The DLC is no longer in demand

Since the early days of the Clinton administration, the Democratic Leadership Council’s “National Conversation,” the group’s major annual event, has been a key stop for Democrats who hoped to be party leaders, and in many cases, president. It was a place to be seen, to impress possible donors, and to solidify one’s place as a serious national player.

At least, it used to. This year’s DLC event appears to suggest the group has lost some of its sway.

TNR’s Ryan Lizza noted the other day the line-ups for the “National Conversation” from the last several years.

Bill Clinton keynoted in 1999 and Al Gore in 2000. In 2001, the event featured Joe Lieberman, Evan Bayh, Hillary Clinton, Tom Daschle, and future governors Kathleen Sebelius and Janet Napolitano. In 2002, the National Conversation was a major stop for anyone testing the waters for 2004. Lieberman, Bayh, Daschle, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Mark Warner, John Edwards, and Dick Gephardt were all there.

The following year, 2003, was a little less star-studded but still featured Bayh, Napolitano, Sebelius, Warner, Ed Rendell, Jim McGreevey, and Jennifer Granholm. The big attraction in 2004 was Kerry, who was by then the nominee and was eager to show off his centrist credentials. In 2005, the event was again attended by top presidential contenders: Bayh, Warner, Vilsack, and Hillary Clinton. But tellingly, unlike in the run-up to 2004, when even a labor liberal like Gephardt felt obliged to show up, there were no traditional liberals in attendance. Edwards, once a DLCer himself but now reinvented as a liberal populist, was conspicuous in his absence, as was Kerry, who was still flirting with a run.

By last year, about a dozen Democrats were openly considering presidential bids, but only two — Vilsack and Hillary Clinton — wanted to be part of the DLC’s event.

Which leads us to this year. Lizza noted late last week, “Watch the guest list closely. It will be a good indicator of the health of the New Dem brand.”

The list was announced yesterday. By all indications, the DLC brand is in trouble.

Here’s the press release from the group.

DLC Chair Harold Ford, Jr. and DLC Founder and CEO Al From, along with Honorary Chair Governor Phil Bredesen, and Co-Chairs Mayor Bill Purcell, Rep. Jim Cooper, Rep. Lincoln Davis announced that the 2007 DLC National Conversation will be held in Nashville, Tennessee from July 28 to July 30. The purpose of the National Conversation is to foster fresh policy ideas and political perspectives among Democrats from every region of the country and every level of government. Over 300 national, state, and local leaders attended last year’s Conversation in Denver, Colorado and hundreds are expected to participate in Nashville this July, showing the continued strength of the DLC’s support nationwide.

Or perhaps not. Based on the DLC press release and media accounts, it doesn’t appear that any of the Dems running for president want to take part in the DLC event. It’s possible someone from the eight-person field will agree to attend, but if any had accepted the group’s invitation, it stands to reason that the DLC would have mentioned it in the announcement. It didn’t.

Given this, it seems fair to say that the DLC “brand” is in decline. For Democratic activists and the netroots, the three-letter abbreviation itself has practically become a dirty word — conjuring images of Joe Lieberman, watered-down principles, capitulation, and a compromise-to-a-fault style of politics. The reputation seems to be catching up to the group.

One assumes none of the Dems’ major presidential candidates would want to label themselves as “DLC Democrat.” It’s the first campaign cycle in quite a while in which that’s the case.

Poor Bob Shrum

  • Hard to take anyone with their record seriously. Like taking advice on winning from the Tampa Bay Devil Rays or Los Angeles Clippers.

    Howard Dean must be screaming for joy.

  • The DLC claimed power with the election of Bill Clinton who won with 43% of the popular vote thanks to a fiscally conservative third party effort and an opponent who lied to the American people while telling them to “Read His Lips”.

    America, Crushed under Reagan and Bush for 12 years misunderstood this victory as a repudiation for the Democratic model of looking out for the people’s freedom and benefit.

    Then… they lost congress and didn’t gain it back until 2004, when liberals found a toe-hold as Dubya let folks realize liberals weren’t the dangerous political class, after all. In 2006, America returned both houses to Democrats.

    A return to principle is rewarded regardless of party or political disposition. The DLC’s “triangulation” and weather vane politics was a fluke that had 5 chances to prove itself and pooched it every time.

  • Another promising omen on the road to 2008. No Hillary at the DLC? Maybe she finally read the writing on the wall.

  • The DLC, perhaps more than any other group, has helped define the “center” as lying somewhere to the right of traditional Democratic values. More than that, they’re the embodiment of the kind of timidity that not only deferred, but saluted, as Bush and company have taken an eight-year collective crap in our living room. I wish them Godspeed as they sail into the sunset.

  • You left out perhaps the most important reason Dem activists hate the DLC: its pro-business bias. When the DLC was in ascendancy, the business community had at least one-and-a-half political parties in its back pocket. The rest of us were left with half (if that) of the Dems. It’s high time the Dems return to progressivism. The Repubs are the business party; it’s the rest of us who need representation from the Dems. As I commented on Josh Marshall’s website a while back, you can’t be for both business and for family-friendly policies, as the DLC claims to be: most of the threats to families stem directly from business practices (anti- unionization, low wages/benefits, minimal sick/family leave, forced unpaid overtime, discrimination against women/minorities, rotating shifts, etc., etc.) Wasn’t it Christ who said something about how one can’t serve two masters?

  • I’ve got to agree with Bill Jacobs: the DLC represnts Dem politics at its worst and there are still high-profile boosters of this centrist mess left in the Congress, namely Clinton and Rahm, to name just two. Rahm seems to think he’s going to shut out progressives altogether. Good luck with that, homeboy.

    The Republican dinosaur has a few years left before it lurches over on its side, twitching in its death throes.

    And I can’t wait for the implosion.

  • Comments are closed.