The Dems’ ‘New Direction’ vs. the GOP’s mystery agenda

We’ve been hearing about it for a while now, but the [tag]House[/tag] [tag]Democrats[/tag] are unveiling a policy agenda they’d implement if they take back the [tag]majority[/tag] in November. It sounds pretty good.

The “[tag]New Direction[/tag]” platform hits all the high points — stem-cell research, use Medicare to negotiate lower prescription-drug prices, minimum wage increase, a repeal of subsidies for oil and gas companies — while clearly emphasizing domestic policy. There are some national security/foreign policy pronouncements — the agenda includes following the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission and boosting port security — but most of the weight is on the issues on which Dems already excel.

Regardless, the one argument that seems to annoy party leaders more than anything else is “I don’t know what we’d get if Dems win back the majority.” The whole “New Direction” platform seems geared towards answering that question with policy specifics — and with proposals that should generate fairly strong public support.

I’d like Dems to consider one other possibility: How about asking what [tag]congressional[/tag] [tag]Republicans[/tag] would do in 2007 and 2008 if they keep the majority?

The current [tag]GOP[/tag] line on the elections is to scare the hell out of voters. If Dems win a majority, they’ll raise your taxes! They’ll force you to marry some gay person! You’ll be required to hire undocumented immigrants in your own home!

But the GOP, at least since 1994, has never actually said why they want to keep the majority, short of keeping the Dems out of power. In other words, I think the Republicans are projecting — their raison d’etre is to stand in the way of the Dems’ agenda. They don’t want to legislate; they want to block legislation they don’t like. They are the obstructionist party, who happen to control all the levers of government.

Name three pieces of legislation or major policy initiatives we can expect to see next year from the Republican Congress. I can’t. I don’t mean stuff they’d bring up despite not having the votes (ban on gay marriage), nor do I mean stuff they want but won’t even try (privatize Social Security), I mean actual legislative priorities.

Dems are laying their cards on the table. Republicans are responding with attacks, but not with an alternative [tag]agenda[/tag]. How about it, GOP? What do you want all that [tag]power[/tag] for?

Cutting taxes (which they’ll say publicly), enriching their benefactors (which they’ll do quietly).

Oh, I guess they’ll gut regulations and privatize whatever they can as part of the enriching…

I think that about sums it up.

  • Hell CB, that would mean they’d actually have to DO something around all those lunches and golf trips corporate america is providing….where would they find the time?

  • Their policies are to make Government so incompetent that America falls apart as a nation.

    Why they want to do this I don’t know. But the truth is that being a Republican’t means never doing anything correctly, only doing it ‘right’.

  • I like it. I cannot wait to see this message on my TV screen, in my magazines, on buses, on billboards, as a preview in movie theaters, on milk cartons etc. That gives me a great idea. How much to put a missing person’s add on milk cartons stating leadership (or ethics) from Republicans is missing. It was last seen in 1994. Maybe with a post apocalyptic picture of America with the caption aged enhanced. Too much?

  • Electing more Republicans will enable Congress to:
    1. Solve all of America’s energy problems by drilling in ANWR.
    2. Repeal the “Death” Tax (protect America’s farmers!)
    3. Enhance our quality of life by giving tax credits to industry to encourage more CO2 production.
    4. Repeal needless government regulation to permit the free market to optimize efficiency and production (except for those regulations whose repeal would spark competition that would interfere with a Ranger/Pioneer company’s margin).
    5. Pass a balanced budget amendment (oops, strike that).

  • rant

    I have a pet peeve concerning the words “new direction” because they can’t be spoken without it sounding like “nude erection.” Apart from my giggling inner child, every time I hear that, I just feel the door has been opened wide for ridicule.

    /rant

  • doubtful,

    i hope you’re happy: now I can’t read those words without the hearing what you hear. Damn you Aqua Scum!

  • Great idea, CB! I hope somebody out there is listening who can put it into practice.

  • I crave the comfort of a Party of Wisdom, a Party of Proven Methods, a Party of Old (But Gold) Ideas, not an exciting “new direction.” I want to go back in the old general direction we were already going before the drunken madman grabbed the wheel. I think we’ve had enough excitement (war; deficits; domestic wiretaps; corruption), “new ideas” (Mars, bitch!) and novel interpretations (Geneva conventions “quaint”; the unitary executive) for one decade.

    But I’ll support whatever sells, I guess.

  • I agree with the giggly undertone to “nude erections”. Too reminiscent of the Clenis.

    I would make more jokes about it, but it would be… below me.

    (Say that sentence out loud for fun 🙂

  • I have been saying this all along! The GOP isn’t the party of governing, they are the party of looting. That’s their nature. They do not believe in government, yet they work very hard at getting elected. Why? Because what they really want out of it is to enrich themselves and their friends, and to destroy and tear down and make government ineffective. Those are their objectives.

    And they have been remarkably effective at achieving them.

    Government is fundamentally corrupt and incompetent, the GOP says, and if you elect them, they will prove it to you. As they have.

    The HUGE, like ginormous difference here, is that the Democrats believe government can work for the people to make the country a better place. To make the economy more efficient and stronger, to bring people out of poverty and more involved in our society, and increase the general welfare. Democrats see government as a remarkable force for good, Republicans see government as a remarkable force for their own good.

  • The Republicans want every American in debt so the rich can live off the interest. I suggest the federal government sell a 70 year mortgage for “The American Dream” – yours for monthly payments of 1,000, with a variable interest rate. In return you’ll get protection from terrorism.

  • Comments are closed.