Taking the low road and the high road at the same time

Chances are, few would have heard about professional right-wing loudmouth Bill Cunningham’s tirade against Barack Obama at a McCain event earlier this week, had McCain not personally denounced it. The story created an interesting dynamic — it served to amplify Cunningham’s ugly attacks (which undermines Obama), while making McCain look like he’s above it all (which undermines Obama).

Yesterday, it was more of the same from The Tennessee Republican Party, which issued a press release smear against Obama, drawing a rebuke from the national party. The result was similar — more people heard about the specific attacks, and more people were led to believe the Republican establishment doesn’t like it.

Josh Marshall encouraged everyone not to miss the trend here.

Hopefully, everyone can now see the McCain strategy for running against Barack Obama. Yes, we have some general points on taxes, culture wars and McCain as war hero who can protect us in ways that flash-in-the-pan pretty boy Barack Obama can’t.

But that’s not the core. The core is to drill a handful of key adjectives into the public mind about Barack Obama: Muslim, anti-American, BLACK, terrorist, Arab. Maybe a little hustler and shifty thrown in, but we’ll have to see. The details and specific arguments are sort of beside the point. They’re like the libretto in a Wagner opera, nice for some narrative structure. But it’s the score that’s the real essence of it, the point of the whole exercise.

Now, a good deal has been made out of John McCain’s repudiation of talk radio yakmeister Bill Cunningham, who led off for McCain at one of his rallies with the full run of Obama sludge. But don’t be distracted or fooled. This is more like an example of what the digital commerce folks refer to as ‘channel conflict’. You’ve got your multiple distribution channels. You’ve got the way McCain’s selling the product. Broadcast. Broad and thematic about McCain. But you’ve got a number of other product channels to sell through, most of them a lot grittier, but no less essential for ultimate success.

It’s not especially subtle. The Republican Machine wants, arguably needs, to destroy Obama with nonsensical smears. The same machine wants to keep McCain above the fray. So, obviously, the answer is to take the low and high roads at the same time — sending supporters to do the dirty work, while the campaign shines a spotlight on the dirty work by denouncing it.

Indeed, isn’t it interesting that McCain campaign officials encouraged Cunningham to take his cheap shots?

“[McCain’s] people told me to give the faithful red meat. Give them red, raw meat.”

Josh added:

Don’t insult your intelligence or mine by pretending that John McCain’s plan for this race doesn’t rely on hundreds of Cunninghams — large and small — across the country, and the RNC and all the GOP third party groups, to be peddling this stuff nonstop for the next eight months because it’s the only way John McCain have a real shot at contesting this race.

If McCain really wants to repudiate this stuff, he can start with the Tennessee Republican party which dished all the slurs and smears about Obama being a Nation of Islam-loving anti-Semite, just today. And once he’s done talking to the people who will be running his Tennessee campaign, we’ll have a number of others he can talk to, like the head of his Ohio campaign, former Sen. Mike DeWine, who gave that Cunningham guy his marching orders.

Let’s just not fool ourselves, not lie to ourselves about what’s happening here and who’s in charge.

Yesterday afternoon, McCain spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker noted that her candidate condemned the press release from the Tennessee GOP and apologized to Obama — the day after apologizing for Cunningham. “There will be times in this campaign where people do and say stupid things,” Hazelbaker said. “It’s a fact and it’s beyond our control…. We will continue to condemn [such comments] in the strongest language possible and reiterate our commitment to running a positive campaign based on the issues.”

As much as I’d like to assume the campaign is operating in good faith, the circumstances make that impossible.

Sigh. Let the swiftboating begin. This is going to get very ugly. I just hope Obama’s ready. So far, he’s proven that he is.

  • They are trying to get Barrack off message. I think we’ve seen from his recent campaign that simply won’t happen. The Obama campaign is very effective about answering charges concisely, and I have a feeling Obama has dealt with most of those issues all of his life. If he’s prepared to fight anything, it’s this line of attack.

    McCain is stumbling into Obama’s trap while thinking he is setting one of his own.

  • What exactly would you like McCain to do? You criticize him for not repudiating the supporter who referred to Clinton as a “bitch,” and then when he does condemn supporters for making inappropriate statements about Obama, it’s all part of some grand conspiracy of which he’s the mastermind. If he hadn’t distanced himself from Cunningham or the Tennessee party, I suspect there would be a post this morning criticizing him for that, too. There are plenty of legitimate grounds for criticizing McCain, but it seems more than a little unfair to hold every Republican’s statements against him regardless of how he responds to them (not unlike Clinton’s and McCain’s attempts to link Obama to every crazy thing that Farrakhan has ever said).

  • I am so shocked that the GOP is going to do whatever it takes to win, no matter how slimy.

    We need to show the parallels between this tactic (which I pointed out yesterday*) and Bush’s use of the same thing back in 2000 against McCain, and against Kerry in 2004.

    * I wouldn’t be surprised if Rove wasn’t trying to play this both ways, so he can make the Republicans look less moronic to the moderates and at the same time feed the islamophobic trolls who make up the base of the party. He’s probably telling them to knock it off with a wink.

    http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/14719.html#comment-385628

  • This is so transparent. It’s exactly how the GWB 2000 campaign worked on McCain. Little smears by small groups and GWB renouncing them. McCain DID learn something from that campaign, didn’t he?
    Also, see the national story about Karl Rove telling the RNC that they better not make political hay about Obama’ middle name. It makes Karl look good, while not reporting on the fact that the next meeting he had that day was with the Tennesse GOP, etc., etc. Karl is soooo above that kind of thing, dontcha know.

  • And I guess we need to drill a few adjectives into the public mind about McCain:

    Crazy.
    Bush’s Buddy.
    Warmonger.
    Corrupt.
    Hypocrite.

  • What exactly would you like McCain to do?

    Vet what people are going to say on his behalf, at his rallies. Duh.

  • I sort of agree with Dillon. Whatever his motives McCain is doing the right thing by renouncing (rejecting?) the wingnut oratory. I think Josh is being too clever by half in thinking this is deliberately orchestrated by the nitwits of the Republican party. They may very well use the phenomena to their advantage though.

  • Also:

    Finished 5th from bottom in Naval Academy class
    Cheated on first wife
    Keating 5 member
    Old
    Melanoma
    Says “my friends” too much

  • Dale (11):”Whatever his motives McCain is doing the right thing by renouncing (rejecting?) the wingnut oratory.”

    But you’re missing the fact that McCain said he’d never met Cunningham, though he had several times before; that Cunningham is rather well known for this kind of speech; and that DeWine told Cunningham to “throw red meat.” Once again it comes down to McCain’s credibility versus a GOP pattern.

  • The concern has to be the effects of this sort of double game on that part of Obama’s support that may not be sufficiently sophisticated to see what is going on. It looks as if the Republicans and McCain campaign is trying to discourage the marginal voters who are drawn to Obama–the young, the occasional voter, the nonpartisan independent. If they can successfully exploit these voter’s natural distaste for the political process and very mild inclination to vote under the best circumstances, they may be able to keep enough of them home on election day to make a difference. It isn’t always about winning votes. For the Republicans it is often more important to dampen turnout.

    What can McCain do? Vet the speakers before they go on. Fire DeWine as the head of your Ohio campaign. Have the head of the Tennessee Republican Party fired. Do something meaningful each time this occurs. Symbolism is meaningless.

  • Dale & Dillon – Just what do you think was meant by “[McCain’s] people told me to give the faithful red meat. Give them red, raw meat.”
    Obama wants socialize medicine?
    Obama wants big govenment?
    Please, spare us from the pretense that these are civil people.
    The Clintons killed Vice Foster & are involved in dozens of other deaths. Swiftboat lies about a real fighting hero, McCain fathered a black baby and was insane from his captivity years, that’s the kind of people we are dealing with.
    Yes, McCain has the same people working for him that smeared him on behalf of The Codpiece in 2000.
    CB is right, denunciations make you seem nice, but you can’t unring the bell.

  • I don’t know Dale. Maybe McCain is playing it straight, but it takes a real leap to suggest Karl Rove does not know exactly what he’s doing. At least that’s immediately what I thought when hearing of Rove’s comments yesterday.

    They’re going to keep reminding us, “We’re not saying his middle name is Hussein,” “We’re not saying he’s black,” “We’re not saying he’s a former drug user,” and it will make them seem gracious to one group while playing on the prejudice of another all in one swipe.

    I’d love to believe that’s not Karl Rove’s thinking but, come one, this is Turd Blossom we’re talking about.

  • The GOPer OODA loop is broken; they have zero experience with someone who can field a piece of tinfoil like Cunningham and throw back an anvil at the same time.

    Beyond that, McCain’s got no choice BUT to play nice with Obama. He’s at risk of having his primary spending capped (he’s just about topped off now, and an FEC decision against him would effectively shut him down until September—game,set, match: Obama). If Obama sees the value of leaving the public-funding behind, he’ll steamroll McCain into the stone age (again, game, set, match: Obama).

    If McCain decides to go “dirty,” he gets ground into his own mud-pie by an opponent who is already proving his ability to fight small-arms sleaze with thermonuclear fact.

    Maybe McCain can garner the knuckledragger sympathy vote— if there is such a thing—but right now, he’s trying to play both outliers of a classic Bell Curve. It’ll net him a record whomping by Obama in November—and a long-term cave occupancy for the GOP….

  • It’s important to keep an eye on this pattern… but… I’d rather have McCain publicly denounce it than not, and, to the extent that it’s being done to have it both ways it can be counterproductive. Go read some wingnut comments on the Cunningham remarks, many of them are angry that McCain would dissociate himself from Willie, and view this as a reason to *not* vote for him. Subtlety doesn’t play with these folks.

    And McCain didn’t have to repudiate him so forcefully if it’s just to score points with the moderates, he could say something more neutral e.g. “My Friends, it’s really important to me that we run a campaign that is respectful to my oponents. There are many areas in which Bill Cunningham and I agree on the conservative values that make this country great, but he went too far in certain comments he made about my opponent, and that’s not what John McCain stands for” then he keeps das base. Certainly Karl Rove’s tactics would have never pushed back so hard on the Cunninghams of the world – I think part of McCain believes that he really doesn’t need to go *that* far (and, just maybe he’s a wee bit more sensitive, having been on the receiving end of the smear machine).

    I don’t want to overly defend McCain on this… but it’s possible that he’s at least some improvement over the most recent republicans. Definitely something to keep a close eye on.

  • I sort of agree with Dillon. Whatever his motives McCain is doing the right thing by renouncing (rejecting?) -Dale

    Cunningham wasn’t making the statements on his radio show, he was introducing McCain at an event.

    starfleet_dude nailes it at comment 9. McCain wouldn’t have had to denounce Cunningham if his staff had vetted him in the first place.

    I surely don’t think McCain is responsible for every dumbass member of his party, but when they introduce him, I do.

    Do you honestly think for one minute McCain’s staff didn’t know what Bill would say? I find that incredibly naive.

    I’ve said for years the Republicans are great campaigners and message masters. I guess their chicanery is working.

  • Anyone who believes the Republican Party ever “operates in good faith” about anything probably also believes in the tooth fairy and that the moon is made of cheese and cows can jump over it.

  • Barack has got the high road. There is no reason for him to get down in the gutter with them. Humor works for the more absurd claims; mild contempt and disdain for others. The thugs have not a solid leg to stand on. They have to go for the cheap shots. They think that life is ‘nasty, brutish, and short’ and do everything they can to prove it.

  • Dale: were you born this stupid or did you have to work to learn it? I refer to your purchase of GOP troll Dillon’s comment that poor McCain can’t get no respect for not being able to control his supporters even when he denounces them.

    You remind me of exactly what people mean when they talk about Dumbocrats and Dimocrats. No wonder the thugs think they can beat us.

    But I forget, you’re a Billary supporter, which explains everything.

  • If Cunningham wasn’t in on the plan, then the McCain people played him too. And with the schism with the radio wingnuts already in place, they’re not going to be the dupes for McCain. This is not a World Wrestling Federation storyline. I doubt the Rushes have signed on to be the badguys.

  • I would like to reject and, at Hilary Cliton’s insistance, denounce, everything Racer X said @8 and geometric logic said @12.

    When they said John Sidney McCain was “Crazy, Bush’s Buddy, a Warmonger, old, Corrupt, a Hypocrite and accused him of Finishing 5th from bottom in Naval Academy class, Cheating on his first wife, being a Keating 5 member, and saying “my friends” too much”, they did not clear it with the Obama campaign first.

    And I’ll say it as many times as it takes for the people to realize that Obama has NOT said John Sidney McCain is “Crazy, Bush’s Buddy, a Warmonger, old, Corrupt, a Hypocrite and accused him of Finishing 5th from bottom in Naval Academy class, Cheating on his first wife, being a Keating 5 member, and saying “my friends” too much”

    Please note the press release and full-page ad forthwith.

    You know, this kind of BS might have worked in October, but do they think it will fly for 8 months???? Even Utah voters aren’t THAT thick.

    Disclaimer: The Obama campaign rejects and denounces the notion that Utah voters are thick.

  • some things I wish Obama would say:

    1. When speaking to Democrats – John McCain says that you (Democrats) are the enemy. Think about it, a man who wants to be president believes that half the jpopulation of ‘his’ county is ‘his’ enemy. Interesting, when you consider how much he supports Bush’s policy of spying on Americans; does he mean spying on his enemies.

    2. Our campaign (Obama’s) is being publically funded – one samll donor at a time.

    3. I gues McCainFeingold doesn’t day anything about powerful Washington lobbyists doing business right from the campaign bus.

    4. What else have you put up as collateral to keep your campaign going – Iraqs oil perhaps?

    Just wishin’

  • “GOP troll Dillon…”

    LOL– now that is one I’ll have to remember; thanks for again confirming my long-held opinion of you, Tom. The rest of your post is not really intelligible enough to craft much of a response to, so I’ll ask again, what would you prefer McCain to have done? Are we to believe for a second that you think he should have stayed silent instead of distancing himself from Cunningham? As for the suggestion that his staff should have “vetted” Cunningham’s speech or that they encouraged him to “throw red meat,” as to the first suggestion, I doubt that Cunningham even had a prepared text for his remarks, so I’m not quite sure what McCain’s staff could have done that they didn’t do; as to the latter, even if it’s true (and we have only Cunningham’s word that it is; interesting that so many on here are ready to accept that as gospel), a request for a “red meat” speech hardly equates to “Barack Hussein Obama” is “a hack, Chicago-style Daley politician.” In other words, even if McCain did encourage Cunningham to be aggressive, he went too far, and McCain rightly called him out on it.

  • Tom Cleaver said:
    Dale: were you born this stupid or did you have to work to learn it? I refer to your purchase of GOP troll Dillon’s comment that poor McCain can’t get no respect for not being able to control his supporters even when he denounces them.
    You remind me of exactly what people mean when they talk about Dumbocrats and Dimocrats. No wonder the thugs think they can beat us.
    But I forget, you’re a Billary supporter, which explains everything.

    Cleaver, you ignorant slut. Did you fail Logic 101? “Whatever his motives McCain is doing the right thing by renouncing (rejecting?) ” Which part of that don’t you understand?

    Yes I’m a Billary supporter because they are Democrats who have served this country well. They are on our side. I voted for Obama for the same reason.

    I can understand you especially thinking in terms of B-movie plots. Yes, the Sistah Soujah moment is now a staple of campaigns, but do you think that Sistah Souljah and many others weren’t pissed that Clinton sandbagged them. The wingnut windbags are not going to keep letting McCain denounce them without resenting it.

    Now get on back to your anal bigotry, your phony name-dropping, your exciting fantasy world of you and your ancestors having been, like Zelig, at each important moment in history. (A Cleaver crossing the Delaware?)

  • This is classic Rovian politics: get an attack dog to do the dirty work while the candidate remains above the fray. In this instance, McCain’s repudiation was actually a little too over the top and may have backfired on him. McCain went on to condemn the messenger too harshly instead of just saying he personally found the messsage to be distasteful. What McCain was supposed to have said was he personally wouldn’t have said or thought such things, but instead John got too heroic and impugned a person who does harbor those thoughts. But that’s old “I’ll just say things off the top of my head” McCain.

  • The best response I can think of to this two-channel strategy is for Obama to simply say, “How can guy who can control his own campaign expect to run the US Government?”

  • It’s a twist on the good cop/bad cop strategy. Lower management goes on a tirade and Senior management makes nicey-nice with the customer. PLease, do they really think we’re that obtuse…wait, Bush is still President, guess we are.

    WTB new President with a heart and a brain, we’re not in Kansas anymore Toto!

  • “Finished 5th from bottom in Naval Academy class”

    geometric, please tell us — where did you end up in your Naval class?

  • “Now get on back to your anal bigotry, your phony name-dropping, your exciting fantasy world of you and your ancestors having been, like Zelig, at each important moment in history. (A Cleaver crossing the Delaware?)”

    How about a Cleaver arm-in-arm moment with RFK?!? Tommy Boy why weren’t you there to take the bullet for your hero??

  • I heard a reporter the other night say that if Obama does get elected he will be assasinated within six months. I believe this to be a true statement as the white suprimists in this country will not allow a black man to be president. It’s a shame there is so much prejidice left in this country but there is.

  • Beyond their control… BWA-HA-HA-HA

    The McCain campaign is becoming a parody of itself. How ridiculous is McCain for claiming he’d never met Cunningham before.

    And seeing the name Mike DeWine again :-p… How wonderful that Ohio voters replaced him with the wonderful Sherrod Brown in 2006. DeWine proves his sleaze with the Cunningham “incident”.

  • I doubt that Cunningham even had a prepared text for his remarks, so I’m not quite sure what McCain’s staff could have done that they didn’t do

    I’m sure there wasn’t a text, but that doesn’t mean you can’t ask him what he’s got in mind to say. Probably they just invited the guy not knowing anything about him other than he’s a local radio talent. Which is why you ask that sort of thing, of course.

  • JRS Jr said:
    “Finished 5th from bottom in Naval Academy class”

    geometric, please tell us — where did you end up in your Naval class?>>>>

    And your point is what? geometric is not running for president.

  • “I’m sure there wasn’t a text, but that doesn’t mean you can’t ask him what he’s got in mind to say. Probably they just invited the guy not knowing anything about him other than he’s a local radio talent. Which is why you ask that sort of thing, of course.”

    True enough, but Obama made the same kind of mistake with Donnie McClurkin in South Carolina, and no one on this side of the blogosphere has suggested that his doing so was an effort to “take the low road and the high road at the same time” with respect to homophobes. Of course, the Obama campaign caught the error and denounced McClurkin’s homophobia before he appeared at an Obama event, but the point remains the same: candidates can’t be held responsible for every intemperate or misguided thing that their supporters say, and sometimes negligent vetting of a speaker is nothing more sinister than that.

  • candidates can’t be held responsible for every intemperate or misguided thing that their supporters say, and sometimes negligent vetting of a speaker is nothing more sinister than that

    IIRC, I remember many a Republican saying that after Rick Kahn went over the top at Paul Wellstone’s memorial service. Or maybe not…

    That said, it would have been best if some one had for a moment told Kahn to keep it respectful.

    Still, if the worst that can be said about Obama is, literally, nothing more than name-calling, it’s not going to be much help to McCain anyway.

  • Seems to me that more than anything McCain is losing control of his campaign, unless he’s really trying to do his part and just doing it very badly. These smear-monger cockroaches can only survive when they don’t get too much attention. This “good cop, bad cop” strategy only puts them more in the spotlight which will alienate more of the general population than it will draw the wingnut base. If strategy it is. There’s always the possibility they’re just retarded, which is highly provable in any case.

    Whether it’s McCain’s own idea or those of his demented handlers, it’s just another sign that the next President of the United States will not be John McCain.

    Thank God!!

  • “There will be times in this campaign where people do and say stupid things,” Hazelbaker said.

    At least one per news cycle, she hopes. Got to get in as many apologies as you can.

  • And your point is what? geometric is not running for president.

    Given the Acedemy’s academic and leadership rigors, ANY graduate of the Naval Academy is quite qualified to be POUS.

  • It’s POTUS, not POUS (piece of useless shi…)

    And not everyone who’s a Naval Academy graduate is qualified to be President either, just as every one with an MBA isn’t… 😉

  • Oh yes, everyone who graduates from the Naval Academy is qualified to be President.

    Like Cmdr. Kevin Ronan.

    He was convicted for illegal wiretapping for videotaping sex acts (while working for the same Naval Academy which should have made him magnificent specimen of mankind thanks to it’s rigorous curriculum, according to JRS Jr.).

    You know, now that I think about it, though, he does seem qualified to be a ranking member of the Republican party, and quite possibly President.

    Or maybe Lamar Owens is a better example, although he was not allowed to graduate despite being acquitted of rape. Which is it, Naval Academy…is he guilty and deserving of punishment or not?

    Yeah, high fucking standards, indeed.

  • JRS Jr.

    re: #41, so you feel that Jimmy Carter was quite qualified to be President, eh? Good to see we agree on something. And please, spare us the “sure, he was qualified but he was still terrible…” pretension.

  • Steve,

    I believe this to be a true statement as the white suprimists [SIC] in this country will not allow a black man to be president.

    Don’t hide your bigotry behind some nameless group, say it loud say it proud. Bigot.

    As for the “substance” of your assertion, why is Justice Thomas still alive given the all-powerful group to which you clearly belong?

  • I dunno, I placed third in my school’s National Merit Scholars. Yes, we had more than one.

    What I don’t get is why this is a platform for people to trash Clinton. Like Tom Cleaver needed another chance to prove that he’s a jerk or something. I don’t get it. He’s agreeing on all points, but nooo, he has to throw in a snide remark about Clinton.

  • Comments are closed.