Christine Axsmith’s termination. She misused government computers and computer resources, and she essentially badmouthed one of her employer’s clients. That’s a huge mistake. Many private companies warn their employees not to blog about the company, and some take steps to discipline or fire an employee for criticizing the company on a public blog. I wouldn’t expect any differently from a government agency or contractor, especially when they have an explicit policy forbidding that use of a computer.

    Now had she been fired for her torture post on a public blog or a letter to the editor written on her own time that would be worth getting upset over.

  • Lets review the recent rules of the road from BushCo and its wholly-owned Congressional division and majority-owned subsidiary, the Supreme Court:

    * Work for government? No free speech for you.

    * Stuck in a trailer home because Katrina wiped you out? No free speech, free press, or free association for you (not to mention very little meaningful assistance at restoring your life).

    * Captured overseas, without or without reasonable suspicion? No rights for you. Whats that you say? SupCtCo didn’t get the memo? Fine. No rights for you once we ship you to a secret prison in Whereverastan.

    * Want to complain about something we’ve done? Tough. We’re removing the courts’ jurisdiction to hear you. Or well just buy up everything you complain about and say it ok now.

    * Gay? Get the hell out of here.

    * Privacy in your own home or on your own telephone or computer? Hey, thats a good one – I love new jokes! Got any others?

    * Like trees, clear air, clean water, untainted natural spaces? Um, enjoy it quick. We have plans for all of that. But some people really do find oil derricks quite aesthetics. And really, spilled oil on the arctic ice will look like a really cool black and white painting. Now if only there were a 29-foot cross on it, it’d look perfect!

    * Black? Lets talk about the estate tax. . .

    * Female? Hey, for you, we actually have something. I give great massage. . . sorry CBR, me and the Chancelloress here, we gotta go get a room. . .

  • Just wanted to add to Zeitgeist’s great list:

    Want to protest something? Sure, just head over to that fenced in Free Speech Area 2 miles over that way?

    Want to attend a speech given by the president at an event paid for by your taxes, for which you have a ticket, at a public facility? Are you crazy, no way, you look like a Democrat.

  • To PRM,
    We, the People, are her clients. You have accepted your position as slave a little too quickly. If your boss is the serves the Gov’t, (the People) then they work for them too.
    A private contractor hired to do the Governments work, is still responsible to the People. Don’t let anyone tell you different. The ones that argue opposite, are Fascists.

  • What you seem to miss, PRM, is that:

    1) The Government encourages employees to blog on their top secret networks using Government resources (you damn well better not be connecting your personal computer! ),

    2) Interrogation Methods and what qualifies as torture are clearly legitimate subjects of conversation within the HUMINT community.

    BAE Systems fired Axsmith because they are spineless twits who won’t tell the Government they are wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • PRM,

    She misused government computers and computer resources,

    How so? If it was the first blog entry, then I might be able to see your point. However, it wasn’t. They even provided her traffic numbers. Clearly, the CIA did not view her blogging as “misuse”.

  • This is one reason I enormously respect the heckler at B’s NAACP speech yesterday.

    That fellow did a heroic thing.

    If fact, I wish there were more hecklers.
    And that they were louder and angrier.
    own
    B deserves no respect.

    What the heckler and the blogger are saying in so many words is just this:

    We had it with your blatant mendacity!
    What is wrong and evil–is still wrong and evil.
    And we reject your paternalistic authority on this issue.

    That is an eminently appropriate message.
    It wants delivering.

    In fact here is a function to ponder:

    The moral vibrancy of a our country varies directly to the number of heckles B receives per week.

    Which is also to say:

    If B were speechifying in the 60s he’d get heckled to shreds.
    Which tells us all we need to know about his current moral standing and our culture’s…

  • Bush said last year that the United States doesn’t use torture.

    But “BAE officials told her that the blog implied a specific knowledge of interrogations and that it worried “the seventh floor” at CIA, where the offices of the director and his management team are.”

    So, is Bush lying, or just oblivious to reality?

  • Um, let’s see a consultant blogged about her clients most potentially embarrassing practice, and that client was the CIA.
    And she got fired, WOW, I am totally shocked.
    Rule of thumb, don’t badmouth your client/boss, and that goes triple for blogs, and cube that for the CIA.
    Sorry, I just don’t see a news story here.

    “I’m Joe interrogator, this my job, I probably don’t want anyone to know what I do exactly, I am probably a hard person to replace, and I would hope that I do not enjoy my job. So I get on our in-house blog and read about some nit-wit software consultant saying this or that about what I do. Right, she’s gone, idiot.”
    And the poor thing had to sit in a cold room with people walking through… oh the humanity.

  • “I’m Joe interrogator, this my job, I probably don’t want anyone to know what I do exactly, I am probably a hard person to replace, and I would hope that I do not enjoy my job. So I get on our in-house blog and read about some nit-wit software consultant saying this or that about what I do. Right, she’s gone, idiot.” – ScottW

    snark//Yep, the morale of our torturers is so vitally more important compared to the rest of the Intelligence Community //snark

  • It wasn’t about torture…we all know the CIA doesn’t torture. I think we all know what this firing was really about…

    in her most popular post — bad food in the CIA cafeteria

    You think you can insult the culinary choices of the “greatest intelligence agency on Earth” and get away with it? Just imagining about Joe Interrogator in Iraq, day dreaming about a nice meal at the CIA cafeteria after his time out of country. That cafeteria is what makes his days in the hot desert bearable. Now? He’s got nothing to look forward to anymore.

  • Al B Tross, Edo, Lance —

    Sure, her superiors encouraged her to use the classified intranet to blog, but as the article says:

    “The CIA says blogs and other electronic tools are used by people working on the same issue to exchange information and ideas.

    Which I interpret to mean that intranet would be used for work purposes — resource sharing, networking between different offices, scheduling, etc. — not airing your grievances with your employer or your clients.

    Arbitrary application of company policy is nothing new. Her boss winks at the CIA cafeteria post but cans her for the torture post. So it goes. I think we could all share dozens of stories of rules that are applied and enforced unevenly in employment in both the public and private sectors.

    However, I see this as largely a matter of Axsmith lacking discretion. One, she’s a computer engineer working for a private contractor, not a government agency. She’s a desk jockey, not a CIA operative. In other words, interrogation and intelligence gathering aren’t in her purview.

    Two, she makes reference to internal CIA interrogation reports in her blog post. If she demonstrates a willingness to discuss what she saw in those reports on an internal intranet, what’s to stop her from blabbing about what she read in public?

    Three, she was using government property to express her opinion internally. We’d be upset if say DHS employees were using government computers to gamble online. This is pretty comparable.

    There are plenty of cases where the Bush administration actively and more egregiously works to stifle dissent and free speech. I’d be angry if she was canned because she wrote a critical editorial or public blog post, or if she was a legitimate whistleblower. But this is just a case of a private employee hoping her company would bend the rules for her and it didn’t.

  • Comments are closed.