Yesterday, we learned that the AP ran a big story on Senate Minority Leader [tag]Harry Reid[/tag] accepting some [tag]tickets[/tag] to [tag]boxing[/tag] matches from the Nevada Athletic Commission, which the AP’s [tag]John Solomon[/tag] suggested was an ethical lapse on Reid’s part. It wasn’t.
Today we learn that the [tag]AP[/tag] has managed to make the same article even worse. A “revised” version of the same article removed language that explained that Reid voted against the interests of the Nevada Athletic Commission. In other words, the AP obscured the one key piece of information that proved that Reid did nothing inappropriate here.
As Aravosis put it:
It is very difficult to believe that this was anything other than intentional on the part of the Associated Press. They appear to have changed a story – taken the most significant piece of information out of a story – in order to better smear a sitting US Senator. And before the AP says it was a simple mistaken edit, a number of the top blogs wrote about that very sentence yesterday, showing how that sentence proved the AP story was a hatchet job. Would AP now have us believe that they never heard of the criticism, and the sentence simply disappeared by accident?
Let’s all say it together: What liberal [tag]media[/tag]?