That passive voice phrase just won’t go away

As long-time readers know, I’ve had an odd fascination with the use of the passive voice phrase “mistakes were made.” Reagan made it famous in 1986 in reference to the Iran-contra scandal, but it’s been used to describe the war in Iraq quite a bit lately.

Last year, describing the Abu Ghraib scandal, Bush said, “Mistakes were made.” Last month, Rick Santorum described the war by saying, “It’s also important for the people of Iraq to know that…mistakes are made.” Just last weekend, on Meet the Press, John McCain said “mistakes were made” twice in the same interview.

But on Wednesday, during his speech to the Council on Foreign Relations, Bush took the phrase to a new level. If it weren’t so sad, I might have been impressed.

“Senator Lieberman goes on, ‘Does America have a good plan for doing this, a strategy for victory in Iraq? Yes, we do. And it’s important to make clear to the American people that the plan has not remained stubbornly still, but has changed over the years.’ The Senator says that mistakes have been made. But he goes on to say that he is worried about a bigger mistake. He writes, ‘What a colossal mistake it would be for America’s bipartisan political leadership to choose this moment in history to lose its will and, in the famous phrase, to seize defeat from the jaws of the coming victory.’ Senator Lieberman is right.”

In general, the amazing thing about the phrase isn’t just its passivity, but its underlying motivation. Describing the war in Iraq, Santorum and McCain, among others, were willing to concede that someone made a mistake; they just weren’t willing to say who. Active voice would assign responsibility; passive voice admits errors without assigning blame.

But notice how Bush used the phrase. He wasn’t willing to personally acknowledge that “mistakes were made”; so he quoted someone else (a Democrat, no less) making the observation for him. It’s usually an accountability-free admission anyway, but Bush took it one step further, using Lieberman to acknowledge the existence of mistakes the president doesn’t feel comfortable recognizing.

I’m not saying mistakes were made,” Bush essentially argued, “but someone else did and I’m passing his remarks on.”

Impressive, isn’t it?

Jeez what is with the laguage comments on blogs? Sully has a post referencing Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language” (he hated the passive voice as well) and the Cunning Realist blog who has been ranting about the administration’s use of language.

Is there some sort of bloggers groupthink going on or what?

  • This administration is all (well maybe not all — looting comes in close second) about control of language. Observe how Scotty never ever accepts somebody else’s characterization of anything he’s asked to comment on. It’s always “well, I would not use those words” or “who said that”.

    They make their own reality with their control of the language. How postmodern of them.

    Lieberman is the new pet Democrat, just like Zell Miller before him. Way to go Joementum, the useful idiot.

  • Is there some sort of bloggers groupthink going on or what?

    Alas, it’s a coincidence. Or is that just what the group told me to think? Hmm.

    By the way, I too was going to mention Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language,” as I have before on this topic, but I decided not to. Guess that was a good call.

  • Comments are closed.