‘The dog ate my national intelligence estimate’

As Slate’s Fred Kaplan explained a while back, a [tag]National Intelligence Estimate[/tag] ([tag]NIE[/tag]) “is not an ordinary report. It marks the one occasion when the Central Intelligence Agency warrants its name, acting as a central entity that pulls together the assessments of all the myriad intelligence departments, noting where they agree and where they differ.”

The last time we heard about the NIE, portions of the document had been leaked, and purported to show that the war in Iraq is making the threat of terrorism worse, not better. At that point, an NIE specific to the war in Iraq was kept hidden by intelligence czar John Negroponte, apparently for fear that it would further hurt Republicans in the 2006 midterm elections.

Several senators demanded that the administration prepare a new NIE on the war in Iraq and present the findings during a closed-door session of the Senate Armed Services Committee last week. As Harper’s Ken Silverstein noted, it didn’t go well.

This committee expected to be briefed on the long-awaited NIE by an official from the National Intelligence Council (NIC), which coordinates NIEs by gathering input from all of the nation’s various intelligence agencies. But the NIC official turned up empty-handed and told the committee that the intelligence community hadn’t been able to complete the NIE because it had been dealing with the many demands placed upon it by the Bush Administration to help prepare the new military strategy on Iraq. He then said that not all of the relevant agencies had contributed to the NIE, which has made it impossible to put together a finished product.

Silverstein describe this as the “dog ate my homework” alibi. That’s putting it mildly.

Consider the administration’s circular reasoning.

They want to escalate the war in Iraq … which requires them to get better intelligence … which they can’t put together because they’re busy escalating the war in Iraq. It’s enough to make me want to pull what’s left of my hair out.

Talk about reckless irresponsibility, shouldn’t the war policy be based on the new National Intelligence Estimate? BarbinMD described the Bush gang’s process as putting the “escalation cart before the NIE horse.”

As for the Senate:

[T]hose in attendance now believe that senior intelligence officials are stalling because an NIE will be bleak enough to present a significant political liability. Given the Bush Administration’s “surge” policy and the extraordinary danger faced by U.S. troops in Iraq (27 U.S. servicemembers died there this weekend), the need for a new NIE is urgent. The intelligence community is doing the nation a disservice by making Congress wait for the truth.

And they’re doing a disservice to the troops by sending them into a civil war without having an NIE already in place.

If the dog eats the homework, then there cannot be an earned grade for the homework. Georgie gets a great big “0.”

The same holds true with the NIE. If it’s not there, then there cannot be an earned funding for the war. Georgie gets a big fat “$0.00”

Call that NIC hack back on the carpet, and ask point-blank: “What intelligence existed that justified the surge?” Or better yet, subpoena the original, war-specific NIE that Negroponte held back, and then rip these clowns with subpoenas to explain what intelligence exists to demonstrate a changed outlook?

And while they’re at it, let the Congress remind these “disobedient youngsters” that they may be employed at the behest of the administration—but “Big Daddy George” isn’t the one authorizing the monthly allowance. “Kids” don’t like doing stuff in exchange for the sound of “an empty piggy-bank….”

  • I’m guessing that somewhere behind the scenes of this delay we have yet another impeachable offense. When do we finally get started with that?

  • “…the many demands placed upon it by the Bush Administration to help prepare the new military strategy on Iraq….”

    How much time did it take just to decide to repeat the “surge” mistakes of 2004, 2005, and 2006?

  • Talk about reckless irresponsibility, shouldn’t the war policy be based on the new National Intelligence Estimate?

    No, no, no. That’s not how you work up a strategy. FIRST you decide what you want to do, THEN you write up the NIE to justify your strategy.

    Even if it means lying/coercing/making shit up.

  • Sooo…an agency that employess several thousand is so bogged down in preparing for Der Surge that there aren’t enough people available to work on the NIE.

    This keeps us safe from terrorism, how?

    I also find it odd that the agency Bush usually ignores (see Tora Bora) has suddenly become vital to the new strategy.

    Could it be they’re being set up in case things go wrong?

    Nah.

  • Whatever happened to on-demand “intelligence” anyway? I guess the stovepipe has been fucked up ever since Cheney rammed Chalabi through it. Now it’s all plugged up with Iranian nukular secrets, and the plumbers are all hiding from Patrick Fitzgerald.

    But hey, we already proved that we don’t need no stinking intelligence. And anyone who says we do hates America, so there.

    Onward to Iran…

  • Why woud the intel agencies continue to shill for W and the gang when they have been the whipping boy and fall guy for all that has gone wrong since the war began? Cut it out guys, you owe the Bushies nothing.

    Why do I get the feeling these guys are busy manufacturing intel for Iran and not Iraq. They’re so easy to confuse. Maybe they should be called East Ira and West Ira instead.

  • Either the US has gone into “ready, fire, aim” mode again, or someone’s hiding something. Probably both.

  • This committee expected to be briefed on the long-awaited NIE by an official from the National Intelligence Council (NIC),

    We all bring our personal baggage to the news interpretation, I suppose. One of mine is my first language — Polish. In Polish, “nie” means “no”, and “nic” means “nothing”. So, unlike the committe, I would not have expected anything of value out of any of Bush’s organizations.

  • Sounds like the typical excuse of miscreants, ne’erdowells and nogooders. We deserve better! This Administration’s foreign policies have accomplished much death, but what else can this WH pin its laurels on? More death? More senseless death? When Pres. Bush fully and in an active voice accepts responsibility for this disaster we call Iraq, then we can begin to have an honest debate on what would be the most prudent course of action for our beloved men and women in uniform.

    I won’t hold my breath, as the threshold of denial is quite accute among the current residents of the WH. -Kevo

  • Comments are closed.