The cloud that continues to hang over Rove

After several weeks of hiding, Karl Rove reemerged last night, delivering a largely predictable speech to the Federalist Society on the scourge of “activist” judges. To hear Rove’s allies tell it, after not being indicted by Patrick Fitzgerald, he’s back to his old self.

“I’ve noticed a big difference,” said one Republican in regular contact with Mr. Rove who declined to speak for attribution because the White House did not authorize it. “There’s a spring in his step, more focus, more – something. Some sort of weight off his shoulders.”

As it turns out, that weight that forced Rove into a temporary exile isn’t off his shoulders just yet. As Murray Waas reported today in the National Journal, Fitzgerald is still eyeing Rove. (via C&L)

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald delayed a decision on whether to seek criminal charges against Karl Rove in large part because he wants to determine whether Lewis (Scooter) Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Cheney, can provide information on Rove’s role in the CIA leak case, according to attorneys involved in the investigation.

Even if Fitzgerald concludes in the near future that he does not have sufficient evidence to charge Rove, the special prosecutor would not rule out bringing charges at a later date and would not finish his inquiry on Rove until he hears whatever information Libby might provide — either incriminating or exculpatory — on Rove’s role, the sources said.

Waas also noted that Fitzgerald has re-interviewed several witnesses with knowledge of Rove’s role in the Plame leak and talked with attorneys of other potential witnesses this week.

That’s the bad news for Rove. The bad news for the rest of us who are wondering what’s going to happen next is that this could drag on for quite a while. Waas explained that Rove will likely remain under investigation until the final disposition of Libby’s case — which could come two years from now.

From Rove’s perspective, this might keep him free of indictment until 2007, if not later. On the other hand, it also means that the cloud of a White House criminal investigation will be hanging over Bush’s top political aide for the indefinite future, which will hardly help to make this scandal go away.

Too bad it’s not a “mushroom cloud” hanging over him. Or even better, a white phosphorous cloud.

  • If there is any doubt that Rove’s happy-go-lucky re-emergence is not a careful choreographed routine the follow two passages from the NYTimes article should place those doubts to rest.

    “I’ve noticed a big difference,” said one Republican in regular contact with Mr. Rove who declined to speak for attribution because the White House did not authorize it. “There’s a spring in his step, more focus, more – something. Some sort of weight off his shoulders.”
    […]

    “He was never as far out of it as people said he was, but he was distracted,” said one Republican official, declining to speak for attribution because he does not speak officially for Mr. Rove. “Now he’s not distracted anymore.”

    Why would the source or sources of these two positive quotes not want to have them attributed to them? It is unlikely that they feared retribution for them. A reasonable assumption is that by insisting on anonymity they give the impression that it is not part of a scheme to rehabilitate Karl.

    Here is another question: why would a reporter go along with such a request for anonymity?

  • As much as I’d like to see Rove indicted yesterday, it wouldn’t bother me a bit if all this came to a head again just in time for the midterms.

    If these people had any ethical sense, Rove would have been gone months ago. His security clearance should be long revoked. But, if Bush wants to keep this wound festering, who am I to argue?

  • Bingo Rege!

    The way this Bush criministration and Rove operate, this is as good as a confession that Rove is in DEEP DOO DOO (to quote Bush SR).

  • At this point, it doesn’t matter if Rove is indicted or not. “Spring in his step” or no, the Plamegate investigation has neutered the man politically. If he was at the height of his powers, the White House wouldn’t be in its current nosedive, Congressional Republicans would be in their customary lockstep not infighting, and Democrats certainly wouldn’t have had this run of extremely good fortune.

    He won’t resign, and Bush will never fire him out of principle. So he’ll continue to hobble the GOP at least until 2006. I hope the White House continue to trot him out. It reminds people how ethically challenged Bush and his cronies are.

  • Hey….

    I am one of those who can’t abide Bush’s elocution.
    Simply put: His voice irks the fuck out of me.

    Frankly, it is even hard to quote him.
    So consider what follows to be sort of therapy.

    First I am going to quote Bush,
    Then I will emend the quote to what Bush might have said if he had more brains than attitude:

    Bush:

    “The stakes in the global war on terror are too high, and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges,” he said. “These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America’s will.”

    What someone with brains would have said:

    “The stakes in the war on global warming are too high, and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges,” he said. ” These baseless attack on science send the wrong signal to our citizens and to a poluting enemy that is questioning America’s will to control the melting icecaps.”

  • That’s OK koreyel. Shrub-ball’s elocution and worldview is offensive on a pan issue basis. Your observation is as valid here as anywhere.

  • Let’s see. Rove suddenly gets happy, and Bush suddenly appears giving the same tired old campaign speech that Rove wrote for him so many times before. Could there be a connection? Hmmmm…….

  • Comments are closed.