The bottom falls a little further

SurveyUSA has another one of those interesting 50-state polls out this week, breaking down Bush’s approval rating on a state-by-state basis. The president is down to 37% overall, which is about average for most of the recent national polls, but to appreciate Bush’s lack of support, you really have to see the state numbers.

The top five:

Idaho — 59% approve, 39% disapprove
Utah — 59% approve, 38% disapprove
Wyoming — 53% approve, 44% disapprove
Mississippi — 50% approve, 48% disapprove
Oklahoma — 49% approve, 49% disapprove

The bottom five:

Rhode Island — 26% approve, 73% disapprove
New York — 27% approve, 70% disapprove
Vermont — 29% approve, 69% disapprove
Delaware — 29% approve, 69% disapprove
New Jersey — 30% approve, 67% disapprove

There are a handful of interesting ways to review the data, but one thing that stands out is just how few states are left for Bush. A few months ago, the top five used to reflect the handful of states where the president was very popular among the many where he still enjoyed majority support. Indeed, in May, Bush was above 50% in 13 states. By September, that number had fallen to 10 states. In October, it was six. Now, it’s three.

There are now 10 states that backed Bush in the presidential election last year in which his support is at 40% or lower. In Texas — Texas! — Bush’s approval rating is only 42%, while his disapproval rating is at 52%.

Will anyone want to campaign alongside Bush next year? Not if they’re even remotely vulnerable.

Maybe he needs one of these (I am linking again, pre-emptive apologies for any screwup of the comments section):

http://medicalalarm.com/?OVRAW=i've%20fallen%20and%20I%20can't%20get%20up&OVKEY=alert%20medic%20watch&OVMTC=advanced

  • And I live in Idaho. His rating actually went
    up from last time. I don’t know what’s wrong
    with the people out here. Idaho is among
    the poorest of states, and they just love this
    guy. He can do no wrong.

    Interestingly, if you judge by the sentiment
    expressed in the letters to our major
    newspaper, you’d conclude that they
    hate Bush. They run about 3-1 against
    him.

    I can’t figure it.

  • What’s also interesting is that serious questioning of W’s core policies – Iraq and deficits – isn’t happening. Sure, there are some misgivings and defections around the edges, eg torture. But on the big stuff, the Congressional Republicans and the rightwing commentariat (now that Alito has replaced Miers) are clinging to him like barnacles. It could be that the democratic process – reasoned fact-based debate, consulting public opinion, forming coalitions – is so degraded nowadays that the only things these guys take seriously are elections (which they’ll do anything to rig, but that’s another story). They really believe that there was an “accountability moment” a year ago, and that’s all that matters. Which means we won’t have accountability again for another year. Depressing.

  • Davis X. Machina, you got it right. I live in New York (where Bush got fewer votes in ’04 than in ’00) and he’s poison here. We know all too well how effective this administration is at protecting us from terrorism. Having the GOP convention here last year– with delegates posing for photos at the Word Trade Center site –was just rubbing salt in the wound.

    But who knows why they like him out in the Heartland? Do they like the deficit, Katrina, Iraq? I can’t understand it.

  • But who knows why they like him out in the Heartland? Do they like the deficit, Katrina, Iraq? I can’t understand it.

    You think Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah are the heartland? That’s just straight-up out of touch.

  • “You think Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah are the heartland? That’s just straight-up out of touch.”

    Could be, Idaho anyway. There’s a joke out here
    that everyone thinks we’re Iowa – no one’s ever
    heard of Idaho.

  • Okay, if “Heartland” isn’t the correct term for the areas where Bush is still liked I’d be happy to re-phrase my thought: I can’t understand why anyone still likes him, ANY-place.

    Better?

  • Falling approval numbers mean at least something in this country is heading in the right direction. Mississippi and Oklahoma are especially gratifying. Oklahomans don’t even mind electing the certifiably insane, so disapproval must really mean something there. Mississippi got a good look at Katrina reality, though not as shocking a view as Louisiana. If their numbers hadn’t gone down, it would mean too many of them were not only dumb right wingers but deaf and blind as well.

  • I don’t think the “heartland,” Republicans or one’s wingnut uncle like Bush. They dislike the alternative more. I live in Texas, and I seldom hear anyone say something unreservedly positive about Bush. The impression I get is that they can either support Bush (however tepidly) or abandon the country to the Democrats (the demonized caricature of the Democrats).

  • Randy is on the right track. The Republican propaganda machine is running the country. Say what anyone may about Bush, the Republican Party has not lost a single vote, and it will not lose any, no matter what happens.

  • Comments are closed.