The day after 9/11/06

Guest Post by Michael J.W. Stickings

Vice President Cheney claims that his job “is to think about the unthinkable, to focus upon what in fact the terrorists may have in store for us”. And what a good job he claims to have done. Five years after 9/11 and there hasn’t been another 9/11.

Cheney credits the Bush Administration’s homeland security efforts, particularly:

— “the terrorist surveillance program”;
— “the financial tracking”; and
— “our detainee policy”.

That is:

— illegal, warrant-less eavesdropping by the NSA;
— an admittedly useful check on money transfers; and
— torture.

And perhaps a whole lot more.

And yet. Just how successful has the Cheney Administration been? How honest is the vice president?

As the Financial Times has put it, “Cheney repeated assertions on Sunday on links between the former Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda despite a recent Senate intelligence committee report that concluded otherwise”.

In focusing on this mythical relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, between Saddam and Osama, Cheney, Bush, and their apologists are willfully deceiving the American people. In truth, they are lying to them.

For it is Iraq that is the problem. It is Iraq — their war — that has detracted from the so-called war on terror, that is, from America’s abilities to deal effectively with the real threat to homeland security, in particular from its efforts in Afghanistan, which is rapidly descending into anarchy. NATO needs more troops in Afghanistan, but so many of the best troops are stuck in the Iraqi quagmire.

And then there have been the secret prisons in Eastern Europe, the torture at Abu Ghraib and Gitmo, Katrina, and Portgate.

All this has left America weaker, not stronger, more vulnerable, not less, more hated, not more loved. America is now perceived more and more to be a cause of the problem of terrorism, not a victim, and certainly not a solution. (State of the Day has more on this here: “Bush may have declared The Global War On Terror, but it looks like bin Laden has already won. Thanks, W., We The People owe you one.”)

Which is why The Boston Globe editorialized yesterday that “the reaction of the Bush administration may prove more harmful to the national interest than even these horrific attacks”. Are the terrorists on the run? Yes, and no: “The long war against the insurgency in Iraq has further inflamed Mideast opinion against the United States without enhancing US security.”

Cheney is simply wrong. Dangerously wrong.

For more, go see Steve Clemons, who says that Cheney “did the predictable,” “focused American military power recklessly at the wrong targets,” “[punctured] America’s mystique in the world,” and “[exposed] before our allies and our foes both our military and financial limits.

No, there hasn’t been another 9/11 since 9/11. There but for the grace of God, as they say.

…his job “is to think about the unthinkable…

Like a kitten-lettuce-tomato sandwich, or a chimp screwing a baby. Adult Swim kinda stuff, in other words.

  • Sadly, his earlier efforts at thinking the unthinkable involved imagining installing a C-average legacy student with substance abuse, maturity, and business failure problems as President of the United States as a puppet for the kleptocracy.

  • Keith Obermann did a wonderful job of ripping Boy George II and Dick Cheney yesterday. If you missed it I suggest checking their website to see if its up.

  • Meanwhile a bunch of jihadists attack the US embassy in Syria with grenades, automatic weapons, and car-bombs, killing several Syrian guards, the latest in a series of clashes over the past year or two. Unless you think the Syrian government is crazy enough to organise terrorist attacks within their own borders (and I’m sure there are feverish wingnuts honing arguments along those lines at this very moment), it seems that al-Qaeda and Syria (which or course is aligned with Iran and helps arm Hezbollah) are deadly enemies.

    So much for a worldview which separates the whole world into “us” and “the terrorists”.

    Too bad that worldview has been motivating US foreign policy now for five whole years.

    Reminds me of a Doonesbury cartoon from the late 1970s. BD is going on and on about how Communists are trying to take over the world. Someone points out that, in fact, in the previous few months Vietnam had invaded Cambodia and China had invaded Vietnam. BD replies, “Of course! They keep invading each other to stay in shape!”

  • Let me echo Lance here. Keith Olbermann has been absolutely on fire recently; attention must be paid. Pass that speech around!

  • Cheney is vice-president. Vice-presidents are designed to be the ideological idiots. He needs to be treated as the buffoon he is and not taken seriously.

  • “Cheney is vice-president. Vice-presidents are designed to be the ideological idiots. He needs to be treated as the buffoon he is and not taken seriously.” – Dale

    Nope, Bush/Cheney flips that on its head. It’s Boy George II who should not be taken seriously.

  • There hasn’t been another Katrina in over a year, does Cheney/Bush credit for that as well ??

    Oh, and there wasn’t a major terrorist attack when Clinton was in office either, who gets that credit ??

    And who actually gets credit for 9/11 ??

    If we are going to go around handing out credits, we might as well do it for everything.

    Isn’t Afghanistan producing more opium then demand for it, I’ll let Cheney take the credit for that too.

  • Olbermann delivered another broadside to the Good Ship Lie-and-Flop. I just spent a few minutes reviewing another smattering of BabbleGoo (the “newsbusters” cell of the Al NeoCon terrorist network) from my favorite “Fodder-for-an-oncoming-locomotive” ideofascist, Noel Shepphard. It’s hilarious how a two-legged puddle of pidgeon excrement can shed so many crocodile tears about KO’s soliloquy being “improper for the moment,” when his pals over at Axis Broadcasting Corp. can spend the same day peddling multiple hours of unsubstantiated rumor, innuendo, and falsehoods. Then—to add grease to the wheel—he dares to defend a man who is not only the target of Olbermann, but who stands before the nation as its Chief Executive and lies through his teeth in a manner that would cause many a Disney animated villian to faint dead away.

    Kieth Olbermann is, without a shred of doubt whatsoever, an excellent reason as to why Dems need to shift gears, abandon the “high-road-only” mentality, and go on an all-out offensive. Those midterms are only eight weeks out—and they’re only getting closer….

  • Re #9. The Daily Show had an interesting (and funny of course) spin on last night’s show with newest “correspondent” John Oliver. John pointed out that we haven’t been attacked post 9-11 and that we haven’t been struck by another hurricane since last year. The conclusion he reached was that: “George W. Bush is the right man to lead us in the era post whatever horrible calamity he leads us into next.”

    Re Olbermann: Keith is one of the few important powerful, sane voices out there today. At least one of the few, and the only one who always gets it right IMO, on TV. Go Keith!

  • “Vice President Cheney claims that his job “is to think about the unthinkable…”

    Yes, I’m sure that self-centered son-of-a-skunk thinks about himself quite a lot.

    But really, wouldn’t that explain his willingness to do the unthinkable? He spent a little too much time thinking about the “unthinkable” and now is personally scared shitless. Something in his brain went Boing! after September 11th and in his big fat paranoid head he is trying to think of ways to save his own life. If he were just some guy down the street with a drawer full of knives he would be dangerous. But this wodge of lard is effectively the President of the last superpower on Earth, is it any wonder we’re hearing arguments that the executive branch can do whatever it pleases to fight terrorism? It is the same sort of argument put forward by people who collect AK-47s: I have the right to defend myself.

    I think that’s what September 11th ultimately did. It separated the cowards from the brave. When BCRR race about squeaking “Look out! We aren’t safe! Be afraid, be very afraid!” it isn’t just to stay in power, it’s because they are deathly afraid and they’re jealous of the people who aren’t afraid. Bush talked about terrorists cringing at the sight of someone voting; He and Chinny cringe at the sound of someone saying “I’d sooner die than give up my freedoms.” The result is the increasingly shrill and nonsensical blather from the White House. They sound crazy because they are crazy. Listen, for example, to Rumsfeld speak some time (not right after a meal). Never mind honest, or likable or smart. Does this man sound stable?

    And as time passes, their fear has only increased (I’m sure they know far more people hate them now than in 2001) and yet there are still Americans who refuse to be consumed by fear. How can this be? Why aren’t they all jumping at shadows like we do?

    In this light, people who object to the war, wiretapping, torture are seen as exposing Bush etc to danger. To BCRR, the people who ask questions, the people who say “no” are some how in on the “plot” to hurt them. Let’s be frank, once the election results were in if it were just a matter of the poor proles getting whacked, they wouldn’t give a damn. But because they think their lives are on the line, because they are miserable cowards, we all must go into full panic mode, stick our heads between our legs and hold that position until they decide it’s safe.

    Thanks Dick, but I’ll pass on that.

  • Nope, Bush/Cheney flips that on its head. It’s Boy George II who should not be taken seriously.

    Comment by Lance

    Nope That’s where they got ya fooled. Cheney is a cartoonish troglodyte, Spiro Agnew redux without the alliteration. The VP’s job is to do the dirty work and take the heat off the Prez. George knows exactly what is going on, condones it and takes advantage of the deniability. It doesn’t take much intelligence to do evil.

  • To a degree, I disagree with Dale (14); Cheney’s no troglodyte, insane moron, the target in front of Bush for everyone to shoot arrows at.

    Cheney’s to Bush what Beria was to Stalin — behind the scenes puppet-master, with the puppet playing an amiable idiot *when it suits him*

    With the exception of Joe McCarthy, y’all have never encountered *evil* with a political clout, so you have a lot to learn about the posibility.

  • “It doesn’t take much intelligence to do evil.” – Dale

    But it does take intelligence to do much (a lot of) evil. Shear systematic evil (Nazi-esque) requires intelligence seperated from morals. You know, like they teach in MBA.

    Bush wants to be “Great” (Alexander the Great, Alfred the Great, George the Great), Cheney wants to be powerful. Between them, they will destroy America, but it is Cheney that is the greater threat.

  • Comments are closed.