The GOP’s Scanlon nightmare

It’s difficult to overstate just how much Michael Scanlon’s plea deal strikes fear into the heart of Congress.

A onetime congressional staffer who became a top partner to lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty yesterday to conspiring to bribe a congressman and other public officials and agreed to pay back more than $19 million he fraudulently charged Indian tribal clients.

The plea agreement between prosecutors and Michael Scanlon, a former press secretary to then-House Majority Whip Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), provided fresh detail about the alleged bribes. The document also indicated the nature of testimony Scanlon is prepared to offer against a congressman it calls “Representative #1” — who has been identified by attorneys in the case as Rep. Robert W. Ney (R-Ohio). […]

Investigators are looking at half a dozen members of Congress, current and former senior Hill aides, a former deputy secretary of the interior, and Abramoff’s former lobbying colleagues, according to sources familiar with the probe who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Because of his central role in much of Abramoff’s business, Scanlon could be a key witness in any trials that arise from the case.

To be sure, House Administration Chairman Bob Ney clearly has the most to worry about. As subscription-only Roll Call recently reported, federal prosecutors’ case against Scanlon alleges that Ney agreed to “perform a series of official acts” that benefited Scanlon and Abramoff’s clients in return for a series of favors, including a golf junket to Scotland, tickets to sporting events, and free meals.

And, unfortunately for Ney, the “series of official acts” were plentiful. There’s already evidence that Ney pressured a casino owner to sell a fleet of ships to benefit one of Abramoff’s clients, received one of those luxurious Scottish golf trips that Abramoff is famous for, promised to use his role on the House Administration Committee to help reopen a casino for an Abramoff client, and placed comments in the Congressional Record favorable to Abramoff’s purchase of a Florida gambling company. In all, prosecutors have found 11 instances in which the lawmaker used his office to help Scanlon, Abramoff, or their clients.

Ney claims Abramoff duped him. We’ll see how that defense works out for him.

As for broader panic on the Hill, Plato Cacheris, Scanlon’s lawyer, was asked at a news conference yesterday whether other lawmakers will be caught up in this fiasco. He said, “I would rather not comment on that.”

Republicans shuddered when the Plame scandal captured the political world’s attention, but that was a White House affair — it’s the Abramoff/Scanlon controversy that threatens lawmakers on the Hill directly. Thomas E. Mann, a Congressional specialist at the Brookings Institution, said, “I think this has the potential to be the biggest scandal in Congress in over a century. I’ve been around Washington for 35 years, watching Congress, and I’ve never seen anything approaching Abramoff for cynicism and chutzpah in proposing quid pro quos to members of Congress.”

Sounds like the U.S. Grant and W.G. Harding administrations rolled into one. Worse, actually.

  • Hey, ‘bagger:

    Some guy over at Washington Monthly is plagiarizing your stuff, using the name ‘Steve Benen.’ Tell him to cut that out.

    So far, I haven’t seen much realization, even in Left Blogistan, that this scandal is huge (except right here, and at the plagiarized version of the article over at Washington Monthly). The government seems to already have evidence of good, ol’ fashioned quid pro quo bribery; now, they have Scanlon, whose jail time goes down with the efficacy of his testimony in sealing the bribers/bribees’ fates. Multiple congressional careers will soon be coming to an end.

  • Context is everything. CB reads better here.

    I was going to say that the news about Scanlon is even better than the bean and cheese taco with green sauce I’m eating right now. DJ Moonbat and I may be using the same taqueria. Nothing like using a little carotid-threatening lard when fryin’ up them beans… The result is almost as good as finding out — soon, I hope — how many members of Congress (and which) are doomed by the Scanlon plea and ongoing investigation.

  • It would be interesting to know just how many Republicans are tainted by this scandal. We have the House, with Delay and Ney The White House is implicated with the indictment of David Savafian. Any bets this trips up a GOP senator or two?

    You might also check out Talking Points Memo. Joshua Marshall seems to be on top of most corruption scandals.

  • This could be the biggest of all, because
    it could result in the Democrats taking back
    Congress, depending on its reach, especially
    since Iraq might not be an issue in 2006.
    Even the Iraqis want us to get the hell out
    now. Story today – sorry, I don’t have the
    link, but it’s all over the news.

  • Before we get too excited, do not discount the possibility that there might be a Dem or two implicated. Unlikely, yes. But definitley a possibility.

  • a Dem or two implicated

    Fine by me. If they’re dirty, they go in the same shitcan as the Republicans. I saw something last week, that Reid is loosely connected, I hope that’s not true, but if it is…adios. I won’t be excusing this behavior on my side. That’s Rush and Fox territory.

  • Mr Furious, I’m with you – I’m not letting Democrats off the hook on this one. I read that Harry Reid got $61k and Mary Landrieux got $24k from Abramoff over two or three years. But at least the donations were on the books.

    Over at the TPM Cafe, I posted all of the information from Abramoff’s “charity foundation”‘s IRS 990 returns for 2001, 2002 and 2003.

    http://auctionhouse.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/4/114556/020

    Now I am starting to track info about the donors and recipients of the funds. Abramoff to a right wing rabbi to a Kansas City conservative bigmouth. They’re all cheating on the 990s!

    Abramoff’s foundation donated $25,000 to the DeLay Foundation for Kids in 2003 so I posted all of the info from DeLay’s three “charities”.

    http://auctionhouse.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/9/15581/1958

    I think I even may have found an angle to a donation of land that no one else has thought of yet.

  • Comments are closed.