The attack on the Askariya Shrine

Iraq’s civil war had been reaching a boiling point for quite a while, but last year’s attack on the Askariya Shrine was, as Ezra noted, widely perceived as “the moment the country took its decisive turn towards civil war.”

Today, what’s left of the shrine was hit again.

Saboteurs blew up the two minarets of a revered Shiite shrine in Samarra early Wednesday, in a repeat of the 2006 attack that shattered its famous golden dome and unleashed a wave of retaliatory sectarian violence that still bloodies Iraq. Sunni extremists of al-Qaida were quickly blamed.

The assault on the Askariya Shrine, one of the holiest in Shiite Islam, immediately stirred fears of a new round of intra-Muslim bloodshed, and prompted the 30-member bloc of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to suspend its membership in Iraq’s parliament, threatening a deeper political crisis.

To ward off a surge of violence, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki quickly imposed an indefinite curfew on vehicle traffic and large gatherings in Baghdad. Before the curfew took hold, arsonists set fire to a Sunni mosque in western Baghdad, police said.

A Shiite shrine was also blown up north of Baghdad, while two Sunni mosques were bombed south of the capital, police said. One was destroyed and the other lost its minaret.

CNN added, “Authorities have evidence that Wednesday’s bombing of Al-Askariya Mosque in Samarra was an inside job, and 15 members of the Iraqi security forces have been arrested, a U.S. military official said.”

As bad as conditions are, one has to assume that it’s about to get even worse.

Consider today’s headlines:

* Blasts Destroy Remnants of Samarra Shiite Shrine

* Four Sunni mosques were attacked today in apparent retribution

* Iraqis Are Failing to Meet U.S. Benchmarks

* Big Boost In Iraqi Forces Is Urged

* Iraq won’t be capable of taking full responsibility for its own security for many years

As Kevin Drum concluded today, “There is, at this point, simply nothing more we can do in Iraq. The only sensible course of action is to leave. Completely.”

And they’re giving weapons to Sunni insurgents while moving their supplies thru Shiite territory.

Yeah, no possible issues there.

Way to go guys.

  • FUBAR just doesn’t describe it anymore, does it? It’s time to go, and let the chips fall where they may. The resulting mess belongs to the Republicans, and to the media.

    I hope someone with the stomach for it goes back through all the pre-Bush media blathering about how Bush was a “uniter” and would “surround himself with smart people”, and how Gore was “such a stiff, boring man”. I hope they write a book on the media’s role in this whole fiasco, and I hope the media bobbleheads read it once before they hang themselves in disgrace.

  • “last year’s attack on the Askariya Shrine was […] widely perceived as “the moment the country took its decisive turn towards civil war.””

    How did this perception come about?

    There is nothing in this comprehensive Brookings report that denotes February 2006 as a decisive turning point. Nothing whatsoever. In fact, the graph on p30 suggests August 2006 saw a significant uptick, but basically all there is is a continuation of a disastrous trend.

    http://www.brook.edu/fp/saban/iraq/index.pdf

    Look, the fact is what happened was just another ordinary day in Iraq. Don’t repeat the meme that bombing the Askariya mosque marks another reversal. It isn’t. It just proves that Iraq is stuck in reverse, surge or no surge.

  • ***And they’re giving weapons to Sunni insurgents***

    September 2001—Glorious Commander Deciderer President Type Person vows to get bin Laden “dead or alive.”

    June 2007—Glorious Commander Deciderer President Type Person provides arms to bin Laden.

    Only in Bu$hylvania….

  • yes, there is a civil war in iraq.

    yes, we should absolutely get out of the way.

    but,

    the humanitarian crisis that will result will be horrifying in the extreme, and we will all own it, in the eyes of the world, even if here in the states we manage to brand it a republican war.

    so, what the hell are we supposed to do?

    my contention is that we should contrive to set up a no-conflict zone somewhere in iraq (or several) to which the innocent noncombatants who are likely to be the victims in the civil war can flee, whose security should become the primary (perhaps sole) mission of american troops in iraq.

    i don’t think it’ll rescue our international reputation or anything, but it seems like the least we could do.

  • Am I the only one who finds it bitterly ironic that Hussein managed to impose a more-or-less secular rule in Iraq, without destroing a single mosque, while the ultra-religious factions fighting for dominance now are blowing up historic monuments one after another?

  • Saboteurs blew up the two minarets of a revered Shiite shrine in Samarra early Wednesday, in a repeat of the 2006 attack that shattered its famous golden dome and unleashed a wave of retaliatory sectarian violence that still bloodies Iraq.

    They can blow up sacred religious icons with alacrity in Iraq… and we can’t even enjoy a Chocolate Jesus in NYC.

    I suppose if it wasn’t such bad form… I’d be forced to say it:

    I hate them for their freedoms.

    Like the name says:

  • #4 Steve

    That’s a big suprise. His grandfather was Hitler’s banker. Follow the money is the bush tradition.

  • #3 Ed: Looking at the table “ENEMY-INITIATED ATTACKS AGAINST THE COALITION AND ITS PARTNERS” on p7 of the Brookings report, it seems that attacks on civilians really took of in Feb ’06.

  • Comments are closed.