Tears of a clown

In February, during a debate on a non-binding resolution on troop escalation, which Republicans said was just some symbolic act with no real meaning, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) started weeping. It wasn’t entirely clear why.

Yesterday, Mr. Sensitive was at it again.

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) broke down on the House floor today, sobbing uncontrollably as he urged his colleagues to vote in favor of the $100 billion Iraq war spending bill.

“Members on both sides of the aisle feel differently about our mission in Iraq and our chances of success there,” Boehner said, pausing to compose himself. As he continued, Boehner began to weep openly, crying out: “After 3,000 of our fellow citizens died at the hands of these terrorists, when are we going to stand up and take them on? When are we going to defeat them?”

I find it hard to believe Boehner is this good an actor, which suggests he’s really this dumb. America lost 3,000 people on 9/11, so we have to stay in the middle of Iraq’s civil war. After all, we need to take “them” on.

“When are we going to defeat them?” I don’t know, Mr. Minority Leader, maybe after we adopt a sane national security policy? Maybe after we withdraw from a conflict that is making al Qaeda stronger?

TNR’s Eve Fairbanks did a feature on Boehner this week. “When you’re comfortable with yourself, you can go through the worst you have to do,” Boehner said, summing up his philosophy. Fairbanks added, “It’s the kind of vaguely New Age self-help line an old-fashioned conservative would have snorted at.”

I might be more inclined to buy into Boehner’s emotional displays if they made more sense.

After all, didn’t Boehner practically admit he’ll eventually abandon Bush’s policy himself? Greg Sargent reported earlier this year:

Late yesterday House GOP leader John Boehner was interviewed by CNN, and he appeared to set a deadline for President Bush to show that his “surge” strategy will succeed. He was asked the following question: “How long can you and your membership give the President and give the Iraqi military before you say, ‘You know what? You’re not doing your job.’?” Boehner’s answer: “I think it’ll be rather clear in the next 60 to 90 days as to whether this plan’s going to work.” So if the “surge” isn’t successful by Boehner’s deadline, what will he advocate then? Let’s all see if we can remember that Boehner said this, shall we?

I remember, and also remember Boehner extending his own deadline. He told Fox News a few weeks ago, “By the time we get to September or October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn’t, what’s Plan B?”

So, by the fall, will it no longer matter whether “stand up and take on” those responsible for 9/11?

The man’s emotions appear to have clouded his judgment. Maybe he needs some kind of break from the rigors of congressional work. The pressure seems to be getting to him a little too much.

Maybe he needs some kind of break from the rigors of congressional work.

Or maybe he needs to adjust his medications.

  • He is that dumb. Yet, he. Bush and the GOP outwitted the dimwitted/tonedeaf Dems once again.

    Bush is just as dumb when he says “Osama wants to kill our children.” Yet, Bush chose to end the search for Osama, allowed Osama to escape Tora Bora, and has expressed his view that Osama does not matter much and that he (Bush) is not concerned with Osama. And then Bush sends many of our children to Iraq where many are being killed, where Osama is not and which had no al qaeda presence prior to the US attack of Iraq.

    Yet Bush’zBitchz roll over on war funding to these geniuses.

  • I think it’s the cognitive dissonance leaking out of his eyes. He’s forced to say things he knows are wrong – something’s gotta give. Reminds me of Poppy a while back bawling when he talked about Jebbie (the good son) while anguishing over the bad son by comparison.

  • I am so confused.

    President Bush said:

    We are fighting them over there, in Iraq, so we don’t have to fight them over here. (The sentence is logical.)

    We will leave Iraq if the government of Iraq asks us to leave. (This sentence is also logical.)

    What confuses me is that while I understand each sentence taken in isolation I am not smart enough to understand the two sentences together.

    Does it mean that we will fight them over here, instead of in Iraq, if the Iraqis grow tired of us fighting them over there?

    Of course, expecting consistency from President Bush is probably an unrealistic expectation.

  • Watching the PBS feature on Tony Blair depressed me totally. The politicians there speak in complete sentences, have ideas, and even some passion. Our politicians dumb themselves down or are selected on the basis of their dumbness. Stupidity is not a virtue in a politician.

  • He’s probably sobbing in infuriated anguish at having to ASK for money, when the previous policy was to just cobble together whatever The Decider-Commander Guy suggested might be the right amount, then steamrollering over any timid twits who dared oppose it.

    When he says, “when are we going to take them ON?”, he means, “when are you going to get back to that happy place where you let US decide who needed to get the smackdown?” Otherwise, the Marines would be in Saudi Arabia now, where the guys who needed “taking on” actually came from.

  • Too many drugs makes you over emotional. He’s totally insincere and stupid to cry when he does. Something is just not right with that guy. Imagine anyone around you doing that…weird.

  • “Can you imagine what the AM radio screech monkeys would do if a Dem did this?” — JoeW

    Limbaugh and crowd, with the willing help of the MSM, would destroy the career of any Dem crying on the floor of Congress. The MSM did it to Muskie in New Hampshire years ago.

  • op99 (re# 7)

    Yep, that’s the Daddy party. The deadbeat, drunken, bar-brawlin’ Daddy party. Then he comes home & gives the Mommy party a little what-for just for good measure.

  • Is there anyone who didn’t laugh out loud when they saw Boehner blubbering?

    Good one, Steve – I think “Tammy Faye” is the perfect name for Boehner.

  • “After 3,000 of our fellow citizens died at the hands of these terrorists, when are we going to stand up and take them on? When are we going to defeat them?”

    God willing, some time after January of 2009, when grownups are back in the White House.

  • The mere fact that Boehner broke down indicates that his decision making on this issue is emotional, and not rational.

  • Forget Tammy Faye – he reminded me of the judge in the Anna Nicole Smith case.

    I also think Boner reminds me of the Mayor in Red Dawn who sells out his own son to save his own ass.

    If Boner thought crying would sell a car, that’s exactly what he’d do.

  • Can’t wait to see Jon Stewart get hold of this one.

    Do you think Ann Coulter will call him a bad name? Edwards gets skewered over a haircut for heaven’s sake!

  • You see this reaction because Boehner actually believes this stuff. Really and deeply believes it, as do so many of the Bush base voters.

    They have their own opinions and their own facts. That’s why his reaction makes no sense out here in real world. Oz is a special place.

  • Rep. John Boehner’s voting record on military issues can be found at: Rep. John Boehner’s Voting Record

    Rep. John Boehner’s history of speeches on the Iraq war can be found at: Rep. John Boehner’s Record of Speeches

    Rep. John Boehner’s ratings from special interest groups on military issues can be found at: Rep. John Boehner’s Interest Group Ratings

    For more information on Rep. John Boehner’s position on military issues please visit Project Vote Smart or call our hotline at 1-888-VOTE-SMART.

  • Comments are closed.