The consequences of a religious-right takeover (or lack thereof)

[tag]Paul Krugman[/tag] devoted today’s column to an issue near and dear to my heart: the religious right movement and its influence on the government. For a change, I’m not entirely sure Krugman has it entirely right.

After working at Americans United for Separation of Church and State for several years, I learned quite a bit about how Robertson, Falwell, Dobson, and others operate, what they want, and how they exercise power once they get it. Krugman argues today that the theocratic wing of the Republican Party set out to permeate the federal government and largely succeeded in its goal.

Today, Regent University, founded by the televangelist Pat Robertson to provide “Christian leadership to change the world,” boasts that it has 150 graduates working in the Bush administration.

Unfortunately for the image of the school, where Mr. Robertson is chancellor and president, the most famous of those graduates is Monica Goodling, a product of the university’s law school. She’s the former top aide to Alberto Gonzales who appears central to the scandal of the fired U.S. attorneys and has declared that she will take the Fifth rather than testify to Congress on the matter.

The infiltration of the federal government by large numbers of people seeking to impose a religious agenda — which is very different from simply being people of faith — is one of the most important stories of the last six years. It’s also a story that tends to go underreported, perhaps because journalists are afraid of sounding like conspiracy theorists.

But this conspiracy is no theory. The official platform of the Texas Republican Party pledges to “dispel the myth of the separation of church and state.” And the Texas Republicans now running the country are doing their best to fulfill that pledge.

I think that’s largely true, but it’s worth noting that for all the religious right’s efforts, and all of the movement’s successes in infiltrating the GOP’s political machine, they’re not exactly thriving when it comes to checking items off their to-do list.

To be sure, Krugman makes a very compelling case that religious extremists have been rewarded with plum jobs, based solely on their religious connections.

For example, The Boston Globe reports on one Regent law school graduate who was interviewed by the Justice Department’s civil rights division. Asked what Supreme Court decision of the past 20 years he most disagreed with, he named the decision to strike down a Texas anti-sodomy law. When he was hired, it was his only job offer.

Or consider George Deutsch, the presidential appointee at NASA who told a Web site designer to add the word “theory” after every mention of the Big Bang, to leave open the possibility of “intelligent design by a creator.” He turned out not to have, as he claimed, a degree from Texas A&M.

One measure of just how many Bushies were appointed to promote a religious agenda is how often a Christian right connection surfaces when we learn about a Bush administration scandal.

There’s Ms. Goodling, of course. But did you know that Rachel Paulose, the U.S. attorney in Minnesota — three of whose deputies recently stepped down, reportedly in protest over her management style — is, according to a local news report, in the habit of quoting Bible verses in the office?

Or there’s the case of Claude Allen, the presidential aide and former deputy secretary of health and human services, who stepped down after being investigated for petty theft. Most press reports, though they mentioned Mr. Allen’s faith, failed to convey the fact that he built his career as a man of the hard-line Christian right.

And there’s another thing most reporting fails to convey: the sheer extremism of these people.

There’s no doubt that the religious right’s extremism is antithetical to American values and traditions, and the fact that Robertson’s activists now pepper the rosters of practically every executive agency is disconcerting.

But I can’t help but notice that the Christian right has also failed to get what the movement wants. Abortion is still legal. Not only is there no anti-gay amendment in the Constitution, but support for legally-recognized gay relationships is on the rise. Public schools still can’t impose prayers on kids. Ten Commandments displays still struggle to receive state sanction. Americans now believe Democrats, not Republicans, are more reliable on questions of morality and values.

This is not to say that the last six years have been pleasant. Because of the religious right’s influence, we have more rigid ideologues on the federal bench, stiffer indecency fines, dangerous restrictions on medical research, spectacularly stupid abstinence-only programs, and a Justice Department that prioritizes porn over civil rights.

But looking back, I think we’ve gotten off easy. Robertson disciples and Dobson acolytes may be everywhere, but they haven’t been that successful. The church-state wall has taken a few hits, but it’s still standing. Dobson looks back at the last six years as a missed opportunity, not a triumph.

Perhaps the real lesson of the last few years is that theocratic Republican officials in the administration tend to screw up and get mired in scandal just like regular ol’ Republican officials in the administration.

History has shown repeatedly that theocracies don’t thrive and eventually collapse under the weight of their own incompetence and corruption. If theocracies were so great then we’d be talking about the wonderful economic engine that is Iran.

Goes to show that the fanatical Christers are just as good as running a nation as their fanatical Islamic brothers.

Anyone who has ever played the computer game Civilization would know immediately. Crappy economy, poor R&D and only good for war.

  • “…Rachel Paulose, the U.S. attorney in Minnesota… is, according to a local news report, in the habit of quoting Bible verses in the office[.]”

    Aw, he says that like it’s a bad thing.

    Out of context, it’s hard to see what Krugman is worried about. And that particular quote will be repeated out of context — by Christians using it to show how they are persecuted by the Ivy League intelligentsia.

  • Two points.

    Yes, abortion is still nominally legal (though not many abortion clinics are still open due to harassment). I think, however, that the real core of the religious right would rather have the issue than the victory. Consider: the moment Roe is actually overturned, the issue starts cutting politically against the right (a solid majority favors choice), while simultaneously ending its efficacy as a fundraising tool. The recent talk of supporting Rudy gives the game away on this, I think.

    Second, lots of these wingnut sleeper agents are sprinkled into supposedly nonpolitical appointments, meaning they will stay on into the next (hopefully Democratic) administration, where they can and will work to undermine any efforts to bring sanity back to governance.

  • But looking back, I think we’ve gotten off easy

    You may have been lucky … but I see a lot of these appointments as being more longterm in nature (assuming that the Dems won’t be petty-minded enough to track them all down and boot them in ’09).

  • the theocratic wing of the Republican Party set out to permeate the federal government and largely succeeded in its goal.

    No shit. Hopefully the liberals will soon get over their years-long delayed reaction, recognize that everything is not hunky dory, and do something about it.

    in infiltrating the GOP’s political machine, they’re not exactly thriving when it comes to checking items off their to-do list.

    Yeah, but what about when it comes to checking off the GOP’s to-do list- ironically, these people have no scruples because they rationalize everything they do in service of GOP politics as therefore in service of God, and therefore ok, so you get corruption.

  • Perhaps the real lesson of the last few years is that theocratic Republican officials in the administration tend to screw up and get mired in scandal just like regular ol’ Republican officials in the administration.

    If anything these idealists are more likely to become mired in scandal, because they are more inclined to believe that the rules don’t apply to them. This is true not only of religious idealists but also the neocon idealists (hello Mr. Wolfowitz…).

  • The fact that the words “competent” and “Christian” both begin with the letter “c” is their only similarity.

    I really don’t think most of the “Christers” received an education much beyond religious group think. IF these idjits are booted from office, it will be because of their incompetence at their jobs.

  • Maybe I should have wrote ‘record-breaking corruption’ or ‘rampant corruption’ in my last comment.

    You have a bunch of dumb people willing to do anything for a bunch of bad people, and you console yourself that the dumb people aren’t accomplishing their goals, meanwhile you’re wondering how the evil people have been so successful accomplishing theirs. The Gilded Youth fiddle away while Rome burns / type blog posts and comments on the blogosphere.

  • In order to fix a problem you have to understand the problem. If you want to get rid of that problem you have to “strike at the root”. If you don’t pull a weed up from it’s root what happens? It grows back. QED

  • Hiding under the guise of “religion” these are actually authoritative ego maniac personalities whose “way” is the right way and the only way. Their incompetence stems from being completely closed minded to anything that doesn’t agree with their preconceived notion of the world. They are horrible to work with or for and seldom qualify for the positions they are appointed to in this administration. They get appointed as appeasement to the right in order to tap into that ‘tithe’ money fleeced from good people convinced they need to buy into salvation. Their leaders in the religious right have turned them into ‘brown shirts’ for their political goals. Fanatics of any kind are oppressive to democracy Paulose and Gooding are perfect examples of this poison. Nothing to hide…why plead the 5th. And Paulose forgot to be annointed with oil by the marine core choir and band and marching unit…Geez, what an ego maniac. “Dress down underlings, I’m the only one who should look proffessional here”.

  • It’s a madrassa, right? A Christian Madrassa. So why not call it by its proper name: Regent University Madrassa, founded by the televangelist Pat Robertson to provide “Christian leadership to change the world,” etc..

  • I wonder how much outrage would be generated if the people trying to take over the government were Muslims? Or even Catholics? How about Moromons?

    IOKIYAPC

    (It’s OK If You’re A Protestant Christian)

    The fundies have a real problem, the American people are way more tolerant than they used to be, and that cuts them at the root. Nowadays we don’t have sanctioned racism, we have women in high office, we even have a Muslim and an Atheist in Congress.

    Die, moronic memes.

    Just die.

  • Perhaps the real lesson of the last few years is that theocratic Republican officials in the administration tend to screw up and get mired in scandal just like regular ol’ Republican officials in the administration. — CB.

    Disagree. They screw up and get mired in scandal more, because they’re always in such a dither about what God says and what God wants them to do, and can’t decide which contradictory bit of their stupid Bible applies to which situation.

    Normal, free, sensible people following the dictates of common decency and kindness and respect for their fellow beings don’t tangle themselves up and everything they touch into such ridiculous messes.

  • Good comments all but you need to consider what the Talevangecicals crave more than anything else.

    No, not whores and meth.

    They need to feel presecuted. They’ve raised paranoia to the level of a fetish. What better way to get your Crucifiction Fix than to fill an Administration with your own after you’ve programmed them to behave in a way that will guarantee people will eventually get pissed?

    If it hasn’t happened already I’m sure we’ll start to hear shrill cries of “See! They’re picking on us because we’re Christians!” If the response is “This person was as corrupt as the day is long,” they’ll counter with how we must love the sinner and hate the sin and more babble about Christian hating.

    It makes me think we should strive to reintroduce hair shirts and self-flagellation.

  • The reason that the lunatic fringe of Christianity has not been able to attain its goal of an American Theocracy is because the “religious right” is just that—the lunatic fringe. Most Christians I know place more emphasis on the NT than the old; many believe that the Nazarene carpenter brought with him a new “Covenant” that effectively supplanted almost all of the OT, with the exception of the 10 Commandments and a few of the more historical story-lessons—which is all but openly saying that “most of the Old Testament should be tossed to the curb.”

    Guys like Robertson, Hinn, and their ilk are playing the historical role of the Sadjucees, Pharisees, and Scribes; they’re just after more power for themselves and their little “pyramid” schemes—and those “schemes” seem now to be the only pyramids ever built by the “12 tribes.”

    The wingnuts don’t like to admit it, but they’re not in power because the majority of Christendom won’t buy into their game. The “moral majority” was always a majority-in-name-only….

  • Bush., Abramoff, and Rove were quoted in memos uncovered in October last year referring to the religious right as “wackos” and other pejoratives.

    The failure of the religious agenda is due in large part to the criminals they chose as their leaders based on what they said, rather than past actions. Perhaps they’ll go back to praying that God changes the country rather than relying on mortals.

  • My comment, though though not strictly about the religious right takeover, is tangential to it.

    I’m really at sea over this Imus issue. “Hate speech” has never appealed to me, but it’s been blatantly in the mass media ever since St. Ronald the Reagan got canonized in 1980 (e.g., calling the poor welfare queens). The sudden dismissal of Imus, while people like Limbaugh and Liddy spew their form of hate, seems too late and too limited.

    At the same time it seems odd that the finger wagging moralists, rather than being ministers of the Lord (who in fact ally with the Bush Crime Family and its media mouthpieces), are a few large corporations who threaten to pull advertising budgets so long as Imus remains on air. They’re no doubt responding to the moral pressures brought by customers and shareholders, as opposed to the greed of their corporate financial officers, but it still seems odd that corporations rather than churches should suddenly come to their moral senses (or merely good taste). Corporations, rather than churches, have pretty much been there, too, when it came to gay rights. The vast majority of the Fortune 500 have non-discrimination policies, many with gay partner benefits; this while many states are amending their Constitutions to discriminate further against gays, with the connivance of so-called churches.

    In my heart of hearts I believe in almost Jeffersonian (i.e., completely) free speech, the classic limit on which is shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theater. I’m coming to the conclusion that Imus (who will no doubt quickly find a lucrative job on satellite media) and the other “hate speakers” – particularly when they tell outright lies about real people (Hillary, the Rutgers team) – should be thought of as dangerous to society as shouting “Fire!”. It shouldn’t be allowed, as is the case in Canada and nearly all of Europe.

    Minimally, it would be nice to see “religious” institutions opposing hate speech.

  • Just because they have not succeeded in establishing a theocracy does diminish the damage they have done to the fabric of government, not to mention the countless individuals whose live’s have been ruined. From the other ponit of view, there needs to be recognition that federal work is open to everybody, not only those who attend “elite” schools.

  • What scares me the most is the indoctrination of Teens with programs such as “Battle Cry”. These are not teaching morals, they are spewing hate onto another generation.

  • I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss the impact of religious right-leaning people in government. They may not have achieved their goals during Bush’s presidency, but that’s not the strategy here. The strategy is to stack the deck of the judiciary (the SCOTUS but also lower courts) and executive with right-leaning Christians, and to the extent that these people stay in government (and get promoted), the impact will be felt over the long term, not the short term.

  • I think that CB is right that the religious right has not fulfilled all of its goal as of yet. But remember the wingnuts have long believed that the professional staff of federal agency have conspired to keep them from achieving their agenda. What BushCo has attempted to do is replace those professionals with “believers”. Just as the Federalist Society has replaced the ABA as the vetters of judges and US Attorneys. This is a long term project. They hope that in the future, Democratic administrations will be thwarted by these sleeper cells. The game is not yet up.

  • I hate to say this, CB, but you sound like one of Billy Wilder’s friends in Berlin, ca December 1932, pooh-poohing Wilder as an “alarmist” over the electoral gains of the National Socialst German Worker’s Party and their future prospects. As Wilder, who left Germany on a one-way ticket the night Histler won the chancellorship the following month, told me “twelve years later, when I finally returned, all those who had called me an alarmist had been killed by Hitler.”

    Just because they haven’t gotten everything they want yet is not to say they’re going to give up and go back to rolling in the sawdust, my friend.

    The more alarm that can be raised about these traitors to America, the better.

  • Unfortunately, I agree that we have yet to see the damage that the court-packing, regulation rewriting and purge of government professionals will yield. Not to mention what one more SCOTUS appointment would do. Please, please stay healthy everyone…no more appointments until 2009!

  • Yeah, the sky is falling. Brilliant.

    By the way, is the theocracy of the Muslim Brotherhood more to your liking? Or do you approve of the invitation to speak in front of Congress?

    Do you imagine Pat Robertson would be welcomed as a speaker, or even merit an invitation?

    Finally, since when is abortion only a religious issue?

  • Go visit Sigmund, Carl and Alfred – it’s interesting to see how uncreative the White Supremacists are.

    White Supremacists – proof that white boys are blastocysts that never evolved.

  • The increased power and visibility of the Christian Right only seems to have only sparked a public backlash. Despite unprecedented access to the corridors of power, they have failed in almost every aspect of their agenda.

    However, one area they have had success is their missionary work in Africa, where Christainist fanatics are just as bad as the Taliban.

  • I think one of the biggest mistakes Tom Dashle made was backing away from that remark about the Ayatollahs of the Republican party. These people are attempting nothing less than the overthrow of the United States government. They should be tracked down and tried for treason.

  • You white supremacists are all a bunch of pussies. Yes I said you’re all pussies! Filthy racist pussies.

    I dare you. 435 752-0839

  • Comments are closed.