‘That’s what great leaders do — act on reality’

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell hasn’t exactly been sticking to the White House’s talking points lately, as evidenced by his acknowledgement that Iraq’s violence meets the standard of a civil war. But last night in Pittsburgh, Powell went a little further — and got a little more personal. (thanks to R.S. for the tip)

For example, Powell said, “Sooner or later, we’ll have to start drawing down. My own judgment is that sometime in the very near future, next year — early next year — there has to be an understanding that some U.S. troops will have to start to leave.” The line drew applause from the packed house.

He also criticized the administration for being unprepared for the post-invasion occupation and the violence. “We pretended, tried to look away, and say there was no insurgency, but there was,” Powell said.

But the most striking comments came in subtle reference to the president himself.

He never took any direct swipes at President Bush, or anyone else in the current administration. But several times last night, Mr. Powell made reference to his partiality to international diplomacy, maintaining friendly economic relationships and “reaching out to the rest of the world.” And at least twice, on a day when President Bush was said to have been splashed in the face with the cold waters of Iraq’s sad reality, Mr. Powell expressed his admiration for leaders who trust realism over idealism.

Speaking of former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, and his acknowledgment of the U.S.S.R.’s untenable economic situation, Mr. Powell said:

That’s what great leaders do — act on reality.” (emphasis added) Earlier on, talking about an encounter with Japan’s former prime minister, he said Junichiro Koizumi “faced reality and didn’t turn away.”

Now, Powell didn’t come right out and say Bush doesn’t act on reality, but given the context, it has to be considered a jab, doesn’t it?

Part of me thinks it may not matter if Powell has given up on Bush and is willing to criticize, at least subtly, the president’s dangerous policies. It was Powell, after all, who enabled those policies for years. He saw what was happening around him, recognized the mistakes being made, allowed himself to be marginalized, and said nothing. Powell wanted to be a “team player,” a fact which Cheney and Rumsfeld were all too happy to take advantage of.

Now, years after it ceased to matter, Powell has the courage of his convictions. If he’d had them four years ago, Powell might have been able to make a difference and save lives. Instead he went along, allowed himself to be used, and lent the White House the credibility it needed to sell a war that didn’t have to be fought.

It is a tarnished legacy.

That said, Powell remains a generally respected figure, on both sides of the aisle. (Indeed, perhaps more on our side than the GOP’s side, at this point.) Last night, Powell mentioned he’d be willing to advise John McCain’s presidential campaign — or the campaigns of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.

If Powell is willing to set the record straight with regards to the Bush White House and its tragic flaws, and do so publicly, it could start to rehabilitate an image that took a serious hit.

It sounds like Powell is a man of some of his convictions. A man for some seasons. He’s still the good soldier, putting leaders over the public.

There’s really not much subtlety about Bush. He’s a major league screw-up and thousands are dying every day while we tiptoe around his ego.

  • The neocon ideology is going down in flames. Check this out.

    John Bolton gets Questioned on PNAC
    Submitted by nomoreneocons on December 7, 2006 – 12:53pm.
    This young reporter is fabulous , and accurate (obviously, considering how low Bolton’s jaw dropped)!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QasOIsL7ig

  • I’ve always seen Colin Powell as an articulate, sincere human-being. He chose for whatever reason(s) to lie down with dogs, and he doesn’t like the fleas he’s gotten as a result. I do hope he can shake those fleas off, and offer common partiotic Americans some insight into this war of President Bush’s choice that Powell did in deed help to initiate. It may prove not only cathartic for him, it may also help us work toward the underreported recommendation from the Baker group: working on healing our bodypolitik that was damaged by this rather dogmatic foreign policy of Mr. Bush where he thinks he can force freedom and liberty on Islamic people.

    Islam means submission. And, as an adherent to the 1st Amendment of our beloved Constitution, I can can respect that people all over the world have embraced Islam; and within the terms of their cultural settings, they may already be practicing the level of freedom and liberty their religion affords them. I don’t know for sure, but then again, I’m not authorized to create foreign policy, so I haven’t had the need to ferret out such possibilities.

    Oh, I guess that our policy-makers may not have taken in such circumstances when they decided to wage war on the Islamic religion. Let’s be real, to our current policy-makers Islam is the last barrier preventing the West from monopolizing oil extraction and production for the benefit of the West. We will continue to be in this fine mess if we can’t find honest rhetoric to accurately reflect the working dynamic of this Bush initiated fiasco. -Kevo

  • Powell’s “legacy” got tarnished a helluva long time before his “staged performance” in 2002-03.

    Let’s recall that the first official Army report on the My Lai massacre, written by one Major Colin Powell, was a whitewash of the entire event, a position supportive of the official Army line at the time.

    The vastly-overrated Colin Powell has been a “go along to get along” guy from the day he entered Army ROTC at CCNY. He’s played “front office black guy” his entire career. Back in the days of slavery, he definitely would not have been a field hand, and Ol’ Massa would have loved Dear Ol’ Colin. Just like Ol’ Massa Bush did till recently.

  • In a criminal proceding Powell would be considered an accessory to a crime.Given the nature of the holocaust that is America’s war on Iraq, Powell is a war criminal,period.

  • Ya I’m with Tom, Powell has been a political character for the administration, he only true credibility coming from the color of his skin and I for one will not forgive the man who delivered the speech that changed minds knowing it was full of crap.

    Just another Republican putting his career before his country. Now that the tide is changing he decides to be a straight talker, not because he actually gives a damn about this country, but because his career is about to be flushed down the Bush toilet with the rest of the shit.

    He has a lot of bodies under his belt and as far as I am concerned he can just melt into the history books with the rest of the Prez #43’s accomplices. I don’t really care what he has to say, standing up when it is easiest, does not make a man, it’s standing up when everyone else is sitting down that makes a man. When you are in a position to make a difference, and you use that to influence people into making uninformed decisions that result in dead soldiers, you should get nothing but a big plate of shame from the people you deceived.

    The biggest cowards weren’t the chicken hawks screaming for war, it was the people with the power of truth that sat by and let the hawks have their war and tell their lies and betray their country.

  • “That’s what great leaders do — act on reality.” – Colin Powell

    It’s a telling sign of where when a statement like the above is made and people don’t shake their heads saying, ‘is he nuts — of course, leaders act on reality. What else would they do?’

  • On principle,

    The look of John Bolton’s face in that youtube clip is priceless. Subtle, yet priceless. thanks.

  • I like Colin Powell. He was marginalized by Cheney, Rumsfeld and a president who was easily manipulated.

    He gave his advice on N Korea: engage them. Bush didn’t take it.

    He gave his advice on Iraq: don’t go in. Bush didn’t take it.

    He gave his advice on how to deal with enemies: talk to them. Bush didn’t take it.

    He’s no saint, and I wish that he had resigned in protest. But I’m not religious so I don’t believe in saints anyways.

  • I too had respect for Powell but as soon as I read this, I just waited for a Tom Cleaver post to give me some historical dirt. Tom, you certainly did not disappoint @4. Holy shit!- he wrote the first My Lai Army report – how the hell did you find that out?

    Btw, I’m not being facetious – tone is hard to convey, but I really am kind of blown away by that. But I guess that’s how you rise up through the ranks, you take the party line and he’s an old soldier in that war.

  • CB: For example, Powell said, “Sooner or later, we’ll have to start drawing down. My own judgment is that sometime in the very near future, next year — early next year — there has to be an understanding that some U.S. troops will have to start to leave.” The line drew applause from the packed house.

    From the same article:

    In the same breath, Mr. Powell also said that the United States needs to make it clear to Iraq’s leaders, its military and its police force that they must quickly learn to stand on their own feet, and that the country’s fate is up to Iraqis, not America’s troops.

    So, whatever happened to his “you fixed it, you own it”? “It’s up to Iraqis” is still the Bush meme. Powell is just blowing in the wind, like a bloody weahtrevane.

  • Tom & Scott W

    Perhaps I’m a bit slow, but could either of you please explain what the flaming fuck Powell’s race/skin colour has to do with…any thing? Is your point that if he weren’t black he would be less of a cretin; is the point that because he is black he should know better? Or is the point to show you’re alert enough to notice he’s browner than Rumsfeld?

    I thought an arsehole is an arsehole is an arsehole, regardless of external appearances, but you gents seem to have some insight into the matter that I don’t share. Care to enlighten?

  • Even the ISG has problems with that reality thing, but for them it’s more about politics … I find it hard to believe that anyone on the ISG actually believes the BS about training the Iraqi armed forces etc. This is more about politics than policy. Or, to use the ISG’s newly-coined term of art “minimizing the discrepancy” between the two. That would be the ISG’s a new definition of lying — a lie is just a falsehood presented in a way that “minimizes its discrepancy” with the truth. Ostensibly offered as a criticism of the Bush administration, it’s actually a pretty useful concept in analyzing the report itself. ISG Report “minimizes its discrepancy” with reality. The public has had it with the war, but the Washington elites are still trying to salvage something from the mess. That’s the discrepancy the report is really trying to minimize with its political euphemisms. Unfortunately, it’s not just a discrepancy, it’s a gaping void that not even Nine Wise Men and One Wise Woman can paper over.

  • The answer is orange.
    Easy, Powell would not have the juice he has if he were white. My theory goes like this, you have a bunch of white guys trying to push a war, who does the selling ? You want someone who appears not to be part of the group, someone who would do the straight talking. I really don’t think some white crusty general would have the effect that Powell had, without him and his semi-blackness we might not have gotten the votes to authorize Bush to use force.

    Powell was the go to man. The UN, the US, I think we all looked at him like he wouldn’t lie for these white guys, he is/was above that.

    And orange, unless you are extremely naive, you know color has a lot to do with perception, good and bad. I will say one word, Ford. Not the same, but as much as people want to act color blind it’s impossible. It’s not just race, it’s appearance, be it clothing or hygiene, or whatever, appearance factors into decision about virtually everything.

    Had Powell been in Dockers and a golf shirt rather then a military uniform, who would have listened ?

  • Comments are closed.